Jump to content

Days:Jeremy and Jett


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Just some speculation here -- lately I've been pretty open with my displeasure for Hogan, but somehow I think these two guys have the stamp of Corday on them. Hogan's guy was Nick, a scrawny (in soap terms) guy with a brain. As little as I think of Hogan these days, I don't think these two latest Ken Dolls are his idea. I think he may have wanted to bring Hortons back, sure, but the look of these two oh-so-edgy fighter pilots (gag me) is Corday's idea, IMO. More underwear model casting, ugh.

I just knew from the moment they announced that they'd be two edgy bad boys from the Air Force that Jett and Jeremy would be absolute losers. Nothing against the Air Force, I know people in it myself, but you just KNOW that when Days does something like that it's going to result in annoying losers. Bad boys? Walking cliches, if you ask me.

I never thought I'd miss Max, but the prospect of watching these two all summer has me missing Max. You read it here first, Darin Brooks -- I'M SOOO SORRY!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Jeremy/Jett scream "Corday" to me, too.

He's probably to blame for Chelsea and Nick being pulled apart this summer. He doesn't like the idea of a "nerd" being a hero on this soap. He probably thinks their "lack of chemistry" is part of the reason for low ratings. What an idiot! It's not their chemistry that people were pissed at... it's the fact that they were on five days a week!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, look at him!

I think its pretty safe to say based on the captions for those pictures of these two guys that Days is unabashedly going for fluff here. "They'll cause trouble and make hearts flutter! Let's hit the beach!" Like I said before, I think Corday took a look at GH's Coop and Logan and went "Hey we should do that! ... but with more muscles!"

The agonizing part is everything Jeremy should have been. He doesn't have to be a nice guy, but he really should be smart. He should have intelligence and a care for current events, maybe he's opinionated with a response for every issue.

This guy, I don't think he could even spell "opinionated".

Am I judging quickly? Yes. If I'm wrong, will I repent? For sure. But am I wrong? I doubt it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If Chick had started when Bope, J&M and the DiMera story was in full swing, and were on only three times a week, then they would be the next best thing. Sadly, they were one of the few couples Days has started since 1999 that I give three hoots about. I am looking forward to this, however, since Chelsea will balance what she wants...the muscly bad boy or the lean, loveable nerd type. It could be good to have an event that is Chelsea's fault and Nick can blame HER.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree this is clearly Corday. But just from their names it is clear TPTB never wanted them to be a long term character.

I mean, with the attitude Stephanie has, Jeremy will not last as her boyfriend long. Besides, they are already together and had sex offscreen. That itself terminates any chance for Jeremy to stay long. I think if something, Jeremy will be used as the transition guy Stephanie needs to realize she wants more from life than a hot stupid guy and meaningless sex.

And Jett´s only purpose seems to be to test Chelsea and her love for Nick. I´m sure they will be flirting a lot, but at the end she will be back with Nick and with her virginity still intact. Sheffer already invested too much into their romance to just throw it all away.

So, summ it up, both Jeremy and Jett seems to be clearly a one note summer characters.

But I think everybody is missing the most important thing. All this storyline is clearly a filler which will not be featured a lot and means teens will not be involved in the main Dimera/Brady storyline. People should be happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree clearly Stephanie/Jeremy won't last. I also agree that Sheffer is not "done" with Chelsea/Nick, all romances need obstacles especially early on.

I don't share the same faith that the storyline will get little airtime though. Even though it's separated from the Dimera stuff, they do need more than one storyline to show daily and I'm sure I'll be getting more than my fill of them. I also don't know if we'll be rid of both of them after the summer.

And if nothing else, I really hate that our first exposure to Jeremy Horton will be summer filler fluff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

well if they really want to bring more horton's back,maybe Melissa's daughter is working as a stripper in Vages..

I still think it was stupid to bring them to the show.even if they claim they have connections to other characters,they are still newbies and that has been a big problem with Days lately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Jett's already growing on me, a bit. At least he's a good guy.

I kinda like Jeremy a bit but I wish they'd add more depth to him. Same for Stephanie. Both just come across as plastic and shallow, which is not what I expect in Mike Horton's son and Kayla and Steve's daughter. I think that's why I'm finding all of this a bit hard to swallow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You and about 99.9% of the rest of the audience. If people want plastic people, they have plenty of different shows to choose from and most of them are on when they're home, not in the middle of the day. Daytime is not the place for this ridiculousness. It needs to have depth. Most of these shoes have been on for 30 years. When will people realize that gimmicks fizzle in this genre? There's a formula of what works. Bloody use it. They've basically taken these plastic people and labelled them so that we should love them. Only, that kind of mind trick doesn't work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We all knew who was oing to play Jet, so no surprise there. But I must say Jeremy looks kind of like I expected. Not that it's a good thing or anything. lol DAYS had one actor who looked more plastic though... the guy who played Willows brother. It didn't help he was such a poor actor either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know Curlee/Demorest tried to give Roger a conscience in regard to raping Holly, and Zas is magnificent in those scenes with Alex. But he kinda ends up blaming Adam and the fact he (well, really the writers) ignores raping Rita and being responsible for her and Ed's child's death make it less than convincing.  I do think during 89-93 they were careful to not whitewash his past with Holly, but his occasional bouts of conscience always seemed to be overridden by his obsession/lust for her. The only purely good thing I can ever recall him doing is helping Maureen during the blackout, and even then, had she lived, he would've found a way to call that favor in.
    • Regardless, I'd still like to see more episodes from the 80s...there is very little of Charlotte Greer, Kirklands and Greenberg's out there sadly.
    • A black family having a white maid would be a good subversion of stereotypes. Also want to say that while the overall show has many flaws, the biggest one that's legitimately stifling is the lack of a rival family.
    • I also do not like the bits I've seen with Delia during Labine's 83 return. I am glad when she came back for the last time in 1986, she allowed Delia to move on from Frank. 
    • Thanks for the well-detailed reply. I'm fairly early in my viewing, so I have some time before it goes nuts. Thanks a lot! @kalbir and @DRW50 thank you so much. I am just approaching 100 episodes, so I'm good for now. 
    • The Duprees as the main family isn't the problem, but the fact is that over 3/4 of the cast are Duprees.. so it limits coupling potential and also keeps the canvas too closed in. Too many female Duprees and no hetero, nor gay, male Duprees is also a problem.   I also agree with @DemetriKanethat the male characters are one note, and not very layered/interesting... outside of Bill, that is. To me, I would have focused on either Nicole's family and dynamics or Dani's family and dynamics instead of trying to introduce/develop both families at the same time.  Nicole's family is more developed and interesting with loads of storyline possiblities then Dani's family right now. And because MVJ and co decided to feature so many Duprees... we're less likely to be free of any outside characters like Ashley/Derek since they're the non-Dupree part of the canvas.
    • BTG: A B&B: B DAYS: B+ GH: A- Y&R: C-
    • I can not see Kat as a police officer and do not want that for her. Thats not her passion nor does she care about that stuff. The stuff with Eva and Leslie is specific to her life and wanting to protect her family. Her "detective" skills have more to do with her business background, which makes her very analytical and pay close attention to details. If this show had a corporation, she'd make a shrewed businesswoman and CEO I definitely dont want to see her sleep with her cousin's husband. That would be too much of a Hayley redux which ironically you dont want with the Sharon/Hayley theory
    • I would make Jan, Ashley's mom, Anita and Vernon's maid. It would lock in to why Leslie would choose to befriend both her and Mona. It also gives Ashley a connection to the Duprees and explains how she befriended Naomi. I would have had Derek start the show as a cop to explain his connection to Jacob. Kat needs to realize that she is MADE to be a detective. Have her go through police training, making the appropriate comments about the uniform along the way. Have her prove she is so much more than a rich princess, even to herself. Then, when Jacob's partner is proven to be dirty, Kat is assigned as Jacob's rookie trainee. At the same time, Naomi does finally get a case she can follow through on. Her client is a person that Jacob arrested. This puts them at odds because Jacob knows this person did it, as does Kat, but Naomi only sees the extenuating circumstances and believes he deserves a lighter sentence and a second chance. THAT is when Jacob will turn to Kat in frustration and she will lose her virginity to him. 
    • This opened my eyes and appeals to my logic. But, don't you also think that the fact that they are so ill-suited means that, by soap-opera-laws, they aren't a long term item?  I like how Belle is written now, so I appreciate the fact that she is in this story.  But, I don't believe anything will become of it, and I think EJ is going to mess it up very soon.  Which explains why I don't get too worked up over it. I'm also suspending my outrage until I see how EJ treats Belle during her mourning.  If he cheats with Cat, then we'll know that he was never meant to be happy.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy