Jump to content

Tank Jobs and Sabotage


kalbir

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I guess the networks and advertisers made the same assumptions about "Matlock" that they had made about "Murder, She Wrote."  In both cases, they assumed the show skewed older in terms of demographics; and in both cases, they were wrong.

Of course, I don't think "Matlock" was as well written or produced as MSW - none of Dean Hargrove's shows were, IMO - but it's possible Andy Griffith had the same kind of broad appeal as Angela Lansbury, even if Ben Matlock wasn't as endearing as J.B. Fletcher.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 129
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Agreed neither shows ever produced MSW caliber episodes, but they could still provide fun little easy to solve mysteries. I know my grandparents and at least my dad lol definitely watched it for Andy (not to mention the cantankerous nature of the character was closer to how Griffith was in real life apparently lol). 
 

Similarly later on both my grandmothers were obsessed with watching Diagnosis Murder too and I’m assuming that was because of Van Dyke plus the show got better after dropping Scott Baio

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Earlier in this thread you brought up Diagnosis: Murder tank job. 1996/97 move to Thursday 9 pm head-to-head w/ Seinfeld but it backfired 1997/98 when Diagnosis: Murder got its first Top 30 finish. Also backfired 1998/99 Thursday 9 pm head-to-head w/ Frasier and another Top 30 finish.

A second tank job 1999/2000 move to Thursday 8 pm head-to-head w/ Friends and that was when Diagnosis: Murder fell out of the Top 30.

Sabotage Fall 2000 move to Thursday 10 pm head-to-head w/ ER. January 2001 move to Thursday 9 pm. February 2001 move to Friday 8 pm where it remained until the final episode May 11, 2001.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Matlock did skew older and NBC was fully aware of that.

The whole point of scheduling it against Who's the Boss was to offer an alternative for the viewers who were not interested in WTB, whose demos would have been strong in kids, teens and young women.

Matlock did well with men and older viewers.

Programming 101.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

"Diagnosis: Murder" did get better after Scott Baio left.  However, even by Dean Hargrove and Fred Silverman's already low standards, I thought DM was an embarrassment to everyone involved, including Dick Van Dyke.

One factor that probably helped was all those endless cast reunions that they did in order to attract more viewers. 

I remember one episode reunited cast members from "Happy Days," "Laverne & Shirley" and other Garry Marshall-produced sitcoms, while another reunited members from the film and TV versions of "M*A*S*H."  And then there was the time GH's Leslie Charleson and Stuart Damon made a cameo in an episode that, I think, centered around famous TV doctors like Quincy, Joe Gannon from "Medical Center" and the like. Ugh, lol.

I just remember hating the whole exercise and thinking, "If y'all would put more time into developing better scripts, and instructing your actors not to act as if they're guest-starring on 'Batman,' and less time on THIS [!@#$%^&*], imagine how decent y'all actually would be!"

 

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

You might be right as that may have been the case because I do remember how hyped up attention the Star Trek themed Halloween episode was given in that same era in the press.

It was definitely sometime in early ‘98 when I was staying at my grandparents for a week when I heard my grandma say “If I don’t catch that new Diagnosis Murder tonight I’m gonna croak!”

Please register in order to view this content

And there I saw her later on sitting glued to the show while grandpa already was half-asleep in his recliner.

I myself only occasionally ever watched it, especially if nothing else was on. My only interest I had in the show really was just watching Van Dyke and Rowell together, otherwise it was just run of mill whodunits that could be mildly amusing. Something for a very lazy Sunday afternoon but unlike MSW it was definitely not appointment TV worthy. 

I agree better scripts so could have helped the show out. In addition to dumping Baio the show really needed to have recast Sloan’s son with an actual actor. Barry Van Dyke’s apple (along with his son Shane’s apple) fell very, very, very far from the tree that gave us Dick and Jerry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The only reason my mom (in her 30s) and her friends watched DM was due to Van Dyke and Victoria Rowell.  She didn't think the stories were as good..but had attachments to both leads.

Matlock..same thing...she had an attachment to Andy Griffith cause of the Andy Griffith show..and also grew to like his rapport with Nancy Stafford's character and later Brynn's character (cause she was from soaps).

My grandpa always watched DM as well...never missed it on Fridays

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This always annoyed me. Not as much as it did with Lois & Clark, as the stunt casting ruined that show after a decent first season, but it still annoyed me. I actually preferred the first season or two (it helped that I didn't know what a piece of [!@#$%^&*] Scott Baio was), even if it was never a good program. I remember preferring Burke's Law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Yes from when they went on Let’s Make a Deal too. Pam stole Forrester designs for Jackie M. Of course a month later we saw Nick, Lesley, Owen, and Bridget all exit in the same episode.
    • Great pairing that seemed to come out of the blue! Around that time, it felt like Sheffer/Goutman didn’t really know what to do with Emily or Hal. And KM and BH had surprisingly great chemistry. It was good for Emily especially because she was coming off those unsympathetic years with the Tom affair and then running the Intruder and essentially just being a busybody.
    • I think the issue with Lulu is less the character (which was the issue in the Julie Berman days under Guza II) and more the lack of nuance. The current GH team rarely writes nuance for any character or at least can't sustain it for long, or they reserve it for a favored few. I also think the rooting interest at GH BTS often remains on preferred characters or actors - BLQ/Setton - vs. Laura's kids. So it's easy to make Lulu the heavy if you think Brook Lynn and Chase are the money on this show. I don't, but I think FV does. And that's not to say I think Amanda Setton is bad in the role, or that I would get rid of BLQ. I don't trend towards either (though I do think that if Setton's personal beliefs keep getting in the way of material I would reluctantly recast). I think Brook Lynn is essential to use as a lead presently. But I don't think it needs to be the black and white dichotomy of suffering young matriarch BLQ and aggressor Lulu. While it's good that unlike in the Guza years they can recognize that Lulu can be obnoxious and rash, can be her own worst enemy and that that is part of the character, it can be toned down or given more layers than it has of late. There's nothing wrong there the writing can't fix.
    • 1999: I just watched it. It felt so primetime. La Lucci is making history. Aretha's daydreaming segment. @Contessa Donatella Thank you, my love. So helpful and informative as always. adding them to my queue.
    • I know this isn’t a usual or anywhere near universal take, but I loved the relatively brief Hal/Emily relationship/marriage more than I ever thought I would have with KMH/BH.
    • In my field (not that) I've written my share of dreck when it's what people wanted vs. something good. In the end what matters is the check. These pilots may not be great, but whether or not those writers intended otherwise they got paid.
    • I think there is plenty to critique and/or roast about the show, but I think there's also good bones and a lot of progressive improvement. It's the Bell/B&B formula and house style that is hardest for it to shake and the most necessary IMO, as well as some dead weight actors or characters, but that formula also apparently works for a lot of general viewers and I suspect CBS. OTOH it's also very modern in certain ways (sometimes overly hip dialogue, and some story) that still make it feel like a show that's bouncing between distant past staples of soap opera fundamentals and the present moment. And the old fashioned product placement is fun but also so goofy, while material like June is hysterical. Imagine leading with 'the underpass is where I live, and I like it there!' It's an unusual show in that way, because its identity and tone is still not fully formed. You don't know what it'll be. But that's normal at this juncture. The closest thing to a glimpse of the future foundation, I think (besides the obvious core family setup that's been there since Day 1), is the rivalry and future familial bond - and likely love/hate relationship - between Kat and Eva. A la many central sisters or siblings throughout soap history.
    • I loved Kelley Menighan! She was an MVP, especially during the show’s last few years. I always looked forward to anything she did with MM, BH, CZ, MW,  and the two grownup Alisons. Wasn’t a big fan of her with RH’s Paul. I always admired how she balanced being a vixen and being neurotic.
    • LLC can be a lot (lady definitely doesn’t phone it in), but her scenes with Rena made me wish they played actual sisters on a better platform.  Aside from JE, who is a legend so it’s no surprise when she’s excellent, Amanda Setton is my MVP of this story and she hasn’t always been great in this role. You see so much happening in her face as she’s navigating the shifts and layers of this story. She’s fully locked in. Glad Rory Gibson is getting his due on GH. I knew he had more to give than what Y&R was giving him. The writing will be a factor here as well because the character of Michael hasn’t been written well in ages (if ever, arguably). GH just can’t sustain the good stuff for more than a few weeks. Alexa Havins is a very good actress and was widely embraced as Lulu initially, but the character’s one-note abrasiveness has a lot of folks wishing she was gone at this point. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy