Jump to content

Ten Dept. Stores will be renamed Macy's in 2006


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Earlier this year, Federated Department Stores (owners of Macy's and Bloomingdale's) acquired May Department Stores (owners of many different regional department stores). Upon completion of this acquisition, Federated decided to convert all of May's regional nameplates into Macy's. The following stores will be renamed Macy's sometime in 2006:

-- Famous-Barr locations in Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky and Missouri;

-- Filene's locations in Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island and Vermont;

-- Foley's locations in Colorado, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma and Texas;

-- Hecht's locations in Maryland, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia and the District of Columbia;

-- The Jones Store locations in Kansas and Missouri;

-- Kaufmann's locations in New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania and West Virginia;

-- L.S. Ayres locations in Indiana;

-- Marshall Field's locations in Michigan, Illinois, Minnesota, Wisconsin, North Dakota, Indiana, Ohio, and South Dakota;

-- Meier & Frank locations in Oregon, Utah and Washington;

-- Robinsons-May locations in Arizona, California and Nevada; and

-- Strawbridge's locations in Delaware, New Jersey and Pennsylvania.

Once this conversion is complete, the number of Macy's stores in this country will double. Actually, Macy's has greatly expanded its presence through the years by taking over so many regional department store nameplates. In addition to the stores listed above, the following stores have also been renamed Macy's at some point in time: A&S, Bamberger's, The Bon-Marche, Bullock's, Burdine's, Davison's, Goldsmith's, I. Magnin, Jordan Marsh, Lazarus, Rich's, and Stern's.

Personally, I think it really sucks that so many local department stores have been (and will be) renamed Macy's for several reasons. First of all, the regional department stores were very in-synch with local tastes, whereas Macy's just promotes New York fashions throughout the entire country. Second, the local department stores were always involved in community affairs, whereas Macy's could care less about the individual communities it serves (other than New York). Third, despite the fact that both Macy's and all of the regional stores listed above are/were mid-priced department stores, Macy's charges more for merchandise than the other stores ever did. (The reason for this is that in virtually every market in the country, Macy's is--or soon will be--the only mid-priced department store. Since there is no competition among the mid-priced market, Macy's is free to raise its prices.) Finally, in the case of many of the former May-owned department stores, there is a lot of overlap between the May stores and Macy's (meaning that many malls have both a May-owned store and a Macy's in them). In malls where such overlap will exist, the May-owned store will simply shut its doors while the Macy's store remains, thus reducing the number of department stores and eliminating competition. (Although in some malls where overlap occurs, the current Macy's store will shut down and the May-owned department store in that mall will be renamed Macy's. Nevertheless, these malls will still lose a department store.)

P.S. The slaughter of department stores will likely continue in the future. That's because Federated is also likely to shut down Lord & Taylor (which was May's nationally based luxury department store). The reason why Federated will likely shut down Lord & Taylor is because the company does not want it to compete with Bloomingdale's (which is the only luxury department store that the company is committed to).

P.P.S. Actually, I the title of this thread is incorrect: the number of department stores to be renamed Macy's next year will be eleven, instead of ten. I am sorry for this error.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

L.S. Ayres is the about the only store around here that I can find clothes that I like. I hope that doesn't change much with Macy's taking over. Although, I hate how I'll owe no more than $200 on my L.S. Ayres credit card and would still have to make a monthly payment of at least $50. Ridiculous!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...
  • Members

I decided to bump this thread because so much as happened since the previous post was written. Before I continue further, however, I want to point out an error in the thread's title: there will be ELEVEN, and not ten, department stores converting to Macy's this year. For a list of these stores, please refer to the first post in this thread.

While the official name change will not happen until Saturday, September 9, much has already occurred: For starters, all of the house-brand merchandise in the former May-owned stores has been dropped and been replaced by Macy's house-brands. Furthermore, advertisements for the Macy's credit card appear all throughout the May stores. Additionally, I have read many complaints on the internet that the level of service and cleanliness at the May stores is worse than ever. (This is in keeping with Macy's notorious reputation for having messy stores and horrible customer service.) As a matter of fact, it seems (by now) that all of the changes have pretty much taken place aside from the name change itself.

One of the biggest changes that has occurred all across the country is the closure of duplicate May locations. (By "duplicate" locations, I am referring to a May location that was in the same mall as a Macy's prior to the name change of the former May stores to Macy's.) Virtually all of these store closures have taken place months ago. (Although, keep in mind, that the current Macy's store remaining open while the former May store being closed has not been the scenario in all the duplicate store closures. Rather, there are some instances where the former May location--in the mall--became a Macy's while the former Macy's location was closed.) These store closures really suck, because competion is eliminated in these malls. And, keep in mind that there were many malls--about 80 across the country--which had both a Macy's and a May-owned department store.

I am very much interested in reading your comments regarding the current state of the May-owned stores that will soon be renamed Macy's. In particular, I'd like to know the answers to the following questions:

*How many changes (towards making the store look like a Macy's) have already occurred at the May-owned stores that you visit? What are those changes?

*Are the May-owned stores (you go to) messier or cleaner than they used to be?

*Is the service better or worse?

*Do you miss the May-owned stores, or are you glad to be getting a Macy's?

*Do you live near any malls that suffered store closings in an effort to prevent duplicate Macy's locations? What effect has this had on this/these mall(s)?

I'd like to conlude by listing all of the stores that have changed their names to Macy's over the past generation. Believe it or not, over two dozen department stores since 1985 have been wiped out solely due to changing their names to Macy's. Keep in mind that this list is arranged chronologically, by the year when each department store was renamed Macy's. Also keep in mind that this list may not be 100% accurrate, as there could very well be other department stores that have also been renamed Macy's. (This list included only those stores that I am aware of having been renamed Macy's.)

1985:

Davison's

1986:

Bamberger's

1995:

A&S (Abraham & Straus)

I. Magnin

1996:

The Broadway

Bullock's

Jordan Marsh

2001:

Liberty House

Stern's

2005:

The Bon-Marche

Burdine's

Goldsmith's

Lazarus

Rich's

2006 (all divisions of the now defunct May Department Stores Company):

Famous-Barr

Filene's

Foley's

Hecht's

The Jones Store

Kaufmann's

L.S. Ayres

Marshall Field's

Meier & Frank

Robinsons-May

Strawbridge's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Frankly, I find this to be good news. I love Macy's and its amazing selection. The one here in Manhattan has five stories completely devoted to men. Its amazing.

Not everyone will be happy, but what can you do. I'm for the transition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Macy's is probably my favorite department store. The one at Union Square, here in San Francisco, has an entire store of just men's clothing (maybe 5 or so floors). They also have housewares and furniture as well as women's clothes, cosmetics, etc. Soon they will be carrying an upscale line of Martha Stewart products in various departments; better that crap from K-mart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I loved my Hecht's and Strawbridge stores. They always had sales too. I wasn't a big fan of Macy's, but now I'll guess I have to be. I already got my new Macy's credit card in the mail this week.

I'll probably be there at Christmastime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
    • Interesting.  It seems to allude to that statement that Warren Burton made around that time about some AW actors getting special treatment.  I wonder who was resentful about not getting to go. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy