Jump to content

Lauren Koslow: Leave, Stay or Return!


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Although nothing concrete has surfaced regarding Lauren Koslow's future at DAYS I do think it is relevant to discuss where this actress really belongs. A lot of fans have never liked her on DAYS, a lot of fans can't recall her time on Y&R (as Jack Abbott's devious wife Lindsey Wells Abbott) and an awful lot of fans hunger for her return to B&B.

If I had my say I would want Lauren to make her triumphant return to B&B, Bill Bell created a role specifically for her on that show and I think it's only fitting that she return to the show that was tailor made for her. The character of Margo Lynley was the ONLY character to ever stand shoulder to shoulder, face to face with Susan Flannery's Stephanie Forrester and serve as a real rival. The chemistry Koslow shared with the cast was dynamic and believable.

Koslow is the right age to return to B&B with the impending exit (one of these days) of Susan Flannery, B&B is in desperate need of a fashionista diva. The re invigoration of a rivalry between the Forresters and a rival fashion entity is something which Lauren Koslow's Margo Lynley is perfectly suited for.

Some evidence:

Ridge, Caroline, Bill and Margo: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cnkfd79z1_4...feature=related

Stephanie vs Margo: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vj3km-XWcY...feature=related

Storm reaches out to a pregnant Margo: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uUrL1enlTk4...feature=related

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Even if she returns to B&B, what are the chances that Bradley and Alden will write for her for more than six months before she's bumped to recurring and ultimately never to be seen on the show again?

Brad has ADD, he clearly doesn't want and know how to write for certain characters after a while.

I say Koslow is smart for riding out her contract status at DAYS, no matter how shaky it looks. Compared to career prospects at B&B, it looks pretty damn steady.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'd love to see her back at B&B but, as Turner said, she would get crappy storylines, she would be thrust in a triangle from hell, her character would be destroyed, and she would be backburned or written out after six months. She is way more secure on DAYS, and Y&R, which I also wouldn't mind at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I of all people know about Brad and his ADD. However, who would've thought that Jackie Wagner or Heather Tom would've gotten so much story? There has to be an exception to the rule, and you never know who that might be.

Anyway, I think there are enough older women on the show that aren't getting any attention. We have Beth, Jackie, and Stephanie. (Ann I guess, but who knows what's going to happen with her). None of them are currently involved in anything big. I'm assuming that any fling/romance that Margo would have, could be had by Beth or Jackie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

All very valid arguments.

I think Koslow's run on B&B would have to be for the long haul in order for it to benefit the show. The fact is Darlene Conley's death was a bigger blow to the show than I think anyone associated with B&B imagined. I think Brad was convinced that the Marone's were going to work out and become the new Spectras...but they flopped. They just weren't as likable as Sally and her crew was and it was the likability factor that sustained Sally for nearly 20 years. Furthermore, the addition of Koslow would necessitate the exit of Lesley Anne Down which although I love LAD...I wouldn't shed too many tears, Margo Lynley trumps Jackie Marone any day of the week.

Essentially, Brad needs to get over his ADD and realize that certain characters are necessary for the structural integrity of the show. Margo Lynley is easily the most viable option for a rival fashion designer. When she left the show in 1992 Margo was embittered against the Forresters and simply fled town out of embarrassment caused by her brother stealing the Belief formula. Currently, the show is running with only one lightning rod: Stephanie. It needs another in order to move forward.

Returning to Y&R would be exciting since it's been over 20 years since Lindsey wreaked havoc on Jack and Jill's lives. Lindsey was the woman who got the incriminating photos of Jack and Jill's affair that Katherine used as ammunition in destroying Jill's marriage to John. Every character Lindsey interacted with is still on canvas. To think, a legitimate rival for Jill, a thorn in Jack's side, a triumphant ally for Katherine. She'd be staying in the Sony family, could be promising.

I can also see the logic in riding out DAYS for as long as she can. Lauren does get good airtime as Kate and she gets a good wardrobe. Certainly, she's been playing the same storyline since she started in '96 but that isn't her fault. She simply plays what she's given, she doesn't re write scripts...that's what I hate about Lauren toiling at DAYS, it doesn't seem that she's ever going to get to play anything like she did at Y&R or B&B and I know she's capable of great things. DAYS wastes yet another talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I like the idea of a return to Y&R.

It would bring in history,which is something that works for veteran characters.

Although Terry Lester was playing Jack,so there could be no flashbacks with him or Jess Walton.

Did Lynsey just vanish from GC or was there a proper write-out?

Could Lynsey have had a child by Jack,or did she stay in town too long for that to happen?

Not that I necessarily want another long lost child to arrive.

on that subject,hopefully a recast Keemo will come to town!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This show needs desperately and all-powerful, rich as hell, self-reliant, ambitious, sophisticated über-b!tch who has a good side but rarely shows it. And she should have a name like Margo or Dominique Deveraux or Iris Carrington. Something a bit French, aristocratic. Someone who eats grapes and drinks champagne in bed for breakfast, where she reclines on embroidered Pratesi sheets. :D Yeah, I know it's a total cliche, but it must be done.

She should also wear superb outfits with amazing, outrageous hats. But for that, the chief costume desginer of B&B needs to be fired. Now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It does and Lauren Koslow could definitely do it. She can put on the faux-English airs with the best of them and play with those clichés and have great fun doing so. She is also amazing at coaxing out chemistry from younger male co-stars (Victor Webster comes to mind). I thought Lesley-Anne Down had it in her to play that sort of gorgeously seductive role (given her Sunset Beach experience) but I guess not. LK is more subtle an actress, though. Plus Margo's history on the show with Bill Spencer, Ridge and Eric will have Stephanie and Brooke, at least, fit to be tied.

[speaking of Bill -- I wouldn't mind the old fox returning to B&B, too. Even if it was only to usher Stephanie off on her world cruise with Sally Spectra while Margo (with Sally's implicit blessing) takes control of Spectra Designs/Jackie M/whateverthehell it is called now. First act of business? Hiring Deacon as her marketing man!]

Don't even tease me about Birgit Muller. Margo should be swanning around in vintage YSL or Valentino. I guess Nolan Miller (even though he is almost too 80s) had a Valentino edge to his designs. Perhaps B&B could pull some strings? Or steal Y&R's costumer who at least managed to procure a Birkin bag, Pauline Trigère wedding gown and other goodies for Sabrina's wardrobe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I totally agree with everything you said. In my opinion, B&B should be like French pop: "elegant, refined" but "without coming off as distant or unemotional"; in fact, the dominant feeling being — "romantic longing, nostalgia, sentimentality, eroticism". All that without sleaze and sap. Couple that with riveting business storylines and you've got yourself a hit. Pure pleasure to watch.

Business should be a crucial, crucial part of this show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I agree. Especially after SilkPress got back to her apartment and started to mock Nicole. Her dislike for Nicole and seeing her as a threat to her getting Teddy Bear is growing worse. So I could see her pulling a kidnapping on Nicole at some point. If anything she was going there to poke the bear and got pressed (pun unintended) when the bear gathered her.   Completely understandable. 
    • Beyond The Underwear Oops I mean Gates!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I swear this entire time I thought Roman knew about the Phillip/Vivian letter lol.  I do like how mature Roman/Kate are as a couple.  It makes me sad the new writers never got a chance to write for John/Marlena. I agree with @AbcNbc247 that the Felicity stuff is a bit after school special-y.  I am pretty sure that (most) of the viewing audience is aware that a grown man should not be shouting at any teenage girl especially one with disabilities.  Just let Xander apologize and move on. Linsey Godfrey was in her Sarah baby voice mode today and it irritates me to no end.   I know it's a cutesy thing her and Xander do but it's annoying. Bringing Kevin back is strange, but I do like the use of history.  I do think Rex probably could have been used instead, but whatever.  I don't care about Rex much either lol.
    • I mean over the past decades. But I do agree that in recent years now, the writing is not working for them as well as it used to then. It's same old, same old...which is what made the Damian storyline refreshing. At least for me.   
    • Did Denise give any interviews where she talked about her first few years on GH... '73-75? I wonder if she had any regrets leaving Days for GH, as from what I've read, the show was in the dumps writing-wise, so am thinking she didn't have great story? Any Leslie story highlights I've seen always start with '76, after Gloria Monty took charge.
    • I know! It's like second verse, here we go again!  Agreed. Certainly there was concern maybe even fear at the highest levels for the very good reason that what they had was so economically successful, so of course this risk was scary but if anyone was brave she was. Yes, he was. I have seen her associated with getting it on the air one other place but no details nor official title. Not the writer or creator so it made me wonder if she functioned as a kind of uncredited ad hoc producer, but then maybe she just supported it. At any rate that is nothing but supposition on my part. No data! Yes, not a surprise anymore but still so frustrating! On one hand I am appreciative that she is included in this book, but scholarship where are you?!
    • that wasnt her point. She wanted to further demonize Ted; that was the main focus of their talk. She wants to ensure that Nicole leaves him so that he's free and single to be with her. At this point, I dont think she really cares what Nicole thinks of her; she just wants her out of the way Eva is Nicole's stepdaughter and is a Dupree by association. If Nicole takes Ted back then its reasonable that she would accept his daughter and i that happens, Eva will have welcomed to their country club, be invited to their parties, have access to their resources, etc....much like Andre whom also isnt a blood Dupree but is accepted by them via Nicole. Eva got what she got from Anita bc of Hayley. I think its important to remember that context bc they just dealt with an interloper that infiltrated their ranks and hurt her daughter in the worse way. Now you have another unfortunate girl positioned to do the same to her other daughter. The feelings are still too fresh and she doesnt want Eva to get the idea that she would ever be allowed the opportunity to play them again
    • Oh I've seem this! That's part of why I'm curious! The show could put EastEnders to shame on the gangster Aspect! Oh I've seem this! That's part of why I'm curious! The show could put EastEnders to shame on the gangster Aspect!
    • Eve was one of those characters that had the "Jessie Brewer"role. They had heavy storyline, they burned through it and now they are there for support and a touchstone in the community (Marland wanted to give Jessie story, but I agree with Monty...she best served in her connecting role, and keeping that damn Amy Vining busy so she keeps her nose out of things) So charcters are important and why they should have kept characters like Bridget around (even as she is more volatiles then Eve) who didnt need a big storyline but could have been behind the bar making connections and expostion, but Rauch wanted JEVA/JEVA/JEVA and DRAMA (which to him meant a lot of yelling and stupidity.)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy