Jump to content

Dying Daytime? Dying Primetime!


YRBB

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I have been thinking about how everyone is proclaiming daytime's death, citing plunging numbers and dipping quality, but aren't we witnessing the same thing happening to primetime, too? Sure, numbers on primetime are so much better, that's nothing to be disputed, and they have more money and more opportunities to have a better product out there. But, setting aside the lavish production of primetime shows (and some of them are really so greatly produced, they look so wonderful)--what do we have? How many shows actually have the perfect writing that we all so unstoppably demand from daytime? How many FRIDAY NIGHT LIGHTS are there out there?

Arguably, primetime numbers have been dipping too for the past couple of years. Back in the 2006-2007 season, the number one show should have 23 million viewers to be even eligible for that spot, now get 18 and you're fine. (A generalization, but not that far off). How come DVRs and TiVo's are cited as causes for the downfall, when daytime's just crap? I'm not saying daytime isn't in a horrible condition right now, because it is, but I have talked to many people on the internet, who seem to think that the state of primetime TV is just as horrible. Either it is procedural dramas, reality, or ABC primetime soaps (I may be a fan of DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES, an excellently produced show, with HUGE writing problems nevertheless). Especially the ABC PTSoaps, oh God. Full of "comedic" music, refusal to show any real drama, light-hearted ish most of them.

I don't know how much I agree with this, but it seems to me that Primetime TV is going down too and I have to wonder--is it just crap writing? What do you guys think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think the problem is systemic. I agree primetime is suffering just as much as daytime. The scary part for daytime is that the numbers weren't as high to begin with, so...

The way we are watching television is changing. I haven't watched primetime television LIVE in YEARS, ever since I got a DVR, about four years ago. The only live TV I watch is when I'm just flipping around, like HGTV or Food Network or the like. (And when I do I instinctively reach for the FF button when the commercial comes)

I think younger people are watching more TV on the net. I also think more original programming is being done on cable stations, like TNT, AMC, and FX that people are tuning in to.

I'm not sure how soaps will survive. I used to think they might migrate to the Internet, but I'm wondering if fans would follow. Certainly the older, less technologically savvy will just forgo their "stories," but I think that older generation is dying off anyway (another reason for the decline of soaps).

My personal thoughts is that all of television will move into an On Demand format. If I want to watch DH, then I will call it up on my television and watch when I want, with the ability to pause, FF, and rewind.

ACNielsen needs to get hip to these newfangled ways of measuring viewers or face losing market share to some young upstart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The industry doesn't like people to talk about the FACT that prime time on standard network television is hitting its twilight years because prime time ratings are very publicly discussed and must be disclosed in the viewbooks that go out to shareholders...major companies like Disney and Viacom can't do much to soothe worried stockholders when the whole prime time lineup is tanking. Daytime, frankly, is a small fraction of the pie and it still makes money, so nobody pays attention to it outside the daytime world.

Network television is on life support. It's over and it knows it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Great, great summary!

Well, let's deconstruct that JUST a bit.

Are you SURE daytime is still making money? Is this true across the board? I have this keen sense that parts of daytime are now losing money...GL, Days... Is this not true?

When you say "network television is...over...", I think a PARTICULAR broadcast model (over the air, local affiliates, a small number of core commercial-supported networks) is over.

I think new delivery models (broadly defined, digital and on-demand...which is what unifies everything from Youtube to Itunes to Netflix to DVRs) is exploding. That can STILL be "network TV"...just different.

I suspect we agree here. So, my sense is that the more accurate phrasing would be 'network television is evolving'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The same thing killing daytime is killing primetime. Homogenization, kthxbye. Everything's the [!@#$%^&*] same. Everything. ABC's little crop of romantic/comedy/drama shows that they like to call primetime soaps are all the same. CBS is full of crime/mystery/forensic shows. NBC has its fair share of them as well, not to mention their increasingly growing numbers of those sitcoms that are deemed "smart" and "not for the average TV watcher" just because they don't have laugh tracks and are shot like movies. FOX is the reality network.

What happened to variety!? Where is it!? It's totally gone. Everything wants to have continuing plotlines and soapy elements (and of course, I love soapy elements, but come on, it gets to be too much) and it seems like there's no such thing as a completely self-contained show anymore. Give me some crime dramas that aren't so damn serious. I love stuff like "Charlie's Angels" and "Hart to Hart" where the purpose of the show isn't to try to change the fricken world but to simply entertain. I miss Aaron Spelling's vision terribly. Terribly. That man knew how to make escapism.

Also, this [!@#$%^&*] that they do when they hold some shows back until winter or spring is ridiculous. Why can't they just let a season air from start to finish from the fall through the spring?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We definitely agree. I would say that network television, as we know it, is over. Done, Bye Bye, See You In the Next Life.

I am SURE daytime is still making money. I know it does, it says so in my investor's prospectus and those things are vetted to hell by legal departments because ABC, CBS and NBC are all public companies and they don't need any hassles from the SEC. What everyone needs to understand is that, once upon a time in the 70s, daytime made HUGE money. It supported the shows in prime time that took years to launch (that's why, back in the day, shows were given time to catch on, unlike now when it's 13 episodes of success or your out)...

Currently, daytime makes money, lots of it in actual fact and soaps in particular net ratings and more importantly demographics that other shows just don't get. Y&R, for example, attracts more affluent viewers in the daypart than the rest of the soaps, GH and B&B also attract these viewers. Take a look at the advertisements for those shows in comparison to the rest of the soaps, you'll see higher end brands, more upscale products...advertisers need these soaps because if they don't have them they will have a helluva time trying to attract affluent women who do not watch the majority of prime time television. I know, for instance, that On Star had a deal with Y&R a few years back specifically because Y&R viewers could afford that service. Keep an eye out for Botox ads featuring Virginia Madsen airing during Y&R, GH and B&B. I've already seen them, a product like Botox is one that is so very difficult to market because the demographic is specific, soaps really narrow down the audience like no other medium.

Tristan Rogers, in an interview with In the Zone ages ago, said that the ABC soaps fulfill a very specific set of demands and that ABC is actually happy with how their soaps fit into their business model. In the current climate of network television, a big rule is to not piss off your audience...that's why GL is still around because CBS does not want to be the company that killed the longest running show in history. That said, GL does not net good ratings or demographics and is basically supported by P&G advertisements. GL will get canceled, everyone knows that, nobody wants to admit when.

DAYS makes money too, with the way things are at NBC if it didn't it would have been killed instantly, no questions asked. Unlike CBS, which has good prime time ratings and can carry the burden of GL somewhat better, NBC can't afford to do that.

Essentially, the amount of profit the soaps produce has shrunk greatly...but they still make money and so long as there isn't another kind of program that can deliver better ratings and demographics (not necessarily for cheaper) there is some life left in daytime.

Prime time is whole other animal because there IS another way to get the kinds of ratings and demographics advertisers hunger: Cable. HBO, Showtime, FX etc get the kinds of numbers that many advertisers spend mucho bucks on. Soap Operas have yet to meet this competitor (aside from, of course, Ms Oprah Winfrey)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Primetime is doing much better than Daytime. Gossip Girls' ratings are up 41% this season.

Grey's Anatomy is doing well. Fringe is doing well. Dirty Sexy Money and Pushing Daises are popular.

These shows have good writers, strong female characters and they give the audience what they want.

Daytime seems to love to torture its audience and the writing sucks. On DOOL and many other soaps the female characters are weak. Who wants to watch that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The thing too is daytime now basically just means soaps (shows liek The View are doing relatively fine--price is right too i assume). Primetime is way more diverse and the networks seem more willing, and to know, of more different type sof programming to help some of that decay...

Again it's relative. Pushing Ds and DSMoney actually are doign worse than they were last year (with DSM havign the least fall off--Private PRactice has had some too) partly for not being on the air since the strike. Fringe is sorta a cult hit but it's not a huge hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Some nightime numbers

Pushing Daisies 3.6/6

Dirty Sexy Money 4.1/7

Lipstick Jungle 3.6/6

One Tree Hill 2.2/3

Gossip Girl 2.3/3

Daytime ratings don't seem so bad when you look at the numbers for these hyped shows.

What is the average budget for a prime time show vs 5 eps of soaps?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Grays Anatomy is not doing well. That show lost 25% of its audience from last year, and it lost last year a portion from the year before. That is a show which was briefly a hit, now resides in the top 10 because nothing of merit is on to take its slot, and is a show that thought it could be a watercooler show for a moment, but fizzled. DSM is another show that got renewed in spite of its total lack of oomph, has tried to retool itself as more of a full fledged soap because it has nothing to lose. It's first episode had a rating of 7.4, by the end of its first season the rating was a 5.0 and ranked #54. Recent ratings have been in the 4.0 vicinity.

I can't say I have even heard of Pushing Daisies. Gossip Girls has become sort of a hit thanks to a really smart advertising campaign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think GG is considered because it's doing well with the demographic that they want it to do well with. I once read somewhere that the WB (and I would guess the CW now too) never really cared about how well their shows did amongst the entire primetime landscape, but how well they did amongst their own shows. They sort of have their own standard, and I think it makes sense for them. They know who their audience is, I think, and they're not trying to conquer the world of television or anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

"Traditional" media- network TV, commercial radio and newspapers- are losing ground in the era of Internet, ipods, mp3s and cable TV. Those "new" media have taken ground at the expense of the old.

I think there's still quality on Primetime, and that Primetime seems to have avoided the mistakes that Daytime has made in digging itself into a hole. Most primetime shows still feature middle-aged characters, often less glamourous-looking, as front burner and don't obsess over eye candy and simple, stupid storylines in a misguided attempt to appeal to younger viewers.

Furthermore, the best primetime shows still have that air of unpredictability about them that is LONG GONE from Daytime. Someone said here that just by looking at a soap mag cover, you can find out a lot of what's going on. No such chance with Primetime. Look at the Law & Order franchise (which has seemingly carried NBC in recent years anyway), and more specifically SVU. SVU has this air of unpredictability, plot twists, etc that mean you MUST watch from start to finish to find out the whole story. Just when you think it's a done deal, there's always going to be something coming up that turns the whole episode on its head. That's what makes good Primetime drama.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah I'm so glad things liek Buffy were on the WB--they wouldn't have laste don network tv. Gossip girl is also one of the most DVRed shows. it has a very very loyal following but a hit in the ABC/CBS/Fox/NBC sense--it wouldn't have lasted a week.

Maybe CW has to start having soaps--they'd be happy with a .5 rating ;)

You kinda don't know what you're talking about :P

I'm NOT a Grey's fan at all, but it's still a hit that any other network woudl snap up if they could (you're right the ratings are slipping and it's definetly peaked). DSM's always done sorta ok in the ratings/demos--and cuz it was cut short by the strike ABC is giving it a chance (much liek Pushing Daisies which gives them reviewer credit)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Here you go, by special request! https://www.instagram.com/p/DJlXDnWJImW/ DAYS 9-26-90 Matt Ashford as Jack Deveraux in drag
    • Concluding 1976... Raymond Schafer arrives in Springfield and begins an extensive probe into Malcolm’s death, puzzling Ed, who wonders why most of Schafer’s question sessions keep turning back to Rita’s involvement with Malcolm. Ed assures the man that Rita’s only connection with Malcolm was as his nurse; he is unaware that Schafer knows a great deal more about Rita than he does. Just to protect Rita, Ed has Mike check on Schafer’s credentials, and learns that he’s a  well-respected criminal attorney. The waitress at the restaurant where Malcolm suffered his stroke tells Schafer that the woman who was with him reacted very professionally to the sudden emergency, as if she were a nurse. Realizing that her little sister has fallen hard for Tim, Rita warns him that she’s very vulnerable and innocent, but Tim tells Rita her advice isn’t necessary. But Tim then receives a plum job offer to be chief neurological resident at a prestigious Philadelphia hospital and can’t pass up the opportunity. Evie is crushed by the news and spends the next several days at home crying. Joe Werner, fully recovered, has accepted a post as a medical aide in a destitute village in India and leaves alone, with Sarah to follow him later. Justin asks Sarah to consider a partnership with him in private practice, but she explains that she thrives on the hospital atmosphere. When a call comes from India that Joe has had another massive attack, Sarah leaves on the next available flight and arrives only moments before he dies. The painful news is relayed back to Cedars at once. Sara returns from India a heartbroken woman, but the day-to-day involvement of raising T.J. and of her career seem to be her salvation. Justin shows a surprisingly compassionate and understanding side to Sara, but, ironically, Justin’s ex-wife, Jackie, arrives in Springfield with her diabetic father, who is suffering from a heart attack. In the process of consulting with Justin on her father’s condition, Jackie comes face to face with Sara for the first time since their college days. Evie’s heartbreak at Tim’s departure turns to fury and hatred when she inadvertently discovers a letter which Tim wrote to Rita just after he left. In it he concedes that Rita was right about Evie’s vulnerability where he was concerned but reminds Rita that he badly hurt her in the same way she feared Evie would suffer. Evie is now sure that Rita somehow forced Tim to leave town and is livid at the idea that Tim was Rita’s lover. She insists she’s cutting off her relationship with Rita and will pay her back for any help she’s received in the past. Ben and Hope’s wedding plans are off, as Ben, while still insisting he’s innocent, won’t explain why the robbery evidence points to him. Hope feels his unwillingness to tell her the truth makes marriage to him impossible, but confides to Ann that she is miserable without him. Ben has echoed these sentiments to Mike but won’t confide in him, either as Hope’s father or as an attorney.   Holly is trying very hard to build a life without Ed, but since she sees him virtually every day at work,she’s unable to put him out of her mind. She accepts a date with a member of the hospital administration staff but is unable to avoid making comparisons between Ed and this young man and winds up alone, sadly holding Ed’s picture and recalling how much she loves him. Believing that the hospital board’s conclusions on Grainger’s death have settled the question once and for all, Rita has regained her self-confidence, and her romance with Ed is growing daily. They admit their love for each other, and Ed confides that he intentionally  held back with Rita for fear of making another mistake. Rita then tells Ed she has never married because for her marriage must be forever. Rita’s mother realizes that Rita is truly in love when she confides in her that she doesn’t understand why she’s been so lucky in having him love her and how she wants to be the very best person she can be for him. Ed proposes marriage to Rita and gives her time to think about it before answering. Rita painfully realizes that her past could, if it rose again against her, make a life with Ed a lost dream. But Raymond Shaefer has been quietly but efficiently carrying on his investigation and has learned that Grainger argued with Rita at her apartment. He presents the evidence he’s compiled to District Attorney Eric Van Gelder, who decides the case warrants further investigation. Rita goes to Ed’s office to tell him she loves him but can’t marry him, that she doesn’t deserve him and “can’t do it to him.” As she turns from a confused Ed to leave, she finds the district attorney and a police officer outside Ed’s door, waiting to arrest her. Ed, insisting that a serious mistake has been made, calls Mike to help her as Rita, shocked and humiliated, is taken under arrest through the hallways of the hospital in which she works. Mike manages Rita’s release on bail only after she has had to submit to the degrading booking procedure. Mike sees her alone at her apartment, explaining he can help her only if she tells him the whole truth. Rita equivocates until Mike mentions Texas, indicating to Rita that he knows at least some of the story. Van Gelder has, in fact, let Mike see the bulk of evidence in the case against Rita, to convince him her arrest wasn’t a capricious whim. Rita explains to Mike that Malcolm believed she intentionally vilified him to his father, to do him out of his rightful inheritance, and then wanted his father dead to collect her money. Mike expresses his appreciation of Rita’s honesty, promising to help her. But Rita’s tormented dreams confirm that she hasn’t yet told all the truth, and after Peggy visits, expressing firm support, Rita tells Roger she has to reveal his part in the story. Roger painfully tells Rita about his being Christina’s father to show her that if Ed knew, it would end Rita’s chances with him forever. Rita, who was ready to tell Ed the whole story, now realizes how risky that would be. Adding to Rita’s pain is her forced leave of absence from the hospital until she’s cleared and the embarrassment of seeing her name in the headlines.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • Yes, but the stories are all pretty awful Seeing Victor rehashing his hatred of the Abbotts  when he married one of them and has a daughter that is half Abbott as well as walking around with Traci's daughter's heart keeping him alive makes him look worse than he already is. And I remember he and Jack chatting amicably in the past few years. Victor interfering in Kyle/Claire is just repeat of Billy/Victoria. Sharon, Nick,Phyllis etc are around but again the stories are lacking.
    • I think Kevin's 1996 Emmy was fair enough. He barely appeared for his second. I don't think anyone else on the list is that deserving but I might have gone with Moore as he did try with the whole Keesha AIDS story. @alwaysAMC Thanks to slick jones' cast list I was able to see that Nikki Rene played Tina. Not much on her, as you mentioned. Tap and a few Broadway listings (it doesn't help that a younger actress with a similar name is in a lot of roles). Nikki Rene: Credits, Bio, News & More | Broadway World https://onceonthisisland.fandom.com/wiki/Nikki_Rene Nikki Rene - IMDb
    • Thank you. That does ring a bell. I remember Theresa and Julian's drunk, giggly fake wedding (with Julian asking "Whassup?" to the minister). Was Bruce tricking the pair as a prank, or did somebody put him up to it? I especially liked Katherine recalling how dashing young Alistair was when he'd pick up Rachel for dates, and how she wished she could be her sister, then feeling guilty once Rachel had her boating accident ...
    • And Kevin Mambo beat Shemar Moore for those two Emmys. I chalk up the wins to the voters not wanting Jonathan Jackson to eventually end up with a five peat (he won 1995, 1998, 1999). These were the 1996 and 1997 Younger Actor races. 1996: Nathan Fillion, Jonathan Jackson, Kevin Mambo (winner), Shemar Moore, Joshua Morrow 1997: Steve Burton, Jonathan Jackson, Kevin Mambo (winner), Shemar Moore, Joshua Morrow
    • https://www.legacy.com/us/obituaries/legacyremembers/denise-alexander-obituary?pid=209074143
    • Today's episode was excellent. Clearly it was confrontation day and they didn't disappoint. I'm glad they didn't forget Mona in all of this and gave us an opportunity to see how she's dealing with this. A major highlight for me were the Kat and Martin scenes. Their chemistry is off the charts and I don't understand why we haven't gotten more of this. I love how they take turns calming each other down. They feel really well matched and believable as siblings. Speaking of siblings, they anvils were dropping strong that Kat and Eva are twins but I do wish someone would mention that they are essentially hood twins which might throw people off the scent.  I'm one of the people who enjoyed Joey and the gambling storyline so it was nice to see him again. It was nice to see different characters like Mona and Eva in that element instead of the usual players. When Doug arrived I don't know what hit me but I just see a funeral in his future. He seems so hopeless and has the worst luck. I just can't see him surviving the year at this rate.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy