Jump to content

Victor Miller Interview


Recommended Posts

  • Members

So, Daytime Confidential did an interview with Victor Miller (ex-writer of AMC, AW, GL, OLTL, and GH) in March (!) and I completely missed it until now. I don't recall any discussion about it, so even though its months old, I think it's still worth talking about. I encourage anyone who hasn't heard it to go and check it out.

Some comments:

- Although I think Victor "gets" it somewhat (he really talks at great length about the excellence of AMC's 80s glory days, and what made the show work), this interview is a bit disappointing because it essentially dissolves into how wonderful and amazing he thinks Megan McTavish is. Megan is the best headwriter he's ever worked with; she is a true "genius" and "brilliant." (Folks: This man worked under Wisner Washam, Agnes Nixon, Lorraine Broderick, Sam Hall and Peggy O'Shea).

- He starts off by talking about the Jesse/Angie returns and he basically blasts "the scabs and the union writers who turned their backs on their union" for resurrecting Jesse and says his return is an abomination. Which is completely fine (he's certainly entitled to his viewpoint), but it's kind of utterly ridiculous when in the next breath he's praising Megan McTavish for being a genius/brilliant and completely acts like an utter fool (and ultimately, dodges the question) when the unabortion is mentioned.

- He says that there's a lot of resentment in the Industry against Megan because she's "really tough" and does not suffer "fools gladly." She's "fired a lot of people," and he has never disagreed with a firing decision she's made (Funnily enough, Victor, fans have never disagreed with a decision to fire her). He then says later that when people are running out of "evil things" to say about her they start say that her storylines are "too dark," but he maintains that there's always light that comes out of them.

- He says that writing for AW was rough and that the show was dark and took itself too seriously (But yet you love Megan McTavish!!?!? Victor, come on!)

- When he and Megan were writing for GL, they read an article about a woman who was pregnant with twins (two different fathers), they loved it and pitched it to P&G to become the infamous Rick/Ross/Blake baby mess (a true abomination). P&G initially shot the story down but they were persistent and they finally said yes.

- When he was writing OLTL in the early 80s, Robin Strasser came to the writers' office complaining about the scripts. "Dorian would never say this [!@#$%^&*]!" Victor was there and he agreed to re-write her scenes for her, not knowing that was a big no-no that could've gotten him fired.

VERY interesting interview, but as someone who admired Victor's work a lot, this interview really shattered my illusion of him Bottom line: Victor's love affair with Megan is utterly mind-boggling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I remember listening to that interview.

I was stunned when, initially, he didn't even remember that he was writing for AMC during the unabortion story! That's pretty scary. It also suggests that he (and Megan) still have no idea what a travesty that story was because, if they did, he wouldn't have had to search his memory for that story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He seems to have a poor memory!

He didn't eremember Victoria Wyndham's name. He didn't even remember the names of the characters in the "Twins with Two Different Fathers Story" that he so loved.

If you take a look at his website autobiography, it's riddled with errors. (No, Megan did not bring you back to AMC after GL. You re-joined when Lorraine Broderick was still there. And Megan wasn't replaced with Richard Culliton -- she was replaced by Agnes Nixon & Jean Passanante. Remember? You wrote under them for two years post-Megan). Weird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

(paraphrasing, it's been a while since I listened to the interview)

Interviewer: What were your thoughts on the controversial re-writing of Erica's abortion?

Miller: I don't know what you're referring to.

Interviewer: The Josh Madden story.

Miller: Was I there for that? Oh.....yeah I think I was.

How can he forget being involved with the biggest plot blunder in the history of the show, which was only 2 years ago. IIRC he even wasn't sure at first if it was Megan who wrote it! Also, when the interviewer referred to it as the re-writing of Erica's abortion, nothing clicked for Miller. I don't think he gets what that story did or why people hated it (or even that they hated it). And if he doesn't get it then BFF Megan doesn't. One of the worst examples of out-of-touch soap writers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Truth be told, not many of us knows what actually transpires in your average soap scribes' room/conference. I'm not an MMT fan by any stretch of the imagination...but let's say, I give VM the proverbial benefit-of-the-doubt. Maybe, in spite of the litany of bad story decisions, as well as personal conflicts with this-or-that colleague, that trail her from show to show, MMT is, in fact, a halfway decent writer (and person). And maybe - just maybe - most of her ideas for AMC, GL, OLTL and GH started off beautifully, but persistent network/sponsor/producer/cast-member interference continually mucked up the execution...

Okay.

Now, pardon me while I go off to bathe, because I feel dirty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

All this proves to me is what I have had said about Tom Casiello. I love him but of course he is not going to come out and say Hogan was to blame for what happened at Days - he is going to focus blame elsewhere. These writers know who is going to hire them and who is not. They are going to stay on good terms with the Head Writers because it is them that will rehire them - not the producers - since the HW usually hires his staff.

I love Tom Casiello but I don't put 100% stock in what he says. I think he is partially right.

Just like here I think Victor is partially right but he missed the truth by a mile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know! It's like second verse, here we go again!  Agreed. Certainly there was concern maybe even fear at the highest levels for the very good reason that what they had was so economically successful, so of course this risk was scary but if anyone was brave she was. Yes, he was. I have seen her associated with getting it on the air one other place but no details nor official title. Not the writer or creator so it made me wonder if she functioned as a kind of uncredited ad hoc producer, but then maybe she just supported it. At any rate that is nothing but supposition on my part. No data! Yes, not a surprise anymore but still so frustrating! On one hand I am appreciative that she is included in this book, but scholarship where are you?!
    • that wasnt her point. She wanted to further demonize Ted; that was the main focus of their talk. She wants to ensure that Nicole leaves him so that he's free and single to be with her. At this point, I dont think she really cares what Nicole thinks of her; she just wants her out of the way Eva is Nicole's stepdaughter and is a Dupree by association. If Nicole takes Ted back then its reasonable that she would accept his daughter and i that happens, Eva will have welcomed to their country club, be invited to their parties, have access to their resources, etc....much like Andre whom also isnt a blood Dupree but is accepted by them via Nicole. Eva got what she got from Anita bc of Hayley. I think its important to remember that context bc they just dealt with an interloper that infiltrated their ranks and hurt her daughter in the worse way. Now you have another unfortunate girl positioned to do the same to her other daughter. The feelings are still too fresh and she doesnt want Eva to get the idea that she would ever be allowed the opportunity to play them again
    • Oh I've seem this! That's part of why I'm curious! The show could put EastEnders to shame on the gangster Aspect! Oh I've seem this! That's part of why I'm curious! The show could put EastEnders to shame on the gangster Aspect!
    • Eve was one of those characters that had the "Jessie Brewer"role. They had heavy storyline, they burned through it and now they are there for support and a touchstone in the community (Marland wanted to give Jessie story, but I agree with Monty...she best served in her connecting role, and keeping that damn Amy Vining busy so she keeps her nose out of things) So charcters are important and why they should have kept characters like Bridget around (even as she is more volatiles then Eve) who didnt need a big storyline but could have been behind the bar making connections and expostion, but Rauch wanted JEVA/JEVA/JEVA and DRAMA (which to him meant a lot of yelling and stupidity.)
    • Why do I feel like (or remember possible

      Please register in order to view this content

      ) Mark Dante operated on Jeff? Also, I was under the impression that Jeff shot himself accidentally. In his drunken stupor he saw Rick and Monica together and he thought hevwas shooting at them.
    • A number of errors in the above article. You wonder how with all that research,how  they slipped through. I think they are conflating Women Alone with Lonely Women. I have never read anything of a serial called Women Alone. However,I am prepared to be proven wrong.   It seems Irna actually WAS interested in TV soaps as witnessed by These Are My Children airing in 1949 on NBC in the early days of TV.   I don't believe that was reluctance, rather simply good business sense as radio's dominance began to wane.   Inferring that was somehow connected to Irna who was off that show 10 years prior.   Again inferring that Phillips leaving 6 years prior had some connection to the eventual cancellation.     Again these two events are in fact one. Irna left ATWT only once in 1970 and returned in 72. She was not working on another P&G show at the time. So either she brought the ratings up or they dipped, depending on which above account you believe   Untrue. A World Apart debuted 5 years after she left AW. And AWA aired longer than a few months. Over a year in fact.   I believe Orin Tovrov was the writer. Irna was not involved in the creation of this show. And no mention of Masquerade an Irna serial  which was on air around this time.   TBD finished in 1962. As we see over and over, these inaccuracies are published and accepted as fact.
    • YES! While I objectively found the writing on RH (particularly during its first few years and then again in its final days) to be excellent, so many of the principle characters were unpleasant, and totally turned me off. I could never settle down and become emotionally involved with a group of people who grated on my nerves.
    • Ugh now we get a Emmerdale and Corrie crossover soon. ugh.. How desperate 
    • This show is definitely not one to deserve the axe.  especially the New Year’s Eve episode was crazy wild! there is a place where u can download nearly all episodes from October 2019 til today. But they don’t accept new people. https://youtu.be/aD-IXEJjymU?si=19wtpwthSNYOe-4y   this is from this years winter break when the returned. I loved it
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy