Jump to content

Deep in the Pits of


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

A lot... and I mean a lot of that stuff can be applied to Megan McTavish's AMC.

McTavish pulls out plot devices more than a magican pulls rabbits out of a hat. Expolsions. DNA. Rape. Comas. Long lost sibling... MURDER MYSTERIES!

I mean, she's on her second murder mystery plot device in six months -- THIRD in 3 1/2 years overall. Michael Cambias in fall 2003, Greg Madden in summer 2006, Satin Slayer winter 2006-2007

The paternity/DNA device just. Won't. Die... Miranda, Little Adam, Josh, Spike, Emma, Baby Girl Carey, Kate/Kathy... NONE of the children brought on to this show during her tenure have had a cut and dry geneology.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Days had a similar obsession with Who's The Daddy storylines under Reilly

I don't know McTavish's work very well ..but I have to ask...

Have dolls come to life and chimpanzees started talking?

Seen any swamp things roaming around?

Have any of these characters levitated over beds while possessed by the devil?

Has a couple floated away on their flying bed while making love?

Reilly's Days=a huge joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's hard to put Reilly on there because you can't just go by his second failure on DAYS and his entire run on PSNS. When he wrote DAYS in the 90s, he was a great success! Sure, his stories were purely plot-driven, but even then, the show was number 2 for years! Reilly made DAYS the soap that it is today, point blank.

As for SSM, I agree that 97-99 were very boring DAYS. The show was like a brokedown version of Y&R, and that doesn't work, not with DAYS. I think she wanted to go back with traditional soap stories, but since Corday was on the gothic/sci-fi high that he got from Reilly, he forced her to write stories such as the brainwashing storylines. Swamp Girl was a GREAT storyline. I remember watching that storyline and I loved it. It was so good. I remember at one point thinking, has the Hope we've been watching been the wrong person? I'm glad they didn't go that route, but the intrigue and mystery was definitely there.

And as for her hand in creating the Salem High gang, she only created Belle, Mimi and maybe Shawn and Philip. I don't recall when SSM was released and Langan came on, but Chloe was introduced in December, while Belle was introduced in August, Mimi in September, and Shawn in October, Philip in November. So while she was responsible for actually SORASing some of the kids, she probably had no intentions on making DAYS teen crazy. While she was writing, Belle wasn't on that much. I remember wanting to see Belle, because Kirsten Storms came on shorly after Zenon debuted on Disney and I had a crush on Kirsten :lol:

Langan's name should be set in stone on that list. SSM? Not really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hated that decision that DePriest made but I think overall DePreist's record in daytime is enough to save her from that list. I think she works better as a co-writer esp. when she was teamed with Pat Falken Smith and Sherri Anderson, but I even liked some of her stuff alone. She was responsible for one of Antoher World's last great storylines that I thoroughly enjoyed and that was the return of Mary McKinnon as the wife of Reginald Love. Taht was an exciting time in Another World.

The Love-McKinnon feud was stirred up and played out wonderfully. And Denise Alexander's acting was great. There was also the introduction of Scott LaSalle and it was hinted that he might be the brother of Marly & Victoria putting a twist in the Donna/Michael story. I have never figured out why that was dropped. It conincided with Anna Stuart's departure as Donna. It showed her have her breakdown about the babies, and we saw Donna wheeled off hugging 3 pillows to her representing the babies. But when Donna returned the 3 pillows was forgotten and never mentioned.

Also DePriest is co-responsible for much of the great Luke & Laura years on GH having served as co-headwriter from 1979-1982 before she and Pat Falken Smith moved to Days of Our Lives where they rejuvanated the show with the introduction of the Brady family and getting rid of much of the dead rubble stories of the past 2 years on the show. When Smith left again it was DePriest who continued the Salem Strangler story alone and pulled Days some of it's best ratings in 2 years and made it the talk of the nation at the time when she wrote the death of Marlena Evans. It ended up not being Marlena but her twin Samantha that was the victim.

Under DePriest she further cemented the shows transformation into the supercouple show.

So I say all this to say that even though DePriest is not one of the best writers in daytime, she doesn't deserve to be in the list of worst either. Like many other writers she has a habit of making some bad decisions but overall I think she has a very good record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OMG!! It's laughable and sad all at once. I do think "the Magic Carpet Ride" you are refering to when Mike and Carrie flew over Las Vegas occured under SSM's toxic pen, but all others can be attributed to Reilly and his sick, twisted, simple mind.

The first run he was entertaining, in a mindless sort of way. It was kind of like watching a cartoon with lazy dialouge. I still can't believe what it did to the show though. I still can't accept the damage it has done.

Since Days turned into a gothic sensation in the mid-ninties, soaps have fallen by the wayside. Several soaps tried to copycat the madness, and gimmicks to improve ratings. This only made the ratings lower in the end, as devoted fans stopped recognizing their shows and favorite characters.

Quality was traded for a quick boost, and what goes up too quickly, comes down just as fast once the shock wears off and the reality of the damage it has done sinks in.

It started with Days and spread through Daytime like cancer, and now gimmicks are still being used to draw viewers instead of character driven and emotional drama.

THANKS JER!! As entertaining as you were, I would lock you in hell and throw away the key, cause I really feel, that you are to blame for this mess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I stand corrected...I guess I see all of the show since 93' as "Reilly's era". Reilly's formula set the stage/created a show where that kind of scene could happen though...the writers after him/before his return were all copying his style and trying to "match" what he did (not to mention what Passions was doing).

I thought it was mindless, but wasn't entertained :(

ICAM with all of this. And the reason this "style" of writing spread so easy, is because it was so easy...

there was no need to tell interwoven, meaningful...substantial and deep storylines when you could just

come up with some silly plot gimmick and go to town in making it as ridiculous as can be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have to get going to class but there's something I have to add to the

discussion of Days under Reilly...

I had a discussion about his style of writing with a friend of mine

in the mid or late 90s. At the time the focus on the teens was especially

strong, as well as the Reilly sensationalism. I believe Sunset Beach

had just started as well.

I wondered how daytime had gotten to *that* level...and I do mean

sensationalistic Days drivel and a focus on dull teen storylines.

My friend's theory? She blamed it all on Aaron Spelling's

Beverly Hills 90210 and Melrose Place (particularly sensationalistic

and over the top in plot centered-ness at the time)

I know those shows had a lot of fans...but I can see why she made the

connection. They were extremely popular night time soaps and the daytime

soaps clamored to imitate them. And yes, they were better written than

Days under Reilly....but I can certainly agree with her that there seemed to

be a connection between daytime's sudden youth obsession and

the popularity of Spelling's shows.

Reilly took that "style", ran with it, and took it to its furthest extreme...adding his

own gimmicks. The sensationalism kicked up a notch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Am I the only one who actually enjoyed SSM's tenure on DAYS? It wasn't as good as JER's first run by any means, but I thought it was pretty good.

Margaret DePriest, IMO, doesn't deserve to be on this list either. She did some great stuff on DAYS, and from what I've seen of her work in AW reruns, she was pretty good there too.

Anyway, here's who I would put on this list.

Megan McTavish

Dena Higley

Ellen Weston

James E. Reilly (post-90s)

Jean Passanante

David Kreizman

Robert Guza, Jr.

Charles Pratt, Jr.

Tom Langan

Leah Laiman

Henry Stern

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • Andrew sure has hard nips.
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy