Jump to content

July 21-25, 2008


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

But dmarex was RIGHT (and I was wrong), at least for Friday. Y&R got a promo boost...which has totally kicked my theory in the pant (not really my theory I guess...more a version of the Jack Peyton axiom, which asserts that viewers DO NOT come back).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually, i honestly do think they will come back - however not all of them. say you have 25 friends. then you start actling like a shitt friends and 8 leave. Once you improve and show that of that 8 some will come back, but not all. and over time if you keep slipping and making mistakes and pissing friends off then you will end up with less and less until you are all alone.

odd comparison, i know. but.. whatever.

also, i do think if you promo something right and it looks good people will tune in. doesnt mean they will stay.

i also dont think whos one what day and what storyline is a direct affect of the ratings for that day, but more of the day before. i.e. if people happen to tune in on tuesday and they like it they will turn in on wed - but if wed sucks they will turn out on thurs and check back in a few days later.

also you ahve to factor in the cbs.com/youtube/itunes/etc and recaps and people having other options and besing busy into this. i dont understand how some people can say that ratings gains/loses day by day are almost only due to who was on and what storyline was on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, I came back. After several years, I saw a story that caught my eye and stayed with the show. The numbers show me that fans WANT to come back to the show. They're just looking for something engaging enough to make them interested enough to consider staying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The fact that all of the CBS soaps gained in viewers this week is something that makes me really happy. Their entire lineup has been on fire lately and obviously people are choosing to keep their sets tuned to CBS for their soap fix as a result of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Here's my honest opinion right now, and it's shocker, but I don't find AMC all that bad right now. The only story that really getting on my nerves these days are the Fusion gang and B&E's attempt to make Annie a Annie Dutton 3.0 (Livvie Locke on PC being 2.0). Other than that, I'm liking the drama around the Hubbard family, with Cassandra, Frankie, etc. Funny thing is it took me a long time to get into them, but I'm finally am. The teens trying to cover up their hit and run isn't that bad of a story. I'm liking Sammuel/Erica/Jackson with some Carmen thrown in. Are the same old problems still there such as Krystal, Babe, and the propping of the Fuision gang? Yeah it is, but the presence of some other much needed stories as the ones I mentioned above seems to balance it out a little, just a little bit. Also, while I can't really get behind the absurdity of Annie losing her marbles and trying keep Ryan all to herself, it's slightly entertaining.

GL and Y&R are some other soaps I, surprisingly, find myself being entertained by.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I notice more and more people saying they watched online and would love to see numbers on how often shows are viewed that way no.

I also agree it's wrong to say the daily fluctuations are only due to who is on and what story, but it's equally wrong to say that doesn't matter at all. Whether we like it or not, there are a lot of viewers now who only watch for certain characters and will not watch when they aren't on. Or they won't watch stories or characters they can't stand. Some people also simply don't have the time to watch everyday and so they pick the days they watch based on who is on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The shares tell the most interesting story lately. They've only budged in a few places.

In households, all shows had the same share of the available audience they did last week.

In women 18-49, Y&R increased from a 10 to a 12% share, B&B went up from a 6 to an 8% share, AMC up from 7 to 8%, and both ATWT and DAYS were up from 6 to 7%. All other shows stayed the same.

In women 18-34, Y&R increased from 6 to 7%, DAYS from 4 to 5%, ATWT from 3 to 4%....and GH dropped from 7 to 6%. All other shows retained their same shares from last week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I kind of agree. The numbers show me that a 4.0 HH daily _is_ still possible for this show.

A big big big structural problem for the show remains Neil/Devon/Lily's story. CKLily, of course, continues to alienate some fans...but part of the problem is that the writing for her remains awful. (Here's hoping Chloe can help her ramp up her ferocity). Devon has no meaningful story, and he should. And Neil is now trapped in lackluster chemistry with TWO women. Neither Tyra nor Karen do it.

The thing is that Kristoff St. John is very very very good at what he plays: which is a stern, principled paterfamilias. So he needs a wild thing to season him, and make him interesting.

It is said that part of the viewer attrition is in fans of color. THEY MUST be given something they can find interesting. Of course, generally speaking, what one group finds to be interesting ALL GROUPS will find as interesting. Good writing is color blind.

Here is hoping we see this fixed soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • On the way to her own engagement party? I've read that the show had trouble getting the audience to sympathize with Rita, but...that seems bizarre. Maybe I can understand the issue with the censors, given that at the time, rape wasn't depicted the way it is now, and marital rape was even less acknowledged.  Wasn't Chris Brooks' rape one of the first honest stories on the subject? I just don't think I could get into a show I didn't have a working knowledge of. I know it's a different era, but I really tried to get into GH once Maura West joined, but it just never jelled.
    • Yes it was! My mom and I convinced my dad to get one. He was--how shall I put this?--on the thrifty side, but one day he came home with one as a surprise. To this day, I'm convinced it fell off a truck. (He knew people with "connections."

      Please register in order to view this content

      ) BUT, we had our VCR and we could watch our soaps. That thing lasted forever! It was built like a tank. Even when we got new ones with more features, we kept that one.
    • Please register in order to view this content

        Blasphemy!  (Haha, I get it.  But, you should try watching AMC! 80s-90s was so good.)
    • I thought about saying how I resented the fact that those two newbies were tripping up the Puppetmaster of all Puppetmasters, when the best others could do was a stalemate (or less...). But, well...*sigh*
    • I read years ago that both Zaslow and Lenore both complained that it came off as a seduction because of CBS censors, so Lenore asked if she could say, "you raped me" to leave no doubt with the audience, and that Zaslow insisted that Holly's rape played realistically 
    • Wow it’s official, Gatwa is out… https://www.avclub.com/ncuti-gatwa-addresses-doctor-who-finale-statement DW fandom on Reddit is in a furor over how things went down and apparent last minute scrapping of the original ending. Also…Billie Piper again really?
    • He comes pretty close, talkin' about how Reva is full of love and joy, blah blah....which is bilge considering he was the one responsible for throwing her out of Josh's life over working with Alan. 
    • Just watched the episode concerning Olivia's drug use and Abby's persistence, etc. Donna Mills did stellar work in this episode, as did Tonya Crowe and Brian Austin Green (Brian).
    • But by Dinah and Hart...Hart especially looked as if he could not tie his own shoes!  Ed, Holly, Alan, Alex Henry and Vanessa among others were not able to put Roger down....Dinah???
    • The preaching seems to end before the Barnes settle in late December, 1981. The stuff that felt overly religious (the Davidsons believing a miracle will save Lori rather than a surgeon, Jeff's miraculous recovery from a beam of light) was quickly nixed because it wasn't working. The closest thing that you get to that under the Barnes is when Dennis Fraser, the drunk driver who killed Nora and Scott, turns his life over to god. The born-again redemptions out of nowhere seem to stop fairly early into the Barnes' run. I do think Miriam's transformation was much more delicately done with her turning on her bestie Nancy because Nancy was seducing Charles, Miriam's wealthy father, so Miriam offers to testify for the Davidsons in the trial against Nancy over possession of Nora's house. In turn, Nancy repays the favor by pumping an emotionally distraught Miriam with barbituates while Miriam carries on her affair with low level thug turned political aide Norm Elliott. Miriam is used by everyone into her life and finally lands herself in the hospital becasue she has become so addicted to the pills. At the hospital, it is the friendship and kindness of the Davidsons that brings Miriam to a more peaceful place. The Davidsons ability to forgive is both appealing and, at times, dramatically limiting. In this case, the Davidsons lead Miriam to her new Mama, Ione Redlon. Now, under Vinley, Miriam is determined to reconnect with her son, Frederick, and her ex-husband, Paul.   My bigger issue with the Barnes' writing is that they write the storylines with twist endings that sorta come out of nowhere. I know the resolution to the Kate Carrouthers mystery sorta plays out like that so I am curious to see how I feel about that.  The biggest change throughout the writing teams has been the view of morality. Winsor had many characters who could be viewed purely through the lens of black and white, but others explored the shades of gray (often younger people). The brief head writerless period was much better at embracing an action doesn't make a person and there characters were much more gray or at least evil at a more local level (Nancy, in this period, only flirts with her brother-in-law where as later she is actively providing pills to Miriam to keep her addicted and away from her own father). The Barnes, for the most part, seem to embrace this level of political corruption that seems to permeate throughout the show making it clear that power (as well as money) is the root of evil. Even criminal Vince Cardello is presented as less evil than Charles Carpenter, though Carpenter's murder of a resident of his complex was rewritten to relieve Carpenter of any responsibility in the matter. Vinley's work seems more into exploring the why or delving deeper in general. Babs Farley, the hooker who is looking to reclaim her life, is such an intriguing character. She is given such meaningful monologues regretting her decisions and desperately trying to keep away from the hands of her former pimp, Ron Washington, who hasn't appeared yet. Monk and Fernandez seem to be wrongly accused of Lori's attack and there seems to be hints of racism that the show is looking to address. Marianne confronts Gil about his feelings towards God in relation to their mother's death years earlier.  There does seem to be a layer of misogyny to Vinley's work, but it's early so I'll be curious to see how this plays out. There are a lot of attacks on women (Lori is nearly raped, Babs was beaten, Nancy is on the verge of being blackmailed for sex by Tab, and the Russ / Marianne / Gil scenario has hints of toxic masculinity. It's very early so it'll be neat to see if that is maintained.  Jerry TImm lasts about a year I think (March, 1982 - March, 1983). One of the episodes on TouTube has a comment suggesting that Timm was fired by CBN because he had done something in his past that came to light. It didn't seem to be clear what that was.  I like what I've seen of Timm as Gil. He has such a presence that it covers up some of his weaker acting choices. It's unfortunate that he didn't get to play as much of the Gil - Stacey - Amber triangle as his replacement does.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy