Jump to content

Unpopular Opinions


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

What else do you need to know? He's overrated for a show that is overrated. His work has always been slow and mundane. Agnes Nixon has always been very socially relevant, not campy like Bill. Yet, you don't really hear her praised as much as your here Bill and the rest of the Bell's. His son Bradley is as much as hack as Guza, Pratt, Brown & Esenstine.

I think most people praise him because they look at the long time success of Y&R, but you must remember, Bill Bell had to make many changes in the beginning because the show wasn't an instant success. He also wrote out the entire original cast except for Jill by the 1980s. The show did decline when it was moved to 1pm EST. So, like I said due to some of the shows success (or most of) it's because of it's early time period. And again, most people would just naturally assume a writer is so incredible because their show has been number 1 for so long by not looking at all the pieces of it's upward mobility through the Neilson's.

Here is a question for you Sylph, do you think Bill Bell is not overrated, if so, please elaborate. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I like reading clever replies, what can I do.

Do I find him overrated? I don't know; I am re-evaluating him. Whereas there are things where he is still the supreme master (payoffs, angst-ridden love stories, great climaxes, he wrote rich people best...), there are also some serious shortcomings (endless recycling of stories, snail pace, non-existent ear for dialogue, at times pretentious and naively didactic...)...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think he wrote the rich pretty well. I think Agnes also created the rich on her shows rather good as well. For example, the Lord's of Llanview and the Tyler's of Pine Valley were the epitome of how the rich from Philadelphia's Main Line lived. The new moneyed Cortlandts and Chandler's were very good as well. The European Marick's were also great, very dark.

But back to Y&R, I think he dependent on that a lot to keep the interest of the audience, family's like the Abbott's, Chancellor's and Newman's front and center instead of the more realistic Foster's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IA with a lot of the pros and the cons about Bill Bell's writing indicated here. However, to say that Agnes Nxon never gets the love that Bill Bell does? I don't know about that. Agnes is considered a goddess around here. I have never heard one iota of criticism about her vision or her writing on this thread -- or, indeed, anywhere else on SON. When people talk about the Jesse-Angie reunion and its critical and commercial success in helping to lift AMC out of Cancellationville, there are still those who believe that Nixon came in from the shadows to pen that story alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No, I know what you mean. I wasn't implying that Agnes was under appreciated. I know she is highly praised and regarded all around for her work. I think the success of Y&R which I also believe has much to do with the time it comes on contributes to more of the Bell hype.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

How did you understand my remark? I meant that she wrote rich people, middle class, poor, she wrote health & social issues, she wrote romance and business intrigue. When Bill attempted something like that, social issues for example, he was too didactic and preachy. And some things — he didn't attempt at all. She also helmed or created a platoon of very different shows: Guiding Light after that famous Irna Phillips write-off, Another World, One Life, Children and Loving! All very, very distinct, different shows. Whereas take a look at Bill. There's a big difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Two very different writers IMO. Lemay might have been Marland's mentor, but Marland's GL and ATWT had a significantly different tone and structure than Lemany's AW from everything I've read so far.

By all means, Marland strikes me more as a traditionalist when it comes to soaps, Lemay, not so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

:mellow: Where did this come from?! :lol:

Who said anything about their similarity? I like them precisely because of their difference. And what does traditionalist mean? You don't like him?

Your list is topped by Nancy Curlee?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I have not gone back to watch much of 1987, but from what I've seen lately, it doesn't feel like the writers or producers had any sort of plan. The show feels as if it's constantly in flux.  I will give it credit for this. It's watchable for the most part minus Lisa/Jamie which I find nearly unwatchable now.   I don't find Cheryl mousy. I think she has a lot of quiet strength, but she was saddled with the Scott romance which the writers did not invest in. She had a good friendship with Julie (also criminally underused), and her interactions with Ada were enjoyable as well. I also like Layman, but Spencer was extremely talented and when Cass returns, Schnetzer and Spencer have some wonderful scenes. Spencer also fits in with Alexander, Hogan, and Marie.  I'd forgotten just how much I missed seeing Wallingford. IT was so good to see him again. Even when they didn't have a major plot, Felicia/Cass/Wallingford/Mitch always brings a smile to my face.  
    •   Dani’s cute ass party planner. He gave me some tea but I was so drunk I don’t remember it.
    • NBC must have been grateful to have LHOTP, it's only hit and still strong after several seasons. Their next established show was Rockford Files at 45th. They didn't develop any comedies and relied on movies and mini series  which didnt establish viewer loyalty and habits. Their only new hit was mid season's Project UFO which debuted Feb up against Rhoda/On Our Own on CBS and How the West Was Won on ABC. It opened with a strong 36 share beating CBS and close to ABC as HTWWW had a 36 share over 3 hours. The next week UFO saw a respectable 32 share, then a 31 so it was slipping. A 28 share followed but a few weeks later it jumped back up to a 34. So no blockbuster but compared to what else they had, there was potential, So next season NBC sent it to Thursday up against Mork and The Waltons and it bombed.  They were smart to see potential in Chips, which took off on Saturdaysnext season. ABC was on a roll with Love Boat, 3's Company, Taxi, Eight is Enough adding to their hits. Their only real flops were Redd Foxx and San Pedro Beach Bums, an Aaron Spelling misfire. Like Redd Foxx, Harvey Korman was lured to ABC but his series was a filler that did well but was considered a time slot hit. Nancy Walker and Rob Reiner were also given series on the philosophy that not only were they popular names, their absence from popular shows like Sanford, Rhoda and All in the Family might weaken those shows. CBS were relying on old favorites. Betty White was strong the first few weeks then faded. Incredible Hulk was their strongest newbie. It was lucky for CBS that NBC was doing so badly or else some of their weaker shows would have really suffered.
    • That outfit looks like something Martin would wear lol.
    • Omg not we both ran into people from the show this weekend!
    • I guess he was let out the gates, because he's outside. 
    • Yup.  You can hate John all you want, but like seriously he was the cornerstone of the show for years.  So he should get a long ass funeral and burial and all the things because Drake and John deserve that.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      look who’s at a party I’m at
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy