Jump to content

GL: Kim Zimmer is Mad!


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Jeez, she needs to lighten up. Most of us would kill to have the equivalent of a paid vacation. These things go in cycles, and I'm sure she'll go front burner again. Anyway, I always notice in the monthly episode counts that the GL actors at the top of the list usually appear in no more than 12-13 episodes per month. I'm sure it's a budgetary thing, and Zimmer, as are a lot of actors on that show, is just caught up in their budget crunch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She's obviously hoping it will have the same effect as Erika Slezak's rant got on getting Higley canned from OLTL, but whether it will actually work is a different matter. She should have learned from what happened with Martha Byrne that PGP dont care about how long you've been with the show or how popular you are with fans, you ARE replaceable, and should have kept her mouth shut, especially considering the fragile state GL is in, she should be fighting for this show, not complaining because she's not the 'star' this month.

That being said, I do agree with her viewpoint because GL is wasting her, especially considering she is the closest thing to the 'heart' of the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She's been on the backburner for over a year which is ridiculous considering how much money they pay her. Why would a budget strapped show like GL let ANYONE stay at home and be paid? That's ridiculous. I know many think Kim's a diva, but this is why GL is dying. Nobody wants to see Natalia and Ava, we want to see Kim Zimmer, Beth Ehlers, Jordan Clarke, Maureen Garrett, etc. in GOOD stories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wheeler and Kreizman or without them, this show is just not salvageable anymore. It's lost too much of its centre to ever be a fraction of how good it used to be. Sad to say, this is not the GL I used to know and love, its some cheap imitation product that doesn't hold a candle to the real thing. At this point, a change in the regime of the show won't be as noticeable as we'd like, the show is just too far gone and beyond repair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I see potential. If they capitalise on family relationships (in the mould of the scenes with Vanessa, Bill and Dinah today) and make the show more about the core families and get rid of people who bring nothing to the show (Jeffrey, Ava, Remy, Natalia, Cyrus, Marina), it could work. Ideally, have Josh and Reva reunite and have their kids come back to Springfield and, along with Dinah and Bill, as well as the Spauldings, give the show a feel of something like Brothers and Sisters, it could be salvaged. I'm suggesting this only because it would be pointless to try and recapture the 'glory days' of GL, and the show is in a tricky position right now with this whole new production model, they're trying to recapture the glory days whilst trying to steer the show into a new direction, and you cant do both. I think GL is in A LOT better shape than ATWT is right now, but that's not saying much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It doesn't make any sense why a cash strapped show would allow their highest paid actor to sit home. P&G has to pay her so why not drag Kim into the studio or on location in NJ, especially when, love her or hate her, Kim and Reva are the most popular names on GL.

I understand that for the last couple of years GL has only worked the actors to their guarantee so they didn't have to pay them extra, but to not even work their highest paid actor to meet their guarantee and yet they have to pay them anyway is assinine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yep I agree....not everyone is that lucky. Even when my mom went on a business trip to NYC she still had to pay for us (my brothers, myself, their girlfriends and my fiancee at the time-she is now my wife).

Even when I worked at a grocery store, I got paid vacation (took a week off and got paid for that week)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Given how prevalent all things nostalgia are right now and How Better Things Were Back in The Day (Mad Men being my favorite show ever right now -- I am counting the days until the Season 1 DVD is released!), I think GL should go back to the past in every way in order to save itself. Dump the uber-realistic locations and mundane non-plots and Friends-like opening theme. Bring back the old-style opening with the "dated" music. Hell, bring back the disco opening!

Write it like it is a soap in the early to mid-80s. Write it as if it were the Dobsons or Douglas Marland writing GL again. Spookiness and swoony romance (remember Quint and Nola!) and wealthy, secretive families led by Alexaaaandraaaa Spaulding and catfights and conflicted Roger Thorpe-esque villains and forbidden love and extra-marital affairs and all that good stuff that made soaps, soaps.

All you need is a three-walled set and some stirring incidental music and exciting, exuberant characters and soapy, well-plotted story. YouTube is stuffed with awesome GL episodes from years past and, honestly, the show didn't need extravagant budgets or production processes, it just needed these basic ingredients.

LOL, OK. Wishful thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have bolded many interesting turns of phrase here, in the hopes that a few of you can give insight.

Business manager - This is interesting, because it speaks to Zimmer's economic motivation for staying with the show and working as much as possible. That's fine...we all need that...but it plays into my suspicion that Zimmer has really NOT been giving her heart to her job for some time. I know she earned kudos with that breast cancer story (to a point...remember the controversy over not shaving her head...so she wasn't THAT committed). I think that Kim's lack of attention to her appearance (I don't have a problem with that...but it DOESN'T look like someone who cares about her job in television), her public irascibility...all say that this has been a "paycheck" to her for some time now. Because she no longer exudes passion, she may be less of an asset to the show.

this regime - WHAT a distancing turn of phrase! It is very "us versus them"...indeed, that is a theme that pervades the whole posting. So, now, put yourself in the mind of a showrunner. Would YOU be supportive of a cantankerous old timer who constantly undermined you? I think not. I'm not defending anyone...seriously...but I'm seeing evidence here that Ms. Zimmer may not be playing her cards right if she wants to remain employed.

to what was Guiding Light - oooooooooh...total *snap*. She is saying what many here and elsewhere have been saying: Guiding Light as it was is dead. She is not on-board with this new vision. Again, this relates to her distancing. She may be an obstacle to the vision for progress that Wheeler/Kreizman/CBS/P&G have signed on to. I AM NOT DEFENDING THAT VISION (far from it). But TPTB _do_ have the power. They can't keep an ornery force who opposes their vision so relentlessly in their midst, can they?

executive director -- Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm. What is that? Wheeler is executive PRODUCER, right? But she does direct at least once a week. This is making me think that Kim is slapping Wheeler as not being a true creative/power force. In other words, Wheeler may be overseeing the *technical* aspects of the show, but that makes me think Kim is saying Wheeler really isn't exerting creative or fiscal control. That, I'm reading between the lines, might belong with some "suits". Speaking of which...

"suit" - Snap, slap and wow! She wants a new contract from these people???? I guess not. "Suit" was elevated, to my knowledge, to a new level of perjorative on Entourage (although it has been a bad word for a while :-) ). This doesn't seem like it is going to end well for Zimmer.

under worked actor - In what sense does she mean this? Underworked in the sense that they are paying her more than they are using her? (Of course...the reason might be clear. It reduces her 'footprint' on the show, and makes it easier for her to be eased off the canvas. ) With casting spoilers suggesting that an old face from Reva's past will be coming to Springfield, I wonder if the long-term end game for getting Reva off the show isn't being fashioned. Especially if Kim is being a bitter, destructive, not "on-message" force behind the scenes (I am not saying she is...I'm just wondering)... Or is this more ego-driven? "I am the history of this show. I am the multiple Emmy winner. I am the link to your most loyal viewers. OF COURSE I should be front and center". (By the way...I would AGREE with that sentiment!)

who the powers that be dislike more, Kim Zimmer or Reva Shayne - That cements it, eh? Is this finally "payback" for failing to take a pay cut the last time it was requested? I suspect so. I suspect the decision was made to keep her till the end...and then jettison her. Does anyone know if she got renewed after she refused the pay cut? Or is that cycle still coming up? P&G has shown there are no sacred cows (Scott Bryce, Cady McLain, Grayson McCouch, Martha Byrne)...so I suspect Kim's time is up soon, and what she is perceiving is the inevitability of that.

bread crumb - Wow...she doesn't have faith in being returned to a meaningful story, eh? But, truthfully, Kim NEVER liked being ANYTHING but front burner. I understand this, but it is a little unrealistic given most shows' treatment of the veteran actor...especially P&G. Kim and her ilk, apparently don't bring in the desired demo. (I know that this is misguided thinking).

Happy Anniversary - What anniversary was it? If it was a "round" one (20, 25, 15...whatever), and it wasn't celebrated....that IS another slap in the face.

I wonder how long Guiding Light will survive?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I also wonder if it was considered controversial at the time to show a morally corrupt doctor?(another character troupe for Agnes Nixon, the upstanding male citizen who is hiding secrets back at home) Up until the early 1970s, prime-time would very rarely tell stories about the private lives of doctors, because advertisers tended to shy away from such content. @robbwolff -- so is this wrong that Ruth dated David before marrying Joe?  Dr. David Thornton is a fictional character from the ABC daytime soap opera All My Children, portrayed by Paul Gleason from 1976 to 1978.  He was introduced as a respected physician in Pine Valley, presenting himself as a widower to his colleagues at the hospital. This facade, however, concealed a darker truth: his wife, Edna Thornton, was alive, and he was leading a double life. David’s character is defined by manipulation and secrecy, as he maintained a carefully curated public image while engaging in deceitful and criminal behavior in his personal life. His relationships were marked by control and betrayal, particularly in his marriage to Edna and his romantic entanglements with other women. David’s charm and professional status allowed him to navigate Pine Valley’s social circles, but his actions revealed a calculating and ruthless nature. Career David was a doctor at Pine Valley Hospital, where he was well-regarded by his peers for his medical expertise. His professional life provided him with a veneer of respectability, which he exploited to mask his personal misdeeds. However, his career was not a central focus of his storyline; instead, it served as a backdrop to his personal schemes. His position at the hospital gave him access to resources, such as the drug digitalis, which he later used in his attempt to murder his wife. David’s professional life unraveled as his criminal actions came to light, tarnishing his reputation in the medical community. Personal Relationships and Family David’s family and romantic relationships were fraught with tension and deception, shaping much of his narrative arc: Edna Thornton (Wife): David was married to Edna Thornton, with whom he had a daughter, Dottie. To his colleagues, he claimed Edna was deceased, allowing him to pursue other relationships without suspicion. In reality, David was plotting to kill Edna, motivated by his desire to be free of her and possibly to gain financial or personal freedom. He began poisoning her with digitalis, a heart medication, which caused her to experience heart pains. Edna was unaware of David’s true intentions until after his death, when the truth about his poisoning scheme was revealed. Dottie Thornton (Daughter): David and Edna’s daughter, Dottie Thornton, was a significant character in All My Children. Portrayed by Dawn Marie Boyle (1977–1980) and later Tasia Valenza (1982–1986), Dottie was raised primarily by Edna. David’s neglectful and manipulative behavior extended to his daughter, as he showed little genuine care for her well-being. Dottie’s life was impacted by her father’s actions, particularly after his death, when Edna became a wealthy widow. Dottie later married Thaddeus “Tad” Martin in 1985, though their marriage ended in divorce in 1986, and she suffered the loss of an unborn child with Tad. Ruth Parker (Fiancée, 1976): David was engaged to Ruth Parker in 1976, furthering his pattern of deceit since he was still married to Edna. His engagement to Ruth, who was also involved with Jeff Martin, highlighted David’s willingness to manipulate romantic partners for his own gain. The engagement did not lead to marriage, as David’s true intentions and double life began to surface. Christina “Chris” Karras (Lover, 1978): In 1978, David began a romantic relationship with Dr. Christina “Chris” Karras, a fellow physician. This affair added another layer of complexity to his web of lies, as Chris was unaware of his marriage to Edna and his poisoning scheme. After David’s death, Chris was initially accused of his murder due to their relationship and her access to medical resources. However, Jeff Martin’s investigation cleared her name by proving David’s death was caused by his own actions. Parents: David’s parents are unnamed in the source material, and both are noted as deceased. No further details are provided about their influence on his life or their role in his backstory. Death David Thornton’s death in 1978 was a dramatic and fitting conclusion to his villainous arc, brought about by his own treachery. Intent on killing Edna to escape their marriage, David had been secretly administering digitalis to her, causing her heart issues. In a twist of fate, their daughter, Dottie, innocently switched Edna’s drink with David’s during one of his poisoning attempts. Unaware that the drink was laced with a lethal dose of digitalis, David consumed it and suffered a fatal heart attack. His death was initially investigated as a possible murder, with Chris Karras as the prime suspect due to her relationship with David and her medical knowledge. However, Dr. Jeff Martin conducted a toxicology screen on David’s body, which revealed that the digitalis poisoning was the cause of both Edna’s heart pains and David’s death. This evidence exonerated Chris and exposed David’s plan to kill his wife, cementing his legacy as a tragic and self-destructive figure. Impact and Legacy David Thornton’s storyline, though relatively short-lived (1976–1978), was impactful due to its intensity and the ripple effects on other characters. His death left Edna a wealthy widow, altering her and Dottie’s circumstances and setting the stage for further drama, including Edna’s manipulation by conman Ray Gardner. David’s actions also strained relationships among other Pine Valley residents, particularly through his engagement to Ruth Parker and affair with Chris Karras, which intersected with Jeff Martin’s storyline. His character exemplified the classic soap opera archetype of a charming yet duplicitous villain whose downfall is precipitated by his own hubris. Additional Notes Portrayal: Paul Gleason’s performance as David Thornton brought a compelling intensity to the role, making the character memorable despite his brief tenure. Gleason’s ability to portray both charm and menace suited David’s dual nature as a respected doctor and a scheming husband. Storyline Context: David’s arc occurred during the early years of All My Children, a period when the show focused on intricate personal dramas and moral dilemmas. His poisoning plot and double life were emblematic of the show’s penchant for high-stakes interpersonal conflict. Lack of Additional Family Details: Beyond Edna and Dottie, no other family members (such as siblings or extended relatives) are mentioned in the source material, limiting the scope of his familial connections. Conclusion Dr. David Thornton was a multifaceted antagonist in All My Children, whose life was marked by professional success, personal deception, and a fatal miscalculation. As a doctor, he wielded authority and respect, but his secret plan to murder his wife, Edna, revealed a cold and calculating core. His relationships with Edna, Dottie, Ruth Parker, and Chris Karras were defined by manipulation, and his death by accidental self-poisoning was a poetic end to his schemes. David’s legacy in Pine Valley lived on through Edna’s newfound wealth and Dottie’s subsequent storylines, making him a pivotal figure in the show’s early narrative. His story remains a classic example of soap opera drama, blending betrayal, tragedy, and retribution.
    • The only blonde I see is one of the actual women staring at first & then screaming & running later.  DAYS: Vivian's manservant Ivan is in a long curly red wig. 

      Please register in order to view this content

      Y&R: long straight black wig is the actor Peter Barton whose character name I am blanking on.   
    • I very much liked office Cleary and the actress who portrayed her (as you say, Mary Peterson).  A shame her turn didn't evolve into a contract role.   BTW, does anyone know the timeframe/years that Betty Rae served as casting director?  If i understand correctly, she not only led the effort for contract roles, but also for shorter 13- and 26-week roles.  IMO, GL had LOTS of very well-casted, limited roles, too. I'm surprised the actors throughout the soap industry, and especially P&G actors, have not assembled a book or something similar, praising Rae.  Each actor could write a few paragraphs or a page of text describing his or her experience.
    • No. Ruth had an extramarital affair with David while married to Joe.
    • I'm not sure I agree with Bernstein's children on that. Bernstein's life and activism here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Bernstein#Social_activism_and_humanitarian_efforts
    • Thursday & Friday's episodes were excellent. The build-up was most definitely worth the wait (2 months). TMG, I can't give her enough accolades. AM, was also absolutely incredible. I think the fallout is going to have a ripple effect. The little clues that have been dropped,  hopefully, will weave seamlessly to reveal even bigger bombshells for the Dupree's and Martin.
    • Thanks, msn drives me nuts on the one hand but on the other hand their headlines appeal to me. And, I just don't do FoxNews.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy