Jump to content

ALL: Soap Trends


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Word to those tired of love triangles. I can't stand trueloveforever supercouple stuff anymore, either.

Puppet Master stuff, as I said in another thread, is something I'm truly done with. Freakin' Dimeras with their hazy motives- I'm over it.

Kidnapping. I can't even tell you how many kidnappings I've seen in the decade or so I've been watching soaps. Characters need to at least learn, carry protection or implant a chip like they do for lost pets, if they're going to keep getting stolen by someone.

Murder mysteries- they need to be retired until a writer can actually come up with satisfying resolution. In fact, mysteries in general need to get off my screen until writers are capable of thinking it through before it launches. Spoilers make it more difficult to do, but the writers should find a way to play with that by this point. Also, spoilers don't excuse things like Elvis Jr. as the Gloved Hand or the outcome of the stupid internet games/storylines on Passions.

And it's more of a structural thing, but I cannot stand super-short scenes. I think the length of scenes on some of these shows might be responsible for how poorly the episodes come out, because they try to make every exit to commercial break something shocking and it wears thin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

My pet peeve...the inexplicably "dropped for lack of evidence" charges, when someone's nailed to the wall, but the affected party just drops them out of coercion, guilt or nobility. It happens all the time on ATWT, and it drives me frackin' insane. I think it goes hand in hand with the "over the top, borderline psycho violent acts" that are my other pet peeve. If the writers are gonna have someone do the crime, someone needs to do the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Another along the lines of P.J.'s is the contrived sudden turn of evidence or deal making to keep a character on the show. Example: last year when R.J. finally got caught on something and suddenly they worked out as usual a chance for him to turn witness on something else and he got off again; or when they wrote in the Asa dealing with Carlo just when it seemed like he was finally going to pay. And so many other examples on shows.

And no more character redemptions by saying they were temporarily crazy or had a brain tumor. It gets so old

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The worst trend of recent years is having the stories told from the perspective of some really morose and dreary leading men. Soaps need to get back to having strong, competent females driving the story. Most women are now portrayed as mindless doormats whose only function is to reflect the dubious glory of their hero.

I can forgive the overused WTD, long lost children and triangles, because they've been daytimes bread and butter since the fifties and aren't likely to be going anywhere, if they're not just an excuse to prop up some lunkhead who isn't worth fighting over in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ruining many characters to pimp a certain favorite or favorites

Messing with paternity/maternity

More than one WTD story on the same soap

The same villian being responsible for every big plot

Contrived love triangles/quadrangles

Contrived redemption stories

Having sex either during or after a big disaster (Kelly and Duke's tornado tryst on OLTL, Phyllis and Nick doing it after Cassie's death on Y&R)

Using rape for shock

Cheesy, OTT SFX (this is DAYS specific. A simple fade to black makes more of an impact than having twinkling stars, fire, etc. circling over a characters' head)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I learned in my creative writing class that there are really only seven original plots to telling a story. You know...there is really only so much writers can do with plots. It is about how the story is written and told that makes it unique!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IA, I wouldn't ban much just on its own, it all depends on how it's executed. There are some things that shouldn't be tried at a given time because of (chronologically local) oversaturation, but I'd never say never.

This thread seems to be more about certain plot devices and not general plot archetypes, but I'd still never say never. Just don't overdo any one of them and don't let it come off as an "easy way out" for the underlying emotional plot going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Okay, I continue to maintain that what is so good about this particular reveal followed by umbrella storyline is that you can see & understand many different points of view where there is not one bad guy or one 100% right person.  About your stated opinion, that Lois & Gloria did the right thing, you know that this was technically an illegal adoption? For it to have been legal the father, if known, would have to have been informed & have signed off on terminating his own paternal rights. And, of course, it is clear how many people they lied to.  Personally I feel like Lois is going to take the biggest "public" blame with Lulu a close second in the blame category. I am looking forward to a tongue lashing I hope Brook Lynn gives to Gloria. I continue to be more than annoyed with Dante. First his attitude toward Gio with regards to Rocco & a drinking game & its results. Second his attitude toward Lulu. Meanwhile enjoying the show every day!
    • Lois and Gloria did the right thing I feel knowing it was Camila that raised Gio has BL feeling some jealousy No one is saying that Camila was a bad mother to Gio I believe it will be Gio saying that Camila was great to him, thanking Lois and Gloria to get BL to see truth
    • Its realistic for Dani and  true of how the character thinks and operates. We've known her long enough to by that this would be consistent with her past characterizatioin
    • Random takes: - What was even the point of that jeweler guy? Also—Dani was borderline harassing him. - I know I’m probably in the minority here, but I want Jacob and Kat to happen. I need something messy to completely dismantle the Duprees—and Katomas just isn’t cutting it.  - I officially can’t stand Jacob and his wife. Same goes for Anita and Vernon. - Hayley’s corset was just as ugly as it looked uncomfortable. - I genuinely don’t remember when or how Derek and Ashley reconciled—and I’m someone who didn’t even mind their storyline! LMAO. - Tuesday’s episode was a mess. - Dani finding out about Hayley’s pregnancy and immediately thinking, “She’s faking it”—huh?! What writer thought that was a realistic reaction? I get denial, but that leap was absurd. I agree the ‘Leslie Victorious’ moment was way OTT. But hey, at least I wasn’t yawning. The following episode, where she handed over her daughter’s last few belongings was much better. - I can’t with the constant back-and-forth between Orphey Gene’s and the Country Club. I forgot this was such a soap trope, but even back in my loyal viewer days (late ‘90s, early 2000s), it wasn’t this bad. While GH has a ton of beautiful sets, we’re stuck with the same three—and half of them are ugly. Also: it’s been way too long since we had a party, gala, or any kind of event. I know the Richardsons’ anniversary gala (back in late April) has had a big ripple effect, but I was kinda getting used to those large-scale episodes. Fingers crossed they don’t go with Guza.  
    • The horrific comments execs and writers make when they justify rape storylines or keeping rapists as love interests is just so icky. I remember Ron Carlivati's comments about the reraping of Marty storyline on OLTL. Made my skin crawl.  No matter what you think of her, Susan Lucci could have demanded front burner storylines but she never did. She was happy to be part of an ensemble. I never got that vibe from Zimmer.  For me, Reva was just not a character I cared that much about after a certain point no matter how talented Zimmer is/was. I think Zimmer had a keener eye for what made a good storyline, but she was less willing to take a backseat if it meant someone else got to shine. I'm trying to recall if she ever mentions Michelle Forbes in her book--one of the few times the viewers did not care about Reva in a storyline. My sense is if she did, it was probably some backhanded remark about how she had to show Forbes the ropes.    
    • GH was good? I havent watched since Joss went away to do her traininig and Lulu had just called Brooklyn out for having Dante's baby and not telling him
    • BTG: A-  DAYS: B+  Eastenders: C
    • There was a rumor that Jean will die and that’s probably why she’s back then
    • There has been some confusion about Michael & facial burns. Please see this post: https://bsky.app/profile/shallotpeel.bsky.social/post/3lqkrryu54226 I've chosen to put this here instead of the Classic Thread because it is now with the appearance of recast Michael that this has come up. Different places online, including at least one podcast, remarks have been made about how remarkable it is that he is without facial scarring. Other fans say it was clear from the first that he did not have facial burns. What is included in this post is 2 screengrabs where you can see his face at the hospital & a very quick edit of that day in the hospital. 
    • Put me in the LOVE KMH camp. As a poster alluded to above, her detractors seem to come from people who first experienced the 80s Emily actress. And that's often the case with soaps, myself included. I enjoy the original actor so much that I just never take to the recast. However, KMH played Emily far longer than the original - for almost 20 years - and when she had great material, she was great. I get the sense she didn't like playing the whiny oh-woe-is-me Emily which was all the material she got from about 1996 until she took over the Intruder in late '99/early '00 and got to play a stronger kiss-ass woman who didn't care what anyone thought of her. (Some would call that a bitch but, if a man was in that role, he'd just be called a smart and savvy businessman.) Her relationship with Hal was great. The transformation was done realistically and I thoroughly enjoyed those years the best out of all. Once the writers decided to break up those two, they went back to writing Emily half the time as whiny and pathetic. I preferred when the writers made her stronger.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy