Jump to content

ARTICLE: Albert Alarr Issues Statement on Ouster as Co-Executive Producer of ‘Days of our Lives’


Errol

Recommended Posts

  • Webmaster
Albert Alarr, Days of our Lives, DAYS, DOOL, #DAYS, #DOOL, #DaysofourLives

With multiple allegations brought against Albert Alarr during an internal misconduct investigation that took place over a nine-week period, the result of which initially called for him to receive just a “written warning” and asked to “undergo training,” the now former co-executive producer and director of “Days of our Lives” is speaking out now that he has been let go from the daytime drama series. Effective immediately, longtime producer Janet Drucker replaces Alarr as co-executive producer.

In a statement issued to TheWrap, Alarr believes that the basis of the investigation into his behavior behind the scenes of the series was the doing of two individuals, who “at a time of industry-wide cutbacks and economic uncertainty, have been relentlessly angling for greater pay and increased influence on the show.” Further, he indicates that race might have played a role in his ouster, saying, “their best strategy to get it was to play on vile stereotypes in order to bring down a Black man in a position of power.”

Calling the decision to let him go “heartbreaking,” Alarr further states, “These allegations were already examined in a detailed and entirely independent investigation that lasted for two months. Dozens of individuals cooperated and every claim was thoroughly looked into. At the end of that process, the decision was made that I should continue in my role as co-executive producer. Now, with no new facts presented, the studios have reversed course and caved to a cynical pressure campaign to force me out of my job.”

Wanting to set the record straight, Alarr says, “Every day, I worked with hundreds of people, the overwhelming majority of whom would disagree with recent mischaracterizations of me. I have been in this industry for decades, and not a single complaint has ever been made against me until now.”

Alarr also says that claims published by the media are “simply false.” He adds, “Others have been taken so out of context or are so twisted that they are unrecognizable from the truth.”

According to Deadline, the nine-week investigation was launched in March and was “triggered by a complaint related to a recent round of layoffs.” 

Filed by a female employee, the complaint alleged that a number of recent staff cuts had “disproportionally impacted women” who were not receiving equal pay on the show compared to their male counterparts, people close to the matter told the outlet. 

Seven contract actresses were said to have departed the series around the time of the layoffs, five of whom were either let go altogether or dropped to recurring status. The remaining two actresses reportedly made the decision to leave the series on their own. Separately, one male actor was laid off.

Since details of the investigation first became public last month, more than 25 cast members signed a petition demanding Alarr’s dismissal as co-EP and director. On Friday, July 28, it was reported that when cast/crew learned that Alarr’s name was on the production sheet for directing the planned August 4 episode, the news allegedly didn’t go over well, forcing the show to extend its planned two-week hiatus to a third week. The show execs to resume production on Monday, August 7, which until now likely would have included Alarr’s continued presence on set had he not departed. “Production will resume, as planned, on Monday with new leadership in place,” said Ken Corday, the show’s owner and executive producer, in an email sent to cast and crew on Friday. “As a reminder, we still have a pre-planned hiatus set for the week of August 14th,” Corday’s email stated in conclusion.

New protocols are said to now be in place to promote a “safe and inclusive workplace environment,” including implementing an HR presence on set.

You can read Alarr’s full statement on his exit from the show below.



Note: The post Albert Alarr Issues Statement on Ouster as Co-Executive Producer of ‘Days of our Lives’ appeared first on the Soap Opera Network website.

Read More

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

It's ironic that he says he's worked with "hundreds of people, the overwhelming majority of whom would disagree with recent mischaracterizations of [him]." Meanwhile, at least 85% of the cast signed the petition to get rid of him.  And, not one person has said a word to defend him, in over a week, including his boss.

Perhaps, in light of recent events, he will have the time to reflect on the fact that while he may have worked with many people, nobody is going to mourn his loss.  It reminds me of what David Gregory said in his memoir about being fired from Meet the Press. He said that after his anger subsided, he was embarrassed to realize that none of his staff ever mentioned being sad to see him go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is one of the most tone deaf, delusional statements I've seen from a soap exec, which is saying a lot. The part about him being a black man feels like something right wing bigots always claim liberals say. I'm dumbfounded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
    • Sally Spencer was a decent actress, but the writing destroyed the "M.J." that Kathleen Layman had built. Layman had a quiet strength about her, and she and Osburn really felt like sisters. Spencer's character should have been either an unmentioned sister, or maybe Jake's that grew up close to Kathleen, M.J. and the rest, but was away for a few years before joining the force. Kristen Marie was o.k., but I always got a mousier vibe from her. Being pigeon-holed with Scott for most of the run hurt things for her, as well.  The Loves were also underserved between Rhonda Lewin and Philece Sampler. Philece would have been better as Nicole. Thank goodness Anne Heche  showed up for the next round of auditions. Christopher Holder was mediocre as Peter, but given a shot, I think Marcus Smythe could have stuck around for a while.  I would have had Peggy Lazarus be a Frame -- possibly an ex-wife for Vince with an agenda. Smythe and Hollen had  a fun chemistry that could have kept the two around.. Bringing recasts for  Cheryl and Ben back mixing it up with other Frames. Corys, Lawrences at the time might have kept all the families stronger. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy