Jump to content

ALL: Would you accept a "straight" character coming out late in life?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I know people get tired of seeing stories of cute, teenage boys coming out. The "late-in-life" coming out story is something the soaps have really never attempted seriously, and certainly not with a longtime character. (Katherine Chancellor's aborted lesbian affair on Y&R was before my time. But the keyword there is aborted.) But three primetime series have recently told such stories.

* BROTHERS AND SISTERS: After his old same-sex fling came back to haunt him, Saul recently admitted to his sister Nora he fell in love with a man.

* NIP/TUCK: Joely Richardson's character Julia has embarked on a lesbian love affair with a character played by Portia de Rossi.

* THE STREET: This BBC drama had an episode about a "straight" demolition man who has sex with another man while working away from home on a project. But when his folks back home learn about the affair, he has to deal with the homophobic fallout.

So that brings me to my question:

Would you accept a longtime character, heretofore known as "straight," developing same-sex feelings?

I highly doubt TPTB would risk such a story in the current soap landscape. They're too chickenshit. They'd fear that they'd forever taint their romantic heroes and heroines by making their sexuality questionable. They never consider the converse argument, that making a character's orientation less black-and-white might make them more intriguing.

Still, I'm interested in what people have to say. I have a feeling that many fans would call it "re-writing history." Of course, TAD MARTIN couldn't be bisexual: he's dated women ALL HIS LIFE. No way would CARLY TENNEY have a lesbian fling: she like-a da pinga too much. But if we're using the widely accepted idea that sexuality is a spectrum, then why not? And maybe they've had same-sex affairs before - who knows what characters have been up to before they turn up on our screens?

So what do you think? And which longtime character would be most prime for such a story?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I accidentally posted this under the "Gay Sandwich" topic. (Never thought I'd type those words. HAH!)

I think the biggest problem with late-in-life-dabbling on the soaps is that we have SEEN most of these vets every day for the last 15-20 (and many times, twenty-plus) years. And we've seen them IN LOVE and IN THE BEDROOM. So the fans would see it as a blatant history rewrite.

That being said, something like Kim Hughes' college roommate showing up in town, and we find out Kim experimented in college or something (this is a ridiculously extreme example, and I don't really want to see it, but you get my drift) IF TOLD CORRECTLY could be a fascinating story. But it would have to be VERY carefully told, and I'm not sure there's any writer in daytime right now (or any EP/network, I should say) that could tackle it respectfully. Otherwise, the fans would completely revolt and it would turn into probably one of the bigger bombs on daytime.

Interesting topic...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You know, I was just getting ready to say that I cauldn't see it working under most circumstances or by most writers, and that I thought most viewers would not accept it. And then I saw this comment. And you are completely and totally right. That is one huge exception.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It wasn't really later in life, but after several failed attempts at giving him a female love interest Lucas finally came out as gay on GH. I would love to see a character like Jake Martin come out on AMC, or Joey Buchanan on OLTL come out. It would make things lots more interesting and reboot some characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It happens in real life, so it could happen on a soap. I'm not suggesting this, but a good example could be Paul on Y&R. His family is deeply religious (like most old school Y&R characters), so that would be a reason he'd his his sexuality at all costs. Even his brother is a priest.

The new Chris Hughes on ATWT is as camp as a row of tents. I could totally see him being gay and it would fit into this mold. We haven't seen him in very serious relationships and the current Chris just isn't believable with women. I'd prefer a more macho man to come out though. That's something rare on soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it's interesting that the oblivious soap press makes no mention of Susan Flannery's recent evolution in demeanor. In a genre all about very clear heterosexual archetypes, she gives the most unfeminine portrayal of one. Of course any equation of gender and sexuality can be different than what we expect, but the identifiers for a soap opera are so defined that I'm surprised Brad Bell hasn't taken note and made changes by now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

yes. i think it would be a great storyline. it could really work with someone is on and off on the show or someone who left for some time and come back because that leaves a gap of time we dont know what happend. Bill Lewis on GL. Philip or Max on Days. Joey on OLTL. id also like to see a steight guy start to have feelings or be attracted to another guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Count me among them, Faulkner.

I don't have a problem, per se, with coming-out stories. The Bible and "the Church" have their views on homosexuality - and as a candidate for confirmation into the Catholic church, I feel I should respect that; but, like it or not, it is reality, and soaps, like every other form of scripted entertainment, should reflect that.

That said, however, I get bored with each new tale of this sort, b/c it's almost always the same tale, told over and over again. There are minor variations with each new version, of course, but the basic arc is the same: sensitive-but-otherwise-well-adjusted teen realizes why he (or she, in the case of AMC's Bianca - but usually, it's a he) has always felt "different" from everyone else; his parents react to his announcement either with hysterical denial or flat-out scorn; he is ostracized by one parent or the other (and later, depending on the story, by others within the community); his family even threatens, at one point, to come undone by this turn of events; but a series of near-tragic circumstances ultimately brings the reluctant parent around, and helps the community-at-large realize what kind of hypocritical, narrow-minded bigots they really are.

Then, in most cases, that teen leaves town within six months, and is never seen or heard from again. (By the way, where is Billy Douglas, lol?) Thank God, however, for ATWT's Luke and Noah, b/c I wasn't ready to say goodbye to Lily's son.

As you have intimated, that's due to fear on the part of network execs and sponsors, for two reasons:

1) Homosexuality, in and of itself, is bound to alienate some viewers, and TPTB are ruled too much by financial concerns to risk that. (Honestly, someone at Televest must've been asleep at the wheel to let Luke-is-gay go on w/o some kind of fight, lol.)

2) If the character in question is someone the audience has known and loved for years, TPTB fear, the audience, including those who otherwise wouldn't mind a coming-out story, will tune out b/c, to quote Marland, "He wouldn't do that." (I mean, characters these days are doing all sorts of things that are illogical, but...well, you know what I mean.)

Would I, lol!?

Just as it was a dream, if you will, of Agnes Nixon's to have someone like Bianca, the front-burner offspring of a legacy/core character, come out of the closet, it is a dream of mine to see the same happen for someone whom most see as a pillar of the community.

Yup, lol.

Exactly - and as you, yourself, have said:

Now, here's where I might get into some trouble, lol.

I have one character in mind who...might be a little shocking to some. In fact, it'll be very shocking, lol.

It's ATWT's Dr. Bob Hughes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

QUOTE (Chris B @ Nov 28 2007, 06:54 PM)
It happens in real life, so it could happen on a soap. I'm not suggesting this, but a good example could be Paul on Y&R. His family is deeply religious (like most old school Y&R characters), so that would be a reason he'd his his sexuality at all costs. Even his brother is a priest.

The new Chris Hughes on ATWT is as camp as a row of tents. I could totally see him being gay and it would fit into this mold. We haven't seen him in very serious relationships and the current Chris just isn't believable with women. I'd prefer a more macho man to come out though. That's something rare on soaps.

I have gotten the gay vibe from Chris since day 1. The same goes with Evan Walsh.

:lol: He should have made a play for Cal Stricklyn. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • This is the perfect way to encapsulate the situation. So many morally-reprehensible stories were foisted on the show and its characters in ATWT's dwindling years. Rape should never be used as a cheap plot device or in a way that degrades the victim. Jack's sexual assault was another heinous example of how nasty the the show's tone had become. The fact that people like Hogan Sheffer, Ron Carlivati, Jean Passanante, Charles Pratt, Dena Higley, etc., somehow end up winning awards for their material, decimates the credibility and integrity of the awards, IMHO. Soaps used to have a solid moral core and did not originally wallow in the gutter, rolling around in filth and depravity just to be cool, hip, campy, or whatever else modern-day PTB aim for. Thank you. Cruelty, degradation and misogyny are not components which lend themselves to successful soaps, which have always been predicated on warmth, family bonds, and providing a comforting haven for their audience. The genre has been crippled because the cynical and ignorant executives in charge understand neither the shows nor what the audience wants to see.
    • Beverlee was on a whole other level from Kim. It's not like they were in competition with each other. I get the feeling that Kim had a slight problem with the super-professional, serious cast members who just wanted everyone to be prepared and do the work, as she seems to like having fun on set. (She's made a few cracks about Chris Bernau being like that). Bev was definitely one of those. But they didn't work together that much. Yeah, they made her manic and also much weaker. She always had a vulnerability, but wanting to kill herself over that guy? No way. Not only that, he didn't leave her! She insisted he marry Maeve. When they did the tribute to Bert/Charita, the compilation of scenes with her showed how much the cast had been almost totally turned over in a relatively short period of time. Nearly every shot was of her by herself because most people she had worked with had been fired, left or been replaced. I assume they couldn't show her with people who hadn't been replaced, like Don Stewart, Elvera Roussel, or Robert Newman because they would have had to pay them for using their clips. It's dreadful to watch. Like she had no connection to the current show.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • A little too much focus on Chad and Cat today but I enjoyed the episode. I have a feeling that Jennifer’s gonna get dumped on though, even though I think that her anger is completely understandable and justified. And honestly, Ron is finally gone; Abigail can come back now.  But, welcome back, Anna! It was nice seeing Carrie have scenes with her mother. Christie Clark and Leann Hunley have never really had that many scenes together and to see them have them now is really nice. I’m glad that both of them were there to comfort Marlena too. Their words were definitely the thing that Marlena needed to hear. Btw, with all this talk of Noah, does it mean that he’s gonna be introduced soon? Amy, revealing that John changed her flat tire many years ago seemed a little random though. I would rather she have said something about how everybody in Salem knows of John Black because of how he was always such a hero. But at the same time, her story also showed what a great guy John was.  I liked Kate’s scenes with Philip too, and her promise to get back at Xander for what he did. And since we didn’t see JPL in the bed, did he need some time off or something? And yeah, everything involving ‘One Stormy Night’ still seems very Ron-like to me.
    • The second photo featuring the late John Spencer is from the Law & Order episode, "Prescription For Death", which was the (second) pilot/first episode all the way back in 1990! He played the father of a daughter that had gone to the ER for a mere sore throat but ended up dead because the doctor on call was drunk and had given her medication that she had an adverse reaction to, after receiving some other medication. So, he will always have that great distinction in addition to The West Wing. (The first pilot, "Everybody's Favorite Bagman", was filmed in 1988! The show was offered to CBS, but they passed. In syndication, it is oddly placed as the sixth episode of Season 1. And Roy Thinnes played DA Alfred Wentworth there. When NBC picked up the show two years later, Thinnes declined to return, and that's how we got Steven Hill's DA Adam Schiff.)
    • exactly. I can understand schadenfreude if it were real, but a lot of this is just an engineered distraction.
    • Days of our Lives S60E204 – Thursday, June 5, 2025 Okay, today’s episode was kind of boring. It was nice seeing Jack and Jen back, but they wasted an entire episode on Jen chatting with Julie - one scene would’ve been enough. Also, why didn’t Jack and Jen go comfort Marlena? And wouldn’t a flashback with Jack, Jen, and John have been great? Maybe something from the Cruise of Deception era? Bottom line - it feels like once John’s memorial is over and the returning fan favorites leave Salem… the show’s going to be dull again.
    • Everything with Elon and Trump is a stunt. If people, and the sycophantic press, are talking about their "feud," they are not talking about Republican plans to gut Medicare, Medicaid, and the ACA. 
    • I can't fully remember, but I don't think they tried to get Beth Chamberlin back. I think Laibson/McTavish likely saw Beth as old news and wanted to move Philip on; either that or have her return only when Philip was closely tied to a new woman. Thanks as always for these recaps. I think I had stopped watching around this time and mostly kept up by reading in the soap magazines. Bridget's degradation was horrible to watch, as the character had grown so much over the years and was clearly regressed just to be a foil for a "hot" couple viewers had zero investment in. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy