Jump to content

Thursday's Ratings - TV has NEW #1 show!


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

WOW!! What a shocker! I thought eventually GA would beat CSI, but I don't think anyone thought it would happen this early. Congrats to Stephen McPhearson, Shonda Rhimes and everyone at GA. I'm so happy about this. :D I believe this is the first time since 2004 that a non reality tv show beat CSI in the ratings. Anyone know what show was #1 in the ratings before CSI took over in 2004?

HHs

1. Grey's Anatomy - 17.1/25

2. CSI - 14.9/22

Total Viewers

1. Grey's Anatomy - 25.14 million

2. CSI - 22.04 million

Adults 18-49

1. Grey's Anatomy - 10.9/26

2. CSI - 7.5/18

Total Viewers

1. Grey’s Anatomy 25.1 million

2. CSI 22.0 million

3. Survivor 17.3 million

4. ER 15.6 million

5. Shark 15 million

6. Grey’s Anatomy Clip Show 13.5 million

7. Six Degrees 13.3 million

8. Deal or No Deal 10.1 million

9. The Office 9.1 million

10. My Name is Earl 8.9 million

11. Til Death 5.9 million

12. Happy Hour 4.4 million

13. Celebrity Duets 3.3 million

Households

1. Grey’s Anatomy 17.1/25

2. CSI 14.9/22

3. Shark 11.1/17

4. ER 11.0/17

5. Grey’s Anatomy Clip Show 10.5/16

6. Survivor 10.2/16

7. Six Degrees 9.3/15

8. Deal or No Deal 6.5/10

9. My Name is Earl 6.4/10

10. The Office 6.2/9

11. ‘Til Death 4.4/7

12. Happy Hour 3.3/5

13. Celebrity Duets 2.7/4

18-49

1. Grey’s Anatomy 10.9/26

2. CSI 7.5/18

3. ER 6.8/18

4. Survivor 6.4/18

5. Six Degrees 5.8/15

6. Grey’s Anatomy Clip Show 4.8/13

7. The Office 4.3/11

8. Shark 4.2/11

9. My Name is Earl 3.7/11

10. Deal or No Deal 3.5/9

11. Til Death 2.2/7

12. Happy Hour 1.7/4

13. Celebrity Duets 1.2/3

CW aired repeats

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I do not see why this is so shocking. I love both shows by the way..and hate this match up..even though it was the right thing to do.

Why would anyone be shocked that GA took at least the first round? It has had GIGANTIC buzz for almost two years...CSI has been slowing down buzz wise and still getting "killer" ratings.

No shock to me...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It will be big doings if it overtakes it for the season...one week...no. Especially premiere week.

I am sure GA will win the season, but I do not rule out CSI.

Should not shock anyone. Its been on for years, has two spinoffs...no surprise...none whatsoever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It is a huge surprise. And it's huge news. That's the way the industry works, Kwing. New #1's are a huge deal.

ABC can now say they have the #1 show. It doesn't matter if it is for one week. They can now brand and advertise Grey's as being #1 and they can say they are the network with the #1 show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Something else to note is that CSI had quite the drop from it's ratings last season. Desperate Housewives will probably beat it as well, maybe even House.

CSI: Miami also had a slight drop, but it's still #1 on Monday. CSI: NY had a big jump with yesterdays premiere, so I'd say it's the star right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Really? I was really disappointed with it, the deaths weren't that interesting to me. Next week's looks a little bit better though. I stopped watching half way through, and started watching Deal Or No Deal (I could never get into GA.) I probably won't be watching the season consitently; if I have to put up with more little moments from Grissom and Sara, I can't stand those two together.

I can't wait! I'm anxious to see how My Name Is Earl/The Office block did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
:o WOW! CSI's drop was huge. In the fast nationals last year, its premiere got a 17.3 (tying with Desperate Housewives). In the fast nationals last night it only got a 13.5. I thought CSI would drop, but not by that much. I wouldn't be surprised if DH beats it for the week, too.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
    • Only thing I enjoyed was Abby / Olivia, etc., and the addiction storyline. Otherwise, I could do without the season.
    • Right? Vanessa had a ball gown for every occasion.
    • Roger's return storyline may have been silly but Roger's return was what lead to GL's last golden era.  It was the combination of Roger's return and Robert Calhoun becoming EP that got GL to finally hit it's stride after some really bad years. It will always disappoint me that the ratings during Robert Calhoun's run didn't reflect the quality of the show.
    • He also gave some of the best episodes, like the episodes surrounding Doug's death. The problem with Days was that Ron had a horrible vision from he top. I don't feel the same for MVJ and nothing that has happened in all these months suggests she doesn't have a handle on the show. Now if it becomes an issue I'll acknowledge it, but I'm not seeing it so far.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy