Jump to content

Brothers & Sisters: Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 805
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Yes, she is completely miscast. Simply awful.

Everytime I see her I can't stop thinking how she's best suited for misunderstood/neurotic female roles. Think her ER role as Abby's mother.

It's a huuuuuge problem for me. The matriarch role should have gone to someone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree with Sylph, in that Sally Field can bug the crap out of me when she's in drama. When she was on ER it was all LOOK AT ME I'M ACTING and I was just shaking my head.

I think she's done well on here, because the character is hyperdramatic by nature but mostly because this cast is too strong to let her lapse into bad habits. When you're working with Callista, Matthew Rhys, Rachel, Ron Rifkin, you have to be on your A game.

I do wonder how Betty Buckly would have been if they had kept her on, but then, the show might not have had the same ratings impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For me, Sally's neuroticism is the character. I'm intrigued how she might be "miscast". Would we want someone more "matriarchal"? I like that Sally's Nora is as screwed up as her kids...and that she's growing right along with them.

Even wise uncle Saul has a lot of growing up to do. I cannot imagine Betty Buckley in the role. I am mostly familiar with her from Eight is Enough, where I remember her as "arch". I can't imagine her having the genuine warmth and emotion that I love in Fields' Nora.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/10/28/scoop-brothers-sisters-gets-a-new-boss/

Scoop: 'Brothers & Sisters' gets a new boss

by Michael Ausiello

Categories: Brothers & Sisters, News

Very interesting behind-the-scenes development over at Brothers & Sisters…

An ABC spokesperson is confirming that Monica Breen and Alison Schapker are out as showrunners and longtime B&S scribe David Marshall Grant is in.

The ABC rep adds that Breen and Schapker continue to serve as executive producers/writers on the show but are now “concentrating more on development.”

Note to self: Do some digging. Something about this smells a little fishy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've heard people say that Breen and Schapker were both weak. Their tenure on the show definitely didn't impress me, mainly last season, which had a lot of problems. This season seems a little better, were they already on their way out?

If they came up with the Ryan story they deserve to go.

I really liked David Marshall Grant as a scriptwriter, I felt like he "got" the show. I hope he can handle this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This whole show just fell apart, desintegrated. The miscast Sally, the endless showrunner changes (Marty Noxon, Greg Berlanti, Mark B. Perry, Alison & Monica [ex-Charmed]...), too much politics, too much Rob Lowe... Grant & Baitz briefly dated according to Wikipedia:

2rwq72b.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What else is Mark Perry from? I can't remember how long he was around?

The thing with this show is it was written off as doomed from the start, from pre-season. This just grew louder after Noxon was hurriedly replaced. I truly believe that the performances are the main reason the show survived those early months. The actors gave everything to the over the top material. I still sort of miss those early days, as it was at least juicy, and they didn't start dropping "names" in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Party of Five. One Tree Hill. He was the showrunner for 12 episodes before departing in the aftermath of the Writers' Strike.

Yes. It all kind of falls very flat, god knows what I'm expecting, but everytime it's all just... Mild... Neither hot nor cold. Just...

I know that the original pilot was posted on some website, but it's nowhere to be found now. It was quite different from what we saw on screen, as usual. Too bad no one leaks B&S scripts. I'd love to read them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've been liking the current season so far.

Season 3 was very hit and miss with an interesting beginning which lasted 1 or 2 episodes before becoming very stand-alonish and boring and only picking up with the two parter and Tommy's departure.

As for the showrunner change: David Marshall Grant is by the most talented writer on staff. His script are always top-notch and each character/actor is nailed down. Breen & Schapker have always been writing sappy scripts so maybe they were at fault for the flatness of season3?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ABC has transformed it into a companion piece for Desperate Housewives. Thus it lost all socio-political edge. Plus, since Baitz was the source of that "edge", there is no one who has filled that void.

Berlanti's name is still on the vanity card at the end...but has he totally left the building?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I do miss the edge of the early episodes, and those wonderful fights between Nora and Kitty, but to be fair, I don't know how much mileage you could get out of, "You wanted us to invade Iraq!" "I know, and I was right!!" "No you weren't, look what you did to Justin!!!" Kitty was supposedly liberal on everything else, aside from guns. Kitty was a fantasy Republican, as I don't think any Republican with views she had on social issues would ever become a hugely popular pundit or host.

I miss Kitty's edge but I think they may have been better off slowly moving out of politics. I think the mistake was bringing Rob Lowe in as a senator and trasitioning further to the fantasy realm. If they were going to bring him in I wish they'd just had him in another profession. They could have had him as an anchorman, or a TV executive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • As Blanche once said, "You're feeling magenta."

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Robert Benton, Director of Best Picture Winner ‘Kramer vs. Kramer,’ Dies at 92
    • Randomly came across this while on Instagram, but Shelly Burch (Delilah Ralston) and Danielle Harris (Sammi Garretson) are going to be on The Locher Room on May 20 at 7:30 PM EST.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Randy (Doug's friend who works for Joey) -- Joey told Randy weeks ago that Joey's plan was to get Doug into so much debt that Doug would be forced to get Vanessa's real estate holding turned over to Joey, to use for money-laundering.  That's been the plan all along, which the viewers knew.  The only thing new is that Joey finally told Doug this. I think Joey is written badly.  I also think Jon Lindstrom is doing "Now I am going to act menacing".   But I don't really feel the menace.  It's too overdramatic and it doesn't feel like a real person.  Jon is a fine actor on GH, so I don't know what's happening here -- the entire BTG mobster premise is badly designed/written.  I don't know if Guza pushed for a mobster storyline?  Or did Jon?  (Jon wrote a novel about Hollywood mobsters). It just doesn't fit.  It feels (to me) like this storyline for Jon was just shoved onto the canvas but it doesn't fit all all. Monday's scene of Mona coming into the "casino" to check up on where Leslie supposedly lost money in the slot machines -- and Randy explaining to Mona that there are no slot machines, there is nothing but the card room.  I had to laugh because they had characters comment that it's just a card room and not a casino -- the show is now acknowledging that there's nothing there.  If they are going to do this, then have it make sense for Fairmont Crest residents to visit a high-end glamourous casino, and not a random room with one table. So what money is Joey laundering? A while back, Joey told Vanessa that he knows about her sexual philandering because owns the escort service that she'd been using. But I don't care...  I'd just prefer that the entire mobster storyline go away. 
    • I caught up this past weekend. The show is better written, but I have been bored with the show. I did notice it ranked in the top 5 again this week, so that's a good sign.
    • I can't take this show seriously. I truly miss WJB writing this show. Bradley didn't inherit his dad's talent.
    • Maybe if there had been a good close up or two
    • I haven't had a chance to view the interview, but I'm glad Mike didn't get the part of Derek.  Derek is a badly written character. Any Ben Gavin screenshot from yesterday's show?
    • Wait, what? So, Martin’s not running for President anymore? Just like that?  I didn’t expect this storyline to be long term but I would’ve liked to see it play out for a little while longer, or at least until Martin’s secret was revealed. And definitely not fade out with a whimper. Sort of like Naomi’s lawsuit against Bill’s firm; what was the point of it all if it was just gonna wrapped up so easily and (probably) forgotten about?  Eva is still the breakout character though. I’m looking forward to seeing where she goes from here with everyone, especially if the twist that we’re all suspecting turns out to be true.  And I did find the gambling storyline interesting finally, now that we know Joey’s endgame. I’d like to see it play out and to see what happens to everybody involved in it.  As for Derek/Ashley… I wonder how it would’ve played out if they actually had cast Mike Manning as Derek. Yeah, the writing isn’t there but I imagine that Derek would have more of a personality lol and I also imagine that it would’ve made Ron Carlivati’s head explode

      Please register in order to view this content

      Ben Gavin did look hot though 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy