Jump to content

Guiding Light cancelled?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

People also need to understand the ATWT/GL are a package deal. Why do you think they are renewed at the same time?

Also, while the other soaps have fallen in their ratings (every other week or so), GL has remained stable. Being a 2.1 may not be great, but it's not a 1.7 and that's the difference. Now once Passions is gone that may be another story, but GL has the ability to grow once more changes are made. There are over 2.5 million viewers (loyal) who watch the show every week. The other's just need a reason to come back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought the same thing. There is no reason why another soap would have to be cancelled to fit Days into CBS's line up. If that is the route they decide to take. I would love to see Days surpase the 09 date. I have little faith in NBC right now, but even less in ABC.

Hypothetically, if CBS took Days they would have an advantage over ABC. Leaving the two fighting it out for rating. Would ABC step it up, or pull out completely? It is hard to say, but I know I do not want Frons anywhere near Days.

Hopefully this remain a rumor for GL. Personally don't watch, but it sucks to thing your soap is the next on the block.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, I know it's not. It's just a feeling I have and it's based on what has happened in the past and what Days is and has the potential to be. I would say the same thing if Y&R or GH was in the position Days was in. I think B&B can be thrown in to as it's a half hour and it does very well, including overseas.

Those 4 shows have great appeal, are very popular, and have tremendous potential if given the right support and direction.

Oh, and I do think Cynthia Watros returning would help GL big time. I like the show right now but would LOVE to see her return :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Anyway, back to the GL discussion for me...

I've been watching it in the last week or so, and I've noticed some things.

First, production values. They're not terrible, but wow... nothing like I remembered the GL I loved back in 1997 - 2000. They use less sets than before (but that's happened with pretty much every soap, no?) but the visual appeal of the show just isn't as soft and "soapy" as it looks before. I don't know if they're using a different lens or what, but I don't like it. Still, though.. not bad at all compared to some others. Just a sharp contrast compared to what I was used to with the show before. Also, the sets are VERY small compared to the great vast GL sets I was used to. It's sad to see GL like this... it's like a shell of its former glory. Man, I used to LOVE GL from 1997 - 2000. Crazy Annie Dutton, Wendy Moniz as Dinah, the Nursery Rhyme Stalker and Joie Lenz as Michelle with Paul Anthony Stewart's Danny... great, great stuff. And Patti D'Arbanville as Selena! Anyway, back on topic...

I've also noticed that they don't feature very many actors on the episodes anymore, do they? Is the cast really that small nowadays, or do they just not have the budget to use more than a few per episode? They also tend to focus on only one or two stories per episode, I've noticed.

Anyway, the Tammy/Jonathan/Lizzie story is intriguing to me. When did Lizzie grow up to be such a scheming, conniving little psychopath? I miss little Hayden Panettiere! She's like a mix between a YOUNG Sami Brady and Jan Spears on Days. Then there's Tammy, who really, really annoys me. Is it just me, or would she be perfect for the role of Courtney on GH? Anyway, Tammy acts so holier-than-thou and ugh... I just don't like her. I do love Jonathan/Pelphrey, though... and I always have from the bits and pieces I've seen before. And does Beth Chamberlain never change her hair? She's had this same style for over a decade! LoL Looks great on her, though. And the woman never ages, either! Wowza.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ActuallyI'm not exaggerating. The fans of the show tell me there are one or two sets that are mostly used as it is. I don't watch "GL" that much so I don't know if it's true, my scenario is a likely one, come, say, 2010. Because if advertisers are paying less for soaps, yet actors' salaries (particularly those of vets) raise each year, or however often it is they renogotiate (since they have to have a raise each time), then that could force the lack of sets altogether!

And the show wouldn't be $1.98 per episode. It would cost just the cast and crew and writers' salaries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes but not to the extent of these 4. B&B does fantastic overseas and does well here. Y&R is Y&R even if it's not as good as it once was. GH and Days have huge fanbases and get lots of media coverage. If you were to do a survey of a large scope of people, the majority would tell you they watch Days, GH, or Y&R or some combination of them. B&B benefits from Y&R mostly so people who watch Y&R will watch that as well most likely.

It's not knocking other soaps. It's just those shows shows, moreso the big 3 (Days, GH, and Y&R), are on a different level. They are more likely to come up in general conversation. They are hyped more and are constantly in the media limelight. Passions was just like that early on when it started. Those 3 are still like that with B&B sometimes in there too. AMC you could toss in there as far as getting media coverage but the other 3 just seem to get the hype and focus a bit more based on my observations.

The easiest way to say this is to say if you had a popularity meter and went around asking a large amount of random people in several states or whatever, those 3 soaps would probably be the answer in most cases to the question of what soap or soaps do you watch. You may find the other soaps in there as well but not to the extent of the other 3, 4 if you want to throw in B&B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Honestly, I really think that GL is going to get renewed again this year.

1. As everyone has been saying it is a milestone year. I know it has happened to other shows but this is 70 years.

2. They are staying steady in the ratings. Are they low yes obviously, but with the drop of a hat that could change look how close the soaps have been the past few months.

3. They seem to have more support of the network. I have seen more ads for the show in the past 6 months then I have in the last 5 years.

4. Tptb seem to have future plans. Ok this one could just be my wishful thinking but who's idea was this find your light campaign? I know they have plans to travel all over the country for the entire year and I think if I was in charge and really thought this is it we are going to end I don't think I would have done something so elaborate and planned out(maybe that is just me).

Maybe this is all wishful thinking but I sincerely hope we get a little more time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am so sick of people assuming that GL is the worst soap on air when they haven't even been watching it lately. :rolleyes:

The writing suddenly became good again with the Tammy/Jonathan exit story. I can honestly say this is the best stuff I've seen on any soap in months. There seems to be a plan in mind with how stories are going to develop in the next few months, the acting is great, as is the direction (I was in awe with Monday's previews of the car accident...it actually gave me chills), even the music is contributing to the dark atmosphere of the show...the overall production of the show in the last week has been coherent and well-done.

Yeah, the sets are small but they still have more than one set. Also, sets aren't everything. I once directed a play that only had one set but the focus was more on the story. I doubt it'll happen but if, God forbid, GL is reduced to a one-set budget, I still think the acting and character writing could keep it afloat.

At this point, I'd be more worried about ATWT. Look at the drop they took in the last week. <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

See, that's where (sorry fans!) I just , by moral obligation, HAVE to disagree.

I mean, if the show were reduced to one set, it just couldn't work.

This isn't primetime. If it were "Two Guys, a Girl, and a Pizza Place," and the show, which airs once a week, for only 22 episodes a season, aired in just one set -- the pizza plac e-- it'd be fine. But this is a SOAP. It lasts ONE hour, not 30 minutes (with commercials), and it airs HUNDREDS of episodes a year and almost every week day. It's also a multigenerational show with characters that, unlike the pizza show, wouldn't cross paths every day.

It really would NOT work. And I'd say that for any soap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Today's episode was excellent. Clearly it was confrontation day and they didn't disappoint. I'm glad they didn't forget Mona in all of this and gave us an opportunity to see how she's dealing with this. A major highlight for me were the Kat and Martin scenes. Their chemistry is off the charts and I don't understand why we haven't gotten more of this. I love how they take turns calming each other down. They feel really well matched and believable as siblings. Speaking of siblings, they anvils were dropping strong that Kat and Eva are twins but I do wish someone would mention that they are essentially hood twins which might throw people off the scent.  I'm one of the people who enjoyed Joey and the gambling storyline so it was nice to see him again. It was nice to see different characters like Mona and Eva in that element instead of the usual players. When Doug arrived I don't know what hit me but I just see a funeral in his future. He seems so hopeless and has the worst luck. I just can't see him surviving the year at this rate.
    • In fiction there has become an expectation by some that every Black character should represent excellence and perfection. It's not like we are talking about a Tyler Perry show where none of the characters are happy and everyone hates each other with a passion.
    • And on rewatch, I could've done without the unsubtle praising Matt like he was the only one who ever accepted Van as she was...but TPTB and their agendas.  It was totally in character for Vanessa to shut down emotionally until she was alone. While she could be volatile, both she and Henry believed in keeping emotions private.  Thank God it's still Bryan Buffinton in the role for both Henry's and HB's funerals. It just wouldn't have been the same with Ryan Brown, who couldn't act his way out of a wet paper bag. Roll My Eyes.
    • I can probably believe the Spauldings reacting that way, as Alan barely cares about anyone but himself and maybe his family, while Amanda only had that one experience with the Coopers, but I see your point. I do think 1997 was a better year than the last 3-4 before it, for whatever that's worth. You are right about Marcus. Kevin Mambo winning two Emmies (the latter during periods where he had nothing to do) helped.
    • I think @Darn @Faulkner and others have a fair point re: it being an unfortunate look and coincidence. I can see their point about the two Black husbands in rapid succession, without much time in between. Frankly, based on the early casting notices I thought before the show's debut (and I still suspect) that Ted's crimes might be far worse than infidelity or a secret baby. That would've mixed it up more. It's a soap, people are going to cheat, but it might've given them more variety if Nicole was stepping out first. Still, I wouldn't trade the Leslie/Eva reveal material for anything right now. Still, Fanfic Account #3 is just looking for any weapon to attack the show for not accepting his unsolicited scripts. When it's not the husbands it's Martin, or Chelsea or Dani. He's seething it got renewed.
    • I'm pretty sure Lucy and Bridget never even have another scene together for the rest of the time they're both on the show. Bridget isn't even invited to the wedding! The lack of community feeling and continuity of non-romantic relationships during this period is very jarring. Characters suddenly only seem to interact with a handful of other characters, rather than characters across the canvas. I'm deep into 1997 in my watch right now and find that it's even stranger because the show goes back and forth between ignoring history in order to manufacture some kind of separation between characters (for example, at one point Amanda refers to the Coopers as a family that the Spauldings "barely know," despite her and Alan spending the better part of 1996 going to war with Buzz over 5th street, and Alan has absolutely no reaction when he finds out about something bad that's happened to Abby, which seems pretty out of character given how close they were in 95/96) and ignoring history in order to create a sense of community that doesn't quite fit (characters who couldn't stand Amanda are suddenly acting all buddy buddy with her). The wheels really feel like they're coming off in 1997 (although I know some would argue that the wheels started to come off years earlier). Watching the Marcus/Dahlia romance again from a 2025 perspective is so weird. Marcus is a full grown man who must be at least in his mid-20s and he's dating a teenager who is not only still in high school, but is still fully a year away from graduation, and no one says anything about how creepy that is. I feel like the buzz around Marcus gave the illusion that the show was more invested in him than it ever actually was. Even during his "big" story where he's arrested for Cutter's murder, he actually doesn't appear on screen very often. He's imprisoned, Griffin is brought on, other characters make a fuss about trying to get him out, but there's a long stretch of time where he doesn't appear at all. I've been keeping episode counts while I watch and between Cutter's death in mid-November of 1995 and the end of the year Marcus/Mambo only appears 7 times (and of that only twice in December).
    • The letter reading was very emotional, and Maeve really got to me too. I was a little worried because Vanessa doesn't give a speech at the funeral, which surprised me, but then we got the private letter reading and her true emotional reaction and I was satisfied there. The YouTube channel I watch these episodes on (if not on our Vault), also had upset commenters talk about how Nola's line about Henry not accepting her at first/seen as a gold-digger was totally untrue. It's sad the writers don't do their homework and give fans the respect (and the characters respect). And yep, Bill got up and spoke at the funeral too, which was nice.  I didn't even realize that was Sharon Leal until you said it!  I had to Google it. I loved Sharon Leal in Boston Public back in the day haha. LOL at your Reva/Josh ALWAYS commentary. What is RME though?
    • Leslie is an extreme liar and manipulator. I'm not sure what her point was in trying to convince Nicole she wasn't trying to hurt her. As much as Eva did help orchestrate the entire plot I feel like there was too much piling on. Eva never said she wanted to be a Dupree so Anita was extremely out of line for that comment.  
    • Thanks!

      Please register in order to view this content

       That's positive and something to look forward to for sure, because you're right, 1996 so far isn't nearly as good as 1995. Ohh - what is Lonatrat?  Sadly you're probably right. I did feel like David was rarely seen once Marcus came on. That would have been an interesting spin, having Frank and Tina be teenage lovers and Dahlia really being his daughter. I'm getting the sense that Tina won't be seen too much anymore, as she just left Dahlia with Frank/Eleni as she's heading to jail for a while. I like the Tina actress too!  Her voice sounds a bit like Rosie Perez to me, which I love. I tried to find her online, but coming up empty. This was the only thing I could find about Tina Crede - a character snapshot video with clips and stills of her (randomly starting just before the 1:00 mark):

      Please register in order to view this content

      That's wild that the David actor is nearly 40 here! Definitely surprises me.
    • 5-6   Meh. It already looks like a scattershot week.    5-5 was actually a good episode. Damian and Lily. Phyllis finally going on the warpath that I knew she could get on with Billy and Sally. Nate started to question Audra and Victor's alliance. And I was not even bugged by Kyle and Claire.   But then there's Cole's off-screen story. Kyle and Claire going back to being whiny. And them even wanting Adam's penthouse just sounded like trying to keep the set around. And Diane shouldn't even give a flying frak about Billy's opinion. And Tessa, Daniel, and the guitars...yeeeah no.   But hey...JM looked good in that short. And those pants.  I agree. One of Y&R's good points with fans has always been that you do at least see the vets. And IN stories. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy