Jump to content

EastEnders: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

 

DTC nearly did but felt she shouldn't be recast. I tend to agree with that, but Sue Tully obviously is never returning, and while I have my issues with the show of late, I do think they are in a better place for a character like Michelle than DTC's run, which likely would have said Gavin was her pimp. I guess we'll see. 

 

I agree about Denise's mother, although I don't like that they renamed her Emerald. It sounds like a Prince backup artist. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

 

They renamed Denise's mother? Why? So stupid. I've been at arms length with EE as of late. I'll probably slide back into watching it some time this week. I do wanna see Roxy and Ronnie's asses depart on New Years. 

 

Now that you've pointed it out, now would be the proper time to recast Michelle as DTC would've had Michelle doing stupid sh-t. I still get pissed how they told that abysmal story and reveal of Mark Jr. that went nowhere. I hate how they stripped him of any history and made him some English chap when it was always stated that Mark was raised stateside. Just so many flubs in that stupid ass story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

It's so early - she doesn't look or sound much like Sue Tully, which is going to take time to get used to, but I'll give her a chance, as I think Michelle could add a lot to the show if written properly. 

 

I already ranted about the Phil stuff in this episode at Walford Web so I'll spare you reading it, but I just hate this story for Denise. And it's so damn boring too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

At least they recast her with a critically acclaimed actress with a strong theatre background. O'Connor actually tried and I give him props for that.

 

Could you imagine DTC trying to recast Michelle? 

Please register in order to view this content

 

He'd cast a weak actress who would've disappointed. 

 

I'd be interested to see what you felt about Phil, but I am over Denise's baby story too. I feel like no regime even tries with her when she has all the story in the world via Libby, Chelsea, and Jordan. Bring her damn kids back full-time! Everyone else's brats are back on the Square but hers. It's annoying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I'll just repost what I wrote there:

 

Finally managed to watch the whole episode. The writing seemed to go through the sentimental checklist, to varying degrees of success. As soon as I saw the black cat wandering through scenes just to remind viewers Something Is Coming, I wasn't sure how much to expect. 

The emotions of Dot's last day were marred a little for me by having absolutely no one make an appearance at her party, in spite of the markets likely having plenty of people who would at least want a sandwich and various residents who had no reason to not pop in for even a second unless they're just completely callous. Thankfully June Brown's performance and the wonderful scene where she found the mixtape, plus her final walk out of the launderette, overshadowed the cliches. 

Not so fortunate were the scenes with Phil, which jarred right from the start with Shirley telling Phil the man she'd loved was strong (the man she loved was broken, and she wanted it that way, which is why she encouraged him to drink, so he'd be in the gutters with her). Of course she isn't going to tell Phil what a loser he was, she wants to encourage him, but none of that sounded like her. This segued to the really terrible shoutfests in the cafe with Sharon and Kathy and Sharon and Louise. What "15-year old" girl would scream that her stepmother was a "selfish little cow"? Did someone get the dialogue mixed up? I see that Louise has also managed to get over her supposed grief over Phil to have more giggling with Bex over the great new life she's going to have without Shakil. There are two versions of this character, neither all that believable. 

More bad dialogue was on the way with Denise and Phil, as they went through the motions of his shaming her for being pregnant (oh the irony - it's his child) to her shaming him over his kids being beyond all hope (oh the irony - she's carrying his child). I remember during the terrible drinking-and-rutting scenes that started this story, people kept talking about the incredible chemistry between Steve and Diane. I didn't see it then, and I don't see it now. It's a shame, because another Christmas, when Ben gave her evidence of Phil's role in Kevin's death, I did see a good rapport between the actors. Maybe because that was natural, based on a tragedy Denise has never fully put behind her. This baby story is just generic soap melodrama, and the acting can't save it. Everything about Phil wandering off to be alone just so he can be reminded to come back is generic melodrama - there's no real reason to be sad because we knew it wouldn't last. There was no real reason to feel Sharon's anger, because we knew it wouldn't last, and we've seen her have this reaction 500 times before over everything from Phil helping to murder Dennis Sr. to Phil causing her to get beaten up to Phil hiring a con artist to play her father. She's not a wife, she's a mug. 

Lee desperately trying to hide from the man he stole from - more silliness in what used to be a good storyline. I just want this to be over. The scene where he met Michelle was supposed to be passing the torch, in a sense - the old is new, and the new will soon be old - but all I could think was I hope they give her better writing than they gave poor Lee. 

Other than being confused as to why Mick was happily singing and dancing right after comforting his devastated wife over her mother's stroke, the panto scenes were a nice enough diversion, with entertainingly bad performances and holiday warmth. 

The family scenes with the Fowlers were what I enjoyed most in the episode, from Martin and Stacey grossing everyone out with knowledge of their sex life to the quiet scenes with Jane and Ian and Martin and Stacey, to her hilarious freakout over the cat. To use another cliche, they're the future of the show, and I'm glad SOC knows this.

Sharon's moving reaction when she saw Michelle at the end is what I want to see most for her, and felt so much more like her than the hoary old camp on display with her earlier in the episode. May that die with 2016 and may Michelle's return be the harbinger for better and better things for Sharon Watts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I didn't know about the broken embargo. Then again, I still haven't rekindled my love affair with Eastenders so these things are passing me by.

 

In fact, I only see bits and pieces of each British soap and only fully watch Y&R and Home and Away consistently as well as focusing on my own writing. 

 

I'm hearing of improvements to Coronation Street and I'm still adjusting to McLeod's tinkered version of Emmerdale, but is Eastenders (in general) worth getting back into? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not currently watching but just watched the Christmas Eve and Christmas Day episodes. I can't stand that Denise is pregnant by Phil. I mean, WTF? That man doesn't need anymore kids to verbally abuse. And that's all they can write for Denise? Please.

 

I love that they brought Michelle back and it's nice to see Sharon with a friend. The new actress does look a bit similar and since I'm not attached to the old one I liked her a lot.

 

It was hard to really enjoy the holiday cheer because these people are so ugly towards each other most of the time. And they seem to get off on Dot being all alone. I don't. I was glad they all came together at the pub and gave her a washing machine. I haven't followed much but she's losing her eyesight?

 

And Max? EW. I've never got his appeal at all. I did watch a clip of Tanya slapping Stacey over I guess Stacey and Max had an affair back around 2007? I wanted to know why she was all happy to see him so I went searching. I wanted to slap Stacey as she comes off so nasty half the time. Is that supposed to be appealing? LOL. Sometimes this show and their harsh characters and tone kind of depresses me but I may try to watch again.

Edited by KMan101
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I'm back! We are back! Me and my husband are finally back at our favorite hobby! How could I postpone returning to this amazing show for so long??? What was I thinking??? Another World - February 2nd, 1989 The dead will revenge the living 

      Please register in order to view this content

      Bay City better be ready, because I'm back!   At Vicky's apartment she is once again drowning in doubts and jealousy. Deep down she realizes that her dream wedding will be a farce and nothing can change that. Bridget tries to calm her down, but the heroine is determined to suffer. She is not hearing any positive thoughts. She doesn't believe Jamie will marry her. At the Cory Publishing building another farce is in process. Iris, once again pretending to be the angel of love and sisterhood... is telling Mac and Rachel some wonderful news. When Iris has good news, you really need to look out for yourself. That's when things are bad. So what are the news? Miss Devil has put Amanda up for an award! Mac is smiling from ear to ear, and Rachel is suspicious. Maybe that's the effect Iris is looking for. To once again accent on the fact that Rachel doubts and criticizes her daughter. Iris will do anything to destabilize their relationship. She is like a cancer. Back to Vicky! Jamie is at the door. Looking like a sad puppy, he has come with a surprise. No, he is not gonna leave her and her unborn... Not yet. He has bought her earrings. Sad face. How nice. NOT. Victoria, of course... manages to break one of them the moment she touches it. Bad premonition maybe? She was back in hysterics. It's not easy to trap a man into marriage. Then you have to live with someone that didn't want you in the first place.  We were introduced to a new character (to me at least she is new) - Cass's sister - Stacey. She is giving me "hidden skeletons in the closet"-vibes. Love a girl like that. Stunning actress. I like her. The highlight of the episode was the strange and creepy reveal of Evan the escort... hugging someone named Janice's grave. I remember she had an issue with Rachel... and Rachel killed her in self defense I think... It was hinted in prior episodes, but I lack the context and story. I just know that everyone at the Frame house was mad that Rachel killed the bish. But I also got the impression that this Janice was sick in the head. So Evan is now talking to her grave and telling her he is going to ruin Rachel's life basically. Oh, Evan... I liked you better as a sexy gigolo.  Overall - 10/10 - how can I rate it lower when I haven't watched in months!!!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Once again, Marlena and Kayla were used very effectively and I couldn’t be happier.  Marlena counseling Johnny and then Chanel was the best part of today. They’re really delving into the human emotion of this storyline and I think that’s a good thing. It feels so much mature than it was before. EJ’s fear about what could happen to Johnny if he doesn’t let go of his anger could lead to some really good storylines in the future.  I also really appreciate the way that Paula/Jeanne are mixing it up and having different characters interact with each other. It was nice to see Shawn and Johnny remember that they’re cousins and share a scene together. I liked the parallel that was drawn between the two of them, and what’s going on with their fathers. I did have mixed feelings about everything with Cat though. I enjoyed Chanel warning her about EJ, mostly because it played into the way that she was written today. But I wasn’t the biggest fan of the Chad/EJ scenes. The two of them discussing Chad’s potential feelings for Cat didn’t really keep my interest.  But above all, I feel that everyone is being used more effectively and that we’re getting a better understanding of everyone as well. And that was exactly what Days needed.  
    • It's a wild story for sure, especially the final conclusion (and fireworks offcamera, like Victoria Wyndham tearing into Michael Logan).
    • @I Am A Swede @DRW50  

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • I did some research and the story wrapped up with Eric,a caretaker responsible for Georgina's death who then  tried to do away with Laurie but a vision of Georgina spooked him and he smashed into a mirror, dying of glass wounds. So there was a supernatural element. I wonder if the Brody character in the credits was Eric Brody?
    • AI has it wrong. David was working as an aide at PV Hospital due to failing to save his brother's life and refusing to continue as a doctor. His true profession was revealed later. Edna had divorced him while he was in Vietnam and he had no reason to be in contact with her. He had no idea that he had a daughter.  Ruth was Ruth Martin, she was still married to Joe, not Jeff. He was not deceiving Ruth as he believed that Edna was his ex. The poisoning story happened late in his run and probably introduced when they knew Gleason was leaving. AI's interpretation of him as conniving seems to based on that short lived poisoning story and other misinformation. For most of 76 he was involved in the Ruth/Joe triangle to the point where Ruth was ready to divorce Joe and leave town. Joe had to have surgery, David operated and Ruth suddenly realized she wanted to stay with Joe despite all the problems they'd been happening. David then got involved with Christina with Jeff and then Edna as complications. And he arrived late 75 not 76.
    • Interesting that they started going into a supernatural direction with ghosts - I don't think they really did that before? I wonder if it was a response to getting put so late in the afternoon and I guess trying to appeal to that former Dark Shadows audience? 
    • That makes sense then! Is there a place where you can read more Daytime Serial Newsletters? They sound very informative. Thank you

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy