Jump to content

Days: If Stefano Is The Seventh Son Of The Seventh Son.....


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

there ar other poss people too...

Maggie's daughter sarah could have a grandchild we know nothing about and he could come on.

abe seems to have a lot of long lost/never knowen about family members.

or they can just create an entire new family like they always do.

didnt craig/nancy have a baby girl? maybe claire will be a lesbian.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm all for a new character, I mean come on, this f-u-c-k-i-n-g show is so incestuous by familial means, even if its not biological...

Only DAYS seems to have this problem with almost every character being related to one another in some fashion. At least B&B only focuses on one core family so its a bit understandable, but DAYS has a wide array of families that all have some type of connection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And what's messed up is that Hogan and his team fixed all that for the most part...

Until THE HACK came back on board.

Now we'll find out that Alice and Caroline are actually half-sisters....

I....hope I didn't say that out loud just now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You and me both.

If Stefano is the seventh son of the seventh son (which I, too, have heard about in the past), then John is just the one after him. As Queen Nubia pointed out, Andre's existence proves Stefano is not an only child. However, as another poster pointed out, the recent Santeen saga suggested that Stefano was Santo's only child prior to John's conception. So, is Stefano still the seventh son of the seventh son, or isn't he?

Also, as I mentioned previously, in another thread, I think there's something weird about the fact that John, who is supposedly in the same age bracket as Marlena, Roman and Tony, is now only 12-13 years younger than Stefano, whom Tony grew up believing was his biological father! So - again, I ask - how old was Stefano when he met Daphne and she sired Tony? Was he just entering puberty? And does this mean John is, in fact, considerably older than the man whose identity he carried for several years?

Word, Roman. For years, we have been led to believe Stefano held the key to John's identity. Frankly, that was the only way I could justify all those wrong turns in the John Black saga (i.e., Father John, Romulus, Forrest Alamain, Tony's half-brother, etc.); Stefano never wanted John to know the truth, so he planted all those red herrings. But now that John finally, FINALLY knows who he is (...for now), Stefano doesn't know? Huh-uh.

Nope. Sorry. I'm still unconvinced this is who and what John Black truly is. Each time DAYS comes up with the "definitive" explanation, it only raises more questions. They never get it right - and you know, they probably never will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Santeen saga, while it explained(stupidly) the whole Brady/DiMera feud(however the whole feud was because Roman stopped Stefano's crime ring and Stefano thinks Bo and Hope killed Megan Hathaway), screwed up alot of history on Days. At this point, I'd say John is probably several years older than Tony and even Roman. If Stefano met Daphne when he was in mid-late teens, then Daphne could have had the affair with Enrico soon enough and given birth to Tony while they were teenagers. Honestly with the church that Shawn Sr. was raised in...I don't know if he'd sleep with someone during his teenage years...so its safe to say that John is YEARS older than Roman, as screwy as that is.

And about Stefano being the seventh son or not, I honestly don't know. The most ridiculous part is that while they were implying that Stefano was Santo's only son while Andre was on the show running around wildly! And it destroys the whole method that made Stefano the Phoenix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you, Khan.

It kills me how, once again, TMFIC decided, with this hack bitch's help, to once again retcon this man's identity and truly think that REAL Days fans are so damn stupid we wouldn't realize none of this.

I'm done with this [!@#$%^&*]......because when the next writing team comes on, John will NOT be the son of Santo and Colleen.....

He'll be TOM HORTON'S son.......making him a Horton!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • It seemed to be your intent. coming into a thread I started and making multiple posts saying my data was wrong. In the next paragraph you say "Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why." That certainly didn't stop you from immediately saying the data was wrong, until I provided additional receipts. Why did you not check the daily episode guide (for instance, this one for the 1980's) I posted for the world to see for exactly this reason...to help confirm airdates: http://daytimeroyaltyonline.com/days-daily-summaries-1980-1989-t15361.html? That is what you should be checking BEFORE you make any posts in the future like this, trying to suggest something from my data is incorrect. You could have also messaged me and asked me why your dates weren't adding up with what the correct data is. I would have fast forwarded through that video you posted, spotted Roman and Hope and immediately have told you that was the 11/1/83 episode.
    • Jason, just let me say that it was not my intent to any way impugn any of your data  or research. I'm very sorry if it came out that way. Obviously the person I got these 4 November episodes from has mislabeled files, multiples, which I was certainly unaware of.  When I am editing it is all about what I see & hear. Later, I find time for greater reflection.  Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why.  If you find you are no longer interested in the edit, that is fine. I have no ego in this. I did it only to share it.
    • I feel like Vernon and Anita need to not be hypocrites and try and take the heat off Bill in this case. It's clear that the family used him as a fixer and especially knowing he helped with Martin's situation, they need to either be quiet or support him. BTW...with Vanessa being in the hospital for food poisoning, am I the only one who thought Shanice was gonna say she's pregnant or had an STD? The only reason I say STD is because she hasn't had any memorable sex partners, but I definitely don't believe she just had food poisoning.
    • Yeah, I mean I know that the name still pertains. I just laugh at it not now being called Arizona Dust, but, I admit it simply does not have the same ring to it. Above, that is interesting that Arizona had already come up before the crisis. 
    • Anita vs. Leslie, bring it!
    • Leslie and her family are from Chicago? Anita's background also includes being a former Chi-Town native? Might they connect this and go somewhere with it?
    • Honestly who's to say Leslie even birthed Eva, I mean she's a liar, I wouldn't believe a word she says about Eva being Ted's(or hers)
    •   1. 11/1/83 cast/set list:  

      Please register in order to view this content

          The "11/2/83" video you posted of Ruth Buzzi's scenes includes Roman and Hope in them, meaning the video you posted is actually 11/1/83, since Roman and Hope aren't in 11/2/83.   2. The video you posted of "11/2/83" has scenes with Roman and Hope. As you can see from my cast/set list, Roman and Hope are not in the 11/2/83 episode (see above note):   4573...11/2/83: Cast: Mickey, Julie, Doug, Maggie, Neil, Don, Marie, Alex, Liz, Andre as Tony, Gwen, Chris, Eugene, Sandy, Letitia, Charlene, Mrs. Whiting, Wanda/Guard, Dave, Delia, Saleslady # 1, Saleslady # 2, Figure in Dark, Raven/animal, Cats/animals, Birds/animals.   2.  11/3/83 :My video collection starts with 11/4/83. so I don't have the 11/1/83 or 11/3/83 video, but in addition to the cast/set list for 11/3/83, here is also the parking clearance call sheet for that day, showing Ruth was not only in the cast/set list but did work that day:     They even had hired the animal trainer and all the animals for the day, so It's sort of a certainty that her scenes were not cut that day, or it would have been a big waste of the budget. 3. As for 11/7/83, I just fast-forwarded through that whole episode myself. Letitia is in it from start to finish. It's her big final episode where she is killed. She starts the episode saying "Eugene, are you there?" In the next act, Marlena shows up and meets Letitia's lion. Later in the episode, Letitia is killed by "Eugene" (the Salem Slasher in a Eugene mask).   So, as we can see from your own post, the 11/2/83 date you have listed on that video is incorrect, since Hope and Roman are in that video but not in the 11/2/83 episode.It seems the dates you have on all your early November 1983 episodes are incorrect.   When you post videos and suggest that my data is incorrect, do you not first compare who is in the scenes and see if that matches who is in the episode? You didn't do that with the "11/2/83" episode, which based on Roman and Hope being in it means that is actually 11/1/83. Best to do something like that first before suggesting my data and research is incorrect.
    • Within the Dupree family, I predict Vernon/Anita will be conflicted about what to do about Bill and his role in the whole Ted/Silk Press Sheila situation... especially since Bill knows where the particular bone about Martin is buried. Dani, Chelsea, and Naomi's reactions to what Bill possibly did isn't hard to guess.. but Hayley's reactions will be interesting to hear.  Especially given her recent pregnancy scare.. she might not be so much on Bill's side, or she'll totally surprise us and be totally on Bill's side.   Either way, I think Martin's secret will be the main focus in May sweeps.. with the fall out of the Eva secret playing out in the background... while the Joey/Vanessa/Doug thing continues to boil/develop.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy