Jump to content

San Diego to ban Wal-Mart Supercenters


Scotty

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

I know that Walmart is loathed by many in politics and the community in general, but those people seem to forget many families and individuals, like myself, live from paycheck to paycheck and that dictates how much we can budget every week to two weeks. So for me and others like me, Walmart for the most part is the only place we can afford to shop for groceries and household goods.

They can say it's their policies, or the size of the stores, but I really feel this is another blow against the lower/working class. Not everyone has the luxury of shopping at regular grocery chains and gourmet markets. Also, Target is no real prize either. My brother has worked there for five years and they pay their people lousy and their health insurance is nothing either.

  • Members
Posted

Wal Mart is the anti christ of the corporate world.

I worked as a manager at Sam's Club for nearly five years while I was in college and they treat people horribly and they pay even worse.

I refuse to ever shop there. Target is much better. IMO.

  • Members
Posted

I SO agree! Target rocks! LOL. I've tried the supercenter kind of Wal Marts....and even though they have alot of items, it is way to crouded, and I have hardly ever found any decent clothes there, and aside from arts, crafts, and the food they have nothing really interests me there.

  • Members
Posted

Finally, protest coming from the government themselves! How ironic is that??? :blink:

Any why are there low-income families and individuals? Because corporations like Walmart feel that they can have a ton of workers give up their labour for a considerably low price. If people aren't getting paid enough, they can only shop at places with low prices. And if corporations can get away with selling an item way below it's production cost and underpay their employees to the point of poverty, then they'll do it. It's an ugly cycle and I'm glad that at least one community is deciding to put a stop to it. Of course, that would mean individual workers would have to not substitute one low-paying job for another and find a job that pays them right, treats them right so that they can go out and help support local business. Huge multi-million corporations can afford to sell their products at low prices. Local businesses can't as much. Unless multi-corporations start giving good salaries and benefits to all their workers, of course the cost of their items are never going to rise..otherwise, I'm sure they would.

I think I pretty much said why I completely disagree with your statement here.

I see the corporate world as totally corrupt so I'm not sure I'd agree with you...

  • Members
Posted

I stick by what I said. I can't afford to shop at a lot of places, so I have to stick with what I can do, and for the most part, it's Walmart.

Target is overpriced on many things, and doesn't have a good selection of merchandise. Sure, their stores may be spaced out nicely, but they are not the end-all and be-all of stores. Like I said in my original reply, ask my brother about how crappy Target treats their employees. They are not the saviors everyone thinks they are. However, he stays because he's a manager, so he doesn't have to deal with the junk that regular floor employees do.

Unlike some, I cannot afford to be a retail snob.

  • Members
Posted

Walmart is good for everything but clothes.

Target has pretty nice clothes at low prices. The Isaac Mizrahi and the 90 Day designer line works well for them.

I'm still waiting for a designer at low price line for men. <_<

  • Members
Posted

Retail snob? :blink: I hate the Gap just as much as I hate Walmart and I'm not exactly swimming in money, either. But I refuse to spend my money and support a corporation that claims to make necessities more accessible to low-income families when its methods are helping to create the poverty that leads people to buy more of their products. If that makes me a retail snob, though...then so be it. <_<

Although accessibility is definitely a valid point here...it's unfortunate that because such huge multi-corporations are making so much money, they have the resources other businesses don't to be more accessible. :(

  • Members
Posted

I'm sorry, what's so accessible about Wal-Mart? At least in my area, EVERYBODY and their long-lost soap opera brother and sister go to Wal-Mart. Traffic congestion on FOOT IN THE STORE is unbearable and trashy mothers spanking their children are EVERYWHERE. Please, spare me! That's why I choose Target. It's less congested, and at my Target, fewer families with crying, bratty babies are there, and well, that's the biggest selling point, really.

I'm VERY proud to say I haven't stepped foot in a Wal-Mart in six months. When I do go, it's because I literally HAVE to go there (for instance, perhaps an oil change or something), but for everyday items? TARGET. TARGET, TARGET, and TARGET!!!

Wal-Mart sucks.

Leave your babies at home.

  • Members
Posted

As a former Wal-Mart employee of nearly 5 1/2 years, I hate Wal-Mart!

When I started working at my local Wal-Mart seven years ago, it was a small store. In 2003 we moved into a Supercenter. For the first several years I was just a regular sales associate, working in the lawn & garden, seasonal, pets, housewares and electronic departments. Then I was promoted to Department Manager of the Pet and Seasonal departments. I left Wal-Mart two years ago.

That being said, the horrible treatment the employees receive at their stores is deplorable. Since I parted ways with them, I have not been back into any Wal-Mart to shop. I will go to any and every other retail store to shop, except Wal-Mart.

I, like Bree, cannot afford to go to very many expensive stores to shop, but I find other stores to go to that I can afford besisdes Wal-Mart.

For example, when I did my Christmas shopping last year, I went to Target, KMart, Dollar General Store, Dollar Tree, a local mall, and Lowe's. I completly bypassed Wal-Mart.

They treat you like crap and I simply got tired of it and quit. The sad part is that, the first couple years I worked there, I actually liked my job. But after a few years of being treated like crap and seeing other people being treated like crap, I hated to go to work.

  • Members
Posted
Hmmph, May I ask, Do you have children? I have two and I do hate to shop with them but there are times when it absolutely impossible to "Leave your babies at home." So before you complain think about the mom that is trying to shop for groceries, maybe picking up a prescription for her babies, and getting other esstential items for the home and handling a two year old at the same time because the babysitter had an emergency or the spouse/significant other had to stay late at work. Think about that and put yourself in their position. <_<
  • Members
Posted

Hmmm, well, JSF, not to burst your bubble or anything, but where I am, there are a lot of Target and K-Mart stores that I have been in, and they have congestion and howling babies/children there too...A lot of mothers just can't leave their children at home when they go out.. some may be even taking their children to get things for them.

There are about three Wal-Marts in my area, and I will be honest and say, I absolutely HATE going there. Not because of the lack of items they have, or the prices, but basically the snarky attitudes that run up and down the aisles in that store. It's not just the employees that are rude, it's the folks that shop there too; however, you can't just say Wal-Mart is the only place that has poor business ethics...There are some K-Marts and Targets that are that way too.

I don't like at all how they treat their employees; however, I look at it this way: If I need to get something, and I am near a Wal-Mart, I'll get it and move on. Same goes for any other store....I personally can get past all the "trashy mothers' and screaming babies, because they aren't hurting me and I am not bothering them.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • I still am baffled by why Monty brought back stunt hire Gerald Gordon in the early '80s out of nowhere for like a year. I haven't found anyone who can come up with a thing he did in that second stint of note.
    • It's interesting to watch this having watched The Doctors. I'm not sure I'm seeing that much of a difference in the characters Gerald Gordon and Anna Stuart played on The Doctors and what they're playing here.
    • I keep forgetting a huge chunk of that year was written by scabs. You're probably right, because by the time the strike was over, they were likely planning an exit for Alan's character as it must have been obvious by then that Bernau was not going to return. If he was still there, it's also doubtful they would have approached MZ and MG about coming back. Wild.
    • And to think the original plan was for David and Lesley to have an affair.  Not only would that have made no sense - Lesley wasn't THAT stupid, lol - but it also would've ruined her and GH.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Week ending March 5 1978 Second season shows are tested CBS finishes first week in March with stronger than usual 1 9.5, but not enough to beat ABC The prime -time ratings pattern continued to hold steady for the week ended March 5, and attention increasingly turns to second season entries as the networks probe one another's weaknesses or cover their own. As usual, ABC -TV won the week, scoring a 20.5 average rating. But CBS -TV was closer than usual with a 19.5 average garnered with the help of several strong specials and movies in addition to some of its dependable series regulars. NBC followed its habit of plummeting when its "évent "entries failed. In this case it was the miniseries, Loose Change, which scored only 24 and 22 shares on Monday and Tuesday, leaving the network with a 16.9 average rating for the week. Looking at new series and new time slots, ABC's Six Million Dollar Man on Monday (8 -9 p.m. NYT) continued to falter with a 22 share, while What's Happening, in its new slot on Saturday (8 -9 p.m.), also remained shaky with a 23 share. Starsky and Hutch is still healthy with a 38 share in its new slot following Charlie's Angels on Wednesday, and How the West Was Won also had a 38 on Sunday (8 -9 p.m.). Against West CBS's Rhoda and On Our Own came in poorly for the second week in a row of face to face competition, with each pulling 25 shares after a 41 share lead in from 60 Minutes. ABC's special two -hour presentation of the upcoming series tryout, Having Babies, scored a 27 share on Friday (9 -11 p.m.) against strong competition from both the other networks (the movie "Ski Lift to Death" on CBS and Rockford Files and Quincy on NBC). For CBS, its new Monday night leadoffs, Good Times and Baby I'm Back, scored so -so 27 and 28 shares respectively. But the second half of the night had its best performance since the new line -up came in- M *A*S *Hwith a 45, One Day at a Time with a 41 and Lou Grant with a 36. Celebrity Challenge of the Sexes and Shields and Yarnell showed no signs of reviving on Tuesday, with 16 shares each, but the new Tuesday movie slot held up with a 41 share from Clint Eastwood's "Magnum Force." The network's entire Saturday line up continued to limp in, as Bob Newhart Tony Randall, The Jeffersons, Maude and Kojak all scored sub 30 shares (with the exception of Newhart's 29, in fact, all scored sub -25 shares). NBC premiered its new Chuck Barris Rah Rah Show on Tuesday (8 -9 p.m.),when it pulled a 24 share. The second episode of Quark had a 27, three points down from its premiere. There might be the temptation to conclude that the 29 share turned in by the National Love, Sex and Marriage Test on Sunday (9:30 -10 p.m.) proves the appetite for "sophisticated" subject matter is not insatiable after all, except that its competition was not only CBS's strong comedy block but also ABC's rerun of "The Way We Were," which pulled a 35 share. Of NBC's other midseason entries -CPO Sharkey, Black Sheep Squadron, James at 16 and Class of '65 -CPO Sharkey turned in the highest score of the week, a 27.   *NBC were in dire straits at this point relying on movies and specials which could hit or bomb in equal measure.  Fred Silverman had his work cut out for him when he arrived that Summer. He favored sitcoms and series as the schedule's foundation and NBC had no sitcoms to build on and few solid series. He also had a big backlog of specials/mini series that had been committed to air. Also NBC had a long standing relationship with Universal so he was forced to work with that studio. He struggled to get quality producers on board as they were either tied into deals with ABC/CBS or were wary of having their shows on the 3rd rated network. He still felt variety had a place on the schedule however and that lead to duds like Susan Anton, The Big Show and Pink Lady and Jeff.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I spent years hoping we would get an oral history like the OLTL book, but it’s too late now with so many having passed away.
    • It’s also strange that it was Monica! I just don’t think of her as the staring off into space type of woman! I watched a bunch of other clips and stuff from random 1978 and 1979 episodes. I’m so used to seeing movement from Monty’s era, especially the early part, that this really is a cool relic. Pretty soon you have scenes start at the new nurses station, the elevators opening and doctors walking to the desk to get their messages from Jessie or Bobbie. People often walk towards doors while taking coats on or off, many Webber house scenes start or end with someone walking up the stairs. This episode is even more static than some of the way earlier ones I have seen, where you would have Steve or Jessie at least going from the old school nurses desk to the medicine room, Steve’s office, etc. That bland dialogue is very much like what they have now. The show picks up a lot of personality. Knowing what we know about David Hamilton and how that really started to get the ball rolling as far as viewers you really see just how vital Lesley and especially Laura were to get things moving for them. They focused on the right characters to get fast results. The show now could learn a thing or two from this.
    • It won't allow me to watch it via the link; I am only able to watch it with the app.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy