Jump to content

Dirty Sexy Money: Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

It is VERY hard to follow. I don't think Berlanti ever was an actual show runner as he was busy with B&S and then Eli Stone, which is his focus, but he was involved--and still is I assume and it's handled at Berlanti's prodcution company. Craig Wright the creator is still one of the main writers--it's not a situation like the playwright/creator of B&S (which still worries me though I liek the new/current showrunners). Reims was the original showrunner--with Wright as creator.

The current show runner is the guy who worked on Big Shots isn't it? Which I thought was AWFUL and flopped so I have no idea what's going on but I enjoyed the direction the show was going so much I'm gonan remian cuationally optimistic (frtnakly I think Cerrone's planned darker directon sounded mroe interesting) He also was an EP at Tru Calling and Reunion two other shows I found awful... sigh this is worrying me more and more lol

Found this dated mid June:

There have been a lot of personnel changes made to the cast and creative staff of Dirty Sexy Money lately. Only four months after replacing original showrunner Josh Reims, Daniel Cerone has left his executive producer/showrunner position. Big Shots creator Jon Feldman is Cerone's replacement.

Apparently ABC didn't share Cerone's vision for a darker season two of Dirty Sexy Money. Fortunately, Cerone is leaving on good terms with the network. He still has a two-year deal with the ABC Studios. There will be an unexpected early break in production so that showrunner duties can be handed off to Jon Feldman.

I'm not sure what to expect from Dirty Sexy Money next season. There has only been one short season of the show, and DSM's already on its third showrunner. Series regular Samaire Armstrong's role has been scaled down, and Lucy Liu may be joining the cast. Will the show look and feel the same when it returns? If Cerone's take on Dirty Sexy Money was too dark, will the series become more of a soapy drama?

Is this news cause for concern, or just the usual retooling?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 166
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

The problems I have with the show begin with its title — it's beyond awful! And in my opinion, the role of Darling patriarch doesn't belong to Sutherland; he's just not suited to play it. And at this particular time, I can't think of anyone who could. But there are plenty of choices.

And Krause is a joke, I just dislike the actor. And also — it's a miscast.

I don't know what to say about Cerone, since he worked on Charmed! :lol: God knows what his vision for this show would look like! It seems that a good showrunner is difficult to find nowadays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^I wanted to lvoe this show but just.. couldnt.

Its a big mess, and not the awesome kinda soapy twisted messed up family mess it thinks it is. everything comes off as either stupid or bad.

I like PK, loved him on Sports Night or whatever that 90's sitcom was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it took a few episodes to find its footing but was awesome near the end--some fo the scnees between Sutherland and Krause were just hair raising and Jill Clayburgh has always been one of my fave older actresses--Seth Gabel prob surprising me and ending up being the other standout character--apparantly Berlanti cast him after his audition for Eli Stone blew him away (his bonding with krause's wife--the pot smoking int he gallery, etc was a brilliant scene).

Sylph I suspect you didn't watch too much of the show but tha tmay just be me beign snarky. I agree the title threw me off and took me a bit to get past--btu I do think Sutherland was great casting--and as a big SFU fan i love Krause but I can understand when you just don't like an actor (don't get me on a rant abotu Tom Hanks unless you have a lot of time...)

Cerone DID do a good job showrunning Dexter season 1--it seems silly for ABC to hire him off of Dexter, then complain he was too DARK lol. But I hated Charmed so :P yeah--

The show did seem to divide critics--Ent Weekly put it on their best of the year list, and I'm sure a few put it on their worse--so it makes sense it so sharply divided audiences I guess. I do hope we can all agree that it was miles better than Big Shots which again has me worried now that that show runner has moved to it... Sigh. Maybe primetime drama shorunner torubles are nearly as messed up as the Daytime head writer sitch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ABC posted a 5 minute "recap" of season one which is good since I'm sure even the peopel who watched every episode like me forget most of the details. There's also an interview with Greg Berlanti about all his shows (I have to admit he's pretty cute but I still find something about him off putting)

">
" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344">

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I really liked this show and I thought it had a lot of potential. It didn't quite live up to my hopes, but still it was quite good. I love PK, but his character needs to have something to play other than consternation at the self indulgent behavior of the Darlings. Imo, they need to show him longing for Karen, but fighting it tooth and nail. It would give his character more depth and make it easier to root for him. Also, they need to show that Nick is the one Karen really loves no matter what (or who) else she's doing.

These characters should not be allowed to get together until the show is almost through it's run, but there should be a lot more push and pull than we got last year when things were too campy.

There are so many good things about this show. The concept is good, several of the characters and actors are very good, but somehow the finished product doesn't quite gel. I also suspect that the writer's strike both hurt and saved this show. The ratings were pretty mediocre if I remember right and it seems like the plug might have been pulled if there were a lot of pilots to choose from. At the same time the strike screwed up the shows momentum. Will people come back after last season is the question. They didn't really give us enough reason to, but I will anyway because I think the characters are so much fun.

I'll be watching this show this fall, but I don't have a lot of hope that it will survive it's second year. All the backstage upheaval speaks to a lack of leadership and direction and that's something DSM has badly needed all along. It doesn't look like it will get it, but I hope I'm wrong. If we're lucky maybe the relaunch will be successful. Personally, I wish they had stuck with Cerone. I could have gotten behind a darker second season. What I can't get behind is fluff, which is basically what Big Shots was. I guess we'll see how things turn out soon enough. I have my fingers crossed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

Cerone left Dexter for DSM--apparantly to take it in a darker direction. Now they decided against that but in the current Ent Weekly they promise it'll be much "soapier". JuliaJms I think your view of the show is pretty spot on though I felt it was really gaining momentum at the end. I'll agree (and it seems the cast and crew do too) that it never *quite* clicked despite all the talent behind and in front of the camera and I hope it finds its footing cuz I have a lot of affection for it and for the kinda show it could be.

Here's the Ent Weekly piece:

Returning Drama

Starts October 1, 10-11PM, ABC

The 125 black-tie partygoers on this three-story yacht have been at it since the previous night, but the wineglasses are still clinking, the twinkle lights still twinkling, the Jacuzzi still bubbling. Then, suddenly, a hush sweeps over the crowd as they hover wearily over trays of plastic sushi and warm glasses of bubbly: The climactic scene on this Dirty Sexy Money episode is finally going down after 16 hours of shooting. A tuxedoed Tripp Darling (Donald Sutherland) presents a small, shiny gift to his family's principled lawyer, Nick George (Peter Krause). ''It's the key to this boat,'' Tripp booms. ''It's yours.'' But seconds later, a half dozen cops storm the vessel, and the family politico, Attorney General Patrick Darling (William Baldwin), turns an accusatory gaze on Nick: ''What the hell have you done?''

We won't spoil what brought on the NYPD raid, but we will tell you what Nick and the Darlings are trying to do: Their mission is to reinvent the prime-time network soap. Again. Last fall, ABC attempted to launch its ''Dynasty for the new millennium,'' as creator/exec producer Craig Wright describes it, with much fanfare. It seemed reasonable to think Sexy would sell: The tongue-in-cheek chronicle of an — berwealthy family living in the age of gossipmongering boasted a platinum cast, including Sutherland, Baldwin, Oscar nominee Jill Clayburgh as family matriarch Letitia, and Emmy nominee Krause as their moral center. But the series premiered to an okay 10.4 million viewers — and dropped to a paltry 6.7 million by episode 10. Worse still, the writers' strike ended DSM's season with the Dec. 5 episode.

Still, ABC saw potential payoff in the Darlings. So just as it did with Pushing Daisies and Grey's Anatomy spin-off Private Practice, the network gave producers time off in the spring to regroup, rather than rushing back on air post-strike. Now Wright & Co. have a second chance to make a show that lives up to its seductive name.

A television series is like a mirage in the beginning,'' says Krause. ''Until you all agree on what it is you're heading toward, it's hard. I think we're getting there now.'' The road to creative clarity, though, was rough. Just after the strike, Dexter exec producer Daniel Cerone replaced original showrunner Josh Reims. Then ABC Studios swapped Cerone out for Jon Harmon Feldman (Big Shots) and started this season from scratch. Execs say the leadership changes were simply about getting the behind-the-scenes chemistry right. ''Jon's a perfect fit,'' says Steve Tann, ABC Studios' vice president of current programming. ''He shares Craig's vision for the show.'' Adds Wright: ''No one was to blame. We took the show in a direction very briefly where we thought, 'If we did that, would it make everyone happy?' We did it, and then went, 'No.'''

The plan that made everyone finally say ''yes'' involves amping things up to prime-time-soap levels, with all the wealthy trappings a cash-strapped nation wants to fantasize about. ''It's getting dirtier, sexier, and moneyer,'' Wright says. ''We're selling the wish fulfillment.'' The story picks up six months after the finale, in which Nick found out about Karen's (Natalie Zea) affair with Simon Elder (Blair Underwood); Brian (Glenn Fitzgerald) left the ministry and joined the family business; and Patrick's transgendered mistress, Carmelita (Candis Cayne), vanished. The premiere will feature character introductions for neophytes and plenty of action for fans, including murder, the revelation of a possible culprit in Nick's father's death, and new cast member Lucy Liu as Nola Lyons. ''She's like a wrecking ball,'' says Liu. ''Even if she makes a mistake, you can't tell, because she walks right over it.''

Nola will begin flirting with layabout playboy Jeremy (Seth Gabel), who'll continue to struggle with the sexual tension between him and Nick's wife, Lisa (Zoe McLellan). Samaire Armstrong, who played spoiled Juliet, and who struggled with ''personal issues'' at an outpatient facility last fall, won't return as a series regular. (Producers insist Armstrong was a casualty of plot changes, nothing more. ''She will still be a member of the family and on the show,'' Wright says.) Nick, meanwhile, is fighting his attraction to Karen, even as she gets closer to Simon, a man with possibly nefarious interest in the Darlings. ''You think you've got him figured out, but the next scene it turns around,'' Underwood says of Simon, whom he describes as ''the chocolate Richard Branson.'' How explosive could things get? ''The best way for Simon to use his power is to end Karen's life,'' Wright hints. ''Whether Nick would allow that to happen and what it might cost him to stop it is an interesting question.''

The cast knows all too well the price of being on a could-be-great prime-time soap that can't quite seem to get off the ground. ''It feels like the start of season 3,'' Krause sighs, ''and we haven't even done a full season's worth of episodes yet.'' Adds Baldwin: ''We're so close, I can taste what it would be like if I were on a hit television series.'' Better than prop sushi and two-day-old fake champagne, we hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Is it just me or does it seem shor runners are having a hard time the past year or two--I guess the strike played a big part. It seems more than usual shows are running through a number of them.

Josh Reims was showrunner number 1 for I think the first 8 episodes, followed by Daniel Cerrone who it sounds like basically was in charge of the two remainign eps that aired (which went ina direction I liked--oh well) and a couple coming up--if even that, and currently it's Jon Harmon Feldman. Craig Wright has stayed on the show as a main writer and EP the whole time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Administrator

1. Josh Reims (first season)

2. Daniel Cerone

3. Jon H. Feldman (current showrunner)

I believe ABC is dumping the Cerone episodes (so ABC basically wasted money shooting those episodes) and starting the season from scratch. So, the season premiere will be a JHF showrun episode.

This show is such a mess behind the scenes! Hopefully they'll be able to straighten everything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Now that GL and LOL synopses are being added I'd welcome requests for specific soaps from 1976.
    • By 78 NBC daytime was struggling. They knew what the issues were but failed to make the changes needed to get those young gals watching.  Jan 78 Plans for NBC's daytime programs - which are in third place -are apparently less well defined at the moment. Michael Brockman, a former daytime programer at ABC, took the position of vice president in charge of daytime for NBC just a few weeks ago. He and his chief assistant, Mary Alice Dwyer (an associate of Mr. Brockman at ABC), are in the process of analyzing the network's schedule to determine where to begin making changes. One thing Mr. Brockman knows, he said, is that NBC needs more women18 -49 (NBC is currently last in that category in daytime). "Whatever you design," he said, "has to fundamentally appeal to that demographic." He indicated, however, that he is less concerned with the network's afternoon serial block than he is with its morning game show and rerun mix, and, like his counterparts at the other networks, Mr. Brockman discounts the notion that recent drops in daytime viewership may be attributable to the one -hour serial form. The first changes were indeed in the morning. In April 78 Card Sharks replaced Sanford and Son reruns at 10am and High Rollers was introduced at 11am knocking Wheel of Fortune back to 11.30 replacing Knockout. Sanford and Son moved to noon replacing To Say the Least. On paper that looked like a stronger schedule. The next move in July was the disastrous America Alive at noon, replacing Sanford and The Gong Show,which set them back even further. Finally in October 78, Jeopardy was brought back at 10.30 and Hollywood Squares moved to 1pm replacing another flop For Richer for Poorer. The only major change for the soaps apart from cancelling FRFP, was Linda Grover as headwriter for The Doctors as of April 78.
    • Yeah, Ben and Evie don't start interacting in a 'we're going to pair them together as a couple' way until Feb/March 1977 when she recommends Ben paint a portrait for Jackie.  And Evie's working for Jackie so she and Ben interact and start to become friends.  That happens after Tim breaks up with  her and she's forgiven her sister.. and he and Hope break up after he covers for his younger brother for a crime that he had committed.  Jackie does come onto the canvas in December 1976 and the first months are her trying to snag Mike while she and Justin seem to play a cat and mouse game with one another as he's trying to restart things with Sara again. I often wonder if the Phillip story only came about because the show was going to be expanded to an hour.. and the Dobson's deciding that some of the new characters they were introducing could be tied to Justin/Jackie's back story.
    • Seems like the Dobsons were aiming for a Joe/Sara/Justin triangle or, having decided that Joe would be killed off, Justin would be waiting in the wings. But that never came to pass and I don't think there was much reference to Justin/Sara as time went on.That was something that could have been used later on but Doug Marland may not have known or cared. Also, when the show went to an hour they could add a lot of characters and not rely on the stalwarts, hence Jackie/Alan/Elizabeth. And after Leslie died, Mike went into Dad mode with Hope. Hope/Ben never took off and Hope was replaced and then dropped and Ben moved on to Eve, whose romance with Tim fizzled and Jordan Clarke left (by choice?)
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Would anyone have any of these Y&R episodes they could add to the vault? It would be very much appreciated. November 11, 1987 February 16, 1989 February 17, 1989 February 1991 episode - Brad vs Paul fight April 10, 1992 November 16, 1992 November 17, 1992 November 23-27, 1992 July 11, 1993 October 5, 1993 June 17, 1994  - english version June 29, 1994 September 15, 1994 May 16, 1995 August 4, 1995 October 27, 1995 March 11, 1996 April 8, 1996 September 6, 1996 November 26, 1996 January 3, 1997 January 27, 1997 February 17, 1997 February 18, 1997 March 5, 1997 April 22, 1997 June 16, 1997 September 23, 1997 September 24, 1997 September 25, 1997 December 11, 1998 January 12, 2000 September 27, 2000 March 5, 2001 March 6, 2001 March 8, 2001 - english version March 19, 2001 April 5, 2001 April 6, 2001 October 7, 2002 January 30, 2004 August 23, 2004 August 24, 2004 June 15, 2004 June 21, 2004 November 8, 2004                                          
    • When I was a kid, I would watch DOOL with my mom. I remember Denise as Susan so well. And later, of course, on GH. How sad to hear she has passed. RIP.
    • I have to dig that scene up on YT. I'm glad they gave them some kind of happy ending, even if it was really late. Interesting! I remember Justin and Sarah being involved, but I either forgot or never caught their backstory. The girl with money and social position of course turns out to be Jackie. He sort of did to Sarah what Vanessa did to his brother! I do remember Justin started out as not the greatest guy. Kind of a horn dog. It's only when Ross comes on that he becomes the "good" brother. I only have some vague memories of Ben and Hope, mostly of when they were in a positive relationship. He certainly changed over time. "Chill" would be the way I would describe Ben (along with "handsome but kind of a yawn") for most of his time on GL, so hearing he once had a violent temper is very surprising.
    • Yes. That's called good writing.
    • interesting idea.  That makes sense, as MVJ seems to have set up each character development (traits) for future plot developments.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy