Jump to content

GL: June discussion


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Since no one has started a new thread for June, I figured I'd get one started. Even though the GL discussions have been almost non-existent.

I have to say that the month of June thus far has been more of the same. Bad pacing, character destruction and inexplicable location shots.

Who knew that Jeffrey's shooting would bring him so many flowers?!?! He had more flowers in his room than Gus and Tammy combined. I guess if you rape someone (twice), you get a lot more love from the people of Springfield.

They still haven't addressed the gay guy that Josh think slept with his wife (thanks to Cyrus). When is that going to happen? I so want him to dump Cassie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Yeah, I post up GL clips and I'm able to watch them in its entirety and a YouTube member is very nice in providing the daily previews as well which was a request that I wanted, so yeah, I know what's going on now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The only situation in daytime history that in any way really compares to the current state of GL (and I’m stretching this theory here for all its worth) was the state of GENERAL HOSPITAL in late 1977 when ABC hired Gloria Monty and Doug Marland to pretty much put the program to bed in thirteen weeks. From what I understand, GH at the time was beyond tired and worn out, a good candidate for the cancellation pile. The core audience of housewives that had made the show successful in its early years had long since fled, and the only answer to the show's survival was to hook a new audience (that being a time when TPTB weren't obsessed with only getting a YOUNGER audience...at that time ANY audience would do). Monty and Marland then used both revolutionary production techniques AND (most importantly) STRONG STORYTELLING and RICH CHARACTERIZATIONS...the kind of characters and stories that got people talking. In less than a year, Monty and Marland did the unprecedented: they not only saved GH from the axe, but they lured a totally new HUGE viewership.

IMO GUIDING LIGHT has two options now. The first is to accept the fact that the show will soon end, and with that realization the team being the LIGHT decides to give it there all and go out with at least a little dignity and pride, if not a bang. In the past, some shows have gone this route: THE DOCTORS, arguably SEARCH FOR TOMORROW, in a way LOVING, and GENERATIONS come to mind.

The second option is to go for broke and truly commit to saving the show by turning out a daily product that is far superior to anything else out there, a la GH in the late 70's. The attempt at the new production model is a step in that direction regardless of the fact that honestly it was launched not to be revolutionary but instead in order to work with a drastically slashed budget. With the proper producers and directors, this new model can really work...but in order for that to happen, THERE HAS TO BE STORY IN PLACE.

One of my favorite shows hands down is BBC's EASTENDERS. When GL launched the new model I tuned in faithfully the first month or so because suddenly the show struck me as really being real and relatable just like EE. The opportunity was there for GL to dump the conventions of daytime soaps that in this day and age have really worn the genre down (such as tired clichés and stereotypical storytelling)...I was rooting for the show to zero in on the now highly visible Springfield as a modern American community peopled with characters whose actions and tales would reflect the real world as we know it in the 21st century. Instead, GL went in a totally different direction: they threw out the core tenets of daytime drama that make it work such as continuity, ongoing and intersecting plots, and the overall themes of love, family, and eventual dramatic payoff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^ ^ Great post, Sedrick. ICAM.

I caught the show today. Reva looked fabulous. It appears as though the "Reva's movie" story is getting to her. Possibly leading to a Josh/Reva reuniting? Looks that way. They still haven't shown any aftermath of Josh finding out the supposed "other man" is actually gay. WTF is going on with that story? Of course, it's meant less Cassie on my screen, which is a good thing.

Well, well, well. Cyrus now has a younger brother on the show - G. Surprise. NOT! I really really wish they would just send his ass back down under. His usefulness has worn off and it's high time for the character to LEAVE SPRINGFIELD.

Tomorrow looks like more of the same. But I seem to enjoy torture, so I'll probably have it on in the background....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow...I didn't think anyone else hated Ashlee besides me. I spent that gagworthy "love scene" obsessively staring at Coop's weird sideburns and ear.

I hate to ask...but WTF was Cyrus searching Harley's house for? I missed something, and he spent half the episode circling her kitchen table and searching her van for something.

G/Cyrus, bros? Why...because everyone in Australia knows each other? G is worthless in the first place. He's a bad Jon clone (hmmn...could there be a good Jon clone...there's a condundrum if I ever heard one...)

And that Reva movie. Sttttuuuuuppppiiiiiiddddd and annoying. The only thing that could have saved those scenes is getting a classic flashback of the very same scene from Reva.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Has anyone ever posted January and February 1974? I can't find them in the 'Look Back to 75' thread. Thanks.
    • Did January and February 1974 DSN ever get posted? I can't seem to find it in this thread.
    • I agree. Especially after SilkPress got back to her apartment and started to mock Nicole. Her dislike for Nicole and seeing her as a threat to her getting Teddy Bear is growing worse. So I could see her pulling a kidnapping on Nicole at some point. If anything she was going there to poke the bear and got pressed (pun unintended) when the bear gathered her.   Completely understandable. 
    • Beyond The Underwear Oops I mean Gates!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I swear this entire time I thought Roman knew about the Phillip/Vivian letter lol.  I do like how mature Roman/Kate are as a couple.  It makes me sad the new writers never got a chance to write for John/Marlena. I agree with @AbcNbc247 that the Felicity stuff is a bit after school special-y.  I am pretty sure that (most) of the viewing audience is aware that a grown man should not be shouting at any teenage girl especially one with disabilities.  Just let Xander apologize and move on. Linsey Godfrey was in her Sarah baby voice mode today and it irritates me to no end.   I know it's a cutesy thing her and Xander do but it's annoying. Bringing Kevin back is strange, but I do like the use of history.  I do think Rex probably could have been used instead, but whatever.  I don't care about Rex much either lol.
    • I mean over the past decades. But I do agree that in recent years now, the writing is not working for them as well as it used to then. It's same old, same old...which is what made the Damian storyline refreshing. At least for me.   
    • Did Denise give any interviews where she talked about her first few years on GH... '73-75? I wonder if she had any regrets leaving Days for GH, as from what I've read, the show was in the dumps writing-wise, so am thinking she didn't have great story? Any Leslie story highlights I've seen always start with '76, after Gloria Monty took charge.
    • I know! It's like second verse, here we go again!  Agreed. Certainly there was concern maybe even fear at the highest levels for the very good reason that what they had was so economically successful, so of course this risk was scary but if anyone was brave she was. Yes, he was. I have seen her associated with getting it on the air one other place but no details nor official title. Not the writer or creator so it made me wonder if she functioned as a kind of uncredited ad hoc producer, but then maybe she just supported it. At any rate that is nothing but supposition on my part. No data! Yes, not a surprise anymore but still so frustrating! On one hand I am appreciative that she is included in this book, but scholarship where are you?!
    • that wasnt her point. She wanted to further demonize Ted; that was the main focus of their talk. She wants to ensure that Nicole leaves him so that he's free and single to be with her. At this point, I dont think she really cares what Nicole thinks of her; she just wants her out of the way Eva is Nicole's stepdaughter and is a Dupree by association. If Nicole takes Ted back then its reasonable that she would accept his daughter and i that happens, Eva will have welcomed to their country club, be invited to their parties, have access to their resources, etc....much like Andre whom also isnt a blood Dupree but is accepted by them via Nicole. Eva got what she got from Anita bc of Hayley. I think its important to remember that context bc they just dealt with an interloper that infiltrated their ranks and hurt her daughter in the worse way. Now you have another unfortunate girl positioned to do the same to her other daughter. The feelings are still too fresh and she doesnt want Eva to get the idea that she would ever be allowed the opportunity to play them again
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy