Jump to content

GH: November 2024 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

So The Nanny Cam recorded Drew/Willow & sent it to Michael who viewed it

This show has story that is moving

Curtis & Alexis were great

Liking Lucas' guilt

BLQ was great with Scout

Drew doesnt give an F about Scout

Liked the lets save Sasha story that is brewing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If the acting and writing were better I would say the show could use Michael and Willow as the Alan and Monica for modern times that they were trying to do with AJ and Carly in the SJB era. 

Maybe Michael can try to kill Drew like Alan with Rick. 

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Still & all, situational ethics being what they are, Micheal is not as culpable as others are. Drew is worst, followed by Willow, followed by Nina & then coming up the rear, are Sasha & of course, Michael, himself.

I always - and I do mean always - prefer Michael who is like the son of Carly & Jason, rather than either a Quartermaine or a Corinthos. You know how in Star Wars universe, they may say, "The Force is strong with this one." Well, Michael is at his best when we could say, "The Spencer is strong with this one." 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Half of GH was pre-empted for me yesterday and I didn't go back and watch.  Did someone send that footage to Michael or is that just from his baby monitor?  And if so, how does Willow not know about this camera?  And why would Michael even have access to that monitor?  They live in the gatehouse.  Sorry, I am sure it was answered in the episode.  I just only got the beginning and the end of GH live yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It was the baby monitor. It came up on his phone. Apparently the camera is motion-activated. As for why Willow anything, let's just say she had other things on her mind. Basically, she sorta grabbed him by the neck & kissed him & then they both started taking off clothes. It was memorable. Also she was on top. Oh. Yeah, I have no idea why Michael had that particular app on his phone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks!  I definitely saw Willow/Drew I was just curious why Michael happened to be have that app and why he was looking at it when he was.  Motion activation makes sense.  Willow's pretty dumb to not know that the baby monitor camera exists though.

Like others have said, it's a bit of a weird way to pace this story and go about it, but I am enjoying it.  I can't believe I am typing this, but there should be more Nina involvement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I also can't believe the things I am thinking. But, I have to say that THIS GH has given more soapy messy goodness in 3 weeks than the prior 3 months!!! But, I did find myself thinking that they were crazy. It was in the afternoon (I think at least) at the Q mansion, in the nursery, which is where older children like Scout drawing a picture earlier, hang out, and so, ANYONE could have walked in at any moment. What were they thinking? Reply: They were not thinking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I guess RTPP looked worse because it followed Another World, but it's a shame they didn't give it more time especially considering how the shows that were put on following it fared.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Durkin was awful. The writing did her no favors, but she was all wrong for the part, lacking the mix of mystery, steeliness, sorrow and hesitancy that defined Victoria. I still have the awful memory of Adam lugging her around like a rag doll. She looked much more like one of the Blue Whale dancing extras than Victoria. And her voice... Maybe I am too harsh. With that said, Curtis didn't seem as bothered. I see from a fan review mentioning Barnabas & Company that Durkin was asked to return for Victoria's final episodes and declined as she had a Christmas trip to Europe with her husband planned and wasn't interested in just a few appearances.  I refuse to believe Victoria actually died during the Leviathan storyline. If Barnabas and Angelique could come back 8 times, she could come back a few.
    • It's a shame she only appeared in three episodes for the purpose of being written out - I thought she was quite good in the little we saw. I liked her vibe better than Durkin that never seemed to quite capture Victoria as a character.
    • He did a lot of romance novel covers, so that might've just been enough for them to get their panties in a twist.
    • Pre-TGIF, ABC most successful 1980s Friday 8 pm comedy I'd say was Webster. Full House wasn't a hit its first two seasons but it started showing growth in its third season which overlapped with the launch of TGIF. Funny thing is, Full House became a Top 10 show with the 1991/92 move to Tuesday.
    • Oakland Tribune, 14 July 1985   AW is another show with Schenkel at helm By Connie Passalacqua For the most part, dictators of South American banana republics enjoy better reputations than executive producers of daytime soap operas. Total authority is vested in these producers, who can kill off a character (thus firing an actor) with a stroke of a pen, or completely change life in his or her soap opera dominion (both in its fictional locale and backstage at the studio) on any kind of whim.  Most rule despotically, inspiring fear in their actors and writers. Which inevitably surfaces on the screen and subtracts from a show's quality. Then there's Stephen Schenkel who became executive producer of Another World last fall. He's been described by one of his actresses as "a teddy bear." He has noticeably improved the show, mostly because his natural warmth encourages backstage cohesiveness, and he believes in personally nurturing his staff and cast. 'I like to be supportive', he said.' I like to generate a certain amount of enthusiasm. I love actors and writers and technical people. And I like to laugh..  ' Schenkel said that most of the factors that have led to the shows improved ratings existed before he took over. There were well defined characters, outstanding writers and excellent production values, he explains. 'These things were in place but needed to be stimulated. There wasn't a lot of excitement. What really was missing was an adequate story. We added Gillian Spencer as a writer. (she also plays Daisy on All My Children), who's wonderful, and it just coalesced. The writers energy and commitment to the show began to give it an emotional intensity and some real passion within the characters." Schenkel, a former ABC programming executive who helped develop Ryan's Hope, is a strong believer in stressing romantic and comedy elements in soap operas. AW is also one of the only soaps with an established group of comic characters, including Wallingford (Brent Collins) and Lily Mason (Jackee , Harry). Schenkel raves about the talents of all his actors, and even has something good to say about the Brooklyn location of the shows studio, which most of his Manhattan-oriented staff loathe. I like the people here. I like to walk down the street and feel their energies, he said. He also violateda soap opera no-no, ' inviting actors and writers to the same party. "Everyone got to know one another, he said. And I didn't get any complaints about actors ' begging for story lines, he said. 
    • Since it's pride month.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • National City Star-News, 5 May 1977 TV topics by Peter Blazi Lear’s ‘All that Glitters’—doesn’t The best thing that can be said about Norman Lear’s newest soap opera“All That Glitters” is that it comes on so late at night most people will miss it. Role reversal is supposed to be the big draw, with women the breadwinners, mainly executives of a huge conglomerate. The men either fuss with the housework or fidget at the office as secretaries to their bawdy bosses. A female fantasyland? I doubt it. While the role reversal idea has some possibilities, the show pushes too hard for laughs and winds up with raucous females and effete males. A confident, independent woman is indeed a sight to behold and attract, but femininity need not be sacrificed. Unlike Lear’s “Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman,” "Glitters” doesn’t, but you’ve got to give him credit for trying. Today’s experimental comedy is what tomorrow’s hits are made of. Better luck next time, Norman. (“All That Glitters” can be seen weekday evenings at 11 p.m. on Channel 6.) .
    • Actually Kim Zimmer got six weeks off to test the waters for pilot season in L.A. - she said later she went on many auditions and got one offer for a sitcom, but she would one of many in an ensemble. She turned it down, because it wasn't worth leaving Guiding Light for a supporting role on a sitcom. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy