Jump to content

Some Soaps to Axe Previews to Cut Costs!


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

No, they never have, but they do have video previews for the next day on boldandbeautiful.com. I think that's what all soaps should do - just have the previews on their websites.

But they should NEVER cut opening credits. I love watching the opening credits. Y&R and B&B both have great openings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it's a good idea. Most of the 'previews' are actually let downs...particularly Y&R. Whoever picks the clips for their previews should be fired...B&B has never done them so for me I know that I have to watch B&B to see what's going to happen.

When it comes to opening credits...I think the ABC soaps, ATWT, and GL would all be well served to cut them down to the bare minimum, B&B should go back to it's old opening that had that fabulous 80s jazzy theme with the Vogue style headshots. Y&R should go back to the more classic version. DAYS has the most classic opening, Mac's voice is the best!

That being said, I am willing to bet that Susan Lucci has her placement in the opening credits in her contract. She's been at the end of the photo album for decades, I don't think she'd give that up. In AMC's case I think they are well served with having Lucci so closely identified with it. To many fans she IS AMC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For me it's mostly what MarkH. said. My formative soap years were the 70's and I remember the older, shorter themes, like DAYS has now. Another World had interlocking rings and a beautiful piece of music. (we called the rings "bums" as kids, how we tried to draw behinds) ATWT had the globe, EON had the Cincinatti skyline, Love of Life had the "Window"...

I think Y&R was the first to do "characters" but they were rather crude line drawings at first.

And AMC had that DAMN BOOK! For about a year it seemed, my sister Tracey (aka Spacey Tracey) ran around the house, opening every book she could find, humming, "Da da da, da da, da da da da, Da da DAAAAH, Da da da da da da"

I can still hear her doing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have to say that I am not a fan. There are some times when previews are really needed. I remember one time on AMC that had a preview of Josh being hung up in a meat locker and had they not shown the preview for that episode I most likely wouldn't have watched it. There was no build up at all and it was completely random (on a Wednesday of all days) to have such action and interesting plot point. Sometimes Previews are the deciding factors for watching certaint shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Doesn't some soap, maybe ATWT? , preview the second half of the show? Something like, "coming up on _______" that plays when it's half over.

I remember when Shelia/Kimberlin Brown came back to B&B in 01 or 02, and they had to keep her hidden from everybody on set so nobody would know she was there. Seems extreme just to keep a secret.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That could easily back fire and have ratings drop. Soaps are very repetitive and monotonous often repeating and harping on the same plot issues daily for months on end. I know the very reason I tune into soaps is either because I am excited about what's happening on the said day or because I am aware of spoilers or because I am bored and I need something in the background. Spoilers and Day aheads are a deciding factor to why I watch I know the shows are definetly not that interesting to watch daily without prior knowledge. Especially shows like Days, ATWT, Y and R, AMC and GH which are all decidedly lacking in quality. I could easily catch the meaty stuff on youtube and not even bother watching live. Unless the soaps are going to get better in terms of writing this is going to serve a very moot point. Isolating the veiwer by cutting out pseudo interesting upcoming clip scenes is a bad move, especially since the writing is so horrid. You need something to entice the viewers into choosing to watch consistently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The ratings were higher years ago because the shows were a lot better than they are now and alot of the shows were either doing new things or old things in a new way. Nowadays, every show is just throwing every ultra-cliched plot point in the book on the screen for shock value to see if anything will stick with audiences. Almost nothing has for any show in years and since there is always so much needless shock, nobody takes most of these developments seriously anyway, so the notion that people will just be dying to tune in tomorrow if there suddenly wer no previews is kind of silly IMO. Same thing with spoilers.

Another big factor is that people who watched soaps in the past had more of a luxury of watching everyday to see what would happen. That's just not as true today. The number of stay-at-home moms and students who don't have to work their way through school is way down, the number of people working 2-3 jobs just to make is up, and our lifestyles are generally pretty hectic. If people can fit their soaps in now, it's usually only via DVR or tape, with them FFing whatever looks boring or whatever characters they don't like so they can fit it into their lives. The lack of 20 snippet clips isn't gonna change that. Like I watched GL on Wednesay and they showed a preview for Thursday's show and it was all Ava, Remy, and Grady. So I didn't watch because I couldn't care less about those characters if I tried and the writing isn't good enough to make them interesting.

Previews and spoilers definitely help me decide which days I'll watch and which days I won't even bother with. If they do away with previews completely and eventually spoilers, it'll kill what little is left of this industry. Most people are simply not gonna be willing or able to watch 5 episodes a week, every week to make sure they don't miss anything. They'll give their shows up rather than sit through 80% garbage they don't care about just to see 20% they do when they have alot of other things to do and with so many of the shows sucking, it'll be easy for most to walk away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • When Robert Calhoun became EP I thought GL was finally hitting its stride after some pretty rough years. Unfortunately the ratings during Robert Calhoun's run did not reflect the quality of the show.
    • There was a five week break between the last Friday episode and the Thursday episodes which were the final four episodes. I have a feeling the final four episodes were refilmed to wrap up the storylines. 
    • Yes, I forgot there was a gap between his exit from GL and his start at ATWT. This almost makes me want to cry. He really turned ATWT around (and good for them). It would have been great if someone had done the same for GL. Can't imagine who. The Dobsons were doing Santa Barbara at this point. I mainly blame Kobe. She may not have been the worst EP they ever had, but she almost totally destroyed the Bauers and decimated much of the rest of the cast, sometimes for egotistical reasons. That was a huge mistake and made it that much harder for the show to recover.
    • Douglas Marland began at As the World Turns in September 1985 but it took about a year for his run to show growth in the ratings. 1986 As the World Turns becomes CBS's #2 daytime drama after Y&R.
    • This is not at all surprising. Watching the recently uploaded episodes, the uneveness is SO apparent. Characters are changing at the drop of a hat. The stories are close to incoherent. It's a mess, and we're only up to May. What a fall from grace. An Emmy-winning show with good ratings and within a few short years hitting possible cancelation territory.  I'm surprised CBS and/or P&G didn't try to do SOMETHING to restore its former glory. Was Marland still at ATWT at this point? 
    • I think she did, yes. The only part of that return I remember appreciating was the ripoff they did of Earrings of Madame De, where a secretly broke India sold a trinket and Ross or Alan (I think it was Ross) then bought it for her, not knowing it was hers.
    • 6-4   Getting around to the rewatching and I guess Dani/Bill/Hayley as A story is coming around better to me. I hope that means that I will feel different about Friday's episode which first time around I felt was more of a Wednesday/Thursday episode. Anita's story and Dani/Bill/Hayley (with Kat vs SilkPress being a solid B plot to keep the SilkPress storyline alive, but NOT A story) have been the focus for this past week. So I'm worried I'll feel a way when I get back to Friday's episode. I guess I'm about to find out.   I know I have issues with Dani/Bill/Hayley coming back into focus since the much better paced SilkPress storyline is truly where it's at with so much aftermath/new direction to explore. However, I'm finding that...just like with the story of Martin's secret being slowly woven back into the story narrative...I care a little bit more for it since it's been background since Week 3, Month 1. IMHO the characters...outside of Hayley...have been developed in other plots. The past week and a half has had Dani and Andre growing closer and they have gotten to the 'third month what are we?' talk that I expect in all relationships in real life. And I liked how the writers have slowly had friction between them to see what they are made of? Is it still just a booty call or can it be more? Meanwhile, Bill has been hiding his physical issues for months. Too busy messing with other people's marriages.

      Please register in order to view this content

          So now that they have some more POV to them, it was good to see an organic...and yes, it was organic...reason for them to be in the same room. In this case...the hospital room. Lord, Karla and Timon have such great chemistry. And Dani and Bill were so acting like exes. No wonder Hayley feels threatened. Oh, well. lol. Bonus...the drama with Bill has Hayley and Naomi back in each other's orbit. They don't have enough scenes together.    You all know I was waiting for Anita's story. So how am I feeling? Pretty good. TT has been playing it to the hilt. And I was not expecting the story of a fourth member who killed themselves after being pushed out. And it's had a build. First through Tracy. And now with Sharon...who is swiftly being established as a piece of work. A Have-Not (if not Has-Been) who is not above scheming. Okay. lol. I liked the conversation between Anita and Vernon where she told him the truth, and he tried to hold her up. Whether she deserved it or not, it was good to see. I'm sure all of the secrets are not out yet so I look forward to more. Cuz we know they are not cancelling the reunion. Which fingers crossed...will be at the police fundraiser.     Honestly, I continued to be impressed with how the writers have kept Silk Press Sheila out of jail, but still playing the beats of it all. She's definitely in covering her tracks mode, and it's great to watch. It's also great to see her mixing it up with different characters. I was happy to get the long-awaited showdown between her and Nosy Nurse and Nosy Nurse READ...HER...DOWN. I was just disappointed Nosy Nurse spilled some tea. And that led to SilkPress's scene with Andre. And then Andre...lord...talked too much.   C plot this episode has been Chelesa's love life. I was wondering where it was going to go after her talk with Vernon. Enter...Mystery Woman. I wonder what her secret would be that would get in her way with Chels. Related to an enemy of the Duprees? Married? I am intrigued. And I do like Chelesa getting the spotlight because daytime does not really do it like how they are doing it with her.    Can Kat and Jacob get a spinoff? lol. 
    • 1986 began with the EP change from Gail Kobe to Joe Willmore and the HW change from Pamela Long to Jeff Ryder. Over the course of 1986 there was turnover in the HW ranks: Jeff Ryder, Jeff Ryder and Mary Ryan Munisteri as co-HWs, Mary Ryan Munisteri and Ellen Barrett as co-HWs, Joseph Manetta, Joseph Manetta and Sheri Anderson as co-HWs. The 1986 ratings reflected the quality of the show. GL was saved from cancel territory in 1986 because Capitol was still CBS's lowest-rated daytime drama.
    • As Michael should be...DARK.   I'm just getting through my first few scenes of Rory as Michael. And I'm already picking up chemistry with LW, EMcCoy, and SMattson from the jump. I liked Rory as Noah on Y&R, but felt it was wasted potential. So far...he's proving me right. 
    • Oh, lord. Those rumors are true, aren't they?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy