Jump to content

Ratings From the 90's


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Season vs. season update:

1. Y&R 8.0 (-0.1)
2. GH 7.0 (-0.5)
3. AMC 6.3 (-0.3)
4. OLTL 6.0 (-0.9)
5. ATWT 5.8 (-0.5)
6. B&B 5.7 (-0.1)
7. DAYS 5.4 (-0.8)
8. GL 5.3 (-0.7)
9. AW 3.9 (-0.6)
10. SB 3.5 (-0.7)
11. LOV 3.3 (-0.2)
12. GEN 2.5 (+0.1)

 

Let's just be clear: this season was one of unequivocal collapse for nearly every show. The only soap to gain viewers is Generations (which, to @Khan's point, did break 3.0 a handful of times, once being its premiere week...barely). I do feel like the show was starting to build an audience during 1990, but this was just a rough year to launch a soap, and it never stood a chance under these circumstances. A slight ratings dip in the fall of 1990 sealed the deal, and by early 1991, GEN was done.

LOV held surprisingly steady during 1990. Can't recall what was happening on that show at the time, but apparently the viewers...didn't hate it as much as most other shows? AMC strengthening under Agnes Nixon's pen, though still unable to prevent some bleeding of viewers. Obviously Y&R and B&B had extremely strong years, nearly holding onto all of their previous season's audience. Can't underestimate Andrea Evans' departure on OLTL. That is one hell of a drop in one year, and worse is to come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 887
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members
I didn't miss anything, but it looks like the 1/22/91 GL "breakout" episode would most likely have been re-aired the following day. On 1/22/91, GL only aired for 22 minutes (3-314 & 321-329PM). My guess is they re-aired it the next day (and even then there were a lot of preemptions). On 1/23/91, it only aired from 339-4PM (21 minutes), so actually the second half of the 1/22/91 episode that didn't air anywhere.
 
So I would say 1/22/91 is the likely full preemption.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

to a great degree, yes. Though I've also keeping track of the summer periods (the period after Nielsen declares the season "over"). I suspect DAYS had a decent summer 1990 thanks to the Cruise Of Deception, which sort of....mitigated their decline for that period. But I would have to agree, two years of steady HUGE declines is shocking, really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@beebs I took your 1987/88, 1988/89, 1989/90 season end ratings and calculated the net differential for the 11 shows that were on all three seasons and they rank as follows

B&B +0.4

Y&R +0.1

General Hospital -0.7

As the World Turns -0.7

Guiding Light -0.7

Loving -0.7

All My Children -1.0

Another World -1.1

Santa Barbara -1.1

One Life to Live -1.4

Days -1.6

B&B showed growth and Y&R was stable. The rest dropped off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Great work. And what's especially jarring is that all of GL's loss is from 1989-90. Most of ATWT's as well. All in all, CBS soaps' ratings really held up well during the late 80s, and it kinda surprising that GL would post such losses during what was, by all accounts, a very good year for the show, creatively.

NBC really lost its groove fast, losing by far the most, in general and relatively speaking. Unfortunately, shifting trends and circumstances kinda doomed them, after being surprisingly consistent during the mid-80s.

 

Loving's losses don't look so bad, until you realize they had a lot fewer viewers to lose.

Edited by beebs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wonder if that could be attributed at least in part to TPTB's decision to streamline the cast, eliminating actors such as Peter Bergman (Cliff), Debbi Morgan (Angie), Robert Gentry (Ross), etc.  I could be conflating all the actor exits - I know that Kathleen Noone (Ellen) and Mark LaMura (Mark) left prior; Maurice Benard (Nico), Rosa Nevin (Cecily) and Lauren Holly (Julie) left around the same time as others; and Candace Earley (Donna), Richard Van Vleet (Chuck), Vasili Bogazianos (Benny) and Matthew Cowles (Billy Clyde) maybe left later (followed by Michael E. Knight (Tad))? - but it seems like every ten years or so, AMC would experience some sort of cast purge/"reset"; and this one in particular might have been hard for some fans to take.

God bless S. Michael Schnessel, because I truly believe he was a wonderful writer for OLTL, but by 1990, I think the man was burning out as the show's HW.  No doubt, Paul Rauch kept pressuring him to come up with ever bigger ideas, but the bigger the ideas became, the more they started to weigh down the show.  Andrea Evans' departure really showed the network just how much the show was suffering creatively.

Chances were, if you weren't a LOVING fan by 1990, you weren't ever going to be one; and if you were, then you were in it for the long haul.  Ergo, it's those diehard fans who would stick with the show until the bitter end that probably explains why their loss in 1990 was minimal.

It ended for two reasons: 1) fans had become hip to DAYS' game, so that when you, as the viewer, saw two characters in a scene together for the first time, you knew what was coming; and 2) Al Rabin and his team appeared to have lost their "touch" in knowing which characters to pair together.  The "misses" were starting to outnumber the "hits."  (Shane/Kayla, anyone?). 

Jack/Jennifer and Roman/Isabella were the biggest successes from that period, of course.  Justin/Adrienne were successful, too, although I think many saw how limited THEY were.  Bo/Carly might have been bigger, had they not come at a point when the entire formula was getting tired and needed to be phased out.  Aside from those pairings, however, and maybe Frankie/Eve, I'm hard pressed to name any couples from that pre-Reilly period that had even a little bit of staying power.

Plus, it cannot be overstated how much Leah Laiman's exit as HW hurt the show.  I know she has her detractors - and I'm not putting her in the same category as Bill Bell, or even Pat Falken Smith - but she knew DAYS.  She knew what worked on that show, and what didn't; and even after TPTB canned her successor, Anne Howard Bailey, and promoted Richard J. Allen and Anne Schoettle, two writers who'd worked under Laiman, the show still wasn't what it'd been with her in that seat.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agnes Nixon definitely did a reset in 1989/90. Peter Bergman left for Restless. Debbi Morgan was not happy that Angie and Cliff did not continue and said in an interview she was treated like a second class citizen at AMC because of her color which was untrue and those comments upset Agnes Nixon and prompted a public reply and rebuke from Agnes. Debbi Morgan was shown the door shortly thereafter. Agnes did a purge of the rest. Agnes did that when she took over AW in the 60s. Most of these AMC characters were on the periphery by this time and it was easier for Agnes to create new characters and enhance major storylines. Essentially, Agnes Nixon did what Bill Bell did for Restless when he shifted from the Brooks family to the Newmans and Abbots in the early 80s.

Edited by JoeCool
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

FROM THE VAULT: WEEKLY DAYTIME NIELSEN RATINGS: WEEKS OF 9/17/90-9/21/90 & 9/24/90-9/28/90:

Please register in order to view this content

FROM THE VAULT: WEEKLY DAYTIME NIELSEN RATINGS: WEEKS OF 10/1/90-10/5/90 & 10/8/90-10/12/90:

Edited by JAS0N47
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    •   Like I said I wasn’t talking about characterization. It makes sense that Dani is in denial. However literally no one in the real world would accuse someone of faking a pregnancy. Why? Because it’s just not feasible. What is Dani supposed to expect from Hayley—that she’ll be hiding a pillow under her shirt 24/7? Come on. The accusation has no legs, and that’s exactly why nobody would ever go there. A far more plausible accusation—one that actually has been made for centuries—is that someone might lie about who the father is. Dani only vaguely hinted at that, but at least that angle would make some narrative sense. I’d go for a coworking space that would be home to these small businesses like Kat and Chelsea’s bag startup (the whole police station trope feels like copaganda to me)
    • I guess RTPP looked worse because it followed Another World, but it's a shame they didn't give it more time especially considering how the shows that were put on following it fared.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Durkin was awful. The writing did her no favors, but she was all wrong for the part, lacking the mix of mystery, steeliness, sorrow and hesitancy that defined Victoria. I still have the awful memory of Adam lugging her around like a rag doll. She looked much more like one of the Blue Whale dancing extras than Victoria. And her voice... Maybe I am too harsh. With that said, Curtis didn't seem as bothered. I see from a fan review mentioning Barnabas & Company that Durkin was asked to return for Victoria's final episodes and declined as she had a Christmas trip to Europe with her husband planned and wasn't interested in just a few appearances.  I refuse to believe Victoria actually died during the Leviathan storyline. If Barnabas and Angelique could come back 8 times, she could come back a few.
    • It's a shame she only appeared in three episodes for the purpose of being written out - I thought she was quite good in the little we saw. I liked her vibe better than Durkin that never seemed to quite capture Victoria as a character.
    • He did a lot of romance novel covers, so that might've just been enough for them to get their panties in a twist.
    • Pre-TGIF, ABC most successful 1980s Friday 8 pm comedy I'd say was Webster. Full House wasn't a hit its first two seasons but it started showing growth in its third season which overlapped with the launch of TGIF. Funny thing is, Full House became a Top 10 show with the 1991/92 move to Tuesday.
    • Oakland Tribune, 14 July 1985   AW is another show with Schenkel at helm By Connie Passalacqua For the most part, dictators of South American banana republics enjoy better reputations than executive producers of daytime soap operas. Total authority is vested in these producers, who can kill off a character (thus firing an actor) with a stroke of a pen, or completely change life in his or her soap opera dominion (both in its fictional locale and backstage at the studio) on any kind of whim.  Most rule despotically, inspiring fear in their actors and writers. Which inevitably surfaces on the screen and subtracts from a show's quality. Then there's Stephen Schenkel who became executive producer of Another World last fall. He's been described by one of his actresses as "a teddy bear." He has noticeably improved the show, mostly because his natural warmth encourages backstage cohesiveness, and he believes in personally nurturing his staff and cast. 'I like to be supportive', he said.' I like to generate a certain amount of enthusiasm. I love actors and writers and technical people. And I like to laugh..  ' Schenkel said that most of the factors that have led to the shows improved ratings existed before he took over. There were well defined characters, outstanding writers and excellent production values, he explains. 'These things were in place but needed to be stimulated. There wasn't a lot of excitement. What really was missing was an adequate story. We added Gillian Spencer as a writer. (she also plays Daisy on All My Children), who's wonderful, and it just coalesced. The writers energy and commitment to the show began to give it an emotional intensity and some real passion within the characters." Schenkel, a former ABC programming executive who helped develop Ryan's Hope, is a strong believer in stressing romantic and comedy elements in soap operas. AW is also one of the only soaps with an established group of comic characters, including Wallingford (Brent Collins) and Lily Mason (Jackee , Harry). Schenkel raves about the talents of all his actors, and even has something good to say about the Brooklyn location of the shows studio, which most of his Manhattan-oriented staff loathe. I like the people here. I like to walk down the street and feel their energies, he said. He also violateda soap opera no-no, ' inviting actors and writers to the same party. "Everyone got to know one another, he said. And I didn't get any complaints about actors ' begging for story lines, he said. 
    • Since it's pride month.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • National City Star-News, 5 May 1977 TV topics by Peter Blazi Lear’s ‘All that Glitters’—doesn’t The best thing that can be said about Norman Lear’s newest soap opera“All That Glitters” is that it comes on so late at night most people will miss it. Role reversal is supposed to be the big draw, with women the breadwinners, mainly executives of a huge conglomerate. The men either fuss with the housework or fidget at the office as secretaries to their bawdy bosses. A female fantasyland? I doubt it. While the role reversal idea has some possibilities, the show pushes too hard for laughs and winds up with raucous females and effete males. A confident, independent woman is indeed a sight to behold and attract, but femininity need not be sacrificed. Unlike Lear’s “Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman,” "Glitters” doesn’t, but you’ve got to give him credit for trying. Today’s experimental comedy is what tomorrow’s hits are made of. Better luck next time, Norman. (“All That Glitters” can be seen weekday evenings at 11 p.m. on Channel 6.) .
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy