Jump to content

Y&R: Week of November 24, 2008


Recommended Posts

  • Members
I agree, her version of Colleen is what we need once again. She had so much on screen chemistry with the cast that it wouldn't matter if the Prof. ever came back but I happened to have liked that storyline.

I wonder why they chose this episode to air? I never would have thought they'd ever show another episode with AL in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I did a little checking yesterday, and AL seems to be OFF the map.

She hasn't updated her myspace blog since January 2008.

Her official website lists, as "theatrical representation", an agent firm that (a) was controversial (they required actors to pay for specific photographers and workshops), (B) had a non-SAG contract that required hire commissions of non-SAG actors, © refused to allow their represented actors to CONTACT them under most circumstances; (d) refused to allow actors to list themselves on some common no-charge web clearing houses; (e) required headshots to be "in costume"...against industry practice. Moreover, the agency appears to have broken apart in 2006. On their website, they still list Leon on Y&R as their top success story.

IMDB lists nothing for her post-Y&R.

I find all of this odd for an entertainer still trying to build a career. If it were me, I'd PERSONALLY be maintaining my website like crazy, LOL.

I wonder if she is shifting careers, or if other troubles that we don't know about took her away from Y&R.

Oh well, if she peruses any message boards, she knows she is missed. That might be small comfort, even if it doesn't pay the rent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oops, did that seem stalkerish? Yikes.

I started with a legitimate source (IMDB), inspired by the Friday show. When nothing further happened, I checked her official site and her myspace (googling them). That led me into this whole blind alley about her agency.

Sigh...that is my crazy surfing behavior when I am searching for a fact. But now I realize it just made me seem pathological :).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I found the thanksgiving episode to be a bit of a letdown and they should not submit it for an Emmy. While some parts were very good, others were just playing cheesy and I actually expected the Winters to burst into that "Cheese will keep us together, mozzarella and cheddar," song. The worst part for me was Lily who for some reason came off to me as a wannabe socialite at a state dinner rather than a member of the family. I was however very impressed with the actress who plays Anna.

The Chancellor family stuff was good, especially loved Chloe saying, "If I didn't have to use the bathroom every 5 minutes, I would duck tape you to a chair and force you to be waited upon."

Does anyone know if the little baby Victoria and JT were holding is their own baby? Most soap babies that age don't seem very comfortable being held by actors and are often upset or reach out to their parent standing near by.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What we need is a viable Colleen. I personally don't care who plays her. Whatever the reason (acting limitations, writer transition hasn't gotten around to her yet, lack of ideas on the part of the writers), Colleen is horrendously neglected right now. It matters, because the Abbotts are being rebuilt, but their young female lead is missing. It matters because of the historical returns during Kay's funeral...and the viewers were cheated out of a mother-daughter reunion. It matters because, prior to the infamous "firing", the writers were on track to making Colleen an eerie repeat of her mother (weight issues, inappropriate relationship with her professor). Those were all potentially interesting directions...but they just got dropped.

Now, and I am not ascribing blame, the character is an empty cipher with little value.

The writers need to build Colleen into a meaningful female lead on the show. If they feel a recasting is required in order to accomplish this--so be it. I am not picking sides vis-a-vis the actress...but SOMETHING is wrong, and Ifeel it is hurting the show's ability to seed the foundation of the future. We have had so many of the "next generation" members mentioned in recent weeks (Nate, Phillip IV, Mackenzie, Abby). Eventually, each of these characters must return with STUPENDOUS casting (as, IMO, they have accomplished again with Noah and with Billy and with Daniel) to carry the show forward. Colleen is on that list of critical next generation members (unless they want to change the focus of the show).

This actress, with these writers, in these storylines, is not working. Something needs to change. It may be -- regardless of your opinion of the current actress -- that she would be served to move on to creative projects that do her more justice. And the writers might be more inspired by a recast. But something has to change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, IA brimike.

And I really think the writers will eventually work their way around to the kids. Concentrating on a select few characters to rebuild is a clever approach, in my eyes, when the fissure in y&r's foundation has been so wide and deep for so long.

I think in 2009, we'll see them reemerge.

And are Abby and Ana gonna be friends? That'd be really cute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ooooh, good idea about Abby and Ana.

How old will Abby be? With Noah now 15, being played by a 20-year old, I guess I have assumed Abby would come back around 13, played by an 18 year old. So that WOULD put her right in Ana's orbit!

And, giving Ana a friend...well, that's the kind of thing we need to build that character! Suddenly, we'd see a next-generation continuation of the "Barber/Hastings/Winters" and "Abbott" friendship. Makes perfect sense.

Although I am totally pro-veteran, I confess I'm eager to have the canvas repopulated with younger members of our core families in adolescent and young adult ages. I don't care if they have stories...I just want them "planted" and "grown", so that the show builds for its' future.

I also wanted that for B&B, but I truly fear that show is a lost cause.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I like the idea of 'planting' the next generation. I don't want to see/hear from them till they're in their 20s, at the very least, but having them planted and around throughout the years is very useful and allows for their presence to not be jarring.

I wouldn't ever count B&B out. They are experiencing what they always experience...they'll rebound.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Today's episode was excellent. Clearly it was confrontation day and they didn't disappoint. I'm glad they didn't forget Mona in all of this and gave us an opportunity to see how she's dealing with this. A major highlight for me were the Kat and Martin scenes. Their chemistry is off the charts and I don't understand why we haven't gotten more of this. I love how they take turns calming each other down. They feel really well matched and believable as siblings. Speaking of siblings, they anvils were dropping strong that Kat and Eva are twins but I do wish someone would mention that they are essentially hood twins which might throw people off the scent.  I'm one of the people who enjoyed Joey and the gambling storyline so it was nice to see him again. It was nice to see different characters like Mona and Eva in that element instead of the usual players. When Doug arrived I don't know what hit me but I just see a funeral in his future. He seems so hopeless and has the worst luck. I just can't see him surviving the year at this rate.
    • In fiction there has become an expectation by some that every Black character should represent excellence and perfection. It's not like we are talking about a Tyler Perry show where none of the characters are happy and everyone hates each other with a passion.
    • And on rewatch, I could've done without the unsubtle praising Matt like he was the only one who ever accepted Van as she was...but TPTB and their agendas.  It was totally in character for Vanessa to shut down emotionally until she was alone. While she could be volatile, both she and Henry believed in keeping emotions private.  Thank God it's still Bryan Buffinton in the role for both Henry's and HB's funerals. It just wouldn't have been the same with Ryan Brown, who couldn't act his way out of a wet paper bag. Roll My Eyes.
    • I can probably believe the Spauldings reacting that way, as Alan barely cares about anyone but himself and maybe his family, while Amanda only had that one experience with the Coopers, but I see your point. I do think 1997 was a better year than the last 3-4 before it, for whatever that's worth. You are right about Marcus. Kevin Mambo winning two Emmies (the latter during periods where he had nothing to do) helped.
    • I think @Darn @Faulkner and others have a fair point re: it being an unfortunate look and coincidence. I can see their point about the two Black husbands in rapid succession, without much time in between. Frankly, based on the early casting notices I thought before the show's debut (and I still suspect) that Ted's crimes might be far worse than infidelity or a secret baby. That would've mixed it up more. It's a soap, people are going to cheat, but it might've given them more variety if Nicole was stepping out first. Still, I wouldn't trade the Leslie/Eva reveal material for anything right now. Still, Fanfic Account #3 is just looking for any weapon to attack the show for not accepting his unsolicited scripts. When it's not the husbands it's Martin, or Chelsea or Dani. He's seething it got renewed.
    • I'm pretty sure Lucy and Bridget never even have another scene together for the rest of the time they're both on the show. Bridget isn't even invited to the wedding! The lack of community feeling and continuity of non-romantic relationships during this period is very jarring. Characters suddenly only seem to interact with a handful of other characters, rather than characters across the canvas. I'm deep into 1997 in my watch right now and find that it's even stranger because the show goes back and forth between ignoring history in order to manufacture some kind of separation between characters (for example, at one point Amanda refers to the Coopers as a family that the Spauldings "barely know," despite her and Alan spending the better part of 1996 going to war with Buzz over 5th street, and Alan has absolutely no reaction when he finds out about something bad that's happened to Abby, which seems pretty out of character given how close they were in 95/96) and ignoring history in order to create a sense of community that doesn't quite fit (characters who couldn't stand Amanda are suddenly acting all buddy buddy with her). The wheels really feel like they're coming off in 1997 (although I know some would argue that the wheels started to come off years earlier). Watching the Marcus/Dahlia romance again from a 2025 perspective is so weird. Marcus is a full grown man who must be at least in his mid-20s and he's dating a teenager who is not only still in high school, but is still fully a year away from graduation, and no one says anything about how creepy that is. I feel like the buzz around Marcus gave the illusion that the show was more invested in him than it ever actually was. Even during his "big" story where he's arrested for Cutter's murder, he actually doesn't appear on screen very often. He's imprisoned, Griffin is brought on, other characters make a fuss about trying to get him out, but there's a long stretch of time where he doesn't appear at all. I've been keeping episode counts while I watch and between Cutter's death in mid-November of 1995 and the end of the year Marcus/Mambo only appears 7 times (and of that only twice in December).
    • The letter reading was very emotional, and Maeve really got to me too. I was a little worried because Vanessa doesn't give a speech at the funeral, which surprised me, but then we got the private letter reading and her true emotional reaction and I was satisfied there. The YouTube channel I watch these episodes on (if not on our Vault), also had upset commenters talk about how Nola's line about Henry not accepting her at first/seen as a gold-digger was totally untrue. It's sad the writers don't do their homework and give fans the respect (and the characters respect). And yep, Bill got up and spoke at the funeral too, which was nice.  I didn't even realize that was Sharon Leal until you said it!  I had to Google it. I loved Sharon Leal in Boston Public back in the day haha. LOL at your Reva/Josh ALWAYS commentary. What is RME though?
    • Leslie is an extreme liar and manipulator. I'm not sure what her point was in trying to convince Nicole she wasn't trying to hurt her. As much as Eva did help orchestrate the entire plot I feel like there was too much piling on. Eva never said she wanted to be a Dupree so Anita was extremely out of line for that comment.  
    • Thanks!

      Please register in order to view this content

       That's positive and something to look forward to for sure, because you're right, 1996 so far isn't nearly as good as 1995. Ohh - what is Lonatrat?  Sadly you're probably right. I did feel like David was rarely seen once Marcus came on. That would have been an interesting spin, having Frank and Tina be teenage lovers and Dahlia really being his daughter. I'm getting the sense that Tina won't be seen too much anymore, as she just left Dahlia with Frank/Eleni as she's heading to jail for a while. I like the Tina actress too!  Her voice sounds a bit like Rosie Perez to me, which I love. I tried to find her online, but coming up empty. This was the only thing I could find about Tina Crede - a character snapshot video with clips and stills of her (randomly starting just before the 1:00 mark):

      Please register in order to view this content

      That's wild that the David actor is nearly 40 here! Definitely surprises me.
    • 5-6   Meh. It already looks like a scattershot week.    5-5 was actually a good episode. Damian and Lily. Phyllis finally going on the warpath that I knew she could get on with Billy and Sally. Nate started to question Audra and Victor's alliance. And I was not even bugged by Kyle and Claire.   But then there's Cole's off-screen story. Kyle and Claire going back to being whiny. And them even wanting Adam's penthouse just sounded like trying to keep the set around. And Diane shouldn't even give a flying frak about Billy's opinion. And Tessa, Daniel, and the guitars...yeeeah no.   But hey...JM looked good in that short. And those pants.  I agree. One of Y&R's good points with fans has always been that you do at least see the vets. And IN stories. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy