Jump to content

Murder, She Wrote


Franko

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Some interesting demos from Variety Nov 87 tracking the ratings from the sart of that season.

MSW ranked 10th in households but was 47th in Women 18-34, 33rd in W 18-49, 49th in Men 18-34 and 33rd M18-49

Whereas Family Ties its 8pm opposition was 12th in households but 8th in W19-34, 8th in W 18-49, 3rd in M18-34 and 4th in M18-49.

So MSW definitely skewed a lot older. NBC was probably getting more advertising $$.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 319
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I *just* rewatched "Death Takes a Dive" (a.k.a. the boxing episode) earlier this afternoon on PlutoTV.  Harry McGraw was a great recurring character.  Too bad Jerry Orbach's joining the cast of "Law & Order" put a stop to his appearances.

As much as I enjoy watching all 12 seasons of MSW, there are SOME things I would have done differently, had I been the series' showrunner.  For one, I think the move to NYC at the start of S8 was somewhat unnecessary, given how frequently Jessica traveled.  Between her home in Cabot Cove, her apartment at the Penfield and her trips both throughout the U.S. and abroad, it seems as if she never spent more than a day or two in any location, so why the need for the house AND the apartment, lol?  Especially when her second career as a criminology professor - which I've always thought was a mistake - fell by the proverbial wayside pretty quickly.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Partially.  I also believe Lansbury herself wanted MSW to be more upscale, for lack of a better word.  Hence, the move to NYC.  (Of course, there was also the growing belief that Cabot Cove, as a main or recurring locale, was beginning to look ridiculous with all those murders occurring inside what was supposed to be a sleepy, little town in Maine.  I, myself, tend to look at that as a "necessary evil," like SORASing on soaps).

As for the criminology professorship itself, I suspect *that* was incoming showrunner David Moessinger's idea to justify Jessica's involvement in so many official criminal investigations, as well as provide yet another, new arena where fresh stories could be generated.  Personally, I don't think it worked, for three reasons: one, it seemed preposterous to me that NYU Manhattan University would have hired Jessica Fletcher, a mystery writer with no real credentials in law enforcement, to teach a course in their criminology department and not in their English or Creative Writing department*; two, if you're still having difficulty after seven years with the premise of a mystery writer and amateur sleuth who helps the cops find the real killer every week, giving her a new side hustle as a criminology professor (who will also go into the inner city from time to time and hold creative writing workshops??) probably won't help (and maybe MSW isn't your kind of show anyway, lol); and three, any full-time teaching position would have tied Jessica down too much and prevented her from being able to travel, which, to me, was always a huge part of the show's charm.

The way I see it, Moessinger had only two real options: either maintain the status quo that had been established by Peter S. Fischer - meaning, roughly half the episodes take place in Cabot Cove, and the rest follow Jessica on her travels - or make a REAL change, have Jessica say adios to Cabot Cove and move to NYC permanently.  Instead, he (and Lansbury) tried to have it both ways - the home in Cabot Cove, the fancy, new apartment in NYC; the new gig as a criminology professor/creative writing teacher on top of all the continued traveling for book tours and research trips - and wound up with an occasionally confusing show.

 

(*The second episode of S8, "Night Fears," pretty much acknowledges this fact - and it's the point, I suspect, where the new team already concedes that they've made a mistake in giving Jessica a job she really wasn't qualified to do.)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lansbury said in her Archive of American Television interview that Jessica having an apartment in Manhattan was her idea and that she wanted Jessica to be more sophisticated - you'll notice that her wardrobe gets an upgrade when she moves to Manhattan and Jessica starts the pantsuit era that she sticks with through the end of the series. 

Start at the 25:00 mark:

Please register in order to view this content

David Moessinger did not last very long and when he was out after 1992, Lansbury took full control of the show through her Corymore Productions banner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks for posting that, @DaytimeFan!

I could be wrong, of course, but I suspect Lansbury butted heads more with Moessinger than she did with Peter S. Fischer.  Say what you will about the first seven seasons of MSW - especially in the last two seasons when, to quote Fischer, Cabot Cove was getting too cute for its' own good - but they did retain a "literary quality" that Moessinger's lone year as showrunner lacked (J. Michael Straczynski's scripts notwithstanding).  Which isn't to say that S8 was a terrible year!  Moessinger and his team certainly broadened Jessica's world and put the show back in the Top 10.  But whenever I watch reruns from that particular season, I often feel like I'm watching a Dean Hargrove-produced series (like "Matlock" or "Diagnosis: Murder") rather than classic MSW.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You are not wrong. Peter S. Fischer and Angela Lansbury enjoyed a very productive working relationship and when he left she understood that he was simply burned out and felt like he'd run out of ideas, something she herself experienced twice before he left.

On the other hand, I get the distinct impression that Lansbury did not align with David Moessinger and disliked the writing for the season he was showrunner. 

There isn't any bad season of MSW but for the 'bookend' episodes that I think are all trash.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, I can't say that I blame her, lol!

Again, I wouldn't suggest that S8 (or any other season) is unwatchable, but it's probably the most un-MSW-like of all 12 seasons.  Even the Cabot Cove-based stories are grittier and "sexier" than they should be; and the guest stars' performances that year are also among the series' all-time campiest, too.  It really is like watching Dean Hargrove and his team of trusted writer/producers try and produce a more cerebral mystery show after years of action-driven fluff and meeting the mark only halfway.

On the other hand, seasons 9 through 12 restore some of the classiness that was missing from S8, but the mysteries also become rather bland - to the point where, by the final season, MSW itself is becoming less like a mystery show and more like a travelogue (that never leaves the Universal Studios backlot, lol).

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To tell you the truth, @Paul Raven, it's so subtle that it's almost hard to tell when she had her, um, face refreshed, lol?  Whoever she paid to do the job was a true artist.

It's very telling how Lansbury, who usually had a pretty good memory, blanked on his name in that Archive of American Television interview, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Yes. I don't know if Lenore was ever asked. Then it became a nun. Thanks. I didn't realize it was in 1987. That timeline doesn't make a lot of sense even if she would have had Ed to interact with. If they didn't ask her back in 1989 and she was willing, what a stupid error. The attempts at these feuds, or even the whole families tied together stuff like Maryanne Carruthers, never had any real impact because of how depleted the Bauers felt even by the mid '80s. And instead of expanding them, which would have been common sense, various producers were just too lazy, or too ashamed, and kept bringing on other families, or bringing in too many people at one time and not knowing how to write for them (the Spauldings in the McTavish era - as SOD said at the time, everyone in the family had the same personality).
    • Wasn't there talk of them bringing back Rita as Gus' mother at one point? Or something?
    • I think they are a part of the same family, although Carla was never really scheming for the same reasons, and once her double life was exposed, she stopped. 
    • Rachel/Ada, Mona/Erica, a mother/daughter at LOVING, these are all examples of the Agnes Nixon "troublesome daughter/put upon mother" trope. Are Carla/Sadie by any chance one of the pairs that make up this trope? Another thing that these 2 shows might have in common. OLTL had a very strong thematic approach to socioeconomic differences between groups of people. Class differences. AW at an earlier point had this too but to be clear it was not as much as OLTL. So that is a similarity but marginal.  Besides that, I see no other comparable things. Paul Rauch was a very different EP at different shows. Oh, I've thought of one more thing. Using actors from the Broadway stage.  But, realistically that was something all of the NY shows had in common. So I don't think it has any uniqueness between AW & OLTL.  
    • When you look at the period between Sweeps, it's as if they tried to maintain a kind of pace where they had a lot of plates spinning in the air & on their fingertips & the whole goal was nothing but to not drop any of those plates. A version of spinning one's wheels. They're not getting anywhere but they give the appearance of a whole lot of activity. I believe it's all about this appearance. At moments they accidentally hit a chord & something resonates but it is a false event.
    • He found the hidden camera and removed the card 
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • I’m not speculating anything, but I admit, I’m getting a little worried about James Reynolds. 
    • I feel like this is what they're doing by creating lots of storylines but their biggest weakness for years is the inability to properly pace these stories and give resolution. A good example now would be the Gio story which has been simmering for months with very little movement. I went from not caring to being invested to not caring again because of how long it's taking for the secret to be revealed. One story like that would be fine but it seems like everything moves at this snails pace on GH. They need to do a better job of rotating the stories so everything isn't in that same treading water phase.
    • However, those of us who watch DAYS have been spoiled. On Peacock there are no preemptions. Not for anything & not in or about any show.  I read somewhere that we Baby Boomers in a way invented instant gratification but then we realized that it was not fast enough.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy