Jump to content

B&B: Bold from the beginning


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I agree with @Soaplovers that we need to watch the early episodes through the lens of the times. 

However, I cannot get over the unwavering confidence of Ridge.  He is written as completely omniscient, he knows exactly what Kristen, Thorne, and Stephanie need.  He is supposed to be in his late-20s, but he already has everything figured out and is great at everything he tries.  There is no business learning curve because his designs are universally adored and his father provides no edits or critiques.  From Kristen's bachelorette party we learn that he knows every successful unmarried guy in LA, and they all think he's great.  Bill Spencer is seemingly the only person in Southern California who doesn't buy into his cult of personality.

I guess I just wish that after Caroline dumped him, he was allowed one moment of negative self introspection or self-doubt.  Or, maybe a hipper guy like Rocco would make fun of his affinity for black speedos.  Instead the character is free of any conflict, except being loved too much by his mother and his girlfriends.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 410
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Watching these early seasons, it's easy to think of alternative storylines.

What if Margo's baby had actually turned out to be Bill Spencer's instead of Clarke's? I think the writers would have gotten a lot more leverage out of that, especially down the road. The only factor would be Don Diamont playing $Bill decades later would be tricky considering Daniel McVicar's age.

Seeing Ethan Wayne getting scraps of storyline here and there, it's not hard to understand why he left. He was as capable as anyone else on the canvas not named Susan Flannery or Joanna Johnson. I keep wondering whether killing off the character, instead of it being an attempted suicide and hospitalization, was a mistake. It just seemed as if beyond a year, the storyline had little impact long-term. Whereas having Brooke, Donna and Katie have to make the devastating decision to put someone who, for much of their childhoods functioned as a de facto father figure in in-patient institutionalized care would have had painful repercussions, like an open unhealed wound. And it would have left things open for Ethan Wayne to one day make an appearance, for a anniversary episode, which many longtime fans might have gotten a kick out of. It's just a shame that the show cut off any chance of many of these actors from the early years coming back. When I watched soaps, I always got a kick out of seeing actors From the show's past "way back when", even if they had been on before I began to watch the show because the actors all genuinely seemed thrilled by it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

Oh I just got to the episode when Ridge and Brooke go to the Big Bear cabin and then Thorne and Caroline show up. Cannot wait to see what happens next, but gotta go to the hairdresser haha

And the scene with Eric and Stephanie when they realize both couples went up there and then they laugh.. so good haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Members

From a writer's perspective, I am enjoying seeing Clarke Garrison try to extract himself from every predicament that he gets himself into. Also from a writer's perspective, I do take issue with the aspect of hiding that Margo and Clarke had consummated their relationship until the reveal of Margo's pregnancy. It seems like a cheat, especially on a soap opera where romance and betrayal are totems of drama. I get that they wanted to surprise, even shock the audience but it also undermines Margo's claim of having a loving, serious relationship (one in which she believed was leading to marriage) I saw no evidence of Clarke even pretending to have anything close to a serious relationship with Margo, so I don't even know where she draws that conclusion, other than she ran away with some fantasy. It made me wonder if the possibility of pulling out Bill Spence as a father were not under consideration and honestly, it would have added an interesting wrinkle if Bill were genuinely a candidate for Mark's father, but Margo didn't want to even entertain that notion due to her desire to have that long lasting tie to Clarke. Decades later, I think it would have been much more interesting if Mark were a Spencer rather than a Garrison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree with you about Clarke Garrison! He is thoroughly enjoyable because his undoing is so clearly a result of his overconfidence (and this is a running theme in all of his storylines). I feel like he is an almost mythologically inspired character trope in that regard - the man whose strength (his arrogance, cleverness and charm) also is the root of his downfall. Seeing Clarke painting himself into corners and then trying to get out of them is a lot of fun. 

As for Margo's pregnancy, I believe the reason it was written that way was that Lauren Koslow was already pregnant and they had to find a way to write it in without shortening the pregnancy too much. I agree the reveal was something of a surprise but not entirely out of left field. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Clarke is the very embodiment of the word hubris.

I feel like very early 1980s Craig Montgomery (ATWT) was in a similar character vein- a cad who became mired in his own chaos, except Craig's troubles spiraled to the point of him going to prison, so it was more pathetic than amusing. Both were the architects of their respective misfortunes.

I know that it was done to accommodate Kozlow's pregnancy but I still think the story could have been written more artfully. I think it was a missed opportunity to add more complexity to the story by adding another thread. Margo and Bill had a pre-existing relationship that the writing revisits anyway, so it would not have taken much to add that connecting thread a little earlier.

TBH, leaving those scenes where Margo and Clarke would have consummated their relationship off screen, makes me wonder whether the writing wanted to leave things a bit open to a possible retcon, just in case but perhaps was dropped when the principal characters (Margo, in particular) left the canvas.

Edited by DramatistDreamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I actually thought tying Storm into the story was smart because of his unresolved issues with his father.  And he and Margo had a good rapport.

I'm wondering if the actor playing Storm opted to leave hence why he was quickly removed from the story and we ended up with Mick coming onto the scene.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ethan Wayne seemed have have good chemistry with all the actresses and could have had good romantic chemistry with Johnson, Linn and Kozlow but seems woefully underutilized. At least with the paternity case, he got a chance to see his character put in an active storyline, but it was weird that he was only ever teased as a romantic interest. Perhaps he made it known that his time on the show wouldn't be long-term? Or else, why wouldn't they have Storm at least date one of the main characters for even a brief amount of time? I always assumed Wayne got fed up with his character getting short shrift and left, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

I’ve reached a point in my viewing where I feel the show is in a slump. Kristin is doing this never ending dance with Clarke, when it’s clear he’s only interesting in Margo. Then you have this weird secret to some that Eric and Beth are dating, which has gone on far too long. Now Stephen is back and incredibly boring. Donna and Katie are acting like egg heads trying to reunite their parents and worst of all: Ridge raped Caroline. The last story is what has really soured things for me. She just got raped last year and they do it again?!

I’m so disgusted by the Caroline/Ridge story and bored by everything else. As much as I loved 1987, I have to say that 1988 has been disappointing so far. I’m hoping the year picks up in the second half and that 1989 is a better year for them.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@Chris B March-August 1988 was the writer's strike. I agree that Ridge taking advantage of an intoxicated Caroline was horrible, especially since she had been raped a year earlier.

Edited by kalbir
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There was a lot of filler in '88 for obvious reasons, but I feel like some of it continues beyond the strike into '89. I am seeing a lot of flashbacks in episodes and for a 30 minute serial, that is an awful lot of time. I get it, that this was a technique to get newer viewers up to speed but it has the effect of being somewhat of a drag, particularly for anyone watching in this day and age when you can watch back to back or binge.

Also, I am seeing some serious plot holes in my viewing and I am trying to figure out why.

Does anyone know what happened to Alan Hayes and why Nicholas Preston was unceremoniously dropped?

When Dave and Brooke broke off their engagement, we basically never saw Dave again. When Thorne shot Ridge, it would have been a perfect opportunity for Dave to be the investigating detective, which would have added some extra dramatic complications. Instead we get a detective that Stephanie easily maneuvered.

At least we were told Storm was going to San Francisco, though there wasn't even a farewell dinner with the Logan family. Soon Rocco will be unceremoniously "disappeared". 

My goodness, plot holes aplenty!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That explains a lot. The pacing has been very odd and there’s lots of flashbacks. It definitely started to feel like something had changed. I may start jumping forward to the end of this writers strike. I’m going to try to find episode recaps and see if I’ll miss anything worthwhile. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Clarke and Kristen are the main thing keeping me invested, although I’m not completely happy with the story. Them and any glimpse of Stephanie is the only thing keeping the show going right now, for me at least. 
 

The Stephen/Beth/Eric story is terrible and Eric is wasted in the story. Donna and Katie also come off terribly immature and beyond that are stuck in dead end stories. I was enjoying Brooke/Ridge/Caroline/Thorne, but the rape ruined that for me. I do love Brooke and Stephanie’s scenes as well. 
 

I’m happy to hear the Logan stuff is wrapped up soon. The writers just aren’t invested in those characters which is so obvious in any of their scenes. I’m ready to start seeing characters like Sally Spectra and later Taylor. I’m also beyond ready for Stephanie to have her own storyline. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The Golden Girls key episodes by ratings September 14, 1985: The Engagement (series premiere), rating 25.0, #1 Season highs February 22, 1986: Adult Education, rating 25.2 October 4, 1986: Ladies of the Evening, rating 27.3 November 8, 1986: Isn't it Romantic, rating 27.3 February 6, 1988: My Brother, My Father; rating 24.6 November 26, 1988: Sophia's Wedding (Part 2), rating 24.3, #1 September 23, 1989: Sick and Tired (Part 1) (season 5 premiere), rating 23.5 January 12, 1991: Sisters of the Bride, rating 19.3 May 9, 1992: One Flew Out of the Cuckoo's Nest (series finale), rating 18.9 Season lows October 19, 1985: The Triangle, rating 18.6 May 16, 1987: Empty Nests (season 2 finale), rating 17.8 February 20, 1988: And Ma Makes Three, rating 18.0 April 29, 1989: Rites of Spring, rating 18.7 April 28, 1990: All Bets are Off, rating 15.8 February 16, 1991: Older and Wiser, rating 11.6 October 26, 1991: Mother Load, rating 10.9 Ten highest-rated episodes October 4, 1986: Ladies of the Evening, rating 27.3 November 8, 1986: Isn't it Romantic, rating 27.3 January 3, 1987: The Sisters, rating 27.0 November 22, 1986: Family Affair, rating 26.8 January 10, 1987: The Stan Who Came to Dinner, rating 26.6 January 24, 1987: Before and After, rating 26.4 February 28, 1987: Whose Face is This, Anyway?; rating 25.8 September 27, 1986: End of the Curse (season 2 premiere), rating 25.6 November 15, 1986: Big Daddy's Little Lady, rating 25.3 February 22, 1986: Adult Education, rating 25.2 Ten lowest-rated episodes October 26, 1991: Mother Load, rating 10.9 September 28, 1991: The Case of the Libertine Belle, rating 10.9 October 19, 1991: Where's Charlie?, rating 11.0 February 15, 1992: Ebbtide VI: The Wrath of Stan, rating 11.3 February 16, 1991: Older and Wiser, rating 11.6 December 14, 1991: The Pope's Ring, rating 11.7 April 25, 1992: Home Again, Rose (Part 1); rating 12.3 October 5, 1991: Beauty and the Beast, rating 12.7 November 2, 1991: Dateline: Miami, rating 12.7 December 7, 1991: From Here to the Pharmacy, rating 12.8
    • The timing is strange, though. How far in advance would they normally be on location? The Achille Lauro hijacking was on October 7, 1985. Nancy had arrived in Egypt in the storyline by October 18. But the character of Hawk, Chris' Native American friend from Arizona, had already appeared onscreen by September and brought a letter telling Chris to be in Egypt by October 25th.  Why did they already have the link to Arizona before the reason to cancel the shoot in Egypt?  The dust and the jar it came in were from Egypt though. Nancy bought it there and sent it to Mac as a gift before she came back to the states and followed Chris to Arizona.
    • Actually that is not what happened. Nor is the timing right for it to have been. We learned from a WOST interview with Pete Lemay  in 2006, which can be found on YT, that it was Fred Silverman's idea to do the 90 minute show. I don't know how much you know about him but he had these amazing successes as head of daytime at both ABC & at CBS. Then he came to NBC where basically everything he touched turned NOT TO GOLD but to shite. Some of the most expensive shows ever produced up to that time were huge flops. Although even he, like a broken clock, could be right on occasion. However, as we know, he was not right about the 90 minute show. As a matter of fact, afterward,  NBC programmers, who worked FOR him, were asked why they did it & they were quoted as saying it was because they couldn't think of anything else to try. It was a stupid idea from a man who had reached the point where he was throwing anything at the wall to see if it would stick.
    • Tamara Tunie at Baltimore event May 10, 2025 https://www.lewismuseum.org/event/a-lewis-table-talk-with-tamara-tunie/ https://www.instagram.com/p/DJH0ZQayihs/ Reginald F. Lewis Museum of Maryland African American History & Culture, Baltimore lewismuseum

      Please register in order to view this content

      Clear your calendar for the Lewis Museum's post gala celebration! On Saturday, May 10 at 2pm, we're bringing the elegance, wisdom, and brilliance of Tamara Tunie to The Lewis! From her powerful performances throughout her career, to her bold new project “Beyond the Gates,” this is your chance to hear it all—up close and personal. Hosted by the always fabulous media personality LaDawn Black, this conversation will be real, inspiring, and unforgettable. Kick off your Mother's Day weekend and come on down to The Lewis. Come ready to be moved, motivated, and in great company! Saturday, May 10 2:00-4:00pm Reginald F. Lewis Museum Register today by visiting the link in our bio! #thereginaldflewismuseum #lewismuseum #thelewis #beyondthegates #tamaratunie #lawandordersvu                            
    • I stopped watching Another World in 1990. Simply, lost interest in the show.  I had watched the show from 1973 to 1990. The 90 minute show started the decline of AW.  NBC panicked with expanding AW due to the GH hoopla. As mentioned above, 1982 was a trainwreck for AW.  The introduction of the Shea family, the movie storyline involving Jamie, and Steve Frame favoring Rachel over Alice. The writers went into that direction due to the forgettable performance of Linda Borgeson. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Ive seen that theory thrown out but the one thing against it is that Leslie and her family lived in Chicago. She only came back to DC last year after her husband died. Unless they say Alan made a trip to DC and died while away, she wouldnt know about that. However I do think the angle of her finding out that Martin was involved could work as that gives her leverage against Bill too for covering it up. She'd want to get revenge on him by threatening to have him disbarred
    • What a good write-up @Errol! Nice seeing the nod to Duplaix's lead.
    • The Egypt location shoot was cancelled because of the Achille Lauro cruise ship hijacking 
    • https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/composer-leonard-bernstein-s-children-request-his-music-be-played-in-the-kennedy-center-in-rebuke-to-trump
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy