Jump to content

B&B: Susan Flannery interview


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Just found this on YouTube. It would seem she's visiting Australia to see her daughter and it's interesting to get to know the actress behind the character seeing as she doesn't do a lot of interviews.

">
" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355">

She certainly looks and comes across as a lot softer than Stephanie but that wouldn't be too hard. Not too impressed that she wants to leave in a year or so though. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

La Flannery should just quit already.

Brad Bell has ruined Stephanie. Instead of exploring her hatred and obsession of Brooke, which led to a rape, he took the easy way out with Steph's shooting. And the storyline had zero ramifications in the Logan and Forrester clans.

Stephanie is a caricature already, after Brooke's rape. La Flannery sparring with Jennifer Gareis is hilarious. If SF needs more sparring partners, they should pit Heather Tom's Katie against Stephanie. Instead they're wasting her with bimbette Donna.

This is Stephanie. She's battled Sheila for years! She and Brooke have been at war for eons! Donna is someone Steph would have for lunch!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The nicest (and weirdest) part is that she's not in Australia to do promotion and still agreed to do the odd interview and promotional spot for Ten. I read that she was a guest on the political game show Good News Week on Sunday night and got a standing ovation for being such a good sport. Would love to see that make it online.

I enjoy the Donna rivalry. She's such a brazen and constant irritation for Stephanie. To give Brad Bell credit, he's never written Donna as being a particularly intelligent woman -- unlike Brooke she only has sex going for her. You certainly won't see her taking over Forrester Creations anytime soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's exactly why Donna vs. Steph is laugable. Donna is a little pest that Steph could kill with a fly swatter. She's no match for Steph. So Eric and Donna's little game of cat and mouse with Steph is just ridiculous. brad bell know how to write only 3 kinds of women 1. sluts (taywhore, donna, jackie), 2. psychos (stephanie, sheila) or heroines (brooke, bridget, katie). He can't seem to write well for women that don't fit so neatly into those molds: fifi, ashley. so IMO his writing of donna is nothing new from his limited bag o' tricks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think I like her more than I did before, if that's possible!

She's erudite, in touch (talking about Kenya and women over 40 in Hollywood) and just... class. I must say the level of questionning was a touch higher than we normally get for soap stars in the States. Plus the interviewers seemed to be unabashed fans of the show without falling to SoapTalk levels of unarticulated gushing.

Man, I hope they figure something out for her stay on as Stephanie. She *is* B&B. And, honestly, I'm not just throwing that phrase around for the sake of it. She's playing the best female role in all of television, IMO (save for, maybe, Glenn Close on "Damages"). Even if the writing has been (at best) dodgy, La Flannery rises above it and transforms the material. If she leaves, the void left behind would be huge.

As for Stephanie vs. Donna, Donna is of course no Sheila. But S&D have an interesting, bitchy, soapy dynamic. Mainly because they are such opposites. Donna is the embodiment of "sex kitten" -- everything Stephanie is not and never was. That is both her strength and her weakness. I wonder if these two don't enjoy the battle for the sake of it rather more than the prize of Eric "Three Legs" Horndog.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But Donna is just a retread of what they've done before.

Steph vs. brooke pitted steph against the complex sex kitten from the valley.

Steph vs. sheila pitted steph against a psychotic woman.

Steph vs. Morgan pitted steph against the psychotic sex kitten.

Donna is nothing new. She's a poor man's version of brooke. Why hire Heather Tom as a talk-to character? Katie should be battling Steph in a battle of wills and intelligence. Steph vs. Donna is too subpar for La Flannery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She wants to retire since 2003... 5 years passed - so we're very lucky. And extremely fortunate if we get some more years with Susan...

Her contract should be up this fall again and I hope Brad Bell can convince her to re-sign with another Betty White sort of trick or another vacation package, addionally to the 2 she already has, to enable La Flannery to travel the world. And having Ian Buchanan on B&B - one of her dearest friends - wouldn't hurt either...

This interview was really great. They touched B&B, Susan's personal life which she usually keeps mum about and talked about the world. You can't do more in 15 minutes.

@ Cat: ICAM about the Glenn Close comment. (And I freaking loved DAMAGES) I could see Alley Mills to fill the Flannery void but I want this moment to be as far in the future as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What a wonderful interview. Luckily, she didn't seem too resolved into leaving the show, which is always good.... And now that the guy presented her with the idea of having a responsibility to the audience.... La Flannery might not leave after all! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I love the Aussie dialect! Susan Flannery shows us that she's not who she is on the screen. On the screen she's such a bitch that you love to hate or to root for but here she was just herself. It shows that she plays a character. That to me is a great actor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you for posting! I can't believe I watched the whole thing. SF is so gracious and matter-of-fact at the same time. The fact that she's still on 200 ep a year gives me hope that if she's offered a deal with 150 or 175, she'll stick around. However, if she wants to enjoy the rest of her life and travel, etc. then she's more than earned it. (It does sound like she enjoys the challenge of directing, so that may be another way to keep her around....)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Because you are posting these things like they are true facts.  And they aren't. But whatever, Donna, you will just keep doing you.   Most people actually are trying to talk about GH in this thread.  Not random twitter/facebook/internet rumors you bring here.  I am just wasting my time even responding.    
    • This is a common theme with long running actors and preposterous storylines. Firstly they may relish the chance to play something different after years as that charcter. Secondly, no matter how dumb the plot it keeps them frontburner and valued to the show and the audience. Thirdly, as VW stated in the end they don't have the power to dictate story and too much complaining can backfire and set them up in a negative light. Not a good position to be in with your employers. So they just buckle up and give it their all or act out the script till it's over.
    • Your use of the word "apparently" would need to include a source. Just your use of the word doesn't make it true or valid. Where would you get the idea that something has happened if you hadn't already received an indication from somewhere else, specifically a valid source (including Tabyana herself)? By using the word "apparently," you are implying this was mentioned somewhere, either in a publication or similar.
    • I think Hotel would have the similar demos as Dynasty W 19-49 would have been strong. St Elsewhere survived b/c it attracted wealthier/urban viewers and The Equalizer was probably stronger with men and younger viewers. So each had their own niche-good counter-programming. As for Aaron Spelling's influence over ABC in terms of scheduling, I don't know if he would have been happy with Charlie's Angels moving to Sunday, The Colbys scheduled on Thursdays or Matt Houston moved to Fridays. I think he just had to roll with the punches.
    • Thank you @Broderick. That information was so helpful. I watched the first episode of the "Mansion of the Damned" storyline. I was extremely confused by Margaret Colin's Paige and her relationship to other characters. Your post helps me understand what's happening. The rest of the show was easy to understand and I'm enjoying it. Hunter's Nola is a good character for me since I know Kim Hunter from other work.  I must have seen clips of Edge of Night before because I remember seeing April. 
    • How is it back tracking when it was in fact the word I originally used? It's not.
    • You know what is a great way to stop these unclear "rumors"?  Just stop posting them and then back tracking with words like "apparently".   Anyhow, I didn't find the Tracy/Lois scenes as good as I hoped.    
    • Jason, in thinking this over, I realize that we look at this space, differently. To me it is a potentially collaborative space. Now that I've realized this, what I should have said, "I'm having a problem because what I'm seeing is not matching up with your descriptions. Maybe these files I just got are misdated. Maybe it's something else. I will keep you posted. Meanwhile this episode, its edit, is ready, even though I might have to issue a corrected date later. But, people can enjoy the performances now. 
    • Thank you for the constructive suggestion. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy