Jump to content

B&B: Ratings are sinking


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Latest ratings: B&B is down to 3.0 and now tied in 2nd place with GH.

GH seems set to take over the No 2 slot on its own soon.

Brad Bell is destroying B&B: too much incest, family partner swapping, BRIDGE isn't the ratings winner it once was, Nick has become an out of control control freak, Rick/Phoebe is a disaster in the making, talented actors are either barely used, or fired(William De Vry and Dax Griffin recently) etc. And I doubt bringing over Eileen Davidson will do the show much good. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

This can be good and bad. B&B always seems to feature their vets in stories which is always good. Which keeps them at #2. But it is always...Brooke/Ridge....or Brooke/Stephanie. And sometimes it gets boring no matter how great Stephanie is. The storyline of Stepahine's abuse was told so fast. If you missed a week u were clueless as to the outcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I really don't understand why the ratings have been so bad, they were even bad in December and that was a great month, and so was most of January. I think the show has been pretty good, and very campy. I don't like the Rick and Phoebe crap, or Ridge and Brooke, but other than that it is pretty good right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I haven't figured out why the ratings are so high. Not that I'm complaining since I'm watching it now but I'm confused by the high ratings combined with the lack of online activity. Is their viewer range skewed toward older non-techies types while Days for example is skewed to the 20s and teens that have lots of online skills?

If BB is rated so high (ie watched by so many more people) why do we barely have one thread a week here with maybe one entry a day and yet a Days daily thread averages 4 pages? Other boards, even those dedicated to BB are also much slower than what I'm used to seeing for Days.

Also how do 1/2 shows compare with 1 hour shows. It has fewer advertising slots available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think a soaps activity on SON is a complete indication of its popularity. B&B has so many different fan sites, devoted to all the different couples that any group can find their niche. I might be one of the only few who actually quit those stupid boards and posts exclusively here. The other ones are too involved on the show while this board provides more of a general over view. Plus the B&B now has its own exclusive board where Brad Bell has been known to post.

I think the soap who's downfall you can really see here is Y&R. There used to be multiple topics about the show in both the discuss the soaps and the spoiler zone and in the past month it has been limited to the weekly discussion and exit discussions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

About the posting amount, fans of Days and ABC soaps are just vocal. Y&R and B&B have fans, they just aren't as outspoken.

I think the show is kinda boring. I wish they'd drop NuRick. They should focus on Pamela (I love Alley Mills). I also wish they'd tone down what seems like NuNick. He has seemed so harsh these past few months and is too crazed on revenge. I like Phoebe and MM, and I guess Bradley does too, he just doesn't seem to know what he wants for her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

NuRick isn't the problem. His hair, on the other hand...

My biggest problem is Nick(a character I found expendible AGES ago. Jack Wagner puts out crap performances to Brad Bell's shitty character assassinations). This character should have been off the show like TWO YEARS AGO!

I also have a big problem with a Phoebe/Rick romance, because there is no chemistry there and it goes with the "keeping it in the family" theme. I'm surprised Brooke condones this crush, especially considering how much she bawled her eyes out when Bridget/Ridge hooked up the first time(IMO, a far more entertaining and combustible chemistry, JennFinn made it work).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Official B&B Board(which I use to frequently visit and post on) is the bomb, especially when I used to plan my entire life around that half-hour. Loved reading posts from glennbird, although he was very pro-Taylor.

And you thought THIS board had nutcases? Has anyone even seen the Official B&B Board and the one linked to the World of B&B Site? Things get downright nasty and vicious between Brooke/Non-Brooke fans on the boards there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Jean Hackney was awful and that lead to Ben's exit story which sucked. I liked Ben/Val together. Val's love for Ben was that of a grown woman moving on with her life and Ben's love for Val made him willingly decide to raise another man's children as his own.
    • It wasn't just a GL thing, it was an 80s thing. Opulent party scenes on soaps were very big back then. Even in regular episodes where people are just going to dinner they're dressed up like they're going to see royalty.
    • Just started the May 27 episode and first thing I see is that Willow got an ugly haircut since hte last time i watched   I dont have the context for how everthing went down but I know its all Lulu's fault which make her a bish for what she did to Gio
    • I'm pretty sure he was. But point taken. GL really had a thing for masked and costumed balls/parties in the '80's. Everyone looks fabulous, but those poor costume designers.
    • Still here ^^ Come on Prime Video, it's due to bring it back!
    • Got through the eighth season, and it was... painful. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I agree 100% with both you and Mitch64.  Soaps have been going further and further off-course since 1981. TPTB just don't have a fundamental understanding of what makes soap fans so loyal. I'd love to be on a writing team with both of you.  Maybe we could put together a real soap opera, and show people what its all about...  
    • They weren't in town, but Fletcher worked at the paper (and we saw anniversary Journal headlines for the 50th, although I don't remember if Roger was one of them), and I'd think Alex would have at least heard of him due to the damage he did to Spaulding only a few years before her return to the fold. I know I have to remember it's not real life, of course.
    • YES. The videos being uploaded to Spauldingfield are almost to the point where Alan is reintroduced. They're already talking about the guy he pretends to be, and yes, he returns at a masked ball. In fact, that masked ball is almost beat for beat the same as the masked ball where Alex was introduced! Get a new schtick. Before the Kobe era, that's pretty much what they did. Characters would just show up. Maybe other characters would talk about them for a while--the Chamberlains, Tony, Maureen, Andy, Kelly, Carrie--but then they would just appear. When Hope came back, she simply knocked on Bert's door and said something like, "Hi, Grandma, I'm home again." No particular fanfare. Sometimes it would be a bit dramatic--Jennifer and Morgan were introduced when Mike accidentally crashed into their car, for instance, and Alan and Elizabeth were introduced through Jackie's flashbacks when she was remembering giving up Phillip for adoption. Nola was involved in the Roger return. Roger's return in 1980 was very dramatic, but in a way that made total sense. He was trying to kidnap a child, so dressing up as a clown did not seem crazy. The mask bit was not only silly, it didn't even make sense. Alex never knew him, so there was no reason for him to be masked in front of her. Yeah, she knew OF him, but there's that phenomenon called cognetive dissonance. If you see someone outside of an expected situation, you probably won't recognize them, especially if you never met them in person and think they're dead. I bet a CIA spook like Roger would be familiar with that concept. And he didn't have to be skulking around SF for months. Again, I will cut Long a little slack--it was not her idea to bring back Roger, she was told to do it. She never wrote for the character. It was something that was not planned. They originally went to Zaslow to offer him the role of Alan. He, of course, turned them down because that was a ridiculous idea, but then he suggested coming back as Roger. At such short notice, it's not strange his return was not handled well.
    • Eh...but neither had been in town. Know the name Roger Thorpe? Sure. But Alex would have gone crazy trying to memorize all of Alan's co-conspirators/lovers/wives and Fletch didn't even know Roger/Adam was on the island, IIRC. But who knew or should've known each other is always a little dicey when people come back to town. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy