Jump to content

Beyonce targeted by PETA


Cheap21

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 26
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Hey Bree, not all the animals used for this are meant for that. I remember seeing on Larry King Live a couple months ago huge kennels full of dogs being mistreated, then used for fur. It was very sad to actually see all of these pets stuffed into a tiny metal cage and thrown around like garbage. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Good for them when it comes to fur! Anyone who makes money off of torture for the SOLE reason of vanity and money is an [!@#$%^&*]. Shallow and heartless people like THAT make ME sick.

You need to rattle cages for changes to be made.

Being skinned alive for some rich !@#$%^&*] Cruella to wear as a coat isn’t "REAL" cruelty? They have feelings and nervous systems, you know. It's not like they're put to sleep. And if you just care about dogs and cats, they're being skinned alive in Asia for fur as well.

And just because an animal isn't "cute" or domesticated means it's OK to torture it? You lost me there.

MARTHA STEWART FUR EXPOSÉ:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkYB9DXWhbE...20Stewart%20Fur

DOG BEING SKINNED ALIVE FOR FUR:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rbXsxS7N2t0

To sugarland and Chris B: Thanks for your posts. It's nice to know there are other people on here who at least care and have hearts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Give me a break.

Like I said before, there are certain animals who are bred for food and clothing. Is the way they are killed humane? No---but you don't hear about PETA going after those people. They target the celebrities because they know the media will put their name in the news over that.

Newspapers and TV shows don't care about Joe Blow in overalls killing minks for fur---but they will broadcast or report PETA confronting Beyonce, J.Lo and any other famous person because that's what gets publicity. PETA will show up at fashion shows and get on the news, but will you see Access Hollywood outside a mink farm or a puppy mill filming PETA breaking in to rescue the animals? Not in this lifetime---or unless Pamela Anderson decides one day to do it and she contacts them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think wearing fur is tacky.

But PETA is even tackier for obsessing over it.

A group of them were parading around without their clothes on saying they'd rather be naked than wear fur. None of them were arrested though.

The rest of us who work for a living don't have time to waste on sh*t like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They “target” celebrities just like every organization focuses on high profile people. Look at all the religious organizations and Madonna. High profile people have influence over the populace, so it makes sense. Just because PETA has some "over-the-top" or "annoying" methods shouldn't make a difference to the actual torture. If I saw a nice kid with an annoying mom fall off a bike and get injured, I wouldn't care less about him just because he has an annoying mom. It's not his fault.

People who wear fur create a demand for it. If it weren’t for them buying it, there would be no demand and no breeding. And how are PETA members going around naked hurting any of you? Does it really matter? Being tortured just because you are bred for a specific purpose means it's OK? Being bred for a specific purpose means they can’t feel pain? The fur industry is the most disgusting because it is done simply for vanity and there are so many cruel-free alternatives. The only reason they’re bred and tortured is to be made into a coat that no one actually needs. There is no reason to wear real fur in today’s world and I can’t believe how cold and heartless some of you are. Being kept in a cage the size of your body where you can’t move, and covered in your own feces and urine for months, and then being killed by being swung by your hind legs into the ground to break your neck, but still left conscious while skinned alive? Heinous, incredibly cruel, disgusting and totally UNNECESSARY.

I think the Golden Girls said it best - "Cruelty is not fashionable"

http://www.petatv.com/tvpopup/video.asp?vi...r=wm&speed=_med

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well if someone doesn't want to wear fur, than that is certainly their business, but if I want to wear fur, than that's my business and mine alone. Dumping a can a paint on someone is not only illegal, but proves what kind of person they truly are...bumbling idiots!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You're a bunch of ignorant people.

These are creatures with no freaking voice and for PETA to speak for them is to be applauded.

BTW, these people have day job too, so this is their passion.

I hate all the Hollywood !@#$%^&*]es parading with their furs, throwing paint at them is not enough for those idiots.

I'm not a member of PETA but I own 2 dogs that I adore and like Oprah said they're human with fur, that's it.

I saw a lot of videos on animal crualty and it was unwatchable so for all of you who defends people who wear fur I say have a heart

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • This is the perfect way to encapsulate the situation. So many morally-reprehensible stories were foisted on the show and its characters in ATWT's dwindling years. Rape should never be used as a cheap plot device or in a way that degrades the victim. Jack's sexual assault was another heinous example of how nasty the the show's tone had become. The fact that people like Hogan Sheffer, Ron Carlivati, Jean Passanante, Charles Pratt, Dena Higley, etc., somehow end up winning awards for their material, decimates the credibility and integrity of the awards, IMHO. Soaps used to have a solid moral core and did not originally wallow in the gutter, rolling around in filth and depravity just to be cool, hip, campy, or whatever else modern-day PTB aim for. Thank you. Cruelty, degradation and misogyny are not components which lend themselves to successful soaps, which have always been predicated on warmth, family bonds, and providing a comforting haven for their audience. The genre has been crippled because the cynical and ignorant executives in charge understand neither the shows nor what the audience wants to see.
    • Beverlee was on a whole other level from Kim. It's not like they were in competition with each other. I get the feeling that Kim had a slight problem with the super-professional, serious cast members who just wanted everyone to be prepared and do the work, as she seems to like having fun on set. (She's made a few cracks about Chris Bernau being like that). Bev was definitely one of those. But they didn't work together that much. Yeah, they made her manic and also much weaker. She always had a vulnerability, but wanting to kill herself over that guy? No way. Not only that, he didn't leave her! She insisted he marry Maeve. When they did the tribute to Bert/Charita, the compilation of scenes with her showed how much the cast had been almost totally turned over in a relatively short period of time. Nearly every shot was of her by herself because most people she had worked with had been fired, left or been replaced. I assume they couldn't show her with people who hadn't been replaced, like Don Stewart, Elvera Roussel, or Robert Newman because they would have had to pay them for using their clips. It's dreadful to watch. Like she had no connection to the current show.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • A little too much focus on Chad and Cat today but I enjoyed the episode. I have a feeling that Jennifer’s gonna get dumped on though, even though I think that her anger is completely understandable and justified. And honestly, Ron is finally gone; Abigail can come back now.  But, welcome back, Anna! It was nice seeing Carrie have scenes with her mother. Christie Clark and Leann Hunley have never really had that many scenes together and to see them have them now is really nice. I’m glad that both of them were there to comfort Marlena too. Their words were definitely the thing that Marlena needed to hear. Btw, with all this talk of Noah, does it mean that he’s gonna be introduced soon? Amy, revealing that John changed her flat tire many years ago seemed a little random though. I would rather she have said something about how everybody in Salem knows of John Black because of how he was always such a hero. But at the same time, her story also showed what a great guy John was.  I liked Kate’s scenes with Philip too, and her promise to get back at Xander for what he did. And since we didn’t see JPL in the bed, did he need some time off or something? And yeah, everything involving ‘One Stormy Night’ still seems very Ron-like to me.
    • The second photo featuring the late John Spencer is from the Law & Order episode, "Prescription For Death", which was the (second) pilot/first episode all the way back in 1990! He played the father of a daughter that had gone to the ER for a mere sore throat but ended up dead because the doctor on call was drunk and had given her medication that she had an adverse reaction to, after receiving some other medication. So, he will always have that great distinction in addition to The West Wing. (The first pilot, "Everybody's Favorite Bagman", was filmed in 1988! The show was offered to CBS, but they passed. In syndication, it is oddly placed as the sixth episode of Season 1. And Roy Thinnes played DA Alfred Wentworth there. When NBC picked up the show two years later, Thinnes declined to return, and that's how we got Steven Hill's DA Adam Schiff.)
    • exactly. I can understand schadenfreude if it were real, but a lot of this is just an engineered distraction.
    • Days of our Lives S60E204 – Thursday, June 5, 2025 Okay, today’s episode was kind of boring. It was nice seeing Jack and Jen back, but they wasted an entire episode on Jen chatting with Julie - one scene would’ve been enough. Also, why didn’t Jack and Jen go comfort Marlena? And wouldn’t a flashback with Jack, Jen, and John have been great? Maybe something from the Cruise of Deception era? Bottom line - it feels like once John’s memorial is over and the returning fan favorites leave Salem… the show’s going to be dull again.
    • Everything with Elon and Trump is a stunt. If people, and the sycophantic press, are talking about their "feud," they are not talking about Republican plans to gut Medicare, Medicaid, and the ACA. 
    • I can't fully remember, but I don't think they tried to get Beth Chamberlin back. I think Laibson/McTavish likely saw Beth as old news and wanted to move Philip on; either that or have her return only when Philip was closely tied to a new woman. Thanks as always for these recaps. I think I had stopped watching around this time and mostly kept up by reading in the soap magazines. Bridget's degradation was horrible to watch, as the character had grown so much over the years and was clearly regressed just to be a foil for a "hot" couple viewers had zero investment in. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy