Jump to content

Talking Supercouples


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

^Very ironic, but Gloria Monty in general can be partly blamed for speeding up the collapse of the daytime drama, as much as she made it a popular thing with GH in the 80's.

One of the things I liked about classic Y&R was the fact that Bill Bell hated "supercouples." If you've noticed, Y&R was never huge on the supercouple explosion, they focued more in individual characters. They had popular couples yes, but not to the campy and over-saturated effect shows like DAYS and GH have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree. Victor and Nikki I'd hardly call a super couple going by the typical standards that signified a super couple in the 80's.

A broader view on what happened with the super couples. Shows got backed into corners when these "super couples" developed such HUGE fanbases. These fans were simply just watching for these couples and the adventures they'd go on. So as a result, shows would feel the need to cater to these couples at the expense of the rest of the show.... and this continues until this day.... Which as a result as seen fans of the overall shows tune out in droves for the past 15 years. I mean I've always had the couples I've rooted for and liked.... but never at one particiular time have I really ever only watched a show for a few characters or one couple. That concept just doesn't resonate with me. It goes the same for any television show. I have to like the show, its premise and the way the canvas is weaved....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the supercouple, is a thing of the past. The last current couple(and I mind you I love Zach & Kendall and Patrick & Robin), I consider a supercouple is Passions's Luis and Sheridan. Dancing around their feelings, presumed deaths, amnesia, crazy ex, deranged father,romances/marriages to other people, kidnapping-I see all that the makings of a supercouple.

JMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To me they're not alot of supercouples on the shows any more/ They're a few out there, but not alot. I would say that couples I would've considered (and do consider) supercouples would be:

Tad and Dixie

Cliff and Nina

Cass and Kathleen

Cass and Frankie

Roman and Marlena

Bo and Hope

Jack and Jennifer

Tom and Margo

Josh and Reva

Nikki and Victor

Ridge and Brooke

Eric and Stephanie

Cord and Tina

Todd and Blair

Erica and Jackson

To me a supercouple has to have the "IT" factor. They have to have that natural chemistry that you can just see pop off the screen when ever they are in scenes with one another (example Nick and Phyllis on Y&R). I think today, so many of the shows are putting couples together who have forced chemistry, throwing them against the wall (like spaghetti) and seeing which ones will stick and be loved by the fans......case in point All My Children's "Rylee." JMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

maybe early Luis/Sheridan had potential but the way they've been written the past 2 years has suggested that they are not a supercouple. The show has been pushing him and Fancy as the true love with Sheridan an evil, hateful bitch obsessed with Luis and out to ruin them. She's a villian with little to no redeeming qualities and that couple has no rooting value as she's turned into someone just like Beth and Alistiar, the 2 people who caused her the most pain over the years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not a PASSIONS fan, and even I didn't understand how the Luis/Sheridan/Fancy triangle turned out. If Galen Gering and Emily Harper have chemistry - and I don't watch, so I don't know if they do or not - and JER wanted to push that to the forefront, that's one thing. But IMO, Sheridan's personality change, while encoded in her DNA, was off-putting and not the least bit gradual.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • ROFL.  priceless.   There are also countless mentions how wonderful Claire is, but I could not stomach watching a compilation of that!
    • The air...is looooooooooong gone.  
    • From what I remeber reading, it seemed as if it all completely falls apart post-Labine and Mayer around a year later when Ben is sent to prison around June 1976. Ben's departure undoes one of the major story threads that had carried the show for many months. Without a catalyst of Ben's ilk in the wings, there wasn't much to carry either story for the two women (Betsy and Arlene). Arlene was briefly paired in a one-sided attraction with Ray before becoming involved with Ian Russell. I believe the Schneiders introduced Ian as a suave businessman interested in Arlene who was also considering a dalliance with Meg. That would have been delightful but Upton arrives and quickly shifts the narrative to Arlene as a kept woman / prostitute (though I only think she was sleeping with Ian, but maybe I'm wrong).  I think it is Upton who transitioned Ben from complicated heel with a romantic appeal to a tortured, brooding romantic lead with a complicated past. I'm not sure that was the smartest move. Upton must have believed that Ben's near rape was his redemption arc, but I don't think it was enough. There is something deliciously wicked about Ben becoming involved with Mia after the death of Mia's stepson Jim Marriott, who had confessed his love for Mia before racing off on his motorbike and being hit by Ben's car. I could see the appeal, but I don't think it completely worked.  There should have been an angle involving Betsy (who had been a reporter I think when she first appeared) investigating Jim Marriott's accident, possibly with Jamie Rolins who was I believe district attorney. Betsy and Ben growing closer as Betsy grows closer to the truth. Ben confiding in Mia as Andrew continues to make Ben his surrogate son setting in motion the same dramatic situation with Andew's second wife being in love with his son/surrogate son.  I think Betsy and Jamie Rollins were together while Ben was in prison, but I don't think they had much to do. I may be wrong. Meg should have gone after custody making it seem like Jamie and/or Betsy were unfit leading to a case with social services which would have brought Diana Lamont back into the mix causing emotional angst for Diana as she works with Jamie to provide him the child she couldn't.  The Felicia / Eddie / Charles stuff seems rather generic once you get to Charles' paralysis and sexual dysfunction. Felicia's pregnancy and her death seemed to bring an end to a story that really wasn't strong enough to be frontburner. The Lynn Henderson stuff always seems rather movie of the week rather than developed for an ongoing story.  In the past, I agreed that it might have been possible that the story had become so disjointed that they needed to freshen up and add new story elements as Upton did but others have suggested that the elements themselves should have just been considered.   For example, I'm not a huge proponent of Rick and Cal as a couple, but I do think there was some mileage of actually reintroducing Barbara into the mix trying to reconnect with Hank, carrying a torch for Rick, causing conflict in the Sterlings marriage with Bruce and Van taking sides over Barbara vs. Cal, and Barbara maneuvering her way into the Beaver Ridge Complex making her business partners with Rick and Meg, which would give her a new rival.  When Ben returned, there should have been a question of how true his redemption was rather than just jumping in head first to a new role.  I think the Schneiders might have been script writers for Ann Marcus on "Search for Tomorrow," but I may be wrong on that.  Upton introduced the Marriotts in Janaury, 1977. Christian Marlowe's Andy Marriott seemed to be in the mold of Ben. I don't know if the story was any good, but I think Upton towards the end hinted an Andrew / Meg / Andy storyline which I thought would have been interesting. I think Upton had some interesting concepts, but from my understand, the execution was awful. 
    • Is there a new drinking game I don't know about?
    • But... the air of mystery and intrigue as they say it...
    • Chelsea wore this Episode #39, April 21, 2025, to watch the family karaoke. https://wornontv.net/508945/ https://shopafrm.com/products/shailene-dress-pink-petal

      Please register in order to view this content

      Preview of the upcoming May 10, 2025 Saturday Night Live: Régine Chassagne of "Arcade Fire" will wear the  same pink petal sheer mesh print but a top instead of a dress (Editorialist link) or (Nordstrom link) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHUNjOYjBOg screengrab of youtube:
    • I didn't wanna "ruin" it for you if Raven hadn't left on her midnight trip to London yet.  But based on where she's going -- and who she'll be staying with -- you can assume there will be some drama when she returns! I believe she even says to Logan or Eliot Dorn before she leaves, "My stepfather, Ansel Scott, always had a 'thing' for me!" lol.  
    • Introducing Genoa City's hottest story in Daytime: April and May are going to be a LONG edit lol. If there's enough demand I'll compile "Abbott Communications" as well.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Greg and Paige were an interesting choice for a couple.  I do think the lack of focusing on the generational differences hindered their long term potential. I think Laura had learned to keep her feelings close to her vest, especially after the hell she went through in her early years on the show.  The last scene of her trying to keep her tears inside as she drove away was the first time we had seen Laura really express what she was feeling after two or three seasons of her keeping her true self hidden from everyone.. even Greg.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy