Jump to content

ALL: With BTG garnering so much attention, should the other networks jump on board the Daytime Train


Recommended Posts

  • Members

With Beyond the Gates receiving so much press here lately and viewers seeming to be tuning in, should the other 2 networks revive their daytime line-up?? Would ABC reviving OLTL or AMC be beneficial or would you like to see them create a new show???  I know it is still early in the game, and while Beyond the Gates is working on fixing its little nuances, I am optimistic for perhaps a revival of daytime

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I think there should be a revived soap in my lifetime. I just want to experience it. It's incredibly popular as of late... to revive all kids of things... People are buying it. Sex and The City got a second life with And Just Like That and as I recall the revival was and IS extremely successful commercially wise and brought sooo many new subscribers to HBO+.

And I think All My Children has the greatest potential to come back, because of how embedded it is in popular culture. They can re-vamp it and just... give it a clean slate feeling, while preserving some core themes and returning some iconic characters. 

I don't think the world has seen the last of Erica Kane. I just don't. Maybe I'm wrong, but we'll see.

I think A LOT of this depends on how WELL BTG does. That's why I'm keeping my fingers crossed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

With P&G back in the soap and production content business, it may be a good time to revisit a revival of The Edge of Night. True crime and crime procedurals have a huge market for them. It would be interesting to have a soap again where the focus is more so on crime and mystery than just simple domestic drama.  

It doesn’t even have to be a true reboot - call or something else or use the EON name and have it set somewhere else. I just think the premise would be a lucrative one in today’s world. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sure why not? Soaps have proven to be a consistent source of subscriptions for the streamers as evidenced by NBC's move of DOOL from the network to Peacock. It makes more sense to invest in something that can provide your platform with relatively inexpensive content year-round rather than gambling on the popularity of prestige shows like White Lotus which only churn out 6-8 episodes every two years. Lots of people deactivate their subscriptions after they finish the latest seasons of shows like Game of Thrones or Stranger Things only to reactivate a year or two later when the new season starts. You don't have that problem with soaps.

As for relevance, I would argue that daytime's grand dames - AMC, OLTL, ATWT, GL, and even AW - are more culturally relevant in 2025 than lots of other shows that have been rebooted for streaming. I don't think anyone was clamoring for a Punky Brewster reboot yet we got one on Peacock. The other great thing about streaming soaps is that demos don't matter as much. The money of a paying subscriber outside of the key demo is just as good as the money of a female 18-49 subscriber.

Netflix has already already launched a daily soap, Valle Salvaje for Spanish speaking territories, and is about to launch a new French soap. And these are ongoing dramas, not novelas. Despite the recent failure of Neighbours on Amazon, I think it would be wise for Netflix or other streamers to start commissioning English-speaking soaps, new or revived. I hope BTG is successful and will sway them in that direction.

The Edge of Night would be perfect for the Cop Broadcasting System. I could absolutely see EoN returning as a hybrid serial-procedural. CBS could even air omnibus episodes during their Crimetime Saturday night block, perhaps with the serialized aspects edited out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Here I am again with your daily required minimum of nitpick & technicalities! NBC had no power or authority to do anything to/with/for/about DAYS except renew, cancel or cut their budget yet again. Peacock & NBC are peer level entities of UNIVERSAL. Peacock had dealt successfully with DAYS in the Beyond Salem projects & were interested in more. DAYS was reciprocally interested in Peacock & the deal was struck. Obviously neither Sony nor Universal had objections. NBC figuring in at this point? Nope. I hope this helps rather than hinders. This idea that NBC gave the show to Peacock persists & is wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If they were to bring back a soap I feel like the only one that would work would be All My Children. I still hate the idea of a primetime reboot didn't come to fruition for them. Beyond that, if BTG is successful I do think other platforms and networks should look into launching a soap. The key is that they have to be intentional and develop something that could work.

Personally, if I were tasked with creating another soap I'd create a supernatural soap to help broaden soaps overall fanbase. A Dark Shadows or Port Charles reboot or honestly, Passions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

All My Children is still talked about in pop culture which is why I feel Disney has been trying to get a reboot off the ground. It would be easy to get enough of the cast back as well whereas I feel like the same can't be said for a ATWT or GL or OLTL

People clown on Passions but it was very popular with younger viewers who are now in their 30s and 40s and the show is always going viral on social media. At the very least I think there would be a huge value in streaming the original series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It was just the delivery that made Passions a mess. The initial set up on paper was one of the strongest of any soap. This is why when Hidden Passions came out, a lot of people were annoyed that the backstory established from it wasn't followed through on the show. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

At the level of non-soap fan name recognition both "Erica Kane" and moreso "Susan Lucci" punch that button, it's true.

In general, I don't think rebooting a classic soap is something that is actually going to happen. The reason I think EON is maybe possible is because of the crime/mystery angle.

I don't know what you mean by "clowning" on it, however it gets a great deal of criticism that I think is fair & it likely would not be a draw as strong as a vampire soap or other gothic or different/quirky venture. It's a real shame that Kindred: the Embraced didn't get the shot it deserved. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I will always think AMC and OLTL on streaming in an hour block (30 mins each) are viable. They have very unique flavors vs. each other, very different tones and both strike at the heart of the country in different ways.

Do I expect ABC/Disney to do it? Nope, not any time soon.

EON remains the most viable soap and it's insane to me no one has ever touched it. So many shows have its DNA even if the showrunners have never heard of it.

I have told @DRW50 and others many times before that I think GL is uniquely viable given its historical roots and simple/wholesome Americana flavor (a la AMC in some ways, though that show can be more whimsical) but I would be legitimately surprised if P&G revisited it. Then again I was legitimately shocked they came back to soaps, lol.

I will admit digging deep into the Marland years made me think about ATWT from time to time. But I also think the show got so bland and creaky by the end, and had so many rough periods long before that besides that I think you would need to almost totally clean slate, and then what's the point of doing it? I just found little inspiring in ATWT's new or veteran cast by the end, and the ones I loved are mostly gone.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@Vee I do think GL and Edge (and maybe OLTL) are all shows that could be revived today due to the core of the show and how easily it still translates today (maybe even more because you don't have to worry as much about pleasing old fans), but in case anyone says no that won't happen, I'm aware. Still, it's always something I'd hope for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • For as much as Bill Bell focused on "social issue" stories, the Brad-going-blind story seems like a real dud to me. Of course someone going blind would have to experience all the emotions and go through a mourning period, but blind people are productive members of society, and Brad as a former physician would have known that.  Instead he is acting like his blindness would be a curse upon Leslie, destroying her growing performing career, which just isn't true. They could hire an aide to stay with Brad when Leslie is traveling.  But no... The show did it much better with Hope in the 90s. Though I would have liked to have seen Hope thriving in more settings (I think we heard about her volunteering but it was offscreen) at least the writers didn't have her miraculously regain her sight, like Brad did.
    • Great point.  GH will never go there and it's just like we love Robin? And the cure.  It's not a bad cause and it's great to have a cause in these times.  It feels a little dated to me, IMO. Also, Emma called Sonny "Mr. Corinthos" and not Uncle Sonny and I have never been happier.   Who told Josh Swickard that he could sing?  Dominic Zamprogna's inability to dance is adorable for some reason.
    • I'm finally playing some catch-up today and I know that I wanted to come back to your comment. Since at the start of the writing change, I was in here for that brief discussion of the popularity of Xander/Sarah. It was just starting when I stopped regularly watching, but I've read enough recaps and like the idea of good (if neurotic) girl/bad boy to know what I like.   I knew it would be a hard sell given Xander's history, but I guess it's to the strength of the actor and actress (and how they look together) that I do like them. And the time jump I felt humanized Xander a little bit to give PT something to play with. I love LG from what I saw on B&B to be invested in neurotic Sarah as well as like her outside of the show due to her history and her romance with a certain Clueless actor at one point.    So far from where I'm at...I'm loving their drama. I feel fully invested and they really work well together.   Now the other one...I believe it's Johnny/Chanel. I'm missed soooooo much of their drama. And I like they are backing away from a baby which is such a RC thing. I hope for more realistic drama for them. I'm not invested...yet...but I'm intrigued. And Well...CB has that bubble. lol. It is nice to see a YOUNG soap couple though.

      Please register in order to view this content

        I also love this as well. Shelle has been together, apart, together, apart so much that at this point...I would love to get to know Belle and Shawn as they are right now separately before they inevitably get back together so that if/when they do, it MAKES SENSE. And I'm GLAD Belle is not with Phillip. I like Shawn with Jada so far. And EJ and Belle just screams messy. I didn't jump on during Sami's last visit so I expect when she shows up again, she will have some more words. The potential is just sooo good. 
    • We are going to have to agree to disagree, because I completely disagree with your assessment. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • @Liberty City Being a more capable actor isn't always the better choice. He has no presence, no charisma. And, he does not come off like the leading man.  @Rmodelboy You're right, Martin has stood up to him, and now I want Brandon recast too! Every guy on this show comes off as submissive. No, Vernon is all talk.  Maurice's presence is for sure felt; that's why the first couple of episodes were dry this week.
    • Given the cuts being made to treatment and research funding along with RFK Jr's quack theories about HIV/AIDS, it is probably more relevant than in some time, but I know GH is not going to really go there in explaining why (and I'm not sure they could have even back in the day). I guess I should be happy Disney has not decided mention of HIV and AIDS is too "woke" for them.
    • Who's a bigger pathetic pick me? Brooke or Katie and Katie is a freaking moron given how Brooke has backstabbed her continually Ridge should have told patchwork girl to STHU 
    • To me, it helps solidify Ted as a character; Johnson was stiff (except for his excessive swaying) and could not emote one iota in his scenes. It was a recast that was well done. Knowing what Robinson is capable of doing, he's an asset to the cast. If they've just established it as a soap opera that patients have watched prior, I doubt the characters would appear in-universe; that wouldn't make sense at all.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy