Jump to content

Y&R: Discussion the Week of March 5th


Recommended Posts

  • Members

text_welcome_7.gif ladies and gents....

Looks like another week of Young and the Restless is upon us....Let's see what's up with those is G.C.

We'll expect to see more of the Colleen/Adrian saga...but someone's gearing up to put the flames out on them.

J.T. gets a taste of a jail cell, and tries in vain to get out..... Jack's up to some more tricks that affect the Newman family...What does David have to say now that he's been cold-busted with the FauxCarmen wanna be?

Dru gets not one but two unexpected visitors....who and what is the reason for the visits? Phyllis' ear hustling spells trouble for Sharon and Brad....Jill and Cane have some tests to take......Daniel blows off plans with Lily to hang with Amber ( :rolleyes::rolleyes: )

Well, there you have it folks.... Now let's do what we do best.....Tell the truth about what we like, dislike or could have done without on this week's discussion of Y&R

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

:mellow:<_<:rolleyes:WHY, WHY, WHY must we go down this road? I find Amber boring and blah. Now they're going to have her screwing up Daniel and Lily's marriage? Why does she get TWO storylines? She's on too much as it is. I feel like it's Cricket time all over again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

At least Christine has a brain, and isn't a dim witted half ass character who sucks worse than a Dirt Devil Vacuum on clearance at Wal-Mart.....I didn't get to see Christine in the 80's, but I have heard stories about how she was on a lot....She was on quite a bit when I started watching full time in the mid 90's, she got on my nerves somewhat; but the annoyance factor has never been as high with a character on Y&R with me as it it with Scamber...... :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, I was just referring to how much screen time Amber is getting. It's just like Cricket had gotten years ago. It used to be like tuning into the Cricket & the Restless. :huh: She was EV-ER-Y-WHERE. :lol: I actually liked Cricket until she was in every daggone storyline. I can't stand Amber as it is and now she's getting double time. <_<

Neil and Devon just buy David and Ines' story that they just met? So how is it that she strategically showed up everywhere Dru was? She had NO IDEA people were looking for her? Neil asked to have thousands of copies of those flyers printed and posted all over Genoa City! So I guess this is how they get out of being charged with slashing Dru's tires, breaking her into her home etc? This is PURE B.S!!!! Someone needs to answer for all that crap. Not just show up at the hospital to prove Dru isn't as crazy as every thought she was. I am really disappointed in this. How is it that Dru seems to be the only one who can put this together? Neil and Devon are NOT dumb. I'm hoping that maybe they are just putting on an act to get Dru out of there, then turn on the guns, but I guess that would be too much to ask, of course.

:lol: @ Dru saying to Ines, "You better quit it." :lol: :lol: :lol: I also :lol: when she said to Sharon, "Do I look like Victor Newman?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

WORD. Dru wasn't batsh!t crazy today and I loved her remarks at Carmen 2.0. Neil is pathetic and way too gullible. He isn't trying to be rationale at all, he's just being his usual sour puss self. I just want this BS to be over and done with. I also liked the preview of Nikki snapping at Phyllis. MTS/Nikki is best at her b!tchiest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I cracked up at sourpuss Nick scowling in the break room when Jack and Phyllis were talking about his running for Senate...you coult tell that Phyllis was all into it; and Jack was loving every minute of it....Jack will not only work on his campaign to win the senate seat, but also to win Phyllis back...that's for darn sure.

Also cracked up when David Chow thought he could get around Sir Victor Newman... :lol: Victor was like, "no, you can put THEM on hold."

Also a side note...the whole Phyllis asking Victoria for help with her wedding is just an added bonus for when the other shoe falls for Sharon and Brad :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
    • Sally Spencer was a decent actress, but the writing destroyed the "M.J." that Kathleen Layman had built. Layman had a quiet strength about her, and she and Osburn really felt like sisters. Spencer's character should have been either an unmentioned sister, or maybe Jake's that grew up close to Kathleen, M.J. and the rest, but was away for a few years before joining the force. Kristen Marie was o.k., but I always got a mousier vibe from her. Being pigeon-holed with Scott for most of the run hurt things for her, as well.  The Loves were also underserved between Rhonda Lewin and Philece Sampler. Philece would have been better as Nicole. Thank goodness Anne Heche  showed up for the next round of auditions. Christopher Holder was mediocre as Peter, but given a shot, I think Marcus Smythe could have stuck around for a while.  I would have had Peggy Lazarus be a Frame -- possibly an ex-wife for Vince with an agenda. Smythe and Hollen had  a fun chemistry that could have kept the two around.. Bringing recasts for  Cheryl and Ben back mixing it up with other Frames. Corys, Lawrences at the time might have kept all the families stronger. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy