Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6817

  • DRW50

    5991

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3465

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Thread:

I hear Cheney has been pushing this 'your vote is private' message to women on the stump a lot, and I know Julia Roberts of all people also did an ad with this line. But I think Michelle Obama leading with it first really put it over the top and I think it has been much, much bigger with women and wives and mothers in red states than people first realized.

And: I think it will sadly get worse for a lot of women in these homes if we do win. Because MAGA will absolutely blame the spouses. They've been bubbling about it ever since Michelle brought it up; Jesse Watters was steaming on Fox at the thought of his wife betraying him, etc. It will be The Crucible.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Apparently what people are missing in the Seltzer poll is this

II like everyone else has been cautious. I still am, but I know what women OF ALL AGES who are independents and republicans have been telling people on the phone banks I have been doing for NARAL since 2022 .Some here, LIKE THE MEDIA choose to ignore us. I get it.2016 was heartbreaking but it's not 2016 and Harris is not Clinton, who had 25 years of propaganda by the same media thrown at her even more than her husband. I'm not going to make any predictions because I am still cautious, yet I would not be at all surprised to see Harris win ALL female demographics this year. 

There is a big reason women in the agegroup below are voting this way. They were young women and teens when there was no Roe. They remember. I think the story Sally Field told was true for many. A close male friend of my older brother told him just 2 months ago how he was voting. He's a republican and just turned 65. He told him a story about coming home to find his mother collapsed on the floor of their kitchen bleeding and unconscious. She almost died from an abortion she had. Not from a medical professional. It wasn't legal then. Turns out his dad was part of it. Why did they decide to risk it? Because they already had 4 children. You can figure it out because it's the same reason many married women choose to do it today. By the way married women are the highest percentage of abortions today.

So while I respect those who are panicked(as I said I have my moments even this year) but what I am hearing phonebanking doesn't match the stats. We'll see. You should also pay attention to the percentage of men below. There are still a lot of older men who remember this also and know.

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If we've said it once in this thread, we've said it a million times (and maybe more): SOCIAL MEDIA IS NOT AMERICA

You can't read a bunch of tweets or FB/IG posts and expect to have your finger on the pulse of this country.  In fact, you SHOULDN'T expect to know from social media how Americans feel, because most Americans simply don't know what the burnouts and fatheads are saying on those platforms, nor do they much care.  So, please, I urge everyone: stop giving those losers and the billionaires who enable them more credit than they actually deserve.

And as I've said before, I think a little PTSD from 2016 is healthy, if only to remind us all of what happens when we sleep on the job.  But, as high as the stakes continue to be this election year, that doesn't mean we, as a nation, are in the exact same place that we were eight years ago.  We've wised up; we know what the assignment is now; and even if Donald Trump manages to eke out another victory, that doesn't mean we'll just roll over and play dead. 

That fascist can make all the threats and promises that he wants, but if his administration thought the constant resistance to his agendas were a pain in the neck five, six, seven years ago, baby, they ain't seen nothin' yet!

Say whatever you will about Bill Clinton, but he and his team knew that you can't go into an election expecting to lose or apologizing if you win.  Clinton knew that Republicans never fight clean, that they operate always with the long game in mind, and that the mainstream media no longer cared about anything except enabling the GOP in order to retain their access.  So, when he ran, he ran with one goal: to hit the GOP, hit 'em hard, hit 'em often and never, ever let up.

Now, many from within the Democratic Party didn't care for Clinton's approach because he wasn't humble - in fact, I'd argue that one reason why Hillary DIDN'T win eight years ago was because even her own party didn't want the Clintons around anymore for that very reason - but at the end of the day, his approach got the [!@#$%^&*] done.

God, I still miss that man, lol.

See: Walter Mondale and Michael Dukakis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I mean, we are literally organizing underground railroads to help abused and battered women get to the polling places on Election Day without incident.  If that isn't a sign that toxic masculinity needs to be stopped...!

Not for the likes of Susan Sarandon, apparently.  She didn't vote for Hillary, and she still feels fresh as a daisy, thank you very much, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There's people out that believe Trump is going to or possibly win because of his social media campaign strategy. Here's a quote from another forum.

"This is the path to a Trump victory that I continue to worry about: that his hyper-online campaign focusing on Musk, RFK, and the blogging manosphere turns out unprecedented numbers of low-propensity voters (males who are young and/or not college educated) and they are enough to propel him to close wins in several swing states. That was the campaign’s big strategic swing. And IMO this election is basically going to be a referendum on whether you can win a campaign largely premised on online disinformation that can not only win over those low-propensity voters but also get them to vote."

Edited by sivad40
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • That's on Kimmer. As someone posted above...she was offered roles in pilots but she would be part of an ensemble or supporting. She didn't want that so she came back to GL. I don't know what she thought would happen..someone offering her "Here's Kimmer!" or The "Zimmer Comedy Powerhouse Hour" variety show..but her housefrau fans did not have the same pull in HW as they did on the soaps. Forbes and Watros knew that you had to take small parts to get noticed ands start a career in primetime. I know she was in consideration for the wife in Evening Shade, but when you go up against Marilou Henner, the soap diva looses. I could see her frustrated in a role like that, where she has to be the understanding wife with a bit of sass, but she could have made it work, if it wasnt for her huge ego.  I think it would have been an issue haveing all the powerhouse comedy actors surrounding...(lets face it..Alice Ghostly woudl have wiped the floor with her...) but it would have been a good launching padd.
    • Oh good, so I don't have to wait too long haha. I'm glad she cares about seeing Bill graduate. I'm guessing I'm in for a bumpy ride between Bill and Matt, if he's going to be his caretaker? Who else could it be, maybe Josh?
    • John Spencer      pg. 445    THEATER THE GLASS MENAGERIE    October 1979     Gentleman Caller      NYC THE GLASS MENAGERIE    1979 - 80    Gentleman Caller        Tyrone Guthrie Theater   Minneapolis   MONSIEUR DE MOLIERE     1979  - 80      Tyrone Guthrie Theater   Minneapolis   ROMEO AND JULIET     1979 - 80        Tyrone Guthrie Theater   Minneapolis  LAKEBOAT      1981                  NYC     007 CROSSFIRE      1984      Romanov      Actors Theatre of Louisville     CAROUSEL      1986 - 87    Jigger  The Opera House at the Kennedy Center     Washington, D. C.     FRANKIE AND JOHNNY AND THE CLAIR DE LUNE  
    • Maeve makes a few sporadic appearances, but returns full-time the next spring/summer. She's back in time to see Bill and Michelle graduate, although she skulks around town and wasn't going to tell anyone she was alive. She comes back wearing this HUGE hat---which was a throwback to the old Vanesaa. lol.
    • Aww, yeah it's very heartbreaking and I mostly enjoyed the Nola/Vanessa scenes because they finally let their walls down and came together in a beautiful moment. So Nola was at the hospital already and bumped into Vanessa, who had MRI papers that fell out of her hand and Nola went down to pick them up and asked her what was going on. Later, Vanessa confided in her about her disease. Then, Nola told Zachary on the beach (he prodded her and already alluded to knowing something was going on with Van), and then Vanessa found out she told him and got a little upset. Now, however, Nola is strangely absent while everyone is mourning her death. I'm curious if Nola will actually tell people about her MRI results. I would assume so. Only Nola, Rick, Roger and Zachary know anything, although there is the MRI results letter from the mail that everyone has missed seeing at home. I'm sure it'll all come out at some point. But... I just saw the next episode and the opening already cut Vanessa out and added Dahlia and Zachary. I guess Maeve is gone for a long time

      Please register in order to view this content

       That will break my heart seeing the town continue to mourn her and assume she's dead. I can't wait to see her return though, and I have to imagine feelings will be torn between loving that she's alive and being very angry she did all of this. While I hate what Vanessa is doing, I'm happy to hear it's not totally against her character. I think you're right, had Henry still been around, she wouldn't put him through this. I'm still surprised she is with Bill, though. I get her feelings on Matt, because she wants him to move on, but still very heartbreaking. I'm glad this was Maeve's choice to have a break vs. being fired.    Interesting, so I'm curious to see who they eventually pair Phillip with. They're flirting with a Phillip/Annie pairing, but I'm not sure if they'll go that route with the Jeva drama, her growing pill addiction, and Rick's past with her.  Ugh, yeah I'm so sad to see Bridget do a total 180 in the last couple weeks. She has always been a strong character from what I've seen, but now she's just bending over backwards to get Hart to love her and it reeks of desperation. Yeah, sure, this new Hart is eye candy, but I'm already tired of seeing Hart/Dinah have sex all over Springfield and the Cayman Islands haha.
    • Yes.  I remember them together during the early summer of 1986.  They didn't share scenes again for 30 years until 2017 because Carrie wasn't on the show when Anna returned during Sydney's kidnapping.
    • I can see Kim being that way. Well, Kyle didn't have to say yes. LOL. The suicide attempt feels plot-driven. I don't know if even Long could've made it work. She'd spent so much time trying to make Reva and Kyle into a couple, it feels odd to just have them give up. Not to mention how odd it is to have Maeve agree to marry him. Re Charita---surely they could've at least tried  finding clips with who was still there. Maybe they wouldn't have been "big" moments, but surely she'd interacted with Ross, Vanessa, and Henry. Vanessa had dated Ed, FCOL. But Mo and Rick were there---surely they could've bothered to find some clips of her with them (and they did interact a fair amount) and used them. And with Ed they could've found some shot of her talking to him and just not cut to whoever was playing Ed in the clip. That to me is what feels lazy---they had more than a year to figure it out, and they went with a bunch of photos. If you were sort of centering it on Rick anyway---then find clips with them and use 'em.
    • I definitely think it's time to write off Nina for good. I think her killing Drew might actually be a good idea. She could completely lose it after losing both Sasha and Willow and she ends up murdering Drew and eventually she gets caught and sent away to prison for a long time. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy