Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Doug & Julie probably had more obstacles to overcome than most. If you recall, they were out of synch with each other repeatedly. He'd be free & she'd be with Bill Anderson, maybe. Then, she'd get free but by then he'd be with Addie. Their stolen moments out of the country sustained them. I believe that thing of them being unavailable to each other began because Bill Bell's plan was NOT TO EVER marry them! So, timing being this huge obstacle for them was by intent.

I get it that today all couples have obstacles. It has become an automatic trope that is always applied but it began by being applied to the supercouple formula that has been referred to & harkens back to PFS & Shari Anderson.

Edited by Contessa Donatella
  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members
Posted

Your first line is ironic because you defined the term perfectly. Hats off to you.

In my mind a supercouple is limited to Luke & Laura and their knockoffs: Frisco & Felicia. All the main 1980s Brady couplings. Maybe Steve & Betsy on ATWT.

I think calling Jessie & Angie a supercouple is an insult to the actors & writers. The characters had inner lives and ambitions that didn't revolve around their pairing.

  • Members
Posted

General Hospital started the supercouple trend but Days took it to a whole other level.

  • Members
Posted

I agree that supercouples were a phenomena of the 80's and tied to the action/adventure trend.

As well as the obstacles of a villianous rival  eg Larry Welch, there had to be some larger than life factor ,usually involving criminals/spies etc.

Days and GH did the most.

I think there had to be some longevity also.

I would include Travis/Liza, Steve/Betsy at some point but the Betsy recast and Doug Marland's writing for them moved them in a different direction.

Other popular couples, who faced more mundane,traditional obstacles do not earn supercouple status.

As for Bill Bell not wanting Doug and Julie married ever, I don't buy it.

I think he believed that they could have got another year or two out of the story before the wedding.

  • Members
Posted

Exactly - "star-crossed lovers" has long been a trope for literature, but it's not the same thing as a supercouple. In all honesty, I see so many shows still clinging onto that thing and it's just not working these days - partially because of the budget (action/adventure stories rarely work without at least some budget), but also since it seemingly makes viable characters never being able to move on. 

  • Members
Posted

They did use the cheap version of the formula with Spencer/Esme. The whole Cassadine adventure, the prolonged period of tension between them/keeping them apart, Esme, the banter. And while I believe they improvised the run into each other’s arms, that is about as supercouple as it gets. The biggest difference was due to IMO racism and the stupid FV schedule.

Posted

Here's the first one I've found today, at least.

Hayes, B., & Hayes, S. S. (2005a). Like Sands Through the Hourglass: A Story of Love. New American Library, A Division of Penguin Group. ISBN 0-451-220005-6


"Head writer Bill Bell had sworn he would never let Doug and Julie marry. But Bill was gone. CBS had offered him carte blanche to do whatever he wanted, and he went on to create and produce The Young and the Restless and then The Bold and the Beautiful, two great soaps that will remain on the air as long as daytime serials last. Bell continued to influence our lives as my mother's writing mentor, but he was no longer writing DAYS. So, in 1976, Corday gave Doug and Julie up to marriage, that state of romantic fulfillment the fans were begging to see."

  • Members
Posted

Woah, this is fascinating. I have to read this book! 

Thank you for sharing! 

Posted (edited)

It is well worth the read. Bill & Susan swap back & forth. He writes a chapter. Then, she writes one. And, so on. Also they are both excellent scribes, using a vast vocabulary, having a great sense of what their audience is interested in, using colorful & descriptive phrases.

Edited by Contessa Donatella
more
  • Members
Posted

And thank God we have people like you who remember all these details and bits... and can quote them perfectly with sources. I would never have remembered such a thing with my ADHD. SON continues to be the place where I find the most accurate info. 

Please register in order to view this content

Thank you! 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • https://bsky.app/profile/lesliegraystreeter.bsky.social/post/3m5vkcmytjc2w https://www.thebanner.com/opinion/column/michelle-obama-woman-president-black-hair-racism-misogyny-7J6PGYF5C5DG7DOBHDTT3OL6V4/  
    • Yeah. I wasn't feeling it either. If it was meant to be a chem test, it didn't work. I don't think so. Because I think Neil and Liz moved into that house after Stefano "died", and Neil lived there until he went to go see his patients and never came back 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Canada aired a repeat today Tues. Nov. 18. So after being a day ahead for the past week, they will now be back in sync with U.S.
    • I was really starting to enjoy it, but after Anspach, Shelton and Keane left, it got a bit blah to watch. Jane Russell was great as Rose, Buddy Ebsen as Toat was interesting as well.  If a second season were in the cards, I would have signed  Karen Carlson on to a contract and cast a couple more women as regulars. The cowboy aspect could continue. Sam Elliott, as always, was fantastic,  The camaraderie between Roy and Quisto was really good as well. Cybill... she was sex on a stick and unapologetic.   Poor Robin Wright barely lasted five minutes, though, before being raped and murdered.
    • I love it that we've gone from daylight to dark -- Luna's even returned to work -- but Steffy is still sitting next to shirtless Finn on the sofa.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Is the current DiMera mansion the same mansion Stefano moved into around 1983?  I remember that house was out near a lake, and not far from Doug Williams' night club.  In fact, there was a tunnel connecting Doug's Place to the DiMera mansion.  If it supposed to be the same house, I'm fairly sure it is not the same set.  But I'm aware sometimes soap opera sets change without any explanation   
    • Amazing work @slick jones I remember watching and enjoying Yellow Rose but losing interest once they went to self contained episodes, Interestingly that's the opposite of what Dallas, KL and FC did. So maybe YR should have been more episodic at first and then go to a fully fledged serial. But really the timeslot was the problem -Sat @10 was not the spot for a serial. And Rounders turned out to be a poor lead in. Maybe 9-11 Tues following A Team would have helped.  
    • LOL!!! He looks like he is reacting as if Luna just passed bad gas or something. 
    • Doug Marland came on board shortly before Gloria Monty, I believe. Jackie Smith was in charge of ABC daytime at that point. All of the characters in place were not his creations. Alan was created by Irving and Tex Ellman who wrote the hurricane story a few months before and brought in Alan, Scotty, David Hamilton, Dorrie and Lisa/Lana. His first character was  Bobbie in Jan 78. Apart from wrapping up the Lan/Lisa story he pretty much kept all the stories going just adding new elements.
    • She is 29... she's inching closer, and we know how important age is on soaps. 

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy