Jump to content

Tank Jobs and Sabotage


kalbir

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Schedule-wise, I could put it at 8 p.m. Saturday, with Once a Hero in the 9 p.m. Sunday slot.

@Franko Sorry can't see Once a Hero Sun @9. The show was kid oriented and was a disaster Sat night.

Maybe - Dolly/Buck James/Hotel on Sat night? And back to a 2hr Disney Movie 7-9 Sun followed by a Sunday night movie.

ABC wasted their movies on Thurs night that season.

@Khan Re Dolly Fri @9. Risky as Dallas/Vice were still battling it out, although I could see Dolly making some noise there. Do you have an idea for Dolly's Sunday @ 9 slot?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 129
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Believe it or not?  "Moonlighting."  I always thought "Moonlighting" was a Sunday night kind of show.  Something witty and fun to kick off the week with.

Other options: "Hooperman"/"The Slap Maxwell Story," or just program "The ABC Sunday Night Movie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  • Members

Looks like a tank job but it could be a move to fill space.

1988/89: Midseason CBS moves The Equalizer from Wednesday 10 pm to dead zone Thursday 9 pm, replacing new drama Paradise which moved to Saturday 8 pm. The Equalizer run ends at four seasons.

Yes, The Equalizer wasn't a hit and didn't show growth during its run but CBS was in the midst of its third place primetime mess era so it really wasn't in a position to have any tank jobs.

Edited by kalbir
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's really a shame that the original "Equalizer" wasn't a hit.  I thought it was such a fantastic show, with a one-of-a-kind actor in the lead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is a neat thread, can't believe I'm only just seeing it. I don't have much to add, except

To me, Gunsmoke is the poster child for this. It was a huge hit in its first decade on Saturdays at 10pm ET but started to slide rather quickly in the mid-1960s. As the story goes, CBS was ready to cancel it in 1967, but it was the Paleys' favorite show, so at the last minute, the decision was made to try it out on Mondays at 7:30pm ET, sending Gilligan's Island to its cancellation. The new timeslot, along with stories that were much lighter than what had originally made the show a success (for better or for worse, according to who you talk to), shot Gunsmoke up from #34 in 1966-1967 to #4 in 1967-1968. It stayed in the top 10 for most of the rest of its run and never left the top 30 again - though the average age of its audience had to be about 60 years old.

CBS could have moved Gilligan to another night/time, but it had already suffered from being in a new timeslot for each of its three seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Re Fading shows getting a new lease.

The Jeffersons. CBS moved it so many times

Season #1 following All in The Family it ranked 4th . For 75/76 it moved up to lead of the Sat night lineup, It dropped to 21st.

76/77 It began the season Sat @8 but mid season CBS shuffled things around and it was moved to 8.30 Wed following Good Times and then to Monday @8. It ranked 24th.

77/78 it was back to Sat night, now at 9pm. In Summer reruns it was shifted to Mon @8. It fell out of the Top 30.

78/79. Another timeslot Wed @8, then moved to Wed 9.30 then back to Wed @8 e3fore a late season move to Sun @9.30. Again the ratings fell with all those time shifts. It barely scraped the Top 50.

79/80 That final move to 9.30 Sun was the new lease on life and The Jeffersons shot to #8.

80/81  It retained its timeslot and was #6

81/82 Best season ever ranking # 3

82/83 Moved up 70 9pm Sunday and was #12

83/84 Finished #19

84/85 Finally ran out of steam and mid season was dropped from Sun @9 to finish the season and it's run Tues @8.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Possible tank job

1983/84: Midseason CBS moves One Day at a Time twice, from Sunday 8:30 pm to Wednesday 8 pm (head-to-head w/ The Fall Guy) then Monday 9 pm. One Day at a Time falls out of the Top 30 and is cancelled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Always weirds a little to think about shows like the Jeffersons, One Day at A Time, Alice etc. lasting as late as 1984/1985 or so as they were always 70’s shows to me, even growing up in the 80’s lol

Please register in order to view this content

 

Comparisons I can think of on that end is something like NBC just letting Empty Nest run for years on Saturday nights into oblivion; or networks letting shows like Roseanne’s original run, Murphy Brown, Wings, etc. run just a season or two too long that once popular and relevant shows ende in complete irrelevance. 


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think I read somewhere that CBS wanted to pick up ODAAT for a tenth season, but that Valerie Bertinelli and Bonnie Franklin were eager to move on.  (If you ask me, I think that was for the best.  By the ninth season, the threads were really starting to show).

The thing is, the longer a show runs on TV, the more expensive it becomes to produce.  So, I never understand why the networks would allow shows to go on for so long when they're clearly past their prime unless it has to do with contractual obligations.

One good example: "The Drew Carey Show," which ABC renewed for three more years (and at a hefty price) after its' sixth season.  However, no one apparently counted on the show's ratings dropping, which they did during the next (7th) season.  By the end of the eighth season, the show wasn't even in the Top 100 anymore!  ABC tried to get out of its' deal with WB, but when that proved impossible, the network basically burned off the last season during the summer, often airing two episodes per week.

Ooo chile, you ain't kidding about that, lol!  I finally watched some early "Gunsmoke" and MAN, that show was DARK in the beginning.

I wonder how the radio series' originators, John Meston and Norman Macdonnell, felt about the changes to the show's tone over the years.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I’m wondering if that’s what happened as well to CBS and to  some extent ABC sitcoms around 1983-84 with the reliance on aging shows and “Hey here’s a new spinoff!!!” leading to the unofficial declaration sitcoms were dead until NBC’s 1984 Thursday night lineup took off.

Barring a good number of exceptions and special cases lol, a new decade usually means new shows for the most part. Most of the pre-1971 shows got deliberately axed in 1971, most of the 80’s show’s abruptly collapsed and ended with either the 91-92 or 92-93 seasons, and most of the 90’s staples just faded away one by one between 2001-04, and most of the 00’s shows just limped into the ‘10’s if they had survived at all. 

And as for dark “Gunsmoke” early on, it reminds me of what happened to Law & Order being a dark & gritty show until 1998 and then it became an old people’s show with increasingly older conservative producers at the helm. The recent revival is one of the worst and most pointless revivals I’ve ever seen

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, networks only pay licensing fees, so they might end up paying a fraction of the cost of production. There's also the fact that once a show goes into syndication it can become very profitable and there's also overseas sales which might spur the production studio to essentially give it away for free (the most infamous example of this was 'Til Death, but Sony in general was for a while well-known for lowering their license fee next-to-nothing in order to get flailing shows to syndication).

There's also the issue that there's only so many shows that can launch per season - so if your network is going through a funk like CBS was in the late 80s through the 90s, that might also be an incentive to keep at least the well-known properties going while they try to fix everything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

TV history is littered with shows that stayed on too long , for various reasons.

So few shows went out at the right time - Mash, Mary Tyler Moore, Cheers but most others saw the writing on the wall but refused to call it quits. Guess that's just how network TV worked back then.

One fading show that was revived was Simon & Simon, another in a long line of Tues 8pm CBS series that failed to make any impression against Happy Days/Laverne & Shirley.

After a lackluster run, CBS took it off and replaced it with another flop,QED. It was a foregone conclusion that it would be cancelled.

Meanwhile on Thursday nights, Magnum and Knots Landing had been moved forward an hour and though Magnum was regularly Top 10/20, Knots was losing a lot of that momentum, so CBS moved it back to 10pm and placed newcomer Cagney & Lacey in that slot, which didn't do any better. So with three new episodes left  in the can, CBS placed Simon and Simon at 9pm and within weeks the show was in the Top 20 and CBS had found the right show to follow Magnum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A more 2000’s example of tank job and sabotage is Malcolm and the Middle @Vee

Tank job:

After treading water in the ratings during the show’s 5th season, Fox moved the show to an earlier time slot from 9PM ET to 7:30ET for Season 6. The show tanked in the ratings and the season itself received lukewarm reception compared to earlier ones.

Sabotage:

For the 2005-06 Season 7, Fox moved the show to an 8:30 ET timeslot on Friday nights behind the untested Bernie Mac show. The show absolutely collapsed, plummeted to the bottom of the ratings, and cancelled along with Bernie Mac. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I also wonder if it was considered controversial at the time to show a morally corrupt doctor?(another character troupe for Agnes Nixon, the upstanding male citizen who is hiding secrets back at home) Up until the early 1970s, prime-time would very rarely tell stories about the private lives of doctors, because advertisers tended to shy away from such content. @robbwolff -- so is this wrong that Ruth dated David before marrying Joe?  Dr. David Thornton is a fictional character from the ABC daytime soap opera All My Children, portrayed by Paul Gleason from 1976 to 1978.  He was introduced as a respected physician in Pine Valley, presenting himself as a widower to his colleagues at the hospital. This facade, however, concealed a darker truth: his wife, Edna Thornton, was alive, and he was leading a double life. David’s character is defined by manipulation and secrecy, as he maintained a carefully curated public image while engaging in deceitful and criminal behavior in his personal life. His relationships were marked by control and betrayal, particularly in his marriage to Edna and his romantic entanglements with other women. David’s charm and professional status allowed him to navigate Pine Valley’s social circles, but his actions revealed a calculating and ruthless nature. Career David was a doctor at Pine Valley Hospital, where he was well-regarded by his peers for his medical expertise. His professional life provided him with a veneer of respectability, which he exploited to mask his personal misdeeds. However, his career was not a central focus of his storyline; instead, it served as a backdrop to his personal schemes. His position at the hospital gave him access to resources, such as the drug digitalis, which he later used in his attempt to murder his wife. David’s professional life unraveled as his criminal actions came to light, tarnishing his reputation in the medical community. Personal Relationships and Family David’s family and romantic relationships were fraught with tension and deception, shaping much of his narrative arc: Edna Thornton (Wife): David was married to Edna Thornton, with whom he had a daughter, Dottie. To his colleagues, he claimed Edna was deceased, allowing him to pursue other relationships without suspicion. In reality, David was plotting to kill Edna, motivated by his desire to be free of her and possibly to gain financial or personal freedom. He began poisoning her with digitalis, a heart medication, which caused her to experience heart pains. Edna was unaware of David’s true intentions until after his death, when the truth about his poisoning scheme was revealed. Dottie Thornton (Daughter): David and Edna’s daughter, Dottie Thornton, was a significant character in All My Children. Portrayed by Dawn Marie Boyle (1977–1980) and later Tasia Valenza (1982–1986), Dottie was raised primarily by Edna. David’s neglectful and manipulative behavior extended to his daughter, as he showed little genuine care for her well-being. Dottie’s life was impacted by her father’s actions, particularly after his death, when Edna became a wealthy widow. Dottie later married Thaddeus “Tad” Martin in 1985, though their marriage ended in divorce in 1986, and she suffered the loss of an unborn child with Tad. Ruth Parker (Fiancée, 1976): David was engaged to Ruth Parker in 1976, furthering his pattern of deceit since he was still married to Edna. His engagement to Ruth, who was also involved with Jeff Martin, highlighted David’s willingness to manipulate romantic partners for his own gain. The engagement did not lead to marriage, as David’s true intentions and double life began to surface. Christina “Chris” Karras (Lover, 1978): In 1978, David began a romantic relationship with Dr. Christina “Chris” Karras, a fellow physician. This affair added another layer of complexity to his web of lies, as Chris was unaware of his marriage to Edna and his poisoning scheme. After David’s death, Chris was initially accused of his murder due to their relationship and her access to medical resources. However, Jeff Martin’s investigation cleared her name by proving David’s death was caused by his own actions. Parents: David’s parents are unnamed in the source material, and both are noted as deceased. No further details are provided about their influence on his life or their role in his backstory. Death David Thornton’s death in 1978 was a dramatic and fitting conclusion to his villainous arc, brought about by his own treachery. Intent on killing Edna to escape their marriage, David had been secretly administering digitalis to her, causing her heart issues. In a twist of fate, their daughter, Dottie, innocently switched Edna’s drink with David’s during one of his poisoning attempts. Unaware that the drink was laced with a lethal dose of digitalis, David consumed it and suffered a fatal heart attack. His death was initially investigated as a possible murder, with Chris Karras as the prime suspect due to her relationship with David and her medical knowledge. However, Dr. Jeff Martin conducted a toxicology screen on David’s body, which revealed that the digitalis poisoning was the cause of both Edna’s heart pains and David’s death. This evidence exonerated Chris and exposed David’s plan to kill his wife, cementing his legacy as a tragic and self-destructive figure. Impact and Legacy David Thornton’s storyline, though relatively short-lived (1976–1978), was impactful due to its intensity and the ripple effects on other characters. His death left Edna a wealthy widow, altering her and Dottie’s circumstances and setting the stage for further drama, including Edna’s manipulation by conman Ray Gardner. David’s actions also strained relationships among other Pine Valley residents, particularly through his engagement to Ruth Parker and affair with Chris Karras, which intersected with Jeff Martin’s storyline. His character exemplified the classic soap opera archetype of a charming yet duplicitous villain whose downfall is precipitated by his own hubris. Additional Notes Portrayal: Paul Gleason’s performance as David Thornton brought a compelling intensity to the role, making the character memorable despite his brief tenure. Gleason’s ability to portray both charm and menace suited David’s dual nature as a respected doctor and a scheming husband. Storyline Context: David’s arc occurred during the early years of All My Children, a period when the show focused on intricate personal dramas and moral dilemmas. His poisoning plot and double life were emblematic of the show’s penchant for high-stakes interpersonal conflict. Lack of Additional Family Details: Beyond Edna and Dottie, no other family members (such as siblings or extended relatives) are mentioned in the source material, limiting the scope of his familial connections. Conclusion Dr. David Thornton was a multifaceted antagonist in All My Children, whose life was marked by professional success, personal deception, and a fatal miscalculation. As a doctor, he wielded authority and respect, but his secret plan to murder his wife, Edna, revealed a cold and calculating core. His relationships with Edna, Dottie, Ruth Parker, and Chris Karras were defined by manipulation, and his death by accidental self-poisoning was a poetic end to his schemes. David’s legacy in Pine Valley lived on through Edna’s newfound wealth and Dottie’s subsequent storylines, making him a pivotal figure in the show’s early narrative. His story remains a classic example of soap opera drama, blending betrayal, tragedy, and retribution.
    • The only blonde I see is one of the actual women staring at first & then screaming & running later.  DAYS: Vivian's manservant Ivan is in a long curly red wig. 

      Please register in order to view this content

      Y&R: long straight black wig is the actor Peter Barton whose character name I am blanking on.   
    • I very much liked office Cleary and the actress who portrayed her (as you say, Mary Peterson).  A shame her turn didn't evolve into a contract role.   BTW, does anyone know the timeframe/years that Betty Rae served as casting director?  If i understand correctly, she not only led the effort for contract roles, but also for shorter 13- and 26-week roles.  IMO, GL had LOTS of very well-casted, limited roles, too. I'm surprised the actors throughout the soap industry, and especially P&G actors, have not assembled a book or something similar, praising Rae.  Each actor could write a few paragraphs or a page of text describing his or her experience.
    • No. Ruth had an extramarital affair with David while married to Joe.
    • I'm not sure I agree with Bernstein's children on that. Bernstein's life and activism here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Bernstein#Social_activism_and_humanitarian_efforts
    • Thursday & Friday's episodes were excellent. The build-up was most definitely worth the wait (2 months). TMG, I can't give her enough accolades. AM, was also absolutely incredible. I think the fallout is going to have a ripple effect. The little clues that have been dropped,  hopefully, will weave seamlessly to reveal even bigger bombshells for the Dupree's and Martin.
    • Thanks, msn drives me nuts on the one hand but on the other hand their headlines appeal to me. And, I just don't do FoxNews.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy