Jump to content

Y&R: January 2025 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Cuz Nick is hotter.

Please register in order to view this content

 And don't forget she was with Jack. 

 

Same.

 

IKR!!! I've been saying that since she was introduced. She does not do bland well at all. But psycho is something she can pull off. It is part of the reason I hope she keeps that part of her when the Jordan storyline is over. And yes, Ik...I"m behind. lol. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 148
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Josh seems averse to writing long term couples. You know the soap template of 2 characters fighting to be together with some interlopers to deal with, getting together for a while and then some obstacle to break them up etc. At least 2 years of story.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree.  There are no love stories on this show, and haven't been for years.  He just randomly puts couples together with little drama, they stay together for about a year, then they break-up and move on to someone else.  No drama, no angst, no heart-break.  How can a "successful" soap opera writer refuse to write long-term love stories?  Aren't soaps supposed to be all about love stories?  It's nuts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Unless it's because Josh Morrow has personal issues with Sharon Case, or he thinks reuniting Nick and Sharon translates into taking a back seat to their now-grown children's dramas, I don't understand what his deal is.  You're fifty years old, bruh.  It's time to leave the keg parties to the next generation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think he's against it and does believe in a future reunion, however, also made the statement that they are not Victor & Nikki. Per an interview with Today (June 2024):

❝ It’s been quite some time since Nick and Sharon have been together, yet some die-hard fans are always hoping for a reunion. Morrow certainly understands and reassures us that the pair will inevitably get back together one day.

However, he's quick to add that Nick and Sharon have a complicated history and have both "hurt each other deeply." Because of this, he doesn't foresee the couple sailing off into the sunset together one day. "They’re not Nikki and Victor," he says. ❞

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's what I'm saying!  Y&R has tried and failed to pair JM with so many other ladies on-screen that I've literally lost count.  It's time to admit that, while Nick and Sharon might not be Victor and Nikki, she's absolutely the best he can do for a mate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Putting Sharon and Nick back together is not the worst idea in the world, especially in light of the stories they've been given in the past few years.

A lot of them could have been played with the couple together.

Sharon's breast cancer (w/o the useless Rey marriage) Adam's return, Faith's bullying, Mariah surrogacy,various Victor dramas, Cameron's return etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For sure, Sharon's bout with breast cancer should've provided the impetus for a Nick/Sharon reunion; and if I were HW'ing the show today, I'd have her cancer recur with the same purpose: to put them back together (this time, for good).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Definitely her over Giggly Heffa any day of the week.

 

And even with that, I can't think of a Nick pairing that I felt could have gone the distance outside of her and Sharon. I mean has he another pairing that has stood the test of time like those two?  And this is coming from someone who didn't like the idea of Nick/Sally but watching it play out (and the fact that JM put in outside of work gym time and it showed), I didn't mind it at all. 

I agree. There's been so many teases with them that I've lost count. But I'm used to them getting close and then an abrupt left turn happens. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

lol. You would know better than I. My system crashed last Sunday so I'm sure I might have missed some episodes. I think my last episodes was the Damian reveal last Monday (sidenote-does anyone know if they followed up on the reveal that week?) and then the mundane Thursday/Friday episodes. I would totally say skip last Friday outright. 

 

I only watched Tuesday of this week so far and yes, I have been enjoying how HE has been playing her psycho version of Claire again for sure. From some of the comments here and a slight spoiler, this week sounds like it's going to be a good one.

Please register in order to view this content

Edited by Taoboi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • I did some research and the story wrapped up with a caretaker responsible for Georgina's death who then  tried to do away with Laurie but a vision of Georgina spooked him and he fell to his death. So there was a supernatural element.
    • AI has it wrong. David was working as an aide at PV Hospital due to failing to save his brother's life and refusing to continue as a doctor. His true profession was revealed later. Edna had divorced him while he was in Vietnam and he had no reason to be in contact with her. He had no idea that he had a daughter.  Ruth was Ruth Martin, she was still married to Joe, not Jeff. He was not deceiving Ruth as he believed that Edna was his ex. The poisoning story happened late in his run and probably introduced when they knew Gleason was leaving. AI's interpretation of him as conniving seems to based on that short lived poisoning story and other misinformation. For most of 76 he was involved in the Ruth/Joe triangle to the point where Ruth was ready to divorce Joe and leave town. Joe had to have surgery, David operated and Ruth suddenly realized she wanted to stay with Joe despite all the problems they'd been happening. David then got involved with Christina with Jeff and then Edna as complications. And he arrived late 75 not 76.
    • Interesting that they started going into a supernatural direction with ghosts - I don't think they really did that before? I wonder if it was a response to getting put so late in the afternoon and I guess trying to appeal to that former Dark Shadows audience? 
    • That makes sense then! Is there a place where you can read more Daytime Serial Newsletters? They sound very informative. Thank you

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Yep. Access to the Vault works fine but upon downloading attempts an error message pops up.   Maybe it is just a temporary glitch.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Downloading isn't working at all.
    • I'm pretty sure this ep is  from Dec 73 From the Daytime Serial Newsletter Ian and Valerie Northcote are deeply concerned over Laurie's  life being increasingly dominated by hallucinations and fantasies about Georgina, the former owner of the house the Reddins recently bought and are now living in. Doreen Post (Linda Purl) was involved in that story .Perhaps she was going to be revealed as Georgina's daughter? Wonder how that story evolved and whether it was wrapped up before cancellation? and thanks to @skylark
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Many thanks to @skylark and @DRW50!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy