Jump to content

DAYS: December 2023 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I liked today's episode as well.  From spoilers I was thinking Sloan turned her back for a moment.  I didn't think she just left a baby outside to go back into an establishment.  What the heck?  No adult would do that lol.

So, ah, what's Nicole's plan?  Just raise the baby in the secret room until it turns 18?  Runaway?  

I actually think Tripp lived with Stephanie and Joey in Seattle for awhile so it is strange he never met Everett.  Nothing about those scenes screamed close sibling bond and I thought they did have one.  

Did Jada go to bed and leave Stephanie/Harris alone the other day?  I can't remember.  It seems like Jada probably should have made Stephanie stay with her.  I am sure nothing happened between Harris/Stephanie, but it's weird Harris couldn't have just said "nothing happened-we will talk later" instead of dragging it out for her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 485
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

It seems to be a writing choice to make Sloan so inept to make her more of the villian in the story which isn't really necessary.  She already stole a baby.   The show doesn't need to pile it on that she has no idea how to raise a child.  Sloan is a smart woman.  I don't think anyone over the age of 12 would just abandon a baby in the middle of a town square to get their wallet and long enough for Nicole to grab the baby and for Leo to steal the stroller without them seeing one another.

I think JS has improved leaps and bounds since she began, but today wasn't her best lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

On the one hand, it felt like they properly laid the groundwork by showing how exhausted Eric and Sloan were on the morning of the kidnapping. Which could explain why she would make such a stupid choice to leave a week-old baby in a stroller unattended. 

On the other hand, why are they constantly taking Jude out in public?  He's been to the hospital, the park, and Sweet Bits.  Most new parents don't take their infants out that often, especially in the winter.

But, on the third hand, most adoptive parents have enough space for an actual nursery.  And most bakeries are large enough to fit a stroller inside.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Nicole kidnapping Jude made me think about two issues.

First, she left the stroller behind, so do the Dimera's live close enough to town square that Nicole could walk home holding the baby?  Much like yesterday when Xander offered to walk Sarah and Victoria home from the hospital, I am constantly distracted by the imaginary map of how small Salem is supposed to be.

Second, there's never any weather events in Salem, unless it's an emergency.  Sloan didn't need to bundle the baby up for winter.  Nobody wears gloves, and Alex wore a leather jacket in August. .  You'd think because so many scenes occur indoors, they would occasionally remark that they can't go out because it is raining..

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

EJ said Nicole drove to the Lake to walk which is by Town Square (apparently as of today).  So Nicole put the baby in her car presumably without a car seat and drove it home.  Rafe said Nicole's car was in the driveway.

The wardrobe is never right because they tape so far ahead.  Chanel has a table of baked goods out in the square in the middle of December and she was wearing a short sleeve dress serving them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Also, is Leo homeless?  His job as a columnist seemed to be paying the bills, and I don't recall that he's been fired.  So, why was he sleeping on a bench? 

Leo is already controversial, I don't think making light of poverty is going to endear him any further. (I know the usual people are going to defend and/or deride Leo, I'm just making the point that it seems gauche to derive humor from economic despair).

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can see why Leo would not have a place to stay, but he should have enough money for a hotel room.

The paper was full on writing fluff pieces about him, so I think they would be thrilled to have him back.  

He did say to Sloan he had no job, no savings, no boyfriend, blah blah, so maybe he did get fired.   It just doesn't make sense.  Leo's changing his clothes everyday and appears to be grooming, so where's all his stuff?  I think it would have been much better to cut showing him on the park bench and just tell Sloan these things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The "Horton Town Square" isn't a real town square. It's an indoor mall.  It has a roof. Really.

They made spoofy fun of that fact in the "Very Salem Christmas" movie when there was snow falling in the square at the end of the movie -- because it can't.

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • This is the perfect way to encapsulate the situation. So many morally-reprehensible stories were foisted on the show and its characters in ATWT's dwindling years. Rape should never be used as a cheap plot device or in a way that degrades the victim. Jack's sexual assault was another heinous example of how nasty the the show's tone had become. The fact that people like Hogan Sheffer, Ron Carlivati, Jean Passanante, Charles Pratt, Dena Higley, etc., somehow end up winning awards for their material, decimates the credibility and integrity of the awards, IMHO. Soaps used to have a solid moral core and did not originally wallow in the gutter, rolling around in filth and depravity just to be cool, hip, campy, or whatever else modern-day PTB aim for. Thank you. Cruelty, degradation and misogyny are not components which lend themselves to successful soaps, which have always been predicated on warmth, family bonds, and providing a comforting haven for their audience. The genre has been crippled because the cynical and ignorant executives in charge understand neither the shows nor what the audience wants to see.
    • Beverlee was on a whole other level from Kim. It's not like they were in competition with each other. I get the feeling that Kim had a slight problem with the super-professional, serious cast members who just wanted everyone to be prepared and do the work, as she seems to like having fun on set. (She's made a few cracks about Chris Bernau being like that). Bev was definitely one of those. But they didn't work together that much. Yeah, they made her manic and also much weaker. She always had a vulnerability, but wanting to kill herself over that guy? No way. Not only that, he didn't leave her! She insisted he marry Maeve. When they did the tribute to Bert/Charita, the compilation of scenes with her showed how much the cast had been almost totally turned over in a relatively short period of time. Nearly every shot was of her by herself because most people she had worked with had been fired, left or been replaced. I assume they couldn't show her with people who hadn't been replaced, like Don Stewart, Elvera Roussel, or Robert Newman because they would have had to pay them for using their clips. It's dreadful to watch. Like she had no connection to the current show.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • A little too much focus on Chad and Cat today but I enjoyed the episode. I have a feeling that Jennifer’s gonna get dumped on though, even though I think that her anger is completely understandable and justified. And honestly, Ron is finally gone; Abigail can come back now.  But, welcome back, Anna! It was nice seeing Carrie have scenes with her mother. Christie Clark and Leann Hunley have never really had that many scenes together and to see them have them now is really nice. I’m glad that both of them were there to comfort Marlena too. Their words were definitely the thing that Marlena needed to hear. Btw, with all this talk of Noah, does it mean that he’s gonna be introduced soon? Amy, revealing that John changed her flat tire many years ago seemed a little random though. I would rather she have said something about how everybody in Salem knows of John Black because of how he was always such a hero. But at the same time, her story also showed what a great guy John was.  I liked Kate’s scenes with Philip too, and her promise to get back at Xander for what he did. And since we didn’t see JPL in the bed, did he need some time off or something? And yeah, everything involving ‘One Stormy Night’ still seems very Ron-like to me.
    • The second photo featuring the late John Spencer is from the Law & Order episode, "Prescription For Death", which was the (second) pilot/first episode all the way back in 1990! He played the father of a daughter that had gone to the ER for a mere sore throat but ended up dead because the doctor on call was drunk and had given her medication that she had an adverse reaction to, after receiving some other medication. So, he will always have that great distinction in addition to The West Wing. (The first pilot, "Everybody's Favorite Bagman", was filmed in 1988! The show was offered to CBS, but they passed. In syndication, it is oddly placed as the sixth episode of Season 1. And Roy Thinnes played DA Alfred Wentworth there. When NBC picked up the show two years later, Thinnes declined to return, and that's how we got Steven Hill's DA Adam Schiff.)
    • exactly. I can understand schadenfreude if it were real, but a lot of this is just an engineered distraction.
    • Days of our Lives S60E204 – Thursday, June 5, 2025 Okay, today’s episode was kind of boring. It was nice seeing Jack and Jen back, but they wasted an entire episode on Jen chatting with Julie - one scene would’ve been enough. Also, why didn’t Jack and Jen go comfort Marlena? And wouldn’t a flashback with Jack, Jen, and John have been great? Maybe something from the Cruise of Deception era? Bottom line - it feels like once John’s memorial is over and the returning fan favorites leave Salem… the show’s going to be dull again.
    • Everything with Elon and Trump is a stunt. If people, and the sycophantic press, are talking about their "feud," they are not talking about Republican plans to gut Medicare, Medicaid, and the ACA. 
    • I can't fully remember, but I don't think they tried to get Beth Chamberlin back. I think Laibson/McTavish likely saw Beth as old news and wanted to move Philip on; either that or have her return only when Philip was closely tied to a new woman. Thanks as always for these recaps. I think I had stopped watching around this time and mostly kept up by reading in the soap magazines. Bridget's degradation was horrible to watch, as the character had grown so much over the years and was clearly regressed just to be a foil for a "hot" couple viewers had zero investment in. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy