Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members
Posted

In the past, I've wondered why KL never introduced a grown son or illegitimate son for Greg - if nothing else than as a(nother) spoiler for Greg and Paige's relationship.  

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Am I alone in the opinion that a primetime TV drama that's been on the air for 14 seasons is allowed to die rather than go through a massive overhaul in an effort to save it? Sometimes, it's not even about the content of the show, it's about the name alone. I figure by 1993, a new younger audience was never going to tune in to "Knots Landing," that show that their grandma watched over a decade earlier. When it's over, it's over.

I watched the S4 premiere and will have it on hold until I finish all of Flamingo Road, but man man man, that cliffhanger from S3 into S4. Just like what I said about Falcon Crest's first season finale, I love a cliffhanger that emphasizes reactions, next steps, and the aftermath of emotional bombshells that have long-term consequences over superficial events like massacres, crashes, and even shootings. There was never any doubt - Val leaving Gary meant that things were never going to be the same in the cul-de-sac, and so to spend that entire summer wondering just how different things would be...yikes. I will always let Ted Shackelford ruin my life, but man Gary is an a-hole, and Abby really is a thot. Val being assertive throughout these first few seasons is really great when you know that she'll become "Poor Val" later on.

Not sure how I feel about Laura moving back in with Richard, but it's really funny to me that Richard, Kenny, and Ginger carried on into S4, because it definitely seemed like all three characters were on their way to a natural departure by the end of the third season. I somehow like Kenny and Ginger a lot more now that they are generally happy with and supportive of one another, maybe because, for a hot minute, they are the "stable couple" on Seaview Circle while all of the older folks are spinning out of control. I can see why there's nothing left for them, though.

The S4 arrangement of the theme is probably my favorite. I love that the melody starts in the strings before it builds to the sax slinking in like, "Oh yes, baby, I'm still here."

Edited by All My Shadows
  • Members
Posted

That would have made more sense than what they did with Claudia's son.

I think if they had made the right changes a few years earlier, the show could have run up to the mid '90s or so, but we're mostly just speculating for fun. I find it more entertaining than anything in the last seasons, frankly.

  • Members
Posted

Oh yeah, I didn't mean that it's not fun to speculate. I just think the show's expiration date was pretty much written in stone by the time it entered the 90s. Some of those episodes I watched in the initial run on the Primetime Soaps channel just seemed really tired, but I'm committing to watching the entire run. Anne and Claudia just don't come off as characters to watch for me.

  • Members
Posted (edited)

No, because I said up front it really shouldn't have gone on and was for the best lol.

Edited by Vee
  • Members
Posted

Gosh what a mess….between his death and Linda’s murder shortly afterwards, sheesh. 
 (I don’t know why Latham & Co. left the back half of S12 Knots a mess like they did.) Always felt Claudia got her karma as the show progressed.

I’ve always adored Kathleen Noone but Claudia is such a messy unlikable character as was Galina’s Kate. 
 

 

  • Members
Posted (edited)

You ain't kiddin', lol!

But seriously.  I do agree that every series has a natural expiration date.  Like @DRW50 said, I think we're mostly just speculating for fun, not seriously suggesting that KL could or should have run longer.

On the other hand, there's nothing that says KL couldn't have run longer, had TPTB been wiser and set the show up for future generations.  But that would've required the kind of long-range thinking that I don't think primetime shows indulge in, quite frankly.

I was good with Anne/Michelle Phillips until whoever decided to make her poor and homeless.  That storyline, along with everything Anne did to get off the streets, including hosting that call-in show (!), was a total misfire. 

Claudia, though, just came across as entirely too arch from the beginning.  She didn't have the layers that Abby had; and the longer Claudia stayed, the harder it became, I think, to justify why anyone even still cared about her.  I think Ann Marcus did a lot to humanize her and make her as something other than Kate's meddling mom or Greg's Machiavellian sibling, but it might have been a case of "too little, too late."

"So much about Greg Sumner revolved around his complicated relationship with Paul Galveston," I said, at the time.  "What if Greg had found himself playing out a similarly complicated dynamic with his long-lost son?  Only this time, HE's the Paul Galveston in the relationship, and the son is the idealistic, young man, who is determined to build a legacy that will outlive his father's?"

Edited by Khan
  • Members
Posted

Season 10 regaining momentum and a bit of lost ratings was a miracle.  The reinvention into a late 80s soap was successful.

However, Latham and co didn't properly plan how to maintain this quality once the Jill story concluded and Abby had departed the show.

And season 12 and first half of season 13 was an attempt at a soft early 90s reset with more topical issues mixed with soap opera melodrama.  

90210 and 1st season of Melrose had that early 90s social issue/very special episode vibes until both successfully tapped into that soapy sweet spot.

To me, Melrose inherited the mantle left behind by Dynasty and Knots Landing.  The apartment setting and young adult focus was a 90s update of KL's cul da sec and married couple focus format...and the OTT plot twists and cat fights was a 90s update of Dynasty's campy set ups and cat fights.

As previously stated, teens and twenty somethings were watching 90210 and Melrose Place..not Knots Landing or Dynasty.

Case in point, back in season 1 when Heather Locklear joined Melroes...my late 30 something mom had to explain to her early 20 something co workers who Heather Locklear was and promised they were in for a treat.

  • Members
Posted

I've said it before, and I'll say it again: Heather Locklear grew so much as an actress once she stopped sounding so nasally, lol.

  • Members
Posted

I don't know the timeline for when Donna Mills departure was announced, but perhaps lapsed viewers returned for Abby's exit story.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • She told Vanessa to "DOUBLE her offer" on the Jarvis house.  The Jarvis family accepted the doubled price.  Assuming the house has an appraised value of $2,000,000, she's theoretically paid the Jarvis family $4,000,000 for the house.  The bank would loan Leslie 80% of the appraised value ($1,600,000), and Leslie had to pay the balance with cash at closing --- $2,200,000.  She only had ONE million.  Where the hell did she get the rest?!  And now she's got contractors working on the house all day & half the night.  Who's paying THEM?  I keep thinking all this will crash around her.  Either that or the writers have absolutely no idea the limits of a million dollars.  Sounds like a "lot of money", but it obviously ain't when we look at Leslie's spending since she got that million dollar check in August.     
    • Maree Cheatham     pg. 403

      Please register in order to view this content

            MATLOCK Sister Peggy (1) 2025   Ray Wise    pg. 428 movie THE WOLF IN THE WELL    Roland Carmel    2024 THE NAPA BOYS    Officer Toland   2025   PodCast HAVOC TOWN      Josiah Abbess       2025    
    • Vernon is an idiot. Why would he have Sharon in the same hotel that Leslie is staying at?
    • Yes, that out of the blue return was odd. Maybe GG found a forgotten clause in the contract he signed when he was wooed to ABC and they were forced to take him back! Like George Reinholt he talked about the contract that promised him primetime roles. But it was loaded in the networks favor. I think it was Gloria Loring that re-signed at Days on the promise of primetime opportunities, but that was all it was- she was put up for guest spots and TV movies but not necessarily guaranteed that she get the role.
    • I still am baffled by why Monty brought back stunt hire Gerald Gordon in the early '80s out of nowhere for like a year. I haven't found anyone who can come up with a thing he did in that second stint of note.
    • It's interesting to watch this having watched The Doctors. I'm not sure I'm seeing that much of a difference in the characters Gerald Gordon and Anna Stuart played on The Doctors and what they're playing here.
    • I keep forgetting a huge chunk of that year was written by scabs. You're probably right, because by the time the strike was over, they were likely planning an exit for Alan's character as it must have been obvious by then that Bernau was not going to return. If he was still there, it's also doubtful they would have approached MZ and MG about coming back. Wild.
    • And to think the original plan was for David and Lesley to have an affair.  Not only would that have made no sense - Lesley wasn't THAT stupid, lol - but it also would've ruined her and GH.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Week ending March 5 1978 Second season shows are tested CBS finishes first week in March with stronger than usual 1 9.5, but not enough to beat ABC The prime -time ratings pattern continued to hold steady for the week ended March 5, and attention increasingly turns to second season entries as the networks probe one another's weaknesses or cover their own. As usual, ABC -TV won the week, scoring a 20.5 average rating. But CBS -TV was closer than usual with a 19.5 average garnered with the help of several strong specials and movies in addition to some of its dependable series regulars. NBC followed its habit of plummeting when its "évent "entries failed. In this case it was the miniseries, Loose Change, which scored only 24 and 22 shares on Monday and Tuesday, leaving the network with a 16.9 average rating for the week. Looking at new series and new time slots, ABC's Six Million Dollar Man on Monday (8 -9 p.m. NYT) continued to falter with a 22 share, while What's Happening, in its new slot on Saturday (8 -9 p.m.), also remained shaky with a 23 share. Starsky and Hutch is still healthy with a 38 share in its new slot following Charlie's Angels on Wednesday, and How the West Was Won also had a 38 on Sunday (8 -9 p.m.). Against West CBS's Rhoda and On Our Own came in poorly for the second week in a row of face to face competition, with each pulling 25 shares after a 41 share lead in from 60 Minutes. ABC's special two -hour presentation of the upcoming series tryout, Having Babies, scored a 27 share on Friday (9 -11 p.m.) against strong competition from both the other networks (the movie "Ski Lift to Death" on CBS and Rockford Files and Quincy on NBC). For CBS, its new Monday night leadoffs, Good Times and Baby I'm Back, scored so -so 27 and 28 shares respectively. But the second half of the night had its best performance since the new line -up came in- M *A*S *Hwith a 45, One Day at a Time with a 41 and Lou Grant with a 36. Celebrity Challenge of the Sexes and Shields and Yarnell showed no signs of reviving on Tuesday, with 16 shares each, but the new Tuesday movie slot held up with a 41 share from Clint Eastwood's "Magnum Force." The network's entire Saturday line up continued to limp in, as Bob Newhart Tony Randall, The Jeffersons, Maude and Kojak all scored sub 30 shares (with the exception of Newhart's 29, in fact, all scored sub -25 shares). NBC premiered its new Chuck Barris Rah Rah Show on Tuesday (8 -9 p.m.),when it pulled a 24 share. The second episode of Quark had a 27, three points down from its premiere. There might be the temptation to conclude that the 29 share turned in by the National Love, Sex and Marriage Test on Sunday (9:30 -10 p.m.) proves the appetite for "sophisticated" subject matter is not insatiable after all, except that its competition was not only CBS's strong comedy block but also ABC's rerun of "The Way We Were," which pulled a 35 share. Of NBC's other midseason entries -CPO Sharkey, Black Sheep Squadron, James at 16 and Class of '65 -CPO Sharkey turned in the highest score of the week, a 27.   *NBC were in dire straits at this point relying on movies and specials which could hit or bomb in equal measure.  Fred Silverman had his work cut out for him when he arrived that Summer. He favored sitcoms and series as the schedule's foundation and NBC had no sitcoms to build on and few solid series. He also had a big backlog of specials/mini series that had been committed to air. Also NBC had a long standing relationship with Universal so he was forced to work with that studio. He struggled to get quality producers on board as they were either tied into deals with ABC/CBS or were wary of having their shows on the 3rd rated network. He still felt variety had a place on the schedule however and that lead to duds like Susan Anton, The Big Show and Pink Lady and Jeff.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy