Jump to content

MTV: The Real Friends of WeHo


Faulkner

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Oy, I just saw this.  At least it has slightly higher production value than Men of West Hollywood on Crackle. However, Brad and Todrick live in the valley, and Jaymes lives in Newport.  So, not only have they expanded the territory of Weho, but once again an outside production has tried to define a city without involving the actual population. 

Weho has one of the largest elderly and Russian immigrant populations in LA, but of course we'll only focus on the four block area of Santa Monica Blvd where the bars are located, as if that is the cultural center of town, and ignore the influence of women, poverty, and immigration on the growth of the Weho society.  I doubt that they'll take the time to discuss how real estate development is pricing locals out of their long term homes, or the expansion of non-gay owned clubs, or the controversy around the largest land owner on Santa Monica Blvd who is forcing small gay bars out of business by increasing rents.  Because we need more time to discuss how difficult it is to manage a social media presence while trying to maintain a private life (snore...)

I get that MTV wants to program an evening around RuPaul, but this reeks of pandering without diverse representation.  I, for one, would prefer an expanded discussion of how younger people are redefining the gender and sexuality binary which was the center of last season's Drag Race story.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I’m all for some messy gays for entertainment purposes (à la the best of Drag Race and Untucked), but few of the gay-focused reality series have really worked, partially because the group dynamics felt forced and inauthentic. The A-List and Fire Island shows were snoozes (although A-List Dallas had potential). Prince Charming was unbelievably sanitized for respectability politics.

Yes, we know reality TV is fake, but this group feels particularly manufactured. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And a guy who isn’t that appealing, even on a superficial level. But the Dallas cast were more willing to share their flaws, which I appreciated. The likes of Reichen and Mike Ruiz on the original A-List were too prissy and vain to share the darker parts of their lives, and what they did show (mostly their “professional” lives—the quotes are for Reichen as MR is a legit photographer) wasn’t compelling enough. 

I don’t know if a Housewives-style all-gay-male reality series would ever be embraced. There has to be a greater concept behind the show for it to work, à la Drag Race. Otherwise, these series are DOA. Having Todrick involved is especially a no-no unless he’s getting dragged left and right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, I love me sum Mike Ruiz let me tell you. lol. I agree about Dallas...they were so willing to show EVERYTHING. 

 

IDK about that. Ironically assuming that one person who allegedly might have filmed one week but was iced out by 3 gay coworkers due to his OF page is about THIS show, what about that show that is all(or mostly) gay and gay PORN STARS at that? Do we know if that aired yet or even if it did well? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The gay porn one seems to have done OK. OUTTV has renewed it. It’s sad that it’s on such a niche outlet. Most people are signed up to too many streaming services already. ($3.99 a month isn’t bad, though. It’s just hard for these programs to find audiences.)

Drag Race fans are LIVID about RPDR being cut to an hour and WeHo getting sandwiched between it and Untucked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This looks and feels about ten years out of date, and stars people who have already flopped on other reality shows and in the public eye, like Todrick. So many interesting programs are never let on the air, or are canceled quickly, while we're left with these drags that look like Soapnet productions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Uh-oh. Today just might’ve been the first Paula/Jeanne stinker. I have a feeling whose fault that might be though. So, Doug III is getting a job at the Pub?  It’s good to see him interact with other characters. I enjoyed his scenes with Roman, even though the talk of Frankie and Max seemed a little random. And it also could be really interesting now that Tate knows. Days really need to start pushing their rivalry again. We need some follow up from the punch. Tying it all to Holly, to Sophia’s pregnancy, to the guys that Doug III owes money to could be good.  But yeah, wayyy too much Leo again in today’s episode. Seriously, has anything changed with this nothing character? I thought it was all Ron’s fault, but maybe Greg Rikaart is (partially) responsible for Leo being so insufferable.  And yeah seriously, Rafe needs to throw all of these people out of his house. Including Gabi

      Please register in order to view this content

      But I do wonder who’s the mysterious voice that Gabi overheard with EJ on the night he was shot. Based on yesterday’s episode, I have a suspicion. 
    • Add me to the group of people who think that Brandon has improved. He has. There's no doubt about it. Especially compared to the beginning. And he's improving in a way that... it makes me think that he realizes what the issues are and is addressing them. Of course, he's no master of acting at this point... but I don't cringe as much as I did. And I've seen people in Bold... I won't even have to name names, because everyone knows who they are... who are becoming even worse than what they were offering in the first place. So... I'm happy that in BTG... people are actually blossoming and improving. It surely means that the atmosphere is creative and nurturing talent.  BUT and it's a big butt... his relationship with his husband is still so lacking and ghastly. I am craving to see more action from these guys. I want to see Smitty's character. If he has any. 
    • Thank you. You guys come to the rescue again. I'll take a look later.   Thank you for the info!!! Now I find myself less confused. You and @DRW50 are amazing.
    • I know Passions used this trope with Ethan and Sam to drag out the paternity, but GH seems to speed through certain stories while dragging others.
    • For any other soap, I think I’d agree, but GH, I don’t know

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Agreed, that there was some strange choices in the episode, especially at the end, but overall, that was some great drama that opens up the potential for so much future storyline. Kat vs. Eva having the most potential, especially over Tomas. I have mixed feelings about Martin/BC though. I thought he did pretty well in scenes with Smitty/MM, but the scenes of him confronting Leslie and of him throwing the books were bad lol she acted circles around him.  It’s similar to what Harding Lemay said about George Reinholt at AW; he could be brilliant in one scene, but then mediocre in the next. 
    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy