Jump to content

Sara A. Bibel's Blog


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 264
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Of course, now it must be Sara Bibel because can never be Victoria Rowell. As difficult as it appears that Victoria was to work with, Y&R didn't fire her and she had major screentime under LML. It is really too bad she let her hurt pride cause her to quit and finally burn her bridges. I miss the hell out of Dru. She was fierce. To this today, I die laughing remembering the scene where she pops the cellphone in her bra. Classic Dru. I would have loved to see Dru's reaction to Daniel's porn addiction. I bet that we would be rolling. I miss those outrageous hats well. No one could pull them off like Dru.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I mean, she is like on of those rare, perfectly carved gems you only come upon once in a blue moon. She is extremely well educated (an Ivy League alumna) and well-read, has excellent manners from what I've seen, knows how to write, has had experience in production and writing, is passionate about the genre... And all that comes with humility and generosity.

What more could one want?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ugh. Now, I have posted on the death of daytime myself...right down to graphs predicting time of death.

But I find myself bristling at your declarative statement, or your suggestion that talented individuals should leave daytime. There is always hope. Keeping talented people IN the genre is an aspect of the hope.

I think I'm also reacting to the elitism here. Do you really want to say an Ivy League education makes her "extremely" well educated and well read? She could have been a slacker at Harvard who paled compared to a star student at Rutgers or SUNY Binghamton :).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Dead as a dead horse. Instead of this young woman returning to dead genre, I think she should have far more freedom in primetime to express herself.

Yup, dead as a dead horse. Dead. Everywhere surrounding it — only death (ratings & message board activity), embarrassments, lies, scabbing, re-writes, foul firings etc. Do you really want something like that to thrive?

Nope. You misunderstood. She is well educated for other reasons, not just because she attended Harvard, no. 2 on 2008 Best Universities and Colleges. B) Right behind Princeton.

Do I sense envy and inferiority complex? :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, while I predict death-by-demography, I don't concur that it is "only death, embarrassments...foul firings". Indeed, I think most viewers are blissfully unaware of this stuff. I do not believe that creative death is inevitable. I only believe that these shows, in these timeslots, with these levels of promotion, and with cost cutting now being manifest in what happens on screens, may be doomed. But I do not totally exclude the prospect of rescue.

You sound like Y&R's Adam and Heather, debating about Harvard/Princeton merits. Surely, you do not base your rankings on US News and World Report? What a flawed, flawed, flawed, flawed, flawed (did I mention flawed?) methodology.

No inferiority complex here. I actually do believe that the Ivys have some advantages, owing largely to their selection factors and their endowments/tuitions. Public schools (large and regional) have a lot less to work with, and more inclusive missions. However, the relative benefits of the Ivys does not mean that all Ivy-educated students exceed (on some measure) all non-Ivy educated students. The distributions are overlapping...the best of the non-Ivy students will clearly o'erleap the worst of the Ivy's.

We coud talk about the gains and losses of different kinds of schools...I think about it every day...but that would take us off topic :).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

MarkH, I will reply.

But, I wanted to say this: I would love it if Sara did a piece (or pieces) about primetime soap opera, what they do good, what they don't. Every soap, including Heroes. :D Because, among other reasons, HWs could learn a lot from Tim Kring's interview after the failed second season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This what I'm talking about. Thank you Sara! Plus they can afford therapist that most people can't when a co worker gets on there nerves.

Most people have at least one co-worker they dislike. Soap actors get paid six figures to do what they love. In my opinion, unless they’re actually being harassed, they ought to suck it up and behave like adults.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Just beautifully done. I could name some minor quibbles, but I won't, because what DAYS gave us today was golden. That was soap opera at its finest, paying homage to history and legacy and actors and the audience. This is why we love soaps.
    • To clarify, we could argue about the necessity to have John Black speak while in hospital, but the body created an opportunity for people to touch him, and move around him.  Even though I never totally suspended my disbelief, I appreciated their creative choice to form a visual representation of loss.  Certainly there were other ways to tell this story, but it will stay with me because those production choices enabled these performances. However, with disdain, I note that Days has found an odd middle ground between a flashback and a montage.  I define a flashback as least a couple of rounds of dialogue, if not a whole scene.  And a montage would be a visual snippet without much dialogue.  But, these were often just a single line, or an entrance.  It felt like a bit of a tease, and made me wish that Peacock had curated a playlist of John Black's Greatest Hits, like they do for some Bravo shows or SNL characters.  OT - but they have yet to maximize that platform.
    • It's tough for me because I feel like this has always been Lulu. She used to be even worse, slut-shaming, verbally abusing other women, and always being written as being in the right. They should let Brook Lynn get dirtier, but I think the material of Lulu digging and being self-righteous, making everything worse even while not intending to do so, but also not being as in the wrong as Dante thinks she is, all makes sense for her. But I don't have as much experience with Lulu as a lot of fans as I just could never stomach her beyond the time she was a mute kid, so I don't have much right to speak.
    • Thanks @JAS0N47 for all the ratings!   All My Children hits Number 1 in the ratings for the first time in its history during the week of 8/20/73-8/20/73!
    • I think the writing is slanted against Lulu.  I don't think there is an issue with the character in general.  I just think Lulu comes doesn't get many layers or nuance in her writing.  Lulu becomes obnoxious and a bully to Brook Lynn and both characters SHOULD have flaws.
    • Totally here for Anita dumping Sharon in the past for first Dante Green, and then Vernon...
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Hey Anita and Sharon

      Please register in order to view this content

        
    • Amanda Setton and Rena Sofer was once again really good in today's episode.  As a Lucky/Liz fan, I didn't like their scenes either.  And they are nowhere near a proposal because they haven't been given a real story.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy