Jump to content

The View 10/07/08: Sheri vs. Elisabeth


Ryan

Recommended Posts

  • Members

GO SHERI!

After listening to Elisabeth spread her lies and talk about Obama's character, Sheri questions McCain's judgement and character by calling him out on leaving his wife for Cindi.

Elisabeth goes "oh that's too personal"

Go Sheri!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Here is the you tube of the fight. Elizabeth gets smacked down! Sherri is so right about Charles Keating and Elizabeth tries to brush it off as nothing. Elizabeth needs to shut the hell up in calling people hate mongers. Glass houses...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Elisabeth Hasselbeck is ''really upset'' with her "View" co-hosts Whoopi Goldberg and Joy Behar about the presidential election, a longtime staff member of the show reportedly told the Chicago Sun-Times.

''It's not as bad as during the Rosie [O'Donnell] era,'' the source added, but said it's bad enough that ''View'' creator Barbara Walters has called a ''cooling off'' meeting between the conservative Hasselbeck and the more liberal Goldberg and Behar.

In July, Hasselbeck was in tears after a discussion about the use of the n-word, in which Goldberg told her the two "don't live in the same world."

Earlier this month, O'Donnell said her former co-host Hasselbeck and Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin are "identical cousins ... women who hunt in high heels."

Left-leaning O'Donnell chose to depart the ABC daytime talk show "The View" earlier than planned last year following an on-air confrontation with Hasselbeck.

As a featured guest on "The Martha Stewart Show" in April, O'Donnell referred to Hasselbeck as "a little Republican who scared me."

Last year, Hasselbeck said she tried to keep her cool during her on-air spat with O'Donnell, in which a political discussion over the war in Iraq became heated when an angry O'Donnell decried Hasselbeck for not standing up for her when media outlets suggested that she'd called U.S. troops "terrorists" during a previous debate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I didnt like Sherri getting personal liek that but it was to counteract Elziabeth's negative tirades. The woman is a hypocrite and says its fine to attack Obama's character but cant handle it when someone does so about McCain/Palin. I really cant stand her

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I dont think that she wants obama attacked and mccain/palin left alone to be honest. I think shes trying to bring a rounded discussion to a very uneven show. Of course she rbings up anything anti obama because the other three bring up anything anti mccain, and of course she defends mccain and not obama, much like the others defend obama and not mccain ever.

also, i think what Liz met when she said something about too personal was Sheri's hubby cheating on her and thats too personal blah blah blah type thing. I also didnt think Liz said Obama was a hate monger (sp?) but the that rev guy was (and, IMHO, he is...). I know no one on here has said she said it about him, but i have seen in other places. it just didnt come off thatw ay to me, but i might be wrong.

Either way this show needs a total overhaul. I also think part of the reason Liz is soooo extreme is that shes the only one on that "side" its 3 on 1 with one too scared to piss people off to ever add anything to the actuall conversation. I think if there was more of a balance she might not be so extreme in her views, but when attacked she, like 99% of people, go on the defense.

Sadly, i dont see Babs shaking up the view because it needs it bad, but to be honest she needs to go. because she never adds anything. Or she should become the moderator. thbey really need a young person in there now because Liz is out of the 20's lifestyle that theyw ere going for when she got the job. And they need someone in the middle of the partys, and someone from the non entertainment world, maybe someone not a mother would also be nice. idk. this show use to be aweosme but now its so typical and boring and pretty unbalanced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Really, I didn't agree with anything you posted. But this first line stood out for me.

How, exactly do you think she tries to bring a "rounded discussion" to the show? All she ever does is spout off RNC talking points. She not at all open-minded. She's an empty-headed Hannity clone, IMHO.

I don't think it's exactly true that there's no one middle of the road on the show. Before this election, Sherri Shepard sided with Hasselbeck at times on views of religion. I've seen it myself. And she supported GWB in 2004, I believe. Regardless, now she is obviously supporting Obama. What's wrong with that? Is she a true moderate? Nope. But she's close enough.

Finally, I won't get into the whole Rev. Wright issue, because it's been discussed on the Prez thread. But I will say simply, what's good for the goose is good for the gander. If Hasselbeck doesn't want her candidate's party attacked for their unorthodoxed church, then she should not throw stones at Obama.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

maybe rounded discussion isnt the right wording, but i thinks he tries toi bring up other view points, other angles, and it becomes a gang attack against her, and then she goes on the defense. I dont think shes closed minded at all, i think she is forced into a role much more extreme than she really is.

Honestly, ic ant discuss SS. Not in terms of the view, because i have nothing at all nice to say. But i dont thinkt ehre is anything wrong with her changing her outlooks and views and supporting whoever she wants to support.

She isnt the mod, Whoppi (sp?) is.

i could not agree more. both should be discussed, brought up, and whatnot. Who you surround yourself with IS relevent, IMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

JP, I admire your ability to give Hasselbeck the benefit of the doubt IRT her views. For me, I really do think that she is that extreme. I haven't seen anything from her on this show that would make me believe otherwise, therefore my conclusion is such. I will just leave it at that... ;)

Yes, Whoopi is the moderator of the show. What I meant to say was that SS came across as a moderate in the political realm there for a little while. Maybe she's leaning more to the left these days...

Do you mind my asking how you have come to this SS dislike? I see that you've mentioned it before. Is it her presence on this show in particular, or did you not like her before The View?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I totally understand your conclusion. And honestly, a part of me giving Liz some doubt is i am painted as this extreme one sided person, and im not. And i think when you find soemthing you can relate to in a person you go off that ;)

Oh yes yes, oi see now. Sorry for that.

I *LOVED* her before she joined the show. I actually still do really like her OUTSIDE of the view. I think she is a great comedic actress, and as someone who had met her i think shes an amazing person to be around. But i DISPISE her on this show. I cant even tell you why.... i just cant stand her. I feel liuke she has NO real view, adds no real input, and is pointless. Its a wasted slot on what could be an amazing show. I think she would be fine as a fillin host from tiem to time, i just think that slot should have went to someone diff. She is the main reason i dont watch everyday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Really? I've never noticed that in you at all. In fact, I think your posts are usually open-minded about alot of things, politics being just one example. I can't believe that someone would think of you as one-sided, but that's just me. :):)

;) Thanks for explaining that to me. I can understand how you might feel that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • This opened my eyes and appeals to my logic. But, don't you also think that the fact that they are so ill-suited means that, by soap-opera-laws, they aren't a long term item?  I like how Belle is written now, so I appreciate the fact that she is in this story.  But, I don't believe anything will become of it, and I think EJ is going to mess it up very soon.
    • Kristen also raped John post-Paris with a Magic Mirror.  Her pregnancy was "delicate" and they couldn't be intimate.  She had already lost the baby, needed to get pregnant immediately again and set a Stefano tricked out Magic Mirror to hypnotize John and John thought he was  having sex with Marlena.  John woke up the next day and thought it was a dream.
    • The show is only a few months in and still finding it's footing. I'm hoping MVJ has years of story in place for these characters and will pretty much stick to that plan (obviously with tweaking along the way) I do have some issues with the initial structure. Making the Duprees the centerpiece and not having a male with that name. Making Martin Vernon and Anita's would have solved that and made the age of the character more appropriate. I agree about not having a young couple in the beginnings of a romance. And having too many married couples. Jacob and Naomi could be just living together. That makes the possibility of other relationships more viable than within a marriage. Same with Smitty/Martin. Having them married with kids limits the story especially in terms of them as a gay couple.  The white characters existing in another universe is also a problem. That ties in with the workplace/job issues. I don't think they needed the hospital-instead the police station/real estate office or Martin's workplace could have utilized and have Derek/Ashley/Vanessa/Smitty/Shanice etc working and interacting there. ATM too many characters are meeting up in cafes etc-we're not seeing them at work. We needed to see more of how various characters interact eg Jacob/Bill, Ted/Bill. There were a lot of extended family scenes but there should be more one on one to get a sense of character and family dynamics. Leslie is a great character but her bag of tricks is getting over exposed. I would hate that she is kept on and other character's made to look like idiots by accepting her presence. They'll need some good writing and twists to keep her around. We can only hope some of the lesser actors improve as I don't want too many recasts or writeouts. So it's early days and I look forward to seeing the show evolve. And give the Duprees some staff!
    • Thanks. I barely remember any of the backstory there, just his ties to her parents. It was all so convoluted, everything with Tangie.
    • 81 and 82 were rather bad, with the infamous invasion of the Kirkland family. But sometime in late 82 or early 83, Claire Labine was rehired as head-writer and immediately put the focus back on the Ryan's. This time Labine's tenure was short, but she did great work. The entire show was compelling again -- especially the Charlotte Greer storyline (one of the best plots of the entire series).  But Labine was fired, yet again, and Ryan's Bar was bombed, resulting in most of the action being transferred to Greenberg's Deli, and a focus on younger characters with little connection to the Ryan family. So that is what you are probably seeing from 84.   
    • It wasn't that altruistic. He made Tangie a substitute for Blake and was apparently so creepy about it that Tangie spent the years in between getting away from him and running into him in Springfield believing that he had purchased her to be his child bride. It was only when she got to know Blake that she realized that she realized his feelings for her were paternal and suddenly she and Roger became friends.
    • When I watched 1999 Daytime Emmys in real time, I was like "Daytime Emmys will never top this" and that's exactly what happened (at least IMO).
    • Yes in Sami's case lots of people took issue with her being with Dumbell Austin outside of the Carrie issue, cause she drugged him and raped him by pretending to be Carrie. Austin didn't consent & well Ejami fans have used that as a smokescreen against the backlash of Sami & EJ being paired. It's also not so much as being paired with someone period, but paired with his victim & his victim sister. That's a line that should never be crossed by Belle/EJ esp Belle cause Sami isn't the only person in her family that EJ has terrorized. For all points and purposes since she was aged to a teen, Belle has been a daddy's girl so on top of the betrayal when it comes to Sami it's also with John. He ran him down & murdered him after raping her sister. On top of all the other evil [!@#$%^&*] he has done. "Good dick", ONS with a monster one time is one thing we all have lapses of judgements, it's whole different thing to be a whole bird who throws her self respect out the window for a roll in the hay relationship with a monster & act like you have selective amnesia about his many crimes towards your family. While getting on your self righteous hoiler than thou horse about others. No there wouldn't be as much as outrage if he was paired with someone like his equally rapey Black family terrorizing sister, or Ava, Gabi or even Nicole. So it's not as much as about him being paired with someone period, it's more of who he should never be paired with his rape victim, her sister's or anyone in the family of the man he viciously ran down. I don't expect much of anything from EJ but I expect a lot more from Belle. As far as Kristen goes Brady has been called everything but the word of God rightfully so for being with his rapist, his brothers rapist, the psycho who terrorized his parents for decades, family, the woman he claimed to love after she violated her by using a mask of her face

      Please register in order to view this content

      to pretend to be her so he would sleep with her. Drugging his sister ie,: Sami. If Kristen was paired with someone that wasn't her victim or victims like Alex, Xander, [!@#$%^&*] even Ben no one would really care for the most part. So I hope this gives you a little insight and I hope you know I wasn't trying to be rude.
    • Speaking of Emily, I really wish that Marie Masters could do a Locher Room. I haven’t seen anything about her in years!
    • 1980/81 Dallas was a killer show. 18/23 episodes finished #1 and the remaining five finished 2nd.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy