Members Lye-C Posted February 4 Members Share Posted February 4 I know Vicky and Marley weren’t identical at the end but couldn’t ATWT just have had Ellen Wheeler play Vicky and hand wave away Marley’s plastic surgery? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Lye-C Posted February 4 Members Share Posted February 4 How did Jensen think she could do two different soaps on two different networks on two different coasts? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members SheenaSoaper Posted February 5 Members Share Posted February 5 When JFP painted the Chancellor mansion gray!!! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Efulton Posted February 5 Members Share Posted February 5 That works for me! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members P.J. Posted February 5 Members Share Posted February 5 I don't think ATWT breaking up Jake and Vicky would have played any better with the AW audience. ATWT should've just created a new character for Eplin and played that. I know as an ATWT viewer I never really cared about Jake no matter how hard they shoved him down our throat. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Soapsuds Posted February 5 Members Share Posted February 5 The AW crossover was a hot mess and I hated it! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Contessa Donatella Posted February 5 Members Share Posted February 5 That is an incredible idea! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Efulton Posted February 5 Members Share Posted February 5 It would have played better to this audience member. Although I thought all of the crossovers should have been temporary with the characters going back to Bay City eventually. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Contessa Donatella Posted February 5 Members Share Posted February 5 There was so much wrong about it. EFulton brought up disrespecting AW & its fans. It also disrespected ATWT & its fans & they resented the Bay City Intruders & I never could blame them for that. Plus it disrespected both the AW actors & their characters! Hot mess indeed! Cass has a signature curl at the nape of his neck, left side & ATWT Hair wanted to cut if off immediately & he had to fight them over it telling them the fans would plotz & they didn't get it at all. And then the ATWT writers gave him a crude joke to tell about Lila that Cass NEVER would have said about any woman EVER. That grand PGP idea was a total bust. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Vee Posted February 5 Members Share Posted February 5 (edited) JFP adored RKK and brought him onto GH where there was allegedly even more trouble. He wasn't forced on her. The timeline on ATWT/AW is also inaccurate. Jensen and ABC got in hot water for her doing GH in 2000. AW ended in the summer of '99 and Vicky Hudson was killed off on ATWT almost immediately thereafter that same summer-fall, in a plane crash. By the time Jensen briefly did double duty on both shows, which got her in hot water at P&G/CBS, Vicky was dead and part of a ghost storyline wrapping up on ATWT. She was therefore appearing as both Melissa on GH and Ghost Vicky for a couple days in early 2000. They didn't kill Vicky because of GH, the character was killed long before she got hired at GH. They killed Vicky because they wanted to. Edited February 5 by Vee 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Contessa Donatella Posted February 5 Members Share Posted February 5 (edited) JFP and RKK came to be great friends. That doesn't mean they didn't start out that way or that NBC didn't force him on her. Or do you think RKK is lying in this interview? https://www.welovesoaps.net/2013/09/robert-kelker-kelly-interview.html Jensen was in breach as of the first day she showed up on air on two different shows. Could be that was Ghost Vicky. Dunno. But it was definitely in 1999. 2000 only enters in at all because that was when the lawsuit got started. And, then it took ages to come to an end. My point was that they killed her off because she wasn't staying & she wasn't staying because she preferred another job & she had one. If I didn't express that well enough, so sorry. Maybe this will help. I stand by it. They would not have killed her if she was going to stay!!! Not only is this the actual truth but it's even common sense. Edited February 5 by Donna L. Bridges adding an URL 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Franko Posted February 5 Members Share Posted February 5 I'm going to hate myself for asking, but what was it? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Contessa Donatella Posted February 5 Members Share Posted February 5 Crabs 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Franko Posted February 5 Members Share Posted February 5 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Contessa Donatella Posted February 5 Members Share Posted February 5 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.png.afb17da57f36f9bdf686a5c5e36353fa.png)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.