Jump to content

Santa Barbara Discussion Thread


dm.

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Notably, the next year in 1990, when Terry Lester left the role as Mason, SOD reported rumors that Lane Davies might return.  According to SOD, Terry left the role after nobody in production approached his agent about renegotiating when his initial contract ran out. SB responded that they had simply overlooked the date at end of Mr. Lester's contract.  The next issue Gordan Thompson's hiring was announced.    

 

There were also rumors printed that when Terry was lured from Y&R to SB Lane did not know that he was being pushed out. 

 

Which makes me think that SB behind the scenes was messier than any Capwell Dinner Party. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I don't buy the rumor of Terry Lester pushing Lane Davies out. From all accounts, Davies was more than ready to go, what with not being happy with Mason's direction (felt he was becoming too domesticated) and his tension with NLG, etc. The TPTB were dumb, but I think even they realized how popular LD was in the role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And, am I remembering correctly? Didn't they switch Masons between Lester and Thompson in the middle of an episode? I believe the episode started with Lester playing the role and then they switched about half way through.

https://youtu.be/UhaecIiMTkE

Just found the link where they did the switch mid-episode.

 

https://youtu.be/UhaecIiMTkE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I looked at the dates from the French SB website and it sort of makes sense with this caveat - Lane left at the end of his contract, but he didn't know that the role would be recast; I don't think it was anything more than that.  So, I don't think Terry Lester actively pushed him out, but his hiring closed the door on the character.

 

 

Yeah, so that's the thing, according to the SOD story, Lester's representative called him and told him that this was the last day of his contract and there had been no offers for negotiation.  He cleaned out his dressing room, didn't say anything to anyone, and went home.  When production called his agent to ask why he was not on set, they were told that his contract had expired.  Nobody on staff was prepared so they had to edit those scenes to try to make some transition between the actors.

 

Thus, production had to pay each successive Mason more money than the one before; because of poor planning.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm currently watching JAN's Warren's exit story from April 1986.  Warren develops a gambling addiction as soon as CC's casino opens.  Unfortunately, Dylan Hartley is rigging the casino to make Warren lose.  His newspaper goes bankrupt.  He decides to steal from the casino by going underwater.  He gets shot.  Then he realizes that the money from the casino is marked so he can't use it to pay CC.  CC demands the cash in person (it is unclear if he knows the casino is rigged).  Sophia winds up helping Warren.  Warren also has a reprochment with Birck, who heals Warren's wound with tricks he learned in the circus.  Then Minx shoots CC with a BB gun, the Lockridge's mortgage the mansion to pay CC and Warren goes off to cure his gambling addiction.

 

The whole arc happens over the course of six episodes.  JAN's body is remarkably more buff than when he started so they have him take his shirt off a lot in the story.  But, I was left wanting a Sophia/Warren romance.  Their chemistry is not mother/son but two desperate people who are not appreciated by their families.  I know Warren is younger than her son, but I think a Warren/Sophia tryst would have been hot.

 

BTW, also looking back I am happy they never tried a Mason/Sophia pairing because she practically raised him.

 

How long do you think CC and Sophia were married the first time when she birthed Eden, Kelly, and Ted? 

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hmmm, looking back it is odd that CC was single from 1969-1985, then as soon as Sophia returned he started sleeping around?

 

Also, Sophia having four kids and two affairs during an eight-year marriage seems excessive.

 

The six episode arc I think had more to do with JAN's exit to go make his Oscar-worthy-film debut in Hunk.  Kirk and Eden, as well as the David Laurant Murder, were the A & B story of the time.

 

 

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

It's always odd when I hear about the tension because I never feel it onscreen. Sometimes you can feel some kind of hostility, no matter how much actors try to cover it up.

 

I guess that may have been one of the reasons the characters were separated for so much of his last year or so on the show though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Yeah. They were very open about their issues in that joint Soap Opera Weekly interview (done when Lane Davies joined GH as Cameron Lewis). And I think the separation in LD's final year on SB was indeed because of said tension. Hence, why that saying of not schitting where you eat applies. At least they were professional on screen 'til LD left! And at least they seemed to bury the hatchet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • https://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/shortland-street-fears-speculation-grows-about-shows-future-amid-industry-struggles/T2GECWXTI5AD3AMEV46YYYUE6E/ Still a big cloud over whether the show will get another year.
    • I had hoped they'd pair her with Michael Knight. They had a nice chemistry and he's been one of the better random castings on GH. When it comes to Gio, I found the scenes with Dante to be overdone. It's obvious they're trying to set up conflict for the reveal but I don't think that was needed. It actually made me less excited for the reveal and killed any interest I had in Dante and Gio forming a bond.
    • He also lost the woman he was going to marry, under very sudden circumstances. They are probably surprised Rena has wanted to stay. I think Lois works OK in her current capacity, if they allowed her to have more of a point of view, a bit more life of her own, and not just the reason for Gio's paternity being hidden. The character always felt very thin to me and on paper this dynamic with Tracy, Brook Lyn, Gio, visits from Gloria could be better for her than how overly centered she was on the canvas the first time around. But as of now she could be better used.  Somehow the show that was revived due to supercouples seems completely alien to romance. The older cast has this hardest but even with tiers who are younger or middle-aged, they've really dragged their feet about Liz and Lucky, they have contorted themselves in trying to figure out how to pair a man with Joss, Kai and Trina barely get focus...and others I struggle to remember. They also blew up Sasha/Cody so now I guess we're meant to be waiting to see if she finds true love with Jason? The show is so hesitant and when you are this hesitant it means you are incapable of writing romance.
    • I agree.  Rena doesn't seem to mind the lighter workload and seems happy though. Strangely, a lot of the veteran cast are without viable love interests-Sonny, Nina, Lois, Jason, Tracy, Alexis, Carly (Brennan doesn't count).  The show lacks serious interest in romance.
    • I just can't wait until next week when we can go back to a full weeks worth of episodes. 3 episodes and a mid-week gap has been so difficult to deal with, especially in light of how good the show is.
    • I always hoped they'd change Parker's paternity back to Phillip.  I guess it doesn't matter since Chloe is off the show currently.  I don't recall Holly or Maggie mentioning Parker, so it's not they are close to him. 
    • I’ve reached the summer of 1998.  Until now, my impression has been that the show has steadily improved since the great quality dip of 1994, reaching as high as 8/10 in 1997. Sure, I could complain about a few things in 1997 (Claudia got wasted after her initial storyline; Thorne’s feelings for Taylor were a bit too sudden; the storyline where Sheila lived with James and Maggie while pregnant got rather boring; Mike periodically revisiting Sheila despite being on the run from authorities), but overall it was a very strong year.  I liked the Thorne/Taylor/Ridge triangle, the mystery plot about who shot Grant, the sham wedding to trap Sheila, Stephanie/Eric/Lauren, and Clarke manipulating his way back to working at Forrester. I even liked the Greenland storyline with Eric/Lauren/Rush, although I had expected to hate it. Maybe 1996 tops 1997 in raw soapy excitement (especially as Sheila got a chance to interact with a larger canvas of characters), but certain problems with overall storyline cohesion puts it somewhat below 1997 for me. Unfortunately, early 1998 has turned out to be a bit of a speedbump, perhaps on par with 1995 levels of quality: - Maggie’s character really got trashed after James left her to be with Sheila, and the early 1998 storylines where she imprisoned Sheila in the house from Psycho, or installed those wires and mikes and such in her house to make her think she’s going crazy, were total GARBAGE. So much so that the latter storyline (and Maggie with it) pretty much disappeared into a limbo.  - I have mixed feelings about the twins plotline with Lauren. No way did Rush survive being shot with a crossbow through the chest, and the romance between Lauren and Rush’s good twin brother Johnny was rather dry to me. I did however enjoy the camp aspect of Rush taking his brother’s place to be with Lauren, and Eric rescuing her. But it doesn’t appear like Bell cared too much about the Johnny/Lauren romance beyond the twin storyline gimmick, and it too disappeared in an unsatisfactory manner (come on, why not hire Johnny’s actor for just 5 more episodes for an arc where he realizes Lauren is not over Eric, or JUST SOMETHING?) - Clarke wormed his way back to FC in late 1997, which had exciting storytelling potential, but then he disappeared almost entirely. Sad to see my favorite character wasted in this manner. Does he get anything interesting to do between now and the Morgan saga of 2000-2001? - The Thomas saga was entertaining in 1997, but it got stretched out too much, and made some of early 1998 tiresome, with Ridge having to decide YET AGAIN which woman he wants to be with. On the plus side, I like the plotline of Thorne being neighbors with Macy and Grant, and we’ve finally been introduced to the SORASed Rick/Amber/CJ crowd. The Stephanie/James/Sheila triangle is also starting, and it makes me excited (I remember seeing some if it in my childhood). I know Sheila, Grant, and James are all leaving soon, which I honestly kind of dread - between them and Clarke’s near-absence, it feels like herd is going to get culled too much in the near future. But I know there’s the familiar 1999-2002 to look forward to.
    • LOL - this is a perfect description, and that's what I loved about it! May be a bit campy, but it immediately caught my attention in a good way.  I'm not familiar with the Fishing Trip storyline, I'll have to look that up. I've noticed that about Josh, which has made him less attractive to me overall. He just yells a lot when he's not happy. Wow, Reva was married to HB!  LOL - "Always... eventually, and again"
    • I love your ideas. I would love to see Jack grown up this confused unhinged individual. He should hold a grudge against both Brooke and Taylor.   
    • @chrisml

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy