Jump to content

Sisters Discussion Thread


soapfan770

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I imagine Sisters was dismissed as a the t.v. version of the "chick lit" insult. T.v. critics and the Emmys tend not to reward shows like Sisters. I remember the snide U.S.A. today critic predicting the Lead Actress category (the year Ward won) and saying Angela Lanbsury should finally win since the emmy voters had decided (gasp!) to put two Sisters actresses in the category.

Most of the time the Emmys do not recognise female-centred dramatic shows. Are Handmaid's Tale and  Cagney and Lacey the only ones?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

With all due respect, @chrisml, I'd have to disagree.  I loved both "Sisters" and "thirtysomething," but as far as the writing goes, I never thought "Sisters" was in the same class as "thirtysomething" (or "My So-Called Life" or "Once and Again").

To me, it's like the difference between "Family" and early KL.  Again, I loved both shows, but I don't think early KL was on the same level as "Family."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No worries.

I do think Sisters did not get the acclaim it deserved. For all the talk about the best dramas around the time of Sisters, it's "Murder She Wrote" that lasted the test of time and is still the most popular today. That show was written off as fluff from the beginning. I'm certainly not comparing it to other shows, but it's interesting that "Murder She Wrote" and "Golden Girls" never went out of fashion. I remember years ago when NEtflix stopped streaming MSW, and all hell broke loose. It got so bad that customer service reps would ask, "Is this about Murder, She Wrote" when you'd call up on Netflix customer service about anything.

I'm almost afraid to go back and revisit Sisters because I wonder if it's as good as I remember (pre-Falconer dying/Georgie's fatal attraction nonsense). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As far as NBC interference goes well I see Willard Scott made into the 100th episode and Season 6 premiere as himself

Please register in order to view this content

 

That said now after rewatching the 6th season again in full, despite my admiration and love for Sheila Kelley on LA Law as I mentioned in the LA Law thread @DRW50 @Khan she just doesn’t work here as a recast Charley. She looks like she could fit as new character as like a step-sister or sister in law and she does decent with Wes,  but it still feels way off. I forgot how much natural rawness and toughness the original actress brought to the role of Charley and Kelley unfortunately doesn’t have any of that edge here.

I don’t know what happened to Jo Anderson and I do wonder if someone at NBC owned Kelley a favor given how LA Law wrote out her out.

Someone mentioned earlier about Cowen & Lipman’s going of the rails in the same manner a decade later at QAF and I totally get the comparison now. Yikes!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I had pretty much stopped Sisters by the time they brought Kelley in but what I saw did not have any of the strengths Anderson brought to the part - she had a subtlety and quiet strength the show needed by that point. 

I haven't watched QAF in a long time but for me it was the opposite of Sisters in that I thought the beginning of the show was rough as hell and weird and it improved from that point on, other than the stories for the lesbians, which were never good.

(I still remember the odd choice to have Justin, in between chasing every older man in every toilet stall he could, being way way too eager to help his BFF lose her virginity, which I refuse to believe happens in real life)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The original concept of Charley was that she was put up for adoption by her real mom and didn't grow up with a family.  I think she was even in foster care so she had to rely on herself in order to survive.

So when she came onto the show, she was guarded and unwilling to open herself up to these half-sisters.  And over time she did grow to accept them and even develop a bond with them.  Her part in the Georgie therapy story was the best part of that horrible story.. and I liked the stories she had in season 5 with finding out her real father did love her, and her realizing that working in a high end hospital doesn't matter if people can't utilize those resources.

Then she was recast with Kelley.. and it was almost like a completely different character.  She was bubbly, hung out with the sisters at Sweet Sixteen, and you would have assumed she had been raised by the family since birth.   It was too jarring of a change..imho

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I totally agree with this fair analysis as well. Not to mention Bea had left Charley as the executor of her will which was…odd lol. 
 

Maybe if Sheila Kelley had came in as something like a new character who was revealed to be their only fam or cousin or a step sister via Truman it could’ve worked better or something idk. Season 5 really did a lot of damage to the show. 

The show notably also recast Reed for the final season and it also destroyed Reed’s character as well inexplicably, which also made zero complete sense after finally getting Kirby ready to be a dad. 

Edited by soapfan770
Autocorrect issue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, I didn't understand Reed's sudden regression to being a spoiled rich girl who couldn't hack it in Hollywood as a struggling filmmaker's wife.  That didn't make any sense to me, given how differently Ashley Judd had played the role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Neither do I, and the actress who was the recast Reed was AWFUL just as her storyline was. It’s as if Cowen and Lipman learned nothing with the Georgie story.

@DRW50 A reason why I fell out with QAF because of their work during the last season because Brian & Justin rehashing everything again before ending on a whimper while the Babylon bombing quickly turned into the equivalent of Melrose Place getting bombed.
 

Apologies I just realized my iPad autocorrected a young Paul Rudd’s Kirby into Rory for some strange reason back in my post. Don’t ask me why. 

Edited by soapfan770
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Reed, as played by Ashley Judd, had her moments where she was rebellious.. but she generally loved both of her parents.  In fact, her version of Reed was a good contrast to Alex where Alex would be more over the top while Reed had a more low key dry wit when interacting with her mom.

The final Reed, who was famous for playing Amy Fisher in one of the tv movies that came out, was a completely different character.  Not only did she not act anything like the Reed of past... but there was a rewrite on her relationship with Alex.. as well as with her cousin Cat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • No idea if this one had ever been up before or what the exact date is, but it's always good to look at/save the new AMC content while you can. If you're here for the drama there is some delirium with Adam and Erica about 10-12 minutes in.

      Please register in order to view this content

      @Vee @Jonathan @Maxim @All My Shadows @alwaysAMC @Contessa Donatella @Soaplovers @DemetriKane @dragonflies @AMCOLTLLover @Khan @Paul Raven @slick jones @Wendy @DeeVee @j swift @EricMontreal22 @AmandainNC28655 @Wilsoky @Franko @Liberty City @robbwolff
    • I think there's a story to tell in someone who always believed in honesty and integrity being emmeshed in so many lies, but I agree that it wasn't very well laid out over the last few months. I think if I was more invested in Lois, I would have more of an issue than I do. Few can hold up against Jane. This is one of those cases where I think mentioning who already switched babies or have long-lost children would just take away from the fallout. If Lulu wants to drag Brook Lyn for hypocrisy there is probably still time (if the show bothers). I don't think anyone would claim these are the best GH episodes ever. It may be very lowered expectations at play. But I do think that scenes like yesterdays were some of Tracy's best, as she is a character who is often not allowed that type of moment.
    • You would think that, wouldn't you? I'd almost think they needed the money to get Robert Newman back, but they also had to know Larkin wasn't going to stick around and play second banana either. I don't get what the writers thought they were doing with Calla. Long liked using actors from Texas, but other than Alex/Bev McKinsey, the characters she wrote for them seemed blah.
    • Bo has a bad history with kids named Zach. (too soon?)
    • Christie said in her interview this week that she recently started taking acting classes again, and has been doing some work in England, so that helped her to jump into Carrie for this (as well as it being all so familiar, it really was home.)
    • Andrea Barber aka Kimmy Gibbler did have a few scenes with Drake too, when he first came on. Christie came in the middle of that storyline 
    • Carrie, as played by Andrea Barber, was at Bo & Hope's wedding. She was the flower girl. The ringbearer was Zachary Parker, the little boy that Megan tried to pass off as her and Bo's son. Andrea's Carrie was at Tony & Anna's real wedding (Aug. 5, 1985). She appeared for the last time on March 21, 1986. Christie's Carrie debuted on April 14, 1986. It appears that Carrie remained in Salem, just off-screen, during that near-month. Christie picked up with what Andrea had been playing, apprehension over John.
    • I don't think she is. I think she just created some really boring characters and for some reason doesn't know what to do with them.  But let's say that she is being force to write these characters that she doesn't like or want to write for.......that's a really bad sign that the creator of the show is being told what to do from the very beginning.  With so many EPs, I was worried there could be too many cooks in the kitchen, too many people giving notes - all those EPs are representing companies who have a stake in the show.    Canada continues to be one episode ahead. Thursday's US episode is another lacklustre episode, even with Leslie in it.  We'll see if Friday or Monday's episode in Canada will be a repeat. 
    • Like a lot of soaps, once relatives left, they kinda dropped off the face of the earth and out of conversations. I don't know why writers do that. If they just don't want to confuse viewers, or don't think it matters, or want the liberty kind of revise history to make their stories work. After Josh left in '84, he's barely mentioned. Even when Billy's railing against Kyle and refusing to accept him, it'd be the most natural thing in the world to say "Kyle's NOT by brother, JOSH is!" and I don't think he ever really says that.  The only writer I can recall who didn't do that is Doug Marland on ATWT. 
    • IIRC, there is a line during this time period where Reva says something like Marah is her first-born child, which fans were not thrilled with.  Dylan makes a few appearances through the rest of the show (and a much later recast that isn't really worth talking about, with a face that is familiar to you). He will make one briefly during 1997, if you get that far.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy