Jump to content

March 20-24, 2006


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Now lets see if the Marlena/Alex wedding plus potential Alex Murder will ALSO keep ratings where they are!

J&M have proven to be a big pull with audience for big events....lets keep out fingers crossed!

Well from the spoiler previews, it sounds like she may have a pretty big one coming up here in May! Lets hope the show delivers...I want Missy happy so that she re-signs in August!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Awesome numbers for Days.

I only hope they stay the same this week. I could see increases in demos for this week but HH may go down since nothing really big happened unless people get into the wedding buildup.

I wonder what days is thinking about Shimi. They pulled in great numbers for the wedding. Wonder if that will affect anything.

I think if Days can stant the same in HH for this week the first week of april they will go up for sure because something is going to happen with Alex. J&M usually pull in good numbers so I am hoping for staying the same in HH and either increasing or staying the same in demos.

As for Missy, ratings and story has nothing to do with it. I agree she just may want a change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Good ratings for B&B! :D

Missy is apparently unhappy with Jennifer moving on so soon after Jack's last "death".

I've got the feeling Matt/Missy will both leave DAYS for good in August, and Jack/Jen will get a happy ending.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

allatwitter that happens because some days there are more viewers watching TV (at a certain time) so what might have been good for a 2.8 the day before is only good for a 2.7 this day even though that could include more viewers watching on the 2.7 day then the 2.8 day. It's a percentage, same thing if there's less viewers watching that day at that time.

500 people watching TV that day at that time. 50 watching DAYS. 10%.

800 people watching TV this day at this time. 80 watching DAYS. 10%, even with 30 more viewers.

Something like that! ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Congrats to DAYS for having an awesome week.... not really happy its at the expense of my AMC but hey, DAYS fans need some good news :) So its nice to see any soap have that dramatic of a rise from one week to the next. ATWT went up too passing AMC so AMC dropps down to 6th in total viewers. Such a see-saw LOL. Nice to See Y&R holding strong it has friggin rocked the last few weeks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What a suprise this week in the ratings has turned out to be for DAYS!!

#3 In Total Viewers

#4 in Households

#1 in 18-49

#1 in 18-34

#1 in 12-17

#4 in Males

Awesome....this is SOO good for DAYS, this is their 3rd week in a row of gains in the ratings, something that has GOT to help them during teir negotiations.

I mean DAYS can now use the "We are currently #1 in 18-49 AND 18-34" i know its only for one week...but DAYS still has been pretty decent so far in demos in 2006, definetly 3 or 4 #1's in 18-49 and I think they have been #1 in 18-34 every single week so far in 2006 (including the tie with Y&R two weeks ago).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Last week all soaps went up and this week most soaps went up, which is a nice thing to see for once and its not even a "sweeps" month.

I know its just one week, but WHERE are all the DAYS naysayers NOW, speak up! I am not being cocky because DAYS had a huge week, DAYS may go down quite a bit next week, but everytime DAYS does well the DAYS naysayers are like Helen Keller, not seen or heard from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Of the so-called "contract" cast members, I'd venture to say these are recurring: Bryton James, Camryn Grimes, and (possibly) Michael Graziadei.  I've suspected since 2018 that Kate Linder and Christian LeBlanc are recurring.  And I believe we all know Miss Ordway is, because she said so. lol.  
    • Dante blaming Gio instead of his dweeb son and the other dweeb was just ridiculous. Gio's paternity story is going in circles with no reveal. I've already started fast forwarding Drew and his stupid ho Willow's story. Kristina's story is beyond dumb with no great payoff.
    • Sarah (with the English accent) isn't just some random character.  Sarah was once the housekeeper for Eliot Dorn and Margo Huntington.  One of the following 2 scenarios happened a few months ago: (1):  One night, while Margo wasn't at home, and while Oscar the Doorman wasn't at his post, a burglar sneaked into the private elevator, rode up to the penthouse, stole several thousand dollars worth of Margo's valuable diamonds and pearls, and tied-up Eliot Dorn and Sarah the Housekeeper, ensuring that Eliot and Sarah couldn't pursue the burglar back down to the lobby or phone the police to apprehend the burglar. OR --  (2): Eliot Dorn was SLEEPING with Sarah the Housekeeper, and the two of them conspired to steal Margo's jewelry and went on a lavish spending spree and then tied THEMSELVES up to make it look as though a burglary had occurred in the penthouse. Margo Dorn currently believes Scenario #1 occurred, and she's rather annoyed that the "incompetent police" haven't located her stolen jewels yet.  Eliot and Sarah know that Scenario #2 actually occurred.  When Sarah stopped by the Unicorn and saw Eliot kissing Raven Swift, Sarah snidely said, "Oh! This must be Mrs. Dorn!  Nice to meet you, Mrs. Dorn!" Sarah knew good & damn well Raven isn't "Mrs. Dorn" because Sarah worked for Margo Dorn on a daily basis for many months.  That was Sarah's not-so-subtle way of announcing, "I'll be paying a visit to District Attorney Logan Swift and letting him know that his wife is sleeping with you, and I'll be paying a visit to WMON to let Margo Huntington know that you're sleeping with Mrs. Swift!"  lol.     
    • The AMC hate came from Jamey Giddens/DC and their industry friends, IMO. For whatever reason I always felt they targeted the show, and it was wrong. AMC ratings were decent and even went up under Pratt (Yet, he was fired). The ratings were also good under Broderick and lowered out after her interim.  There was no reason to be upset with the show other than it being slow. They literally played it safe and did the best they could in 2010 and 2011. 
    • I have very detailed synopses of all 1976 storylines for the soaps from the Daytime Serial Newsletter. Please let me know if you are interested in a particular show and I will post it in the appropriate thread. As I stated they are very detailed, so I don't want to clutter up threads if posters are not interested.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Surely we (and Billy Flynn) are not going to be saddled with a character named Aristotle Dumas? This isn't 1970's Edge of Night.
    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy