Jump to content

ALL: With BTG garnering so much attention, should the other networks jump on board the Daytime Train


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I think a reboot of GL that is based on the original radio concept could be viable .

A minister and his daughter (Rev Rutledge and Mary) the idealistic young man (Ned Holden)

the embittered artist with mysterious past (Eliis) , the striving immigrant family (the Kranskys) etc.

Update those characters with different ethnicities and give the stories a modern twist and away you go.

 A more realistic and issues based soap to contrast/ complement the more glitzy shows.

Edited by Paul Raven
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

As much as I'd love to see our old soaps revived in one way or another, I honestly think that daytime needs to look at new material. BTG has gotten all the buzz it's gotten because it's new. A revival of a classic soap might get some buzz, but ultimately, I can't imagine it would have lasting interest outside of its original fans.

IMO, any soap sequels would work best as semi-regular movies/specials, and any attempt at starting over or riffing on a classic soap premise would work best as a primetime series. EON is literally perfect for today's world of 10-15 episode seasons that are released once every year or two. Just don't put Ryan Murphy's hands on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

On the one hand, @All My Shadows, I agree with you.  The genre needs fresh characters and storylines - and ones that are rooted in reality - if it wants to reclaim its' relevance.  But, on the other hand, I think those who have argued that an EON reboot in particular could be successful today make a very good point.  (As a matter of fact, I'd even go along with an EON reboot that starred an African-American male as Mike Karr!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You're probably right, although I think the buzz is in part just because it's the first soap to premiere in over 25 years, and it would still have that buzz even if it were tied to an old show. 

I agree with those who think the most we will get of old soaps is that AMC movie if it ever actually happens, but a revival of Edge, or, as @Paul Raven said, a show going back to GL's original premise, I could also see working.

The only way for daytime to survive is to get new viewers, but a majority of the viewers are always going to be those who were around in the past. If they could find a way to combine both worlds for some future soaps, I wish they could try.

Of course, I know that's jumping the gun and just keeping this show on is what matters most for the time being.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it's worth to remember that shows these days need good elevator pitches and the only ones that I can truly see that with is Dark Shadows and yes, Edge of Night. All other shows are bit "life and times in a X small town where we follow X family's trials and tribulations". They're just not very unique, so you might be better off creating a new show without any baggage of the old show. Though I guess I could continue to advocate for Love of Life with the story of saintly Van's never-ending search for dignity while her dastardly sister Meg keeps getting in her way (cue organ music).

With that said, they were supposedly developing All My Children movies for Lifetime as of last September (?), so I'd assume AMC has a good shot at going to series again if that works out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I believe in Never saying never. For me it's the wisest approach. I really don't get why we need to repeat constantly how this or that is impossible or won't happen. It just adds to the atmosphere of doom and gloom that has been following soap operas for decades now like a plague. I believe in miracles and I believe that... just like in fashion... people's tastes return to basics sooner or later. And I believe daytime dramas in a way are the OG basics of TV entertainment. Years ago people were saying that there would never be a new soap and here we are... BTG proved them WRONG.

I still think that AMC has the biggest potential. I already said why...  but I'll repeat - it's quintessential soap opera, embedded in pop culture, and there is a reason for it. I agree that Dark Shadows has potential, but it can also go very wrong, because people will compare the new show with the original to ad nauseam. Of course this is meant to happen to any show that is revived, remade and etc... but Dark Shadows has a huge cult following and I would not want to see these people getting their hopes up and... then receiving a pathetic version of the original. If they don't do it right... it can sink pretty fast. You just don't f-ck with people's cult status shows. That's why I think AMC has more room to experiment. It's still iconic as hell, but I don't think I would call it - cult classic. That's just my POV. AMC can be re-started any day and work perfectly if given a great head writer. Mistakes can be more easily overcome than... if people are touching cult-material.

Erica Kane has been the basis of so many soap opera... and even primetime characters, inspired so many similar heroines and storylines, that I think... people would appreciate revisiting the OG version. Following that train of thought - I don't want to sound cynical...  but sadly time is ticking and if they plan to do something they should be doing it in the next couple of years. I don't doubt that Susan may be able to rock Erica Kane in her late 80s or ever early 90s... May God give her eternal health and longevity... she's proven to the world that she can break all kinds of record... but STILL...  I would love to get AMC back when people still remember it and it's still in their memories. 

Edited by Maxim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

 

I think @All My Shadows's idea for a rural-based soap has merit and potential as well.  Such a show would offer viewers glimpses of a way of life that isn't often depicted on television, and certainly not on soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

God knows it ain't because of the writing (sorry, "Yellowstone" fans), lol.

I, myself, have long advocated for a soap set in the Great Plains region: Oklahoma, Kansas, Nebraska, the Dakotas, etc.  Frankly, I've seen enough soaps supposedly set in the Midwest to last me the rest of my days.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I like that idea. I just wonder what they would treat as rural in today's soap world, or TV world.

That and they are odes to violence and gore and some kind of cliche struggle of "real Americans." It's hard to know how they would translate to daytime, but if it gets another soap on the air I'd try it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • For as much as Bill Bell focused on "social issue" stories, the Brad-going-blind story seems like a real dud to me. Of course someone going blind would have to experience all the emotions and go through a mourning period, but blind people are productive members of society, and Brad as a former physician would have known that.  Instead he is acting like his blindness would be a curse upon Leslie, destroying her growing performing career, which just isn't true. They could hire an aide to stay with Brad when Leslie is traveling.  But no... The show did it much better with Hope in the 90s. Though I would have liked to have seen Hope thriving in more settings (I think we heard about her volunteering but it was offscreen) at least the writers didn't have her miraculously regain her sight, like Brad did.
    • Great point.  GH will never go there and it's just like we love Robin? And the cure.  It's not a bad cause and it's great to have a cause in these times.  It feels a little dated to me, IMO. Also, Emma called Sonny "Mr. Corinthos" and not Uncle Sonny and I have never been happier.   Who told Josh Swickard that he could sing?  Dominic Zamprogna's inability to dance is adorable for some reason.
    • I'm finally playing some catch-up today and I know that I wanted to come back to your comment. Since at the start of the writing change, I was in here for that brief discussion of the popularity of Xander/Sarah. It was just starting when I stopped regularly watching, but I've read enough recaps and like the idea of good (if neurotic) girl/bad boy to know what I like.   I knew it would be a hard sell given Xander's history, but I guess it's to the strength of the actor and actress (and how they look together) that I do like them. And the time jump I felt humanized Xander a little bit to give PT something to play with. I love LG from what I saw on B&B to be invested in neurotic Sarah as well as like her outside of the show due to her history and her romance with a certain Clueless actor at one point.    So far from where I'm at...I'm loving their drama. I feel fully invested and they really work well together.   Now the other one...I believe it's Johnny/Chanel. I'm missed soooooo much of their drama. And I like they are backing away from a baby which is such a RC thing. I hope for more realistic drama for them. I'm not invested...yet...but I'm intrigued. And Well...CB has that bubble. lol. It is nice to see a YOUNG soap couple though.

      Please register in order to view this content

        I also love this as well. Shelle has been together, apart, together, apart so much that at this point...I would love to get to know Belle and Shawn as they are right now separately before they inevitably get back together so that if/when they do, it MAKES SENSE. And I'm GLAD Belle is not with Phillip. I like Shawn with Jada so far. And EJ and Belle just screams messy. I didn't jump on during Sami's last visit so I expect when she shows up again, she will have some more words. The potential is just sooo good. 
    • We are going to have to agree to disagree, because I completely disagree with your assessment. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • @Liberty City Being a more capable actor isn't always the better choice. He has no presence, no charisma. And, he does not come off like the leading man.  @Rmodelboy You're right, Martin has stood up to him, and now I want Brandon recast too! Every guy on this show comes off as submissive. No, Vernon is all talk.  Maurice's presence is for sure felt; that's why the first couple of episodes were dry this week.
    • Given the cuts being made to treatment and research funding along with RFK Jr's quack theories about HIV/AIDS, it is probably more relevant than in some time, but I know GH is not going to really go there in explaining why (and I'm not sure they could have even back in the day). I guess I should be happy Disney has not decided mention of HIV and AIDS is too "woke" for them.
    • Who's a bigger pathetic pick me? Brooke or Katie and Katie is a freaking moron given how Brooke has backstabbed her continually Ridge should have told patchwork girl to STHU 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy