Jump to content

"Designing Women" reboot in the works


dragonflies

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

When I watched the show as a child, Delta Burke always had my attention, but, even though Charlene wasn't much of a character, I think Jean Smart was the real glue of the show. She was just such a great actress, with empathy and nuance which added to what could have been as much of a caricature as Rose on the Golden Girls quickly became. I haven't seen it in years but I remember her performance in the WWII episode where she first met her husband in dream form - on paper that is such a silly conceit, but she made it work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

You could really feel the decline of the writing in the arrival of Carlene. I love Jan Hooks, but the character was just yokel yokel yokel. It's sad to say that Jan got more dramatic material in SNL sketches than she did on DW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I've wondered that myself.

 

Over the years, I've heard and read theories suggesting that all the Emmy love for MB was due to the fact that Emmy voters, especially the older ones, looked upon Candice's dad, Edgar, as a sort of elder statesman for the radio and TV industries.  However, while that might explain why Candice herself won so many Emmys, I don't believe it explains the other wins for that show.

 

In the end, I think it comes down to bias against DW's Southern roots.  There were other, less brilliantly written (and acted, and directed, and produced) series during that period that received multiple Emmy wins and nominations, so you can't say DW never won in the major categories, because it was deficient in those departments.  And though "The Golden Girls," which was the female-centric series of the era that did take home several awards, was set in Miami, it wasn't an explicitly Southern show.  (Heck, all four "girls" were Miami transplants -- and Blanche's "Southern-ness" was often the brunt of jokes...and limericks. ;))

 

DW, OTOH, never made any bones about its' reverence for all things Southern, just as it never hid the fact that its' political viewpoint always tilted heavily to the left.  Even its' most stereotypically Southern characters (I'm thinking of recurring characters, such as "Daddy" Jones) weren't funny because they were from the South.  That might have turned off Emmy voters, who, being from the East and West coasts, probably held their own prejudices toward the South and Southerners.

 

 

IMO, the problem was that they were trying to give viewers a variation on Charlene, when all the humor that could be derived from that kind of character had already been derived.  LBH and her second-in-command, Pamela Norris, really should have worked on making Carlene a character in her own right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wonder sometimes if it's because the writing for Designing Women could be very strident, especially those big, long speeches when Julia and Mary Jo would go on a tear. I found Mary Jo unbearable much of the time, as talented an actress as Annie Potts was. 

 

That's true.

 

They did seem to finally try a new character archetype in the last season, with BJ, but it was too late.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

For me, it's tough to call, since both exits happened almost simultaneously.  If Jean Smart had stayed at least for one more season, then I think I would know for sure whether Delta Burke's exit alone was the true death blow.

 

 

That's also possible.

 

Re: B.J. -- In order for a character like hers to have worked, you needed someone in the writers' room who knew how conservatives thought, or thought at the time.  As it was, I don't think they tapped her full potential.

 

Moreover, I think B.J./Judith Ivey's addition to the show upset the balance of the show too much, with Dixie Carter and Annie Potts forced to play caricatures of their own characters.  Julia was less inhibited than she'd been before (which the writers attempted to explain away as her going through menopause), while Mary Jo became an outright "dry drunk."

 

 

Same here.  No matter how much it bored me to watch Dixie Carter sing (and granted, I don't think she performed on the show too often), I considered the trade-off a worthy one.  It takes a true talent like Carter, who was a Republican IRL, to deliver those pro-liberal rants consistently and effectively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I guess you can say DW probably got lost in the shuffle between Murphy Brown and The Golden Girls, which both catered to similar demos. 

 

LBT's writing may have come off as too "preachy" for some. However, I don't think Diane English was any less "preachy."

 

I think LBT also felt CBS did a better job with promotion/marketing for MB than they did with her show. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I would say the same about "Family Ties" being overshadowed by "The Cosby Show."  FT, IMO, was better-written, but people (and Emmy voters) gravitated more toward TCS, because it was more groundbreaking.

 

And poor "Newhart" and "Night Court" lived for so long in "Cheers"'s shadow that I think it affected their chances of getting more Emmy nominations, let alone wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I thought Carlene was how Charlene was when she first left popular bluff.  We have to remember when DW started, Charlene had lived several years outside of Popular Bluff so she had become more refined though still naive and trusting.  Carlene was more like a fish out of water, yet was insightful in an odd way (she didnt tell those popular bluff stories ad much as charlene).

 

I think the reason whuh people said Delta leaving affected the show more than Jean smart was because it was harder to replace Suzanne.  Allison was obnoxious and not charming, while BJ was more like a conservative Julia than she was like Suzanne.

 

I dont recall Dixie Carter singing all that much..maybe 4 or 5 times on her own.  My fav singing performance of hers was Sweet Georgia Brown at her sons wedding and she's drunk....while charlene/mary jo/Suzanne are bewildered and amused.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Betty White has shared how they used to call Rue, "The Actress", and that's exactly how I think of Jean among the DW. 

 

Suzanne certainly grabbed my attention too, she was outrageously hilarious (which was a slow build... another subject). But I always thought of Dixie as the star and even wondered why she didn't get first billing.

 

This is my favorite. That hand on that hip.

 

Please register in order to view this content

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know this isn’t a usual or anywhere near universal take, but I loved the relatively brief Hal/Emily relationship/marriage more than I ever thought I would have with KMH/BH.
    • In my field (not that) I've written my share of dreck when it's what people wanted vs. something good. In the end what matters is the check. These pilots may not be great, but whether or not those writers intended otherwise they got paid.
    • I think there is plenty to critique and/or roast about the show, but I think there's also good bones and a lot of progressive improvement. It's the Bell/B&B formula and house style that is hardest for it to shake and the most necessary IMO, as well as some dead weight actors or characters, but that formula also apparently works for a lot of general viewers and I suspect CBS. OTOH it's also very modern in certain ways (sometimes overly hip dialogue, and some story) that still make it feel like a show that's bouncing between distant past staples of soap opera fundamentals and the present moment. And the old fashioned product placement is fun but also so goofy, while material like June is hysterical. Imagine leading with 'the underpass is where I live, and I like it there!' It's an unusual show in that way, because its identity and tone is still not fully formed. You don't know what it'll be. But that's normal at this juncture. The closest thing to a glimpse of the future foundation, I think (besides the obvious core family setup that's been there since Day 1), is the rivalry and future familial bond - and likely love/hate relationship - between Kat and Eva. A la many central sisters or siblings throughout soap history.
    • I loved Kelley Menighan! She was an MVP, especially during the show’s last few years. I always looked forward to anything she did with MM, BH, CZ, MW,  and the two grownup Alisons. Wasn’t a big fan of her with RH’s Paul. I always admired how she balanced being a vixen and being neurotic.
    • LLC can be a lot (lady definitely doesn’t phone it in), but her scenes with Rena made me wish they played actual sisters on a better platform.  Aside from JE, who is a legend so it’s no surprise when she’s excellent, Amanda Setton is my MVP of this story and she hasn’t always been great in this role. You see so much happening in her face as she’s navigating the shifts and layers of this story. She’s fully locked in. Glad Rory Gibson is getting his due on GH. I knew he had more to give than what Y&R was giving him. The writing will be a factor here as well because the character of Michael hasn’t been written well in ages (if ever, arguably). GH just can’t sustain the good stuff for more than a few weeks. Alexa Havins is a very good actress and was widely embraced as Lulu initially, but the character’s one-note abrasiveness has a lot of folks wishing she was gone at this point. 
    • It's pilots like "Hurricane Sam" and "Anything for Love" that makes me so afraid to write professionally, because, my God, what if I actually tried and came up with something just as awful, if not worse (if that's even possible)?
    • JANUARY 1974 SPECIALS ADDED... Here are the January 1974 specials which have been added to the yearly list on page 76:

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Wow, you have the patience of a saint watching through this period. I think the show does get better but it takes a while.  I won't give any spoilers about Zachary, but I will drop a slight hint: GL was probably trying to get a ratings boost by doing a story inspired by one of CBS's few primetime hits in the mid-1990s. And no, Zachary does not turn out to be a Texas ranger. 
    • Love makes everything possible.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

         
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy