Jump to content

B&B/Y&R: March 2024 Spoilers


Message added by Errol,

Effective April 2024, B&B Spoilers and Y&R Spoilers will become separate threads within the Discuss Previews and Spoilers forum as some posters are interested in reading spoilers for one show but not the other.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 200
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

That is what I want to know, LOL.  Danny keeps telling Phyllis to stay away, but then agrees to have dinner with her or whatever.  It's stupid.
FYI, on Monday March 4 US (Friday March 1st Canada) Phyllis has a fantasy about how her dinner with Danny will go

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

B&B Preview images from the youtubetv episode guide
(these will become the episode thumbnails for CBS)
https://tv.youtube.com/browse/the-bold-and-the-beautiful-UCiaukWSbRCUga4KUd9vKVtw 



Preview of thumbnail pic for Season 37, Episode 113
(Monday March 4)

Please register in order to view this content

 



Preview of thumbnail pic for Season 37, Episode 114
(Tuesday March 5)

 
 

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I know Right Janea4old I am not sure Danny cuts Phyllis out of his life the Spolier just said he sets the record straight with Phyllis .so I am not sure what that means . I do know the trio tapped quite a bit in Feb to air this month .and I don't understand why if the triangle is truly over .

From what I was told by a Twitter insider and Canada insider Even though Danny chose the Bug and is with her for a bit something happens at some point (rumor has it they get stranded someplace )some how  Phyllis and Danny end up having a ONS and she will actually blackmail him with that so he leaves Christine to be with her.  I wouldnt be surprised if she gets it on video he obviously won't want the bug to know about it so Phyllis will use that that to her advantage basically as leverage , basically either He leaves the bug and be with her or She blows the whistle. And reveals her evidence 

 This is pretty much what happened all those years ago? Only now some form evidence instead of a baby?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Did you see what admin @Errol posted this morning about reputable sources for spoilers at this link?
https://boards.soapoperanetwork.com/topic/66290-monthly-vs-general-spoilers


Furthermore, the rumors you are hearing sound like things people are guessing from who was filming when.

There was a BTS scene that Michelle Stafford had on her IG about 4-8 weeks ago about a dinner and sharing sauce with Michael Damian. M.S. played it up for fun, but she didn't actually say anything would happen.  I think a lot of rumors came from people making guesses due to her post.

The dinner is scheduled to air Wed. March 6 U.S. 


 


This is what happened all those years ago:
Danny didn't have sex with Phyllis. She had sex with some other guy and got pregnant with Daniel, but did something to the guy so he wouldn't remember.  Then Phyllis did something to make Danny think that Danny slept with Phyllis but he didn't. He was faithful to Christine.  
Then Phyllis said Danny was the father, but he wasn't.
Then Danny married Phyllis out of obligation to baby Daniel, because he thought Daniel was his.  Phyllis tried to woo Danny after they were married, and to get him to like her a little. He tried to be friends for the sake of the baby.  Danny had sex with Phyllis for the first time a while after he was married to her.

More than a year (maybe two or three years?) later on, Danny learned that he wasn't the father (long storyline) and he sued for and won full custody of Daniel, after proving that Phyllis was morally unfit.  Danny later moved to Europe and took Daniel with him and raised him alone.  Phyllis never saw Daniel again - well not until years later when Daniel was a teenager.

Note that I am relaying this off of memory from decades ago, without looking it up, so I probably have some details wrong, but that's the gist of it.

 

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Update:

Lauralee Bell and Michael Damian interviewed by Kristyn Burtt on zoom,
interview posted March 4, 2024.
The video is embedded within this article:
https://soaps.sheknows.com/the-young-and-the-restless/news/720106/lauralee-bell-michael-damian-do-chris-danny-reunite/

But the video is hard to see because it's a connatix.com video that disappears if you have an adblocker.   I had to try several browsers with various settings before I could see it.

The video is 19 minutes long and mostly just chatty stuff.   Lauralee and Michael D. enjoy promoting their recent scenes and talking about the old days.
  
Partway through, Lauralee says a very vague spoiler.  "There's something coming up that's so classic Phyllis. This one will remind you of back in the day.  That's coming up in a few weeks.  It's classic Phyllis."

Lauralee sounded enthused about it, but most of the past few months of Christine/Danny/Phyllis stuff has been a stupid dud (in my opinion), so I'm skeptical that anything upcoming would be worthwhile.

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There is this pic Which has Danny Gripping his hands on Phyllis  i know its to get though to her but if He accidentally leaves bruises she could possibly take pics and use that as leverage against Danny. Which would be classic Phyllis .

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^ picture from SOD
https://www.soapoperadigest.com/photos/first-look-photos-spoiler-pics-of-the-week-ahead-1736841/


Yeah but Abby witnesses that scene and Christine walks into that scene a minute later, so she'll know.

Pictures from here at this site
https://www.soapoperanetwork.com/2024/03/the-young-and-the-restless-prevue-for-the-week-of-march-4-8-2024

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Days of our Lives S60E204 – Thursday, June 5, 2025 Okay, today’s episode was kind of boring. It was nice seeing Jack and Jen back, but they wasted an entire episode on Jen chatting with Julie - one scene would’ve been enough. Also, why didn’t Jack and Jen go comfort Marlena? And wouldn’t a flashback with Jack, Jen, and John have been great? Maybe something from the Cruise of Deception era? Bottom line - it feels like once John’s memorial is over and the returning fan favorites leave Salem… the show’s going to be dull again.
    • Everything with Elon and Trump is a stunt. If people, and the sycophantic press, are talking about their "feud," they are not talking about Republican plans to gut Medicare, Medicaid, and the ACA. 
    • I can't fully remember, but I don't think they tried to get Beth Chamberlin back. I think Laibson/McTavish likely saw Beth as old news and wanted to move Philip on; either that or have her return only when Philip was closely tied to a new woman. Thanks as always for these recaps. I think I had stopped watching around this time and mostly kept up by reading in the soap magazines. Bridget's degradation was horrible to watch, as the character had grown so much over the years and was clearly regressed just to be a foil for a "hot" couple viewers had zero investment in. 
    • Having the majority of the cast on those low numbers is no way to tell story. And just 2 dayplayers for the month. So sad for the #1 soap.  
    • I believe it was. And this is actually one of the cases where I wouldn’t mind some dumb soap opera bringing back from the dead. They gave Mishael, Amanda, with all of Hilary’s connections but none of the personality except for fleeting moments. Hilary absolutely should’ve just left town. They decided to kill her and the baby. Just baffling,
    • That was Mal Young right? He thought a tragic death was a better option than crafting a story where Hilary leaves town. Was it a case of punishing someone who wants to leave? And then they have to jump through hoops to bring the actress back.
    • Ooo @TaoboiI will say I just watched Amanda give it to Abby and I loved it. Honestly just made me miss Hilary more. I will never understand or get over that decision to kill her off. Also call me crazy but I could definitely see the Damian actor playing NuTed on BTG. Very much still enjoying the Lily attraction.
    • I rewatched these episodes---they broke my heart. Somehow, Nola had seen Vanessa leave the hospital, and follows her home, and Maeve just lets out this primal scream---chills went down my spine. And knowing the history between them---never quite liking the other and always getting on each other's nerves (to put it mildly)---makes it a much richer to have them put it all aside in the moment and be family to each other. I've never seen/heard what Maeve thought of the story itself, but she did want a break, so it's not like she was fired and then brought back. Yes, Vanessa could be this stubborn and unwilling to ask for help. She'd pretty much always been an "I can do this on my own" type of woman, although when she first came to town, she would still run to Henry. But after she met Billy, she stopped relying on her father. It's part of the reason she (briefly) got addicted to pills after Bill's birth---she was determined to take care of him all by herself and became obsessed with the idea she was the only one who could. Of course, nothing before to this extreme. I should say, there's no way (IMO) they could've told this story---Vanessa letting her loved ones thinking she'd died---if her father Henry had still been alive. She never would've been able to do that to him. And it does chafe that she's letting Bill believe it, when her mantra had been all about protecting him since the day he was born. I honestly don't recall what I thought about it at the time. But now I'm thrilled she's free of Matt at least. LOL.
    • I had no idea Peter Reckell was 70. He doesn’t look or feel it and I guess I thought Bo and Hope were closer in age than 9 years. Wow even the new writers had to have Jack praise Leo. Melissa Reeves continues to slip back in effortlessly as Jennifer. I like Ari and Holly being old friends. Holly learning about John’s death reminded me of how John used to call her Nikki if my memory is serving me right. Doug who happily sleeps in high school Holly’s room shirtless and in his underwear is now asking about birth years. How old is he anyway?    The Cat and Chad romance is insulting. 
    • Her husband is Marty Levy. Chocolate Fortunes (her company) was started in 1987.  So that explains the mystery of 'Whatever happened to Pam Peters?' She had been running a successful business for decades.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy