Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 30.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • hookedongh

    6312

  • remos

    4086

  • Ms. Quartermaine

    3372

  • ILoveTracyQ

    1894

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members
Posted (edited)

partyperson, I haven't forgotten about sending more clips. :) Just been busy... And I don't know what Tracy mouthed either...I'm not really good at reading lips. Oh, I am glad you like my new signature/banner. :D

Any more Tracy this week, anyone know???

Edited by Ms. Quartermaine
  • Members
Posted

Np lol I usually am good @ reading lips,her words were off. And I need to ask you some very important info just pm me on youtube biggrin.png

No!!! Poor Bernie sad.png. He wasn't the most important but still loved him! Why not kill the Jews! LOL Jk don't take mt joke personally

  • Members
Posted

Bernie is a throw-away character. Yes he's a mobbie, but it's not as if the real problem with the mobbies will be addressed. Now, killing Jason - THAT will be addressing the real problem.

On a side note, caught up with the show to yesterday. For month it was 'spoiled' that John would be the one returning Daniel. Oh well….

Arguably I'm biased, but there was more chemistry in the room when Luke and Tracy were talking about their other lovers, than in anything between Luke and Anna. I hope they kill that 'pairing' soon, and go for the money couple. It would be nice if Joe was working an angle, too. I'm not liking him being a schmuck. Can't he be Interpol or something?

  • Members
Posted

Well I just liked how he was apart from the rest...anyway agreed on that. I believe Luke wouldn't really fight that hard on something as sad as this relationship,if you can even call it that. There more like friends with benefits,not life partners or a couple,they don't even catagorize in any of those,they catagorize in the section labeled,"Friends with Benefits." Same with Joe all those "pairs" were just sex placements,yes chemistry but you can't really have any type of sex without the chemistry there so yeah...huh.png

  • Members
Posted

From soapoperafan blog for GH summary the 19th and the 22nd (so this is for Monday's show after Joe gets shot.

ILTQ BTW SOD has Richard S talking about leaving and being sad to film his last scenes etc

Joe Jr. is on the loose and for some reason threatens Starr. This of course leads to Sonny, Trey and Michael wanting to go after him. There’s some activity at the docks and then Joe heads for Tracy.

  • Members
Posted

*cries*

I don't want Joe to die. I don't want Richard to leave. :(

Maybe I will write TPTB a letter and give them Remos's Interpol idea. Things got too hot so he had to bow out.

Gah I really was starting to love him. Scummy and all. And yeah, RS and JE have more spark than JE/TG, but I liked him all on his own.

:(

Not happy. But I guess I hope that JE/RS rock the goodbye stuff. Poor Tracy. She gets a man who is into her for her, and......

Just please. No Tracy/Duke. Ian is a cutie, but Duke is creeping me out. No, just no.

But no to Luke/Tracy as a couple again, either.

So what's a girl to do?

  • Members
Posted

So will there be one more Joe/Tracy scene before Joe goes bye-bye (thank Gawd!)?

I'd like him to tell her that he has genuine feelings for her, and that when he gave her the antidote he thought he was choosing her life over his (at the time he was). I'd like her to know that before he kicks. I want nothing else from him. Nothing.

Gotta tell you-- I'm not loving the Luke/Tracy friendship. Sure I love seeing JE and TG acting together. They so clearly love it. That's the thing. I see sparks flying like CRAZY.

When I see them on screen I see this great, crazy love affair that doesn't seem like it would work, but it DOES! They should not be friends. It seems ridiculous. A huge waste of a GREAT pairing. They should me married!!

This split makes NO SENSE to me.

NO SENSE. I actually get angry when I think about it too long.

Anna and Luke have NO CHEMISTRY (Anna and Duke have even less, but that's another story and none of my concern).

On another topic, are they REALLY going to kill Jason before he and Sam have makeup sex?!?! It seems so cruel.

WHAT is wrong with this show?

  • Members
Posted

^^ I agree with you Laine….. about Joe confession and Luke and Tracy. My only hope is that TPTB aren't stupid (I know, it's a stretch) and get over their ridiculous need for all the 90's pairing, and see what is right in front of their face. If the plan is to bring them to a place where their obvious love gets 'rekindled' and they are built from scratch again, fine. Just get on with it. For all Luke's protestations that he's "crazy about Anna", there is nothing on the screen that shows that to be true.

  • Members
Posted

I guess if the docks stuff happens first, then he finds Tracy.....he dies when she is there? Oh, my girl. I also guess the spumor about Tracy getting arrested might be true. Monica turns her in for helping him, or Anna finds out, and arrests her, and that is why Luke is comforting her-because Joe is dead.

I can't help it. I like Joe and RS. I am probably going to cry like a baby at those scenes if they play out anywhere close to what I am expecting. :(

  • Members
Posted

Lainey and Remos, I agree with both of you I thought I could like Lacy as friends because at least that meant they were still in each others orbit. But i've decided I hate it!!! Hearing Luke talk about Anna is like hearing him talk about a distant family member, there is no emotion it's like Tony is sickened to say the words. Just being in the same room with Jane and his face lights up and he seems excited to be there. Yesterday when Luke and Lulu were talking and he said he was 'crazy' about Anna, it just seemed fake to me. TPTB are trying too hard with them, there is nothing there and I can only hope that they will come to their senses and see whats in front of them.

I found myself last night on my phone watching old You Tube clips and vids of the two of them together and the more I watched the angrier I got at the thought of them not getting back together.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I could've sworn FV let other people direct either here or at OLTL. I may be wrong. IIRC Kimberly is now very active directing multi-cam/sitcom work.
    • IIRC MVJ said the million was just the first piece of what Leslie got or was already owed, something they did make explicit in dialogue but not too explicit. Still, I am past worrying about it. I do think they want 30-yo elder millennial Peaches in her Sophia Petrillo wig to be a point of pathos for Leslie. In theory I am fine with that, and don't dislike Peaches despite the jarring physical disconnect and need for a recast lol. But I do think they do a lot of B&B-style whizzing from Point A to Point C with Leslie on this kind of stuff - in one scene she is raising hell, in the next she is weeping over Peaches. There's very little transition to that sometimes that allows for the nuance, and that can be done much better and they can go much deeper with Leslie (and most characters). The newer/younger audience for the show may have less issue with this kind of quick change than we do.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       Thank you.   That was part of my reasoning as well. I think about the days of Kevin, Joey, and Jessica on OLTL or Lucky/Liz/Nik/Sarah/Emily on GH or the Last Blast Kids on DAYS or the Glow by Jabot kids, and it takes me back. Sure I started soaps due to the older cast with their divas, but I do like to see people around my age back then, too. Great memories.   So I love a good relatable teen tale. Bullying. Hormones for the Bad Boy. College choices and internal conflict. 
    • Thank you for the information.  I did listen to the entire interview with Miss Roux -- way back when it was first released.  But I am unable to recall her mentioning Connie Ford, and don't have time nor effort to listen to the entire thing again, just for one small morsel. So again, thanks for responding.    I do recall Roux sounded extremely fragile and perhaps a bit wounded in the interview. I almost felt guilty for even listening to it.  So perhaps that has some influence on my reluctance to listen to it again.  She seemed troubled, to say the least.   
    • Boxer-briefs, huh?   Well...called it on Cane/Giggly Heffa hooking up so not surprised.
    • Do you have Addie’s first air date??
    • Even now Victor is always so warm with Ashley. I liked their brief re-pairing as well.
    • @depboy Thanks. That does help. @titan1978 @Paul Raven Really enjoying the analysis of the production methods and what Monty was doing.  I wish we got some of those biopics here that a few UK soaps got as a biopic on Monty's first few years at GH would be fascinating. 
    • The original 'mansion' was one of the set upgrades they did in 1980 . It was the Chandler residence. When that story fizzled out I think it became Stuart Whyland's house -not 100 on that. But it was revealed that Stuart was working for the Di Mera's (rewrite) so Stefano moved into that house. Mmmm...then it became Alex Marshall's? Neil and Liz lived there also. At some point it was finally replaced.  
    •   Thanks. I'm glad she got to as I know some producers tend to get mad if actors want to direct.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy